Brief Look at Association vs causation

2,423 views

Published on

A very brief summary of causation vs. association, causal pathways, the Bradford Hill Criteria, and Pyramid of Clinical Evidence.

Published in: Health & Medicine, Education
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,423
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
98
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Cross-sectional Studies considered 2.3 by the OBGYN journal I looked at, but it is not technically a “Clinical” study.Double check to see if this is the same pyramid of evidence you see used in Epi.
  • Brief Look at Association vs causation

    1. 1. Association vs. Causation Patrick B. Barlow PhD Candidate in Evaluation, Statistics, & Measurement The University of Tennessee This and many other lecture materials are available at www.slideshare.net/pbbarlow1
    2. 2. In this Presentation… Section I: Association vs. Causation, what does it look like?  Conceptually speaking  Casual Pathways Section II: Methods for judging strength of causal relationship  Bradford Hill Criteria  Pyramid of Clinical Evidence
    3. 3. Some Terms Association Causation Causal Pathway Interaction / Effect Modification Confounding / Mediation
    4. 4. Association vs. Causation Conceptually Speaking Association  Correlation  Regression  Odds / Relative Risk Causation  Influence  Effect  Confounding  Explanation  Dependence  Intervention  Likelihood  Randomization  Conditional  Attribution Adapted From: Joffe et al. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2012
    5. 5. Association vs. Causation Conceptually Speaking Association  Two observed variables that are jointly distributed  Can be strong, weak, positive, or negative. Causation  “A causal relationship is one that has a mechanism that by its operation makes a difference” (Joffe et al., 2012).  For example:
    6. 6. Causal Pathways When in doubt, draw it out! Causal Pathways  Visual depictions of the proposed links between a given exposure(s) and the outcome of interest. They help researchers understand the mechanisms at work in a complex disease process. Exposure ? Outcome
    7. 7. Types of Causal Pathways Simple (Direct) Confounding (Mediation) Effect Modification (Moderation) Exposure Exposure Exposure ? ? Outcome Confounder ? Outcome Effect Moderator ? Outcome
    8. 8. Types of Causal Pathways Simple (Direct) Confounding (Mediation) Effect Modification (Moderation) Diet Diet Diet ? ? CAD Smoking Hx ? CAD Activity Level ? CAD Examples adapted from CTSPedia.com
    9. 9. Methods for Judging Strength of Causal Relationship Bradford Hill Criteria Pyramid of Clinical Evidence
    10. 10. The Bradford Hill Criteria  Provides researchers with seven criteria for assessing strength of evidence.  Strength of association (i.e. effect size)  Consistency (i.e. reliability)  Specificity  Temporal relationship  Biological gradient  Plausibility  Coherence  Experiment (reversibility)  Analogy (consideration of alternate explanations)
    11. 11. The Bradford Hill Criteria a closer look…  Strength of association (i.e. effect size)  Is the magnitude of the association both statistically and clinically meaningful?  Consistency (i.e. reliability)  Can these results be reproduced? Do they coincide with existing research on the same phenomenon?  Specificity  Association is specific when the exposure is associated with only one disease  Temporal relationship  Does the exposure (cause) precede the outcome (effect)?
    12. 12. The Bradford Hill Criteria a closer look…  Biological gradient  Dose-response relationship can be established  Biological Plausibility  Is the association coherent with the current body of biologic knowledge?  Coherence  Is the association plausible given what we already know about the disease or disorder?  Experimental evidence  Has this association been shown in a randomized experimental trial?  Analogy (consideration of alternate explanations)  Have all other plausible alternative explanations been considered and ruled out? “The third variable issue”
    13. 13. Strength of Evidence & Study Design Which criteria are difficult to satisfy with…  Case – Control studies?  Cross – Sectional studies?  Cohort – Studies?
    14. 14. Pyramid of Clinical Evidence Systematic Reviews & Meta-analyses Cross-Sectional Studies: Level “2.3” Evidence Summaries RCT Cohort Studies Level 1 Evidence Level 2 Evidence Case Control Studies Level 3 Evidence Case Series Case Reports Ideas, Editorials, Opinions Animal research In vitro (‘test tube’) research
    15. 15. So, when reading an article… Whenever digging into a new controversy or research area, it is helpful to use methods for judging the strength of the relationship being discussed.  What type of study design are the using? (Pyramid of evidence)  How strong is the evidence? (Bradford Hill Criteria)  What is the clinical vs. statistical significance being presented?

    ×