Inter-National Relations from Below Rising of the P2P Mode of Foreign Relations Örsan Şenalp Social Network Unionism snupr...
The Discipline of Western Supremacy <ul><li>State-centric IR, IPE </li></ul><ul><li>Intergovernmentalism </li></ul><ul><li...
Neo-Gramscian Hegemony, Empire, Global Organic Crisis   <ul><li>Hegemony: Global Governance as superstructure for the tran...
Restructuring = >   Proletarianisation   WTO IMF  World Bank OECD UN agc. EU  USA  ... privatization deregulation financia...
Kees Van der Pilj's intervention <ul><li>Underlines the overdetermination of productive forces, and society as primary pro...
Critique . <ul><li>What is missing is a comprehensive analysis of change in productive forces, production relations (as fa...
P2P revolution and theory <ul><li>Since 1970s a qualitative change in productive forces taking place: transnationalisation...
P2P Mode of Foreign Relations   <ul><li>Van der Pijl identfies Gobal Governance mode or foreign relations for today's worl...
Patterns of P2P mod. of frgn. rl. <ul><li>Peer labour, collective production / Occupation of soverign symbols spaces as bi...
'New working class' formation and rise of Transnational Prince?  <ul><li>Unidentified Revolutionary Objects UROs: </li></u...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

P2P Mode of Foreign Relations

1,682 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,682
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
477
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

P2P Mode of Foreign Relations

  1. 1. Inter-National Relations from Below Rising of the P2P Mode of Foreign Relations Örsan Şenalp Social Network Unionism snuproject.wordpress.com
  2. 2. The Discipline of Western Supremacy <ul><li>State-centric IR, IPE </li></ul><ul><li>Intergovernmentalism </li></ul><ul><li>Methodological individualist neo-neo synthesis </li></ul><ul><li>Mainstream transnationalists </li></ul>
  3. 3. Neo-Gramscian Hegemony, Empire, Global Organic Crisis <ul><li>Hegemony: Global Governance as superstructure for the transnational production / world market </li></ul><ul><li>Emperialist / Keynesian Global Governance </li></ul><ul><li>Global Organic Crisis </li></ul><ul><li>Alt. Democratic Global Governance </li></ul>
  4. 4. Restructuring = > Proletarianisation WTO IMF World Bank OECD UN agc. EU USA ... privatization deregulation financialisation free trade zones flexibility subcontracting good governance expanding proletariat crisis of unions losing of social rights environmental degradation New enclosure / global apartheid Process creating the global working class [in it self at present] Crisis
  5. 5. Kees Van der Pilj's intervention <ul><li>Underlines the overdetermination of productive forces, and society as primary pro. for. </li></ul><ul><li>Independantly utilizes Marx's abstraction to other fields of social relations, </li></ul><ul><li>Identifies historical structures and relevant patterns of foreign relations, </li></ul><ul><li>Overcomes the agency-structure duality and level of analysis problem while recognizing the primary role of power and classes </li></ul>
  6. 6. Critique . <ul><li>What is missing is a comprehensive analysis of change in productive forces, production relations (as far as know until recenlty regulation school, post fordism analysis is accepted) </li></ul><ul><li>-the vol. 1 of his project is published in 2007, </li></ul><ul><li>there is a refernce to Castells, H&N en J. Merk: 'collective worker', immaterial worker, TCC, distributed (Rifkin), informatized networked capitalism </li></ul>
  7. 7. P2P revolution and theory <ul><li>Since 1970s a qualitative change in productive forces taking place: transnationalisation of production: financialst., ownership, world market. and labour processes.. </li></ul><ul><li>The primary productive force society itself is changing: P2P as a new relational dynamic is rising, it radically changes all fields of social relations, as well as society (Bauwens) </li></ul><ul><li>Hyper connectivity and potential accesibility is the key for rising P2P dynamics and practices: P2P transnational production, gov, properrty </li></ul>
  8. 8. P2P Mode of Foreign Relations <ul><li>Van der Pijl identfies Gobal Governance mode or foreign relations for today's world </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Occupying space, Protection, Exchange </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Global governance as new superstructure and capitalist strategy with emancpatory potential </li></ul><ul><li>P2P based new global commons based alternative sub and superstructure that can be coupled with a peer transnational revolution? </li></ul>
  9. 9. Patterns of P2P mod. of frgn. rl. <ul><li>Peer labour, collective production / Occupation of soverign symbols spaces as big city centers </li></ul><ul><li>Collective reapprepriation and protection of commons / re-commonisation of water, public goods, services </li></ul><ul><li>Distributed access to commonised processes and producs / direct P2P exchange </li></ul><ul><li>Peace transition is possible, Bauwens and Rifkin's argument, yet infratructure is owned by the capital </li></ul>
  10. 10. 'New working class' formation and rise of Transnational Prince? <ul><li>Unidentified Revolutionary Objects UROs: </li></ul><ul><li>Zapatista, Latin America, Seattle, WSF...2004 </li></ul><ul><li>European unrest, students & migrants revolt </li></ul><ul><li>Wikileaks, Anonymous, </li></ul><ul><li>Arab Spring, </li></ul><ul><li>Peaceful European revolts for real democracy </li></ul><ul><li>the social networks phenomena (fbook/twitter..) </li></ul>

×