Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Monitoring of power decentralisation - 10.12.2017 en

247 views

Published on

MONITORING OF THE PROCESS OF POWER DECENTRALIZATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE REFORM as of December 10, 2017

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Monitoring of power decentralisation - 10.12.2017 en

  1. 1. MONITORING OF THE PROCESS OF POWER DECENTRALISATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE REFORM as of 8th December 2017
  2. 2. МОНІТОРИНГ ПРОЦЕСУ ДЕЦЕНТРАЛІЗАЦІЇ ВЛАДИ В УКРАЇНІ 2 № KEY INDICATORS Slide 1 Dynamics of AHs forming 3-6 2 Rating of the oblasts in terms of AHs forming 7,8 3 Institute of starostas in amalgamated hromadas 9 4 Cooperation between hromadas 10 5 Results of financial decentralisation 11-17 5.1 Growth of local budgets (2014 – 2017) 11 5.2 Own-source revenues of the local budgets 12,13 5.3 Own-source revenues of the local budgets. Growth rate 14 5.4 Local budget expenditures 15 5.5 Remaining funds of local budgets, deposited funds 16,17 6 State financial support 18-21 6.1 Dynamics of state support for regional development and infrastructure buildup 18 6.2 Status of subvention allocation for social and economic development of specific territories 19 6.3 Status of subvention allocation from the State Budget to local budgets for development of infrastructure of amalgamated hromadas by projects 20 6.4 Status of distribution of State Fund for Regional Development between projects 21 7 Decentralisation in education 22-24 7.1 Establishment of hub schools in the oblasts, incl. AHs 22 7.2 General education schools 23 7.3 General education schools 24 8 Decentralisation in health care, creating hospital districts 25 9 Decentralisation of powers in architectural construction control and improvement of urban development law 26 10 Decentralisation in administrative services provision 27 11 Decentralisation in social policy 28
  3. 3. DYNAMICS OF FORMING AMALGAMATED HROMADAS INDICATOR 1 3 692 amalgamated hromadas were formed out of those 51 will have first local elections on 24.12.2017 out of those 27 are waiting for CEC decision on setting first elections Amalgamated hromadas Amalgamated hromadas which are waiting for CEC decision on setting first elections As of 08.12.2017
  4. 4. DYNAMICS OF FORMING AMALGAMATED HROMADAS in 2015 - 2017 692 NUMBER OF AMALGAMATED HROMADAS NUMBER OF HROMADAS WHICH CREATED AMALGAMATED HROMADAS NUMBER OF RESIDENTS IN AMALGAMATED HROMADAS (mln persons) in 2015 - 2017 amalgamated hromadas formed 692 AHs (29 % of the total number of the basic level councils as of 01.01.2015) 3247 number of residents in amalgamated hromadas (14,2 % of the total population of Ukraine) 6,0 mln pers. INDICATOR 1 4 amalgamated hromadas were formed (out of those 27 are waiting for CEC decision on setting first elections) 3237 1739 795 1,4 3,1 6,0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2015 2016 2017 + 1,7 + 2,9 0 200 400 600 800 2015 2016 2017 159 366 692 + 207 + 326 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 2015 2016 2017 3247 1746 800 + 946 + 1501
  5. 5. DYNAMICS OF FORMING AMALGAMATED HROMADAS Average number of hromadas which formed one AH Average population of one AH 5,0 4,8 4,7 4,55 4,6 4,65 4,7 4,75 4,8 4,85 4,9 4,95 5 5,05 2015 2015-2016 2015- 2017 INDICATOR 1 5 8300 8400 8500 8600 8700 8800 8900 2015 2015-2016 2015-2017 8805 8470 8760
  6. 6. AMALGAMATION OF HROMADAS WITHIN RAYONS INDICATOR 1 6 Rayons where 100% of hromadas amalgamated Rayons where 50…99% of hromadas amalgamated Rayons where 1…49% of hromadas amalgamated 692 AHs 490 rayons
  7. 7. RATING OF THE OBLASTS IