Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

RtI Models for At-Risk Students in an Urban Setting

2,094 views

Published on

This presentation was given by Chenai Okammor, Pearson Digital Learning's Vice President of National Accounts, at the Pacific District Executive Forum on March 11, 2009. The presentation focused on Response to Intervention (RtI) models for at-risk students in urban environments.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • RTI INFO
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

RtI Models for At-Risk Students in an Urban Setting

  1. 1. RtI Models for At-Risk Students in an Urban Setting <ul><li>Chenai Okammor </li></ul><ul><li>VP – National Accounts </li></ul><ul><li>Pearson Curriculum, Digital </li></ul><ul><li>March 11, 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Pacific Executive Forum </li></ul>
  2. 2. Urban Districts???? <ul><li>Diversity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Cultures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Languages </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stake Holders </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Income levels </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Complex Levels of Decision Makers </li></ul>
  3. 3. Ensuring Students Succeed: So many mandates…So little time!
  4. 4. Current Accountabilities State Tests, CSTs, NAEP, AYP, Subgroups, Differentiated Accountability
  5. 5. Guiding Policies (Punitive?) NCLB State Standards District Frameworks
  6. 6. 21st Century Skills Framework The Dorrington Group
  7. 7. Guiding Practices Evidence-Based Instructional Practices
  8. 8. Assessing the Special Ed Referral System RtI is Born The History Within the 1 st 25-30 years of EHA – Special Education #s had ballooned Failure to achieve at grade level was too often understood only in the context of something being wrong with the student. Insufficient systemic attention was directed at general education programs for addressing poor academic performance.
  9. 9. Why RtI?: Failure of Pre-Referral Interventions
  10. 10. Why RtI?: Overrepresentation and Disproportionality
  11. 11. Response to Intervention (RtI): Problem-Solving Approach <ul><li>Construction Team </li></ul><ul><li>General Ed teachers </li></ul><ul><li>Special Ed Teachers </li></ul><ul><li>Students </li></ul><ul><li>Parents </li></ul><ul><li>Literacy Coach </li></ul><ul><li>Site/District Administrators </li></ul><ul><li>Instructional Aides </li></ul><ul><li>School Psychologist </li></ul><ul><li>ELL/ESL/ELD Teacher </li></ul>
  12. 12. The Blueprint: Creating an Effective RtI Model
  13. 13. The Blueprint: RtI Features and Attributes <ul><li>High Quality Classroom Instruction </li></ul><ul><li>Early Identification & Intervention </li></ul><ul><li>Multiple Tiers of Intervention </li></ul><ul><li>Differentiated, Individualized Intervention Curriculum </li></ul><ul><li>Ongoing Progress Monitoring </li></ul><ul><li>Problem-Solving Approach </li></ul><ul><li>Document Intervention Plan and Fidelity of its Implementation </li></ul>
  14. 14. The Blueprint: Creating an Effective RtI Model Science Based CORE Valid and Reliable SCREENING High Quality & Relevant PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT District/School INTERVENTION
  15. 15. The Foundation: High Quality Classroom Instruction THE CORE MATERIALS OR SOLUTIONS
  16. 16. Response to Intervention (RtI): Content Standards & Core Instruction
  17. 17. The Frame: Universal Screening for Early Identification & Intervention
  18. 18. Response to Intervention (RtI): Universal Diagnostic Screening <ul><li>Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) </li></ul>
  19. 19. Response to Intervention (RtI): Universal Diagnostic Screening
  20. 20. Exterior Walls: Multi-Tiered Model of School Supports <ul><li>THE INTERVENTIONS </li></ul>
  21. 21. Response to Intervention (RtI): Multiple Tiers of Intervention
  22. 22. <ul><li>Reading Comprehension Problem Areas </li></ul><ul><li>Cause and Effect </li></ul><ul><li>Making Predictions </li></ul><ul><li>Drawing Inferences </li></ul>RtI – Every Tier Use Data to Design Custom Intervention Plans
  23. 23. The Roof: <ul><li>THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT </li></ul>
  24. 24. Response to Intervention (RtI): Staff Development to Build Teacher Capacity 
  25. 25. <ul><li>Reading Comprehension Problem Areas </li></ul><ul><li>Cause and Effect </li></ul><ul><li>Making Predictions </li></ul><ul><li>Drawing Inferences </li></ul>RtI – Every Tier Use Data to Design Professional Development
  26. 26. Response to Intervention (RtI): Ongoing Progress Monitoring (PD)
  27. 27. USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO MEET YOUR GOALS
  28. 28. Using Technology to Enhance RtI : Model Technology Supports
  29. 29. RtI Waterford and Successmaker
  30. 30. Using Technology to Enhance RtI : Model Technology Supports
  31. 31. Waterford Early Learning Program: Objective-Based Sequencer in Action 
  32. 32. Waterford Early Reading Program: Class Summary Report
  33. 33. Waterford Early Math & Science: Individual Student Report
  34. 34. RtI Waterford – At All Three Tiers
  35. 35. <ul><li>Weisz Tuscon Clip </li></ul>Waterford Success
  36. 36. Using Technology to Enhance RtI : Model Technology Supports
  37. 37. RtI Successful Planning with SMe
  38. 38. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Initial Placement Motion Courseware Level 7.0+ 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 0 50 100 150 175 200 225 275 300 4.50 6.15 6.82 Diagnostic Exercises
  39. 39. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Cumulative Performance Report  Total Gain Total Time Exercises Correct Class Average
  40. 40. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Grouping by Areas of Difficulty  Specific Skill Specific Students
  41. 41. Plumbing, Lighting, & Electrical: YOUR STAKEHOLDERS
  42. 42. <ul><li>Technical Services </li></ul><ul><li>Implementation services </li></ul><ul><li>On-site support </li></ul><ul><li>Telephone support </li></ul><ul><li>Professional Services </li></ul><ul><li>Professional development </li></ul><ul><li>Consulting services </li></ul><ul><li>Training services (Online and On-Site) </li></ul>Pearson Curriculum, Digital: Service and Support
  43. 43. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Forecasting High Stakes Test Results Analysis of over 10,000 students performance on state assessments (FL, MI, MO, NC, OH, and CA) showed a consistent, strong statistical correlation (.60 - .80 correlation coefficient) between SuccessMaker Foundations courseware levels and scale scores on criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments.
  44. 44. Waterford Early Reading Program: Individual Student Report
  45. 45. SMe Individual Course Report Reading Adventures Performance by Strand Overall Achievement Recent Score Cumulative Score
  46. 46. RtI The Tucson Study (WF)
  47. 47. Response to Intervention (RtI) THANK YOU

×