The document summarizes key findings from the DAWN2 study on the psychosocial impact of diabetes. It finds that:
- Living with diabetes negatively impacts quality of life and emotional well-being. Nearly half of people with diabetes experience significant diabetes-related distress.
- Family members of people with diabetes also experience burden and worry. Many family members want to help but do not know how.
- Participation in diabetes education is associated with better psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. However, over half have never participated in education programs.
- There are gaps in psychosocial support from healthcare systems and many providers want more training to better support patients. Discrimination due to diabetes is also common.
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Psychosocial impact of diabetes
1. Psychosocial impact of diabetes:
DAWN 2
multi-national results
Ingrid Willaing
Steno Diabetes Center, Denmark
on behalf of the DAWN2 study group
2. WONCA 2015
Duality of Interest Declaration
Ingrid Willaing
I report the following potential
duality/dualities of interest in the field
covered by my lecture:
Advisory board member for Novo Nordisk A/S
Employed by Steno Diabetes Center A/S,
a research hospital working in the Danish
National Health Service and owned by Novo
Nordisk A/S
3. Background
Living with diabetes is demanding and many experience
psychosocial challenges1
Effective psychosocial support can help reduce stress,
improve psychological functioning and improve
outcomes2,3
Healthcare professionals feel ill-equipped to provide
required psychosocial support4
1. Rubin RR, et al. Diabetes Care 1992;11:1640–57
2. Alloway SC, et al. Can J Diet Pract Res 2001;62:188–92
3. Jacobson AM. N Eng J Med. 1996;334:1249–53
4. Peyrot M, et al. Diabet Med 2005;22:1379–85
5. Diabetes has a negative impact on a
wide range of life domains
Nicolucci A, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77
100
80
60
40
20
0
Relationships
with family/
friends/peers
Work and
studies
Leisure
activities
FinancesReduced
emotional
well-being
Reduced
physical
health
21
35
38
4446
62
Proportionofpeoplewith
diabetes(%)
People with diabetes reported a negative impact on the
following aspects of living:
6. Almost half of people with diabetes
have diabetes-related emotional
distress (PAID-5 ≥ 40)
Proportion of people with diabetes who had significant
emotional distress related to diabetes80
0
Proportionofpeoplewithdiabetes
(%,95%CI)
10
20
30
40
70
60
50
Nicolucci A et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77
*Global score
Country-specific data and the mean (dotted line) are adjusted for clustering, and weighted on age,
gender, region, and education to allow generalization from the sample to larger populations.
These data differ from the unadjusted global score and country score (range).
CI, confidence interval; PAID-5, Problem Areas in Diabetes Short Form – 5 items.
7. 14% of people with diabetes report
likely depression (WHO-5 ≤28)
Nicolucci A et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77
Holt RIG et al. IDF Melbourne 2013;P-1726
Proportion of people with diabetes with likely depression30
0
Proportionofpeoplewithdiabetes
(%,95%CI)
5
10
15
20
25
*Global score
Country-specific data and the mean (dotted line) are adjusted for clustering, and weighted on age,
gender, region, and education to allow generalization from the sample to larger populations.
These data differ from the unadjusted global score and country score (range).
CI, confidence interval; WHO-5, World Health Organization Well-Being Index-5.
