Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb Christian Veillette, MD, MSc, BSc(Hon) Orthopaedic Resident PGY-4 Upper Extremity Round...
Objectives <ul><li>Epidemiology </li></ul><ul><li>Etiology </li></ul><ul><li>Anatomy and Biomechanics </li></ul><ul><li>Pa...
Epidemiology <ul><li>Trapeziometacarpal joint  OA - common </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 in 4 women </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1...
Etiology <ul><li>Osteoarthritis </li></ul><ul><li>Inflammatory arthritis </li></ul><ul><li>Hypermobile laxity </li></ul><u...
Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Shallow saddle-joint architecture </li></ul><ul><ul><li>little intrinsic osseous stabilit...
Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Grasping and pinching functions of the thumb involve three arcs of motion: </li></ul><ul>...
Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Opposition </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Axial rotation at TM joint </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sh...
Role of palmar beak ligament <ul><li>Pellegrini  et. al Contact patterns in the trapeziometacarpal  joint:  The  role  of ...
Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Primary ligamentous stabilizers of TM joint </li></ul><ul><li>Anterior oblique or “volar ...
Anatomy <ul><li>Adductor pollicis longus spans the .V. between the thumb and index metacarpals </li></ul><ul><li>Abductor ...
Pathoanatomy <ul><li>Unique architecture of basal joint allows its varied  functions but predisposes it to unusual wear pa...
Pathoanatomy <ul><li>Progression theory </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Excessive laxity + repetitive loads </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><...
Diagnosis <ul><li>Typical patient </li></ul><ul><ul><li>50-70 year-old woman, radial-side hand or thumb pain </li></ul></u...
Clinical Exam <ul><li>“ Shoulder sign” = dorsoradial prominence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><...
Clinical Exam <ul><li>Focal tenderness </li></ul><ul><ul><li>dorsal + volar to APL/EPB </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>MP: vola...
Clinical Exam <ul><li>Special tests </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Grind Test”: axial load + MC rotation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><...
Imaging <ul><li>“ Poor correlation between X-rays + symptomatic disease” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Swanson JBJS-A (54) 1972 </...
Classification - Eaton <ul><li>Stage I </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TM – Precedes cartilage degeneration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><...
Classification <ul><li>Stage II </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TM narrowing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM contours still normal </l...
Classification <ul><li>Stage III </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TM joint destruction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM joint sclerosis,...
Classification <ul><li>Stage IV </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Advanced disease TM and ST joints </li></ul></ul>Exact  risk  and  r...
Differential Diagnosis <ul><li>OA/RA </li></ul><ul><li>Hypermobile Laxity </li></ul><ul><li>Trauma </li></ul><ul><li>Infla...
Non-operative Treatment <ul><li>Education </li></ul><ul><li>Activity modification </li></ul><ul><ul><li>less forceful pinc...
Splinting <ul><li>Long Opponens/Thumb spica </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Full time    3-4 weeks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Part ...
Operative Indications <ul><li>Persistent pain  </li></ul><ul><li>Functional disability </li></ul><ul><li>Failure conservat...
Principles of Surgery <ul><li>Pain relief </li></ul><ul><li>Maintain function/strength </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Grip </li></u...
Procedures <ul><li>Trapezium Excision </li></ul><ul><li>Excision + Rolled Tendon Graft (ANCHOVY) </li></ul><ul><li>Silicon...
Algorithm JAAOS. 2000;8:314-323
Trapezium Excision <ul><li>Gervis WH  JBJS Br  1949;31:537-539. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Excision of the trapezium for osteoa...
Arthrodesis – TM Joint <ul><li>Younger patients (<50 yrs) + High demand </li></ul><ul><li>Advantages </li></ul><ul><ul><li...
Arthrodesis – TM Joint <ul><li>Cavallazzi RM J. Hand Surg. 1986;11B </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis t...
Anchovy <ul><li>Trapezium Excision </li></ul><ul><li>Rolled Tendon Graft </li></ul><ul><li>FCR tendon interposition </li><...
Silicone Arthroplasty <ul><li>Lower demand + Rheumatoid </li></ul><ul><li>Concerns: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Weakness </li></...
Silicone Arthroplasty <ul><li>Sollerman J. Hand Surg. 13B 1988 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>12 year f/u </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><l...
Osteotomy <ul><li>Base of thumb metacarpal, unload volar portion TM joint </li></ul><ul><li>Wilson JBJS 65B:179, 1983 </li...
