Presentation to the Financial Estimate Committee July 10, 2008 Director Max Williams Department of Corrections
DOC Planning Process <ul><li>Two-day summit in April 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Presentation by all institutions on capacity a...
DOC Ballot Measure 61 and 57 Workgroups <ul><li>Existing Capacity Options </li></ul><ul><li>Capacity Alternatives </li></u...
Option A for Measure 61  <ul><li>Option A: Keep Intake at Coffee Creek Correctional Facility (CCCF) and make Santiam Corre...
Option B for Measure 61 <ul><li>Option B: Move Intake to Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI) and use the Intake b...
Measure 57 Option
Risks of Possible Options <ul><li>Challenge of siting a new women’s facility </li></ul><ul><li>Insufficient rental beds an...
Risks of Possible Options <ul><li>Access to sufficient labor pool </li></ul><ul><li>Inability for DPSST to meet statutory ...
Oregon Department of Corrections General Fund Debt Service Projection
Oregon Department of Corrections Projected Bed Increase
Oregon Department of Corrections New Construction Costs Projections
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Ballot measures

4,386 views

Published on

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
4,386
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3,415
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ballot measures

  1. 1. Presentation to the Financial Estimate Committee July 10, 2008 Director Max Williams Department of Corrections
  2. 2. DOC Planning Process <ul><li>Two-day summit in April 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Presentation by all institutions on capacity and resource options </li></ul><ul><li>Examined DOC’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and risks </li></ul><ul><li>Attendees from every division </li></ul><ul><li>Department-wide collaboration to gather information </li></ul><ul><li>Created nine workgroups and a dedicated project manager </li></ul>
  3. 3. DOC Ballot Measure 61 and 57 Workgroups <ul><li>Existing Capacity Options </li></ul><ul><li>Capacity Alternatives </li></ul><ul><li>Central Infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Transition, Work, Education and Treatment </li></ul><ul><li>Health Services (medical, mental health, dental, pharmacy) </li></ul><ul><li>Inmate Habitability </li></ul><ul><li>Intake, OISC (Sentence Computation and Records) and Assessment </li></ul><ul><li>Stakeholder Management </li></ul><ul><li>Communication </li></ul>
  4. 4. Option A for Measure 61 <ul><li>Option A: Keep Intake at Coffee Creek Correctional Facility (CCCF) and make Santiam Correctional Institution (SCI) a female facility. </li></ul>Option A Mobile medical/dental Modular units Infirmary beds (OSCI) Segregation beds – male and female SCI OISC OSCI Infirmary beds OSPM release issues DRCI: +432 m (6/11) PRCF: +270 m (6/11) JC: +1,804 m (10/11 min & 2/13 med) TRCI: +432 m (4/13) +1,600 women (11/13) WC: +2,000 m (4/14 & beyond) WC: +800 m (after 2017) DRCI: +1,227 2,156 temporary beds in existing facilities SCI: -440 -2,156 temp or rental beds CCCF: 108 existing, +400 temp beds, +60 new Seg. beds SCI: +440 Rentals: +800 New women’s facility: +1,600 beds (-1,200 temp beds) Infrastructure Facility Upgrade New Capacity Options Male Female
  5. 5. Option B for Measure 61 <ul><li>Option B: Move Intake to Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI) and use the Intake beds as female beds. </li></ul>Option B Mobile medical/dental Modular units Infirmary beds (OSCI) Segregation beds – male and female SCI OISC OSCI Infirmary beds, remodel for Intake OSPM release issues DRCI: +432 m (6/11) PRCF: +270 m (6/11) JC: +1,804 m (10/11 min & 2/13 med) TRCI: +432 m (10/11) +1,600 women (starts 3/13) WC: +2,000 m (4/14) WC: +800 m (2017) DRCI: +1,227 2,156 temporary beds in existing facilities SCI: -440 CCCF Intake: -432 Rentals: +400 -2,156 temp beds and -400 rental beds CCCF: 108 existing, +400 temp beds, +60 new Seg. beds SCI: +440 CCCF Intake: +432 Rentals: +400 New women’s facility: +1,600 beds (-800 temp & rental beds) Infrastructure Facility Upgrade New Capacity Options Male Female
  6. 6. Measure 57 Option
  7. 7. Risks of Possible Options <ul><li>Challenge of siting a new women’s facility </li></ul><ul><li>Insufficient rental beds and prohibitive cost </li></ul><ul><li>Existing siting conditions and agreements at current facilities </li></ul><ul><li>Ability to advance the building timeline at Junction City and White City </li></ul><ul><li>Unanticipated construction delays and cost increases </li></ul>
  8. 8. Risks of Possible Options <ul><li>Access to sufficient labor pool </li></ul><ul><li>Inability for DPSST to meet statutory training obligation </li></ul><ul><li>Increased legal challenges to 8 th Amendment related issues </li></ul><ul><li>Inmate habitability issues/operations- safety and security </li></ul><ul><li>Legislative approval process </li></ul>
  9. 9. Oregon Department of Corrections General Fund Debt Service Projection
  10. 10. Oregon Department of Corrections Projected Bed Increase
  11. 11. Oregon Department of Corrections New Construction Costs Projections

×