8. Women with diabetes report worse
psychosocial outcomes than men
Nicolucci A, et al. IDF Melbourne 2013;P-1653
Indicators Men
N=4523
Women
N=4073
p
WHO-5: Psychological well-being 59±23 55±24 <0.0001
PAID-5: Diabetes distress 32±25 37±26 <0.0001
EQ-5D VAS: Health perception 68±19 66±20 <0.0001
DIDP: diabetes impact
(% reporting a slightly negative
to very negative impact):
Physical health
Financial situation
Relationship with family, friends and peers
Leisure activities
Work or studies
Emotional well-being
61
38
20
38
32
43
62
45
21
36
33
48
0.22
<0.0001
0.71
0.23
0.64
<0.0001
I am very worried about the risk
of hypoglycemic events
(% who mainly or fully agree)
51 57 <0.0001
9. Discrimination is common and
associated with worse outcomes
19% of people with diabetes experienced discrimination
from their community1
Experiencing discrimination due to diabetes is
associated with increased diabetes-related emotional
distress2
1. Nicolucci A, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77
2. Wens J, et al. EASD, Barcelona 2013; PS 095-P1142
10. Discrimination varies across countries
Country-specific data and the mean (dotted line) are adjusted for clustering,
and weighted on age, gender, region, and education to allow generalization
from the sample to larger populations. These data differ from the
unadjusted global score and country score (range). Wens J, et al. EASD, Barcelona 2013; PS 095-P1142
Proportionofpeoplewithdiabetes
(%,95%CI)
0
10
20
30
50
40
Proportion of people with diabetes who feel discriminated
against because of their diabetes
11. Higher levels of empowerment are
associated with a less negative impact
on different aspects of life
Percentage of respondents reporting a negative impact by tertiles (from empowerment scale)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Leisure activities
Work or studies
Emotional well-being
Percentage
Lower
Middle
Higher
Tertile
13. Background
Family support and social support are essential for
living well with diabetes1
Limited evidence is available about adult family
members’ burden of diabetes2
Only a few, small studies have evaluated the
burden of diabetes on adult family members of
people with diabetes
The DAWN2 study provides an opportunity to
review this globally
1. Peyrot M, et al. Diabet Med 2005;22:1379–85
2. Torenholt R, et al. Diabet Med 2013]
14. Total participants globally n=15,438
People with diabetes1
n=8596
Type 1
n=1368
Type 2 (n= 7228)
-Insulin Med (n=2591)
-Non-Insulin Med (n=2937)
-Non-Med (n=1700)
Family members2
n=2057
Healthcare professionals3
n=4785
PCPs/GPs
n=2066
Diabetes specialists
n=1350
Nurses
n=827
Dietitians
n=542
Family members in DAWN2
1. Nicolucci A, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77; 2. Kovacs Burns K, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–88
3. Holt R, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:789–98
15. Diabetes has a negative impact on a
wide range of life domains of family members
Kovacs Burns K, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–88
Negativeimpact
(%)
Work and
studies
Reduced
physical
health
Leisure
activities
FinancesReduced
emotional
well-being
Relationships
with family/
friends/peers
Family members of people with diabetes reported
a negative impact on the following aspects of living:
16. Diabetes results in burden, worry
and distress for adult family members
of people with diabetes
Kovacs Burns K, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–88
Kovacs Burns K, et al. IDF Melbourne 2013;PD-0924
40% 35%
expressed high
levels of
distress related
to concerns
about their
relative with
diabetes
reported a
‘moderate’ to
‘very large’
burden from
caring for a
relative with
diabetes
17. 61% of family members are very
worried about hypoglycemia
Kovacs Burns K, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–88
Proportionoffamilymembers
(%,95%CI)
100
0
10
20
30
40
60
80
90
70
50
Global score
Country-specific data and the mean (dotted line) are adjusted for clustering,
and weighted on age, gender, region, and education to allow generalization
from the sample to larger populations. These data differ from the unadjusted
global score and country score (range).
18. Many family members want to help,
but do not know how to
Kovacs Burns K, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–88
...want to be
more involved in
helping with
diabetes care
… do not know
how best to help
46%
39% 37%
% of family members who…
…would like to be more
involved in helping their
relative with diabetes deal
with feelings about the
condition
19. The majority of family members have
not participated in diabetes education
71% 77%
Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes
of family
members did
not participate
in any diabetes
educational
activity
Willaing I, et al. Diabetes 2013;62(suppl 1):A79
of family
members did
not participate
in any diabetes
educational
activity
20. Family member participation in
diabetes education varied by country
Country-specific data and the mean (dotted line) are adjusted for
clustering, and weighted on age, gender, region, and education to allow
generalization from the sample to larger populations. These data differ
from the unadjusted global score and country score (range). Family
member participation in education 463/2057=23% Kovacs Burns K, et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–88
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Proportionoffamilymembers
(%,95%confidenceinterval)
22. Background
Active self-management is essential to achieving good
health and quality of life in diabetes1,2
Strategies are available today that can increase
involvement of people with diabetes in their disease
management3,4
The DAWN2 study allows us to review the current
situation in terms of involvement and education of
people with diabetes
1. Peyrot M, et al. Diabet Med 2005;22:1379–85
2. Funnell MM, et al. Clinical Diabetes 2004;22:123–7
3. Coulter A, et al. BMJ 2007;335:24–7
4. Haas L, et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2393–401
23. Gaps in care for psychosocial and
behavioral assessment
*Percentages given are weighted and do not reflect crude
rates of respondents for each indicator; thus crude numbers
and percentages do not coincide Nicolucci A et al. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77
In the past 12 months, did anyone from
your healthcare team (% reporting ‘yes’):
Global score,
%*
Country score,
median (range)
Measure your long-term blood sugar
control level?