Volar Ligament Reconstruction <ul><li>Radial ½ FCR distal, ulnar ½ proximal </li></ul><ul><li>Hole in thumb MC base – dors...
Volar Ligament Reconstruction <ul><li>Eaton et. al. J. Hand Surg. 9A(5) 1984 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Eaton Stage I-II </li><...
Volar Ligament Reconstruction <ul><li>Long-term results: 15 years </li></ul><ul><li>Freedman,Eaton,Glickel. J. Hand Surg. ...
Ligament Reconstruction with Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty (LRTI) <ul><li>Burton RI, Pellegrini VD. J. Hand Surg. 11A(...
 
LRTI - Results 8% 95% excellent 3 21 Horn resection Double LRTI Baron,Eaton J. Hand Surg 1998 13% 95% excellent 9 24 Excis...
Double Interposition Arthroplasty <ul><li>Eaton Stage IV </li></ul><ul><li>Maintains height ratio </li></ul><ul><ul><li>PP...
PubMed <ul><li>Search for “thumb arthritis randomized trial” </li></ul><ul><li>2 results: </li></ul><ul><li>Randomized, pr...
Ligament reconstruction with or without tendon interposition to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. A pros...
Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: arthrodesis compared with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. <ul><li>...
Recommendations <ul><li>Stage I (Laxity + Instability) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Eaton Procedure (Volar Ligament Reconstructio...
Complications <ul><li>Neurologic </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Radial Nerve : Dorsal sensory branch </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Med...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Basal Joint Arthritis Of The Thumb

21,578 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology

Basal Joint Arthritis Of The Thumb

  1. 1. Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb Christian Veillette, MD, MSc, BSc(Hon) Orthopaedic Resident PGY-4 Upper Extremity Rounds 2004 St. Michael’s Hospital
  2. 2. Objectives <ul><li>Epidemiology </li></ul><ul><li>Etiology </li></ul><ul><li>Anatomy and Biomechanics </li></ul><ul><li>Pathoanatomy </li></ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul><ul><li>Imaging </li></ul><ul><li>Classification </li></ul><ul><li>Treatment Options </li></ul><ul><li>Literature Review </li></ul><ul><li>Complications </li></ul>
  3. 3. Epidemiology <ul><li>Trapeziometacarpal joint OA - common </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 in 4 women </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 in 12 men </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. Armstrong et al. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1994 Jun;19(3):340-1 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>143 post-menopausal women </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>radiological prevalence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>isolated carpometacarpal OA – 25% </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Isolated scapho-trapezial OA – 2% </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>combined carpometacarpal and scapho-trapezial OA - 8% </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Symptomatic – basal thumb pain </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>28% with isolated carpometacarpal OA </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>55% with combined carpometacarpal/scapho-trapezial OA </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>“ The most frequent site in the upper extremity in need of surgery for disabling osteoarthritic disease” Pellegrini Clin. Orthop 23(1) 1992 </li></ul>
  4. 4. Etiology <ul><li>Osteoarthritis </li></ul><ul><li>Inflammatory arthritis </li></ul><ul><li>Hypermobile laxity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>young females </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Connective tissue disorders </li></ul><ul><li>Failed reconstructive procedures </li></ul><ul><li>Trauma </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Bennett’s/Rolando Fractures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dislocations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ligamentous injuries </li></ul></ul><ul><li>No longitudinal natural history study has established clear etiology for basal joint disease </li></ul><ul><li>Strong association between excessive basal joint laxity  development of premature degenerative changes </li></ul>
  5. 5. Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Shallow saddle-joint architecture </li></ul><ul><ul><li>little intrinsic osseous stability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>must rely on static ligamentous constraints </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Four trapezial articulations </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trapeziometacarpal (TM) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Scaphotrapezial (ST) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Trapeziotrapezoid </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Trapezium-Index metacarpal </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Only the TM and ST joints lie along the longitudinal compression axis of the thumb </li></ul><ul><li>Radiographic disease most commonly affects TM and ST joints </li></ul><ul><li>Term pantrapezial arthritis is somewhat misleading </li></ul>
  6. 6. Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Grasping and pinching functions of the thumb involve three arcs of motion: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Flexion-extension </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Abduction-adduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Opposition </li></ul></ul><ul><li>TM joint compression </li></ul><ul><ul><li>=12 x thumb-index pinch </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cooney 1977 JBJS </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Differential radius of curvature </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Maximal congruence at extremes Ab/Adduction </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Opposition </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Axial rotation at TM joint </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Shear forces </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Flexion-adduction  Volar articular surface concentration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Minimal dorsal contact </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Palmar