The extreme right and theonline public sphereLieke Ongering, MA
Inclusion   Exclusion
• Features of the extreme right (Mudde, 1995)      •   Nationalist      •   Racist      •   Xenophobic      •   Anti-democ...
Active constitution of the „Other‟                     Active exclusion of their constitutive „Other‟                Creat...
• BNP can be seen as a British extreme right   party   • Research on the BNP online:        • Copsey (2003), Atton (2004) ...
• Open, democratic and bottom up structure • Web 2.0 encourages Interactivity, networking   and selfpublishing • O‟Reilly:...
BNP + Web 2.0 = more open?
Analysis of the discussions on the page,                      for example:What do they      Who is talking         How do ...
• Process of achieving mutual understanding      • Rational-critical debate      • Coherence and continuity      • Recipro...
Coding schemeAdapted from:GRAHAM, T. 2009. What‟s Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sp...
Coding example
• The normative conditions of the public sphere  were unsatisfied  • No „mutual understanding‟  • No structural and dispos...
“Solution. Get them all out.PROBLEM SOLVED EASY.”• Unreasoned comments• Insulting comments towards constitutive other• Att...
Confirms earlier research    Community with closure   Anti-public sphereBNP + Web 2.0 = more open?
• Compared to earlier research:  • More openness    • Multi-voiced discourse within the BNP community  • Less hierarchical...
Inclusion   Exclusion
Internet a democratic Internet                                          a polarised Internet      • e-participation       ...
Extreme right = extreme example   Exclusion can also take place in   democratic e-participation projects  Detect exclusion...
• Research done at University of Leeds• Supervised by Dr Giles Moss• E-mail: lieke@ongering.eu• LinkedIn: http://www.linke...
The extreme right and the online public sphere
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

The extreme right and the online public sphere

857 views

Published on

1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Nice to see this online, forgot this was put on slideshare.
    - Lieke
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
857
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
18
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The extreme right and the online public sphere

  1. 1. The extreme right and theonline public sphereLieke Ongering, MA
  2. 2. Inclusion Exclusion
  3. 3. • Features of the extreme right (Mudde, 1995) • Nationalist • Racist • Xenophobic • Anti-democratic • Believe in strong stateThe extreme rightMUDDE, C. 1995. Right-wing extremism analyzed. A comparatics analysis of the ideologies of three allegedright wingextremist parties (NPD, NDP, CP‟86). European Journal of Political Research, 27, 203-24.
  4. 4. Active constitution of the „Other‟ Active exclusion of their constitutive „Other‟ Creation of „communities with closure‟ (Couldry, 2002), „anti-public spheres‟ (Cammaerts, 2007)The extreme rightCAMMAERTS, B. 2007. Jamming the political: boyong counter-hegemonic practices. Continuum: jourmal of media andcultural studies, 21(1), 71-90.COULDRY, N. 2002. Alternative media and mediated community. Paper presented at The International Association forMedia and Communication Research. Barcelona.
  5. 5. • BNP can be seen as a British extreme right party • Research on the BNP online: • Copsey (2003), Atton (2004) • Atton (2004): “The „community‟ established by the BNP in cyberspace is replete with closure: organisationally, dialogically, discursively.” The British National PartyATTON, C. 2004. An alternative Internet, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.COPSEY, N. 2003. Extremism on the net. The extreme right and the value of the Internet. In: GIBSON, R., NIXON, P. & WARD, S.(eds.) Political Parties and the Internet. Net gain? London: Routledge.
  6. 6. • Open, democratic and bottom up structure • Web 2.0 encourages Interactivity, networking and selfpublishing • O‟Reilly: • “Architechture of Participation” Web 2.0O‟REILLY, T. 2005. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. [Online].Available: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html [Accessed 26 October 2011].
  7. 7. BNP + Web 2.0 = more open?
  8. 8. Analysis of the discussions on the page, for example:What do they Who is talking How do they talk about? with who? talk? Analysis of the deliberativeness of the discussionsBNP Facebook Page
  9. 9. • Process of achieving mutual understanding • Rational-critical debate • Coherence and continuity • Reciprocity, reflexivity and empathy• Structural and dispositional fairness: • Discursive equality • Discursive freedom • SincerityThe normative conditionsof the public sphereGRAHAM, T. 2009. What‟s Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere. Amsterdam:Amsterdam School of Communications Research, University of Amsterdam.
  10. 10. Coding schemeAdapted from:GRAHAM, T. 2009. What‟s Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere. Amsterdam:Amsterdam School of Communications Research, University of Amsterdam.STROMER-GALLEY, J. 2007. Measuring deliberation‟s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3, 12.
  11. 11. Coding example
  12. 12. • The normative conditions of the public sphere were unsatisfied • No „mutual understanding‟ • No structural and dispositional fairnessBNP + Web 2.0 = more open?
  13. 13. “Solution. Get them all out.PROBLEM SOLVED EASY.”• Unreasoned comments• Insulting comments towards constitutive other• Attraction towards the BNP ideology• Only 2 % clear aversionBNP + Web 2.0 = more open?
  14. 14. Confirms earlier research Community with closure Anti-public sphereBNP + Web 2.0 = more open?
  15. 15. • Compared to earlier research: • More openness • Multi-voiced discourse within the BNP community • Less hierarchical communication • User-generated content more important• Changes in line with general development of the Internet• These changes should not be exaggerated  BNP community is still very closedSome minor changes
  16. 16. Inclusion Exclusion
  17. 17. Internet a democratic Internet a polarised Internet • e-participation • Polarisation and • networked public fragmentation Inclusion and exclusion (Sunstein, 2009) onlinesphere(s) • Information cocoons • inclusion • exclusion Inclusion and exclusion onlineSUNSTEIN, C.R. 2009. Going to extremes. How like minds unite and devide, Oxford, Oxford University Press
  18. 18. Extreme right = extreme example Exclusion can also take place in democratic e-participation projects Detect exclusion and prevent from happeningConcluding remarks
  19. 19. • Research done at University of Leeds• Supervised by Dr Giles Moss• E-mail: lieke@ongering.eu• LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liekeongering• Twitter: @nietweinigThanks!

×