72 75.3 (61.6–92.8)
Examine your feet? 45 53.6 (14.8–81.8)
Ask if you have been anxious or depressed? 32 32.5 (14.6–57.3)
Ask about the types of foods you have
been getting?
49 45.4 (26.6–63.8)
24. Differences in perceptions about
communication across countries
0
20
40
60
80
100 Proportion of people with diabetes who said their healthcare
team asked them how diabetes affects their lives
Proportionofpeoplewithdiabetes
Proportion of healthcare professionals who said they asked their
patients how diabetes affects their lives
25. Perceptions of communication differ
between people with diabetes and
healthcare professionals
People with diabetes
were listened to
regarding how they
would like to do things
29
37 38
56
77
72
0
20
40
60
80
100
Individuals(%)
People with diabetes
being asked by their
healthcare professional
for ideas when making
their diabetes
care plan
People with diabetes
felt that their
healthcare professional
conveyed confidence
in their ability to
make changes
People with diabetes Healthcare professionals
27. Base: All Qualified HCPs (PCPs/GPs: n=2,066; Specialists: n=1,350;
Nurses: n=827, Dietitians n=542)
Q1050 Have you ever attended post-graduate training in any of
the following areas?
Post-graduate training (HCPs)
Base: All Qualified HCPs (PCPs/GPs: n=2,066; Specialists:
n=1,350; Nurses: n=827, Dietitians n=542)
Q1055 In which of the following areas would you like to
receive more training or support on an ongoing basis in order
to provide better care for your patients with diabetes?
Training Attended Training Desired
AD
AB
A
AD
CD
AB
A
BD
ACD
AC
A
A
AD
BD
BCD
A
D
ABC
A
ABD
B
A
AB
AB
AB
A
28. Beliefs about diabetes management
(HCPs)
Base: All Qualified HCPs (PCPs/GPs: n=2,066; Specialists: n=1,350; Nurses: n=827, Dietitians: n=542)
Q950 Please think about your personal beliefs around diabetes management and indicate the extent to which you agree or
disagree with each of the following statements.
53%
16%
52%
58%
26%
60%
57%
16%
51%
43%
17%
37%
0% 100%
It is important for me to advocate on behalf of
people with diabetes and be involved in health
policy issues for improvement of care of diabetes
HCPs have a very limited influence on how well
people take care of their diabetes
My success in caring for people with diabetes
depends largely on my ability to understand and
manage the emotional issues my patients face
PCPs/GPs (A) Specialists (B) Nurses (C) Dietitians (D)
Ratings of ‘5’ or ‘6’ on a 6-Point Agreement Scale
(‘1’ = Fully Disagree and ‘6’= Fully Agree)
A
A
A
ABD
A
ABD
A
29. Participation in diabetes education is
associated with better psychological outcomes
Participation in diabetes education was
associated with:
− better quality of life (p=0.0002)
− higher diabetes empowerment (p<0.0001)
− fewer psychological problems (p=0.001)
− better wellbeing (p=0.005)
Willaing I et al. EASD 2013, Barcelona; PS 094-P1136
30. Diabetes is associated with significant psychosocial
challenges
Family members are burdened by diabetes – but they
represent an untapped potential for support
Active engagement and participation of people with
diabetes is lacking – and there are significant
communication gaps
Half of all people with diabetes never participated in a
diabetes education program, but those who did, found it
very helpful
Training and support for healthcare professionals is
limited - but much wanted
Discrimination due to diabetes is prevalent and is linked to
worse treatment outcomes
DAWN2: Key global findings
31. For further information,
please see:
− www.dawnstudy.com
Thank you for your attention!