pattern joint surface wear </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Role of palmar beak ligament <ul><li>Pellegrini et. al Contact patterns in the trapeziometacarpal joint: The role of the palmar beak ligament. J Hand Surg [Am] 1993;18:238-244 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>23 cadaver forearm specimens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Loaded to simulate lateral pinch, and pressure-sensitive film used to record joint contact patterns in functional positions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>palmar compartment of TM joint was primary contact area during flexion adduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Simulation of dynamic pinch and release produced dorsal enlargement of contact pattern  physiologic translation of the metacarpal on the trapezium </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Detachment of palmar beak ligament resulted in dorsal translation of the contact area  producing a pattern similar to that of cartilage degeneration seen in the osteoarthritic joint </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>End-stage osteoarthritic specimens had a nonfunctional beak ligament and demonstrated a pathologic total contact pattern of joint congruity </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Anatomy and Biomechanics <ul><li>Primary ligamentous stabilizers of TM joint </li></ul><ul><li>Anterior oblique or “volar beak” ligament </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tethers base of thumb metacarpal to trapezium  1 o restraint to dorsoradial subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Supported by clinical success of volar ligament reconstruction </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Dorsoradial ligament </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 o restraint to dorsal translation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Supported by cadaver studies simulating acute dorsal TM joint dislocations </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Anatomy <ul><li>Adductor pollicis longus spans the .V. between the thumb and index metacarpals </li></ul><ul><li>Abductor pollicis longus inserts at the base of the thumb metacarpal and causes dorsal subluxation in absence of sufficient ligamentous stability </li></ul><ul><li>Intermetacarpal ligament is an extracapsular tether between the two metacarpals </li></ul><ul><li>Palmar (anterior) oblique ligament is eccentrically positioned and tightens with thumb metacarpal pronation </li></ul><ul><li>Flexor carpi radialis tendon </li></ul>
  11. 11. Pathoanatomy <ul><li>Unique architecture of basal joint allows its varied functions but predisposes it to unusual wear patterns when joint is unstable </li></ul><ul><li>Rate of degeneration influenced by the forces subjected to over the course of time </li></ul><ul><li>Repetitive thumb pinch are at greater risk for developing symptomatic basal joint disease than the average person </li></ul><ul><li>No consistent relationship between symptoms and degree of radiographic evidence basal joint degeneration </li></ul><ul><li>Series of steps in joint degeneration </li></ul>
  12. 12. Pathoanatomy <ul><li>Progression theory </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Excessive laxity + repetitive loads </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Synovitis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Osteophytes + joint space narrowing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Attenuation/insufficient volar beak ligament </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dorsal radial subluxation of 1 st MC base </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Adducted posture of 1 st MC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Distal aspect tethered to 2 nd MC by adductor policis </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Progressive functional deficit </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Decreased grip </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Narrowed palm, functional hand width </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Diagnosis <ul><li>Typical patient </li></ul><ul><ul><li>50-70 year-old woman, radial-side hand or thumb pain </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Insidious onset, duration from several months to several years </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Exacerbated by common activities (handwriting, holding heavier books, turning doorknobs or keys in locks, doing needlepoint, using scissors) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pain relieved by rest, NSAIDS, splint </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Functional limitations vary depending on patient’s vocation and hand dominance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Older individuals complain of progressive inability to perform ADLs (opening jar tops by hand, opening cans with can opener) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Less commonly </li></ul><ul><ul><li>women in 20s or 30s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>pain in the thenar eminence due to TM joint synovitis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>associated excessive joint laxity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>pain may radiate up radial aspect of the forearm with certain activities, especially extensive writing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>may complain of muscle cramping in the first web space and thenar eminence </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. Clinical Exam <ul><li>“ Shoulder sign” = dorsoradial prominence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Inflammation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Osteophytes </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Adduction contracture </li></ul><ul><li>MP hyperextension collapse </li></ul>
  15. 15. Clinical Exam <ul><li>Focal tenderness </li></ul><ul><ul><li>dorsal + volar to APL/EPB </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>MP: volar plate + UCL </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ST joint – 1 cm proximal to TM joint </li></ul></ul><ul><li>ROM </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Radial + palmar abduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Active + passive pinch (MP hyperextension collapse) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Laxity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dorsovolar: Beak ligament attenuated </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Radioulnar </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Generalized laxity testing </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Neurovascular </li></ul>