Thank you
Editor's Notes
Thank you for the introduction and
thank you for the opportunity to present at this conference
I come from Steno Diabetes Center, DK and I am presenting this on behalf of the DAWN2 study group
These are my conflicts of interest
Living with diabetes is demanding and many people experience psychosocial challenges due to their diabetes
We know from previous research that effective psychosocial support can help reduce stress, can improve psychological functioning and improve outcomes such as glycaemic control and quality of life
The first DAWN study showed that healthcare professionals at that time felt ill-equipped to provide the required psychosocial support for people with diabetes
The DAWN2 study explores the current status for psychosocial health in people with diabetes as well as the status for self-reported qualifications of health care professionals to provide the support that is needed
I will present a number of the overwhelming amount of results from the study.
First we will look at the impact of diabetes on quality of life and well-being in people with diabetes.
Many of these results have been published in Diabetic Medicine, and a number of country results have been published in more local journals.
Many more papers are coming up on global as well as local results of the DAWN2 study.
DAWN2™ shows that altogether diabetes has a negative impact on a wide range of life domains.
62% of PWD report about reduced physical health
46% report about reduced emotional well-being
44% report a negative impact on finances
38% report a negative impact on leisure activities
35% report a negative impact on work and studies
And 21% report impaired relationships with family, friends and peers
These numbers underpin the challenges that people with diabetes face in their daily life. They also indicate a substantial need for improved support.
This slide shows the prevalence of diabetes related emotional distress in the 17 countries, measured by the PAID scale.
The countries are grouped by geographical region with America to the left, then Western Europe, Eastern Europe and Russia, Eastern and Asian countries to the right.
The horizontal dotted orange line shows the cluster adjusted average of 41% from all countries.
The country range varied from about 20% - more than 60%, shown here as squares with confidence intervals. Some countries are somewhat above the average of 41%, and some are somewhat under - with the largest emotional burden in south and east Europe and Asia
When we look at the prevalence of people with diabetes with likely depression, using the WHO-5 scale, we see a slightly different pattern across countries with a mean of about 15% reporting likely depression with slightly higher proportions in eastern European countries.
Some subgroups of people with diabetes seem to have worse psychological outcomes than others. Women report worse outcomes than men as shown in this table:
Women report
Lower psychological well being, more diabetes distress and lower health perception (measured by WHO-5 and EQ 5D)
A higher percentage of women report negative impact on finances and on emotional well-being
And there is a higher degree of serious worries about hypoglycaemia
Unfortunately discrimination due to diabetes happens with a mean of 19% experiencing this across the 17 countries.
Experiencing discrimination due to diabetes is associated with increased diabetes-related emotional distress.
This slide shows the distrubution of experiencing discrimination across the 17 countries.
We see that there is variation across countries – but we see discrimination in all countries.
Countries like Algeria, Turkey, India and Poland have more problems than the other countries.
There are some positive findings, or some hope:
This slide shows that higher levels of empowerment, measured by the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, were associated with less negative impact of diabetes on different aspects of life such as emotional well-being, work or studies and leisure activities.
The dark blue bars illustrate lower level of empowerment, the lighter blue bars illustrate middle level of empowerment and the grey bars higher level of empowerment
The y-axis shows different aspects of life: emotional well-being, work or studies and leisure activities.
The x-axis shows the percentage of respondents by tertiles reporting a negative impact of diabetes on these different aspects of life.
A rather under researched area is the family burden of diabetes.
In the following I will show you some of the results from the DAWN2 study on experiences, attitudes, wishes and needs of family members of people with diabetes
Previous research on diabetes and family shows that diabetes affects the entire family. Family is generally a primary source of support for PWD and plays a key role in instrumental care and in providing emotional and moral support. Family support and social support are essential for living well with diabetes.
Previous studies have also shown that family influences the ability of the person with diabetes to self-manage and cope with having diabetes. But we have limited evidence about the burden of diabetes on adult family members of people with diabetes.
In the DAWN2 study this burden is evaluated.
In the following slides I will focus on the reports from the 2057 family members of people with diabetes who participated in the DAWN2 study
This slide shows the wider social and psychological impact diabetes has on adult family members living with people with diabetes.
Almost half of family members report reduced emotional well-being and more than a third of family members report that diabetes impacts on their financial situation.
But also leisure activities, physical health, work and family relationships are negatively affected by diabetes.
In more detail this slide shows that 40% of family members expressed high levels of distress related to concerns about their relative with diabetes
and 35% of family members reported a moderate to very large burden from caring for a relative with diabetes.
As for worries about hypoglycaemia as many as in average 61% of family members are very worried about hypoglycaemia with some variation across countries.
Algeria represents the highest percentage (80%) and DK and the Netherlands the lowest (30%).