  16. 16. Clinical Exam <ul><li>Special tests </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Grind Test”: axial load + MC rotation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Crank Test” : axial load + flexion/extension </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pinch Test – MP hyperextension collapse </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Distraction Test – relief of pain </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Imaging <ul><li>“ Poor correlation between X-rays + symptomatic disease” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Swanson JBJS-A (54) 1972 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>X-rays- 3 views </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pronated AP </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lateral </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Oblique </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Special X-rays </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Stress view – basal joint subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pinch lateral - assess basal joint height, follow up measurements </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Classification - Eaton <ul><li>Stage I </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TM – Precedes cartilage degeneration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM - Contours normal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM - Joint space widening if effusion/synovitis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM stress subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ST joint normal </li></ul></ul>Eaton, Lane, Littler. J. Hand Surg. 9A 1984
  19. 19. Classification <ul><li>Stage II </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TM narrowing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM contours still normal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM joint osteophytes <2mm </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ST joint Normal </li></ul></ul>
  20. 20. Classification <ul><li>Stage III </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TM joint destruction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM joint sclerosis, cystic changes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TM joint osteophytes >2mm </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ST joint normal </li></ul></ul>
  21. 21. Classification <ul><li>Stage IV </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Advanced disease TM and ST joints </li></ul></ul>Exact risk and rate of progression cannot be precisely delineated. No longitudinal studies
  22. 22. Differential Diagnosis <ul><li>OA/RA </li></ul><ul><li>Hypermobile Laxity </li></ul><ul><li>Trauma </li></ul><ul><li>Inflammation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dequervain’s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stenosing flexor synovitis </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Carpal Tunnel </li></ul><ul><li>Trigger Thumb </li></ul><ul><li>Wrist ganglia </li></ul><ul><li>Carpal instability </li></ul><ul><li>Metabolic </li></ul><ul><li>Tumour </li></ul><ul><li>Infection </li></ul><ul><li>Referred pain </li></ul>
  23. 23. Non-operative Treatment <ul><li>Education </li></ul><ul><li>Activity modification </li></ul><ul><ul><li>less forceful pinching, alternating hand use, switching to larger diameter writing instruments and golf grips, using reading stand to hold books </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NSAIDS </li></ul><ul><li>Intra-articular steroid injections </li></ul><ul><li>Physiotherapy </li></ul><ul><ul><li>thenar/adductor stretching & strengthening </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Splinting </li></ul>
  24. 24. Splinting <ul><li>Long Opponens/Thumb spica </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Full time  3-4 weeks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Part time  3-4 weeks + night use </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Prefabricated versions appear to be less effective and less comfortable than a well-fitted custom splint </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Swigart et al. J. Hand Surg. 24A(1)1999 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Stage I-II – 76 % </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>StageIII-IV – 54 % </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>sufficient symptomatic relief to allow continued activities with intermittent time-limited splint use </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>19% progress to surgery </li></ul></ul>
  25. 25. Operative Indications <ul><li>Persistent pain </li></ul><ul><li>Functional disability </li></ul><ul><li>Failure conservative treatment </li></ul><ul><li>Compliant patient </li></ul>
  26. 26. Principles of Surgery <ul><li>Pain relief </li></ul><ul><li>Maintain function/strength </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Grip </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pinch </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Ligamentous stability </li></ul><ul><li>Carpal height </li></ul><ul><li>Hyperextension collapse at MCP joint </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Cause of failed surgical treatment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Intraoperative Staging </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Assess cartilage erosion: T-M, S-T joints </li></ul></ul>
  27. 27. Procedures <ul><li>Trapezium Excision </li></ul><ul><li>Excision + Rolled Tendon Graft (ANCHOVY) </li></ul><ul><li>Silicone Arthroplasty </li></ul><ul><li>Arthrodesis </li></ul><ul><li>Osteotomy 1st MC </li></ul><ul><li>Volar Ligament Reconstruction (EATON Procedure) </li></ul><ul><li>Ligament Reconstruction + Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty (LRTI)(BURTON) </li></ul><ul><li>Double Interposition Arthroplasty </li></ul><ul><li>Interposition Costochondral Allograft </li></ul><ul><li>Cemented Arthroplasty </li></ul><ul><li>Cementless Arthroplasty </li></ul><ul><li>Ceramic Arthroplasty </li></ul>
  28. 28. Algorithm JAAOS. 2000;8:314-323
  29. 29. Trapezium Excision <ul><li>Gervis WH JBJS Br 1949;31:537-539. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Burton RI. Orthop. Clin North Am. 1986;17;493-503 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Loss of pinch strength </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Instability CMC joint </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Proximal MC migration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>MCP hyperextension instability </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Trapezium excision should be limited to the painfully arthritic TM joint in the low-demand elderly patient without evidence of significant subluxation </li></ul>
  30. 30. Arthrodesis – TM Joint <ul><li>Younger patients (<50 yrs) + High demand </li></ul><ul><li>Advantages </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Reliable pain reduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Maintain ADL’s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improved grip </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Disadvantages </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Adjacent joint arthrosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ROM (key pinch) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Hand flattening </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>MCP hyperextension </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Nonunion 13%-29% </li></ul></ul>
  31. 31. Arthrodesis – TM Joint <ul><li>Cavallazzi RM J. Hand Surg. 1986;11B </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis today: why? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>10 year f/u, 42 patients </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Relief of pain, maintenance of stability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Good function </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Patients pleased </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Primary indications </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Salvage of failed reconstruction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Treatment of manual laborer </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Optimal position of fusion for thumb CMC joint </li></ul><ul><ul><li>20 o of radial abduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>40 o of palmar abduction </li></ul></ul>
  32. 32. Anchovy <ul><li>Trapezium Excision </li></ul><ul><li>Rolled Tendon Graft </li></ul><ul><li>FCR tendon interposition </li></ul><ul><li>Froimson. Clin. Orthop. (70): 191-199 1970 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>30% Decrease pinch strength </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>50% Loss joint space @ 6 yrs </li></ul></ul><ul><li>APL tendon interposition </li></ul><ul><li>Robinson J. Hand Surg. 16A:504-9, 1991 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>39 patients </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>50% excellent (no pain, full ROM, normal grip) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>35% good (75% ROM) </li></ul></ul>
  33. 33. Silicone Arthroplasty <ul><li>Lower demand + Rheumatoid </li></ul><ul><li>Concerns: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Weakness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dislocation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Fracture </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Deformation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Osteolysis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Synovitis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunologic alterations </li></ul></ul>
  34. 34. Silicone Arthroplasty <ul><li>Sollerman J. Hand Surg. 13B 1988 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>12 year f/u </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>51-84 % carpal erosion </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Pellegrini, Burton J. Hand Surg. 1996 20A </li></ul><ul><ul><li>4 year f/u </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>25% clinical failure </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>35% subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>50% loss of height </li></ul></ul>
  35. 35. Osteotomy <ul><li>Base of thumb metacarpal, unload volar portion TM joint </li></ul><ul><li>Wilson JBJS 65B:179, 1983 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Eaton Stage II </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>23 osteotomies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>30 o dorsal closing wedge </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>12 yrs f/u </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>no revisions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>all patients satisfied </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ fully functional” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Indications: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>High demand hand </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Young laborer </li></ul></ul>
  36. 36. Volar Ligament Reconstruction <ul><li>Radial ½ FCR distal, ulnar ½ proximal </li></ul><ul><li>Hole in thumb MC base – dorsal to volar </li></ul><ul><li>Deep to APL </li></ul><ul><li>Deep to intact FCR </li></ul><ul><li>Final anchor point APL </li></ul>
  37. 37. Volar Ligament Reconstruction <ul><li>Eaton et. al. J. Hand Surg. 9A(5) 1984 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Eaton Stage I-II </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>50 reconstructions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Avg age 45 yrs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>f/u – 7 years </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>95% good-excellent result </li></ul></ul>
  38. 38. Volar Ligament Reconstruction <ul><li>Long-term results: 15 years </li></ul><ul><li>Freedman,Eaton,Glickel. J. Hand Surg. 25A(2) March 2000 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>23 patients </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Avg age 33 yrs female </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Eaton Stage I + Instability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>15/23  90% satisfaction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>8 % progressed on x-rays </li></ul></ul>