Many family members want to help, but do not know how to help.
These results highlight a willingness from up to 46% of family members to increase their support, and be more involved in helping with diabetes care
but also highlight an unmet need to understand how to support as 37% do not know how to help.
This slide shows that the majority of family members have NOT participated in diabetes education. Approximately 75% of family members of people with diabetes have never participated in any educational activity to support them in supporting their family member with diabetes. Almost the same number for type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
And this slide shows the rates of family member participation in diabetes education in the 17 countries. Again the countries are grouped by geographical region with America to the left, then Western Europe, Eastern Europe and Russia, Eastern and Asian countries to the right.
The horizontal dotted orange line shows the cluster adjusted average of 23% participation rate from all countries.
The country range varied from about 10-40%, again shown as squares with confidence intervals. Some countries are somewhat above the average of 23%, and some are considerably under.
The following slides show results about active involvement of people with diabetes
and support for self-management
Previous studies have shown that active involvement of people with diabetes is essential to achieving good health outcomes and good quality of life
Previous studies have also shown that strategies are available today that can increase involvement of people with diabetes in their disease management
This slide shows shows indications of critical gaps in diabetes care as regards psychosocial and behavioral assessment in diabetes care.
The slide shows a rate of 72% having had long term blood sugar measured and about half of people with diabetes having had foot examinations and assessment of food choices.
But we see a low rate of PWD being questioned about psychosocial health, as less than a third have been asked about that.
There is one crucial question which should probably be asked regularly if you believe in a psychosocial impact of diabetes. That is how diabetes affects the life of the person with diabetes.
Here we see the proportion of people with diabetes who said their healthcare team asked them how diabetes affects their lives
And now wee see the proportion of healthcare professionals who said they asked their patients how diabetes affects their lives
These spectacular differences in perceptions about communication vary in size across countries – but the differences are found in all countries
This slide also shows how perceptions of communication about involvement differ between people with diabetes and healthcare professionals
The dark blue bar shows the percentage of people with diabetes who report having been asked by their healthcare professional for ideas when making their diabetes care plan. The lighter blue bar shows the percentage of health care professionals who report having asked the patients about ideas.
Similarly you see the differences regarding listening to how people with diabetes would like to do things
and third: whether health care professionals conveyed confidence in patients’ ability to make changes
These differences in perceptions may be significantly contributing to poor self-management of diabetes
The last results are about education and training
Let us take a look at health care professionals and their post graduate training in this busy and somewhat complicated slide.
The bars show the different groups of health care professionals:
PCPs/GPs are light blue, Diabetes specialists are darker blue, Nurses are medium blue/light purple and Dieticians are grey.
The red ABCDs identify significant differences between the professional groups.
Let us focus on PCPs/GPs and the left side of the slide. Looking at training attended we see that in general this group has received lees training than diabetes specialists, not only in medical management of diabetes, but also in dietary management, communication and motivation, self-management education and psychological aspects of diabetes. Looking at the right side of the slide: apart from medical and dietary management of diabetes, PCPs/GPs are less interested in receiving more training than the other professional groups. However, HCPs seem altogether very motivated for more training regarding psychosocial aspects of diabetes
Here we see that PCPs/GPs differ significantly from the other professional groups as regards beliefs about the impact of the professional on self-management by the person with diabetes.
PCPs/GPs to a significantly lesser degree believe that their success in caring for people with diabetes largely depends on their ability to understand and manage emotional issues their patients face.
And 17% believe that HCPs have a very limited influence on how well people take care of their diabetes.
There may be many explanations for these results.
As in many other studies we found that participation in diabetes education for people with diabetes is significantly associated with better psychological outcomes such as:
better quality of life
higher diabetes empowerment
fewer psychological problems
better wellbeing
We also found that those who did participate in diabetes education found it helpful
In summary the DAWN2 study shows that:
Diabetes is associated with significant psychosocial challenges
Family members are burdened by diabetes and they represent un untapped potential for support
Active engagement of people with diabetes is lacking
Half of people with diabetes and less than 25% of family members ever participated in diabetes education – but those who did found it very helpful
Discrimination due to diabetes is prevalent and is linked to worse treatment outcomes
Training and support for healthcare professionals is limited – but desired by health care professionals
For further information about the DAWN2 study you can look at this website.
Thank you for your attention!