  39. 39. Ligament Reconstruction with Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty (LRTI) <ul><li>Burton RI, Pellegrini VD. J. Hand Surg. 11A(3) 324-32, 1986 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Excision trapezium </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Volar ligament reconstruction (FCR sling) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interposition Arthroplasty (Anchovy) – FCR </li></ul></ul>
  40. 41. LRTI - Results 8% 95% excellent 3 21 Horn resection Double LRTI Baron,Eaton J. Hand Surg 1998 13% 95% excellent 9 24 Excised LRTI Tomaino,Pellegrini,Burton J. Hand Surg. 77A,1995 11% 92% excellent 2 24 Excised LRTI Burton,Pellegrini J. Hand Surg 1986 n/a 92% excellent 3 25 Partial LRTI Eaton,Glickel,Littler J.Hand Surg. 10A(5)1985 Migration/ Loss Height Results F/U (yr) n Trapezium Proced. Author
  41. 42. Double Interposition Arthroplasty <ul><li>Eaton Stage IV </li></ul><ul><li>Maintains height ratio </li></ul><ul><ul><li>PPx/MC-T </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Barron,Eaton. J.Hand Surg. 23A(2) 1998 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>95% good  excellent functional outcome </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3 yr f/u </li></ul></ul>
  42. 43. PubMed <ul><li>Search for “thumb arthritis randomized trial” </li></ul><ul><li>2 results: </li></ul><ul><li>Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Aug;6(4):311-20. </li></ul><ul><li>Randomized controlled trial of nettle sting for treatment of base-of-thumb pain. J R Soc Med. 2000 Jun;93(6):305-9. </li></ul>
  43. 44. Ligament reconstruction with or without tendon interposition to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. A prospective randomized study. <ul><li>Kriegs-Au G, Petje G, Fojtl E, Ganger R, Zachs I. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86-A(2):209-18. </li></ul><ul><li>43 patients (52 thumbs) randomized </li></ul><ul><ul><li>trapezial excision with ligament reconstruction (n=15) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>trapezial excision with ligament reconstruction combined with tendon interposition (n=16) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>mean follow-up period of 48.2 months </li></ul><ul><li>Group I had significantly better mean scores for palmar and radial abduction, cosmetic appearance, willingness to undergo surgery again under similar circumstances (p < 0.05) </li></ul><ul><li>mean scores for tip-pinch strength and mean subjective scores for pain, strength, daily function, dexterity, and overall satisfaction did not differ significantly between the groups </li></ul><ul><li>Both groups had satisfactory results with regard to performance of ADLs and ability to return to work </li></ul><ul><li>amount of proximal metacarpal migration, at rest and under stress, did not differ significantly between groups </li></ul>
  44. 45. Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: arthrodesis compared with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. <ul><li>Hartigan BJ, Stern PJ, Kiefhaber TR. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Oct;83-A(10):1470-8. </li></ul><ul><li>109 patients (141 thumbs), < 60 yo </li></ul><ul><li>retrospective review </li></ul><ul><li>subjective evaluation of pain, function, and satisfaction demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups </li></ul><ul><li>>90% of patients satisfied following either procedure </li></ul><ul><li>Grip strength did not differ between the groups, the arthrodesis group had significantly stronger lateral pinch (p < 0.001) and chuck pinch (p < 0.01) </li></ul><ul><li>Group treated with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition had better ROM with regard to opposition (p < 0.05) and the ability to flatten the hand (p < 0.0001) </li></ul><ul><li>Higher complication rate in the arthrodesis group, with nonunion of the fusion site accounting for the majority of the complications </li></ul><ul><li>All of the patients with nonunion had improvement in their pain status compared with preoperatively, and all were very satisfied with the outcome </li></ul>
  45. 46. Recommendations <ul><li>Stage I (Laxity + Instability) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Eaton Procedure (Volar Ligament Reconstruction) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Stage II-III </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Low demand </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>LRTI </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Trapezium excision/interposition anchovy </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>High demand </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Arthrodesis </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>MC osteotomy </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Stage IV </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Double Interposition LR </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>LRTI + excision trapezium </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Trapezium excision (low demand) </li></ul></ul>
  46. 47. Complications <ul><li>Neurologic </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Radial Nerve : Dorsal sensory branch </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Median Nerve : Palmar cutaneous branch </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Neuroma </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RSD </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Vascular </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Superficial branch radial artery – volar to S-T Joint </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Infection </li></ul><ul><ul><li><1% (LRTI) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Carpal Tunnel </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Postoperative decompression </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Silicone </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Fracture, synovitis, erosion, subluxation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Fusion </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Nonunion </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Arthroplasty </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Loosening, fracture, dislocation, osteolysis, difficult revision </li></ul></ul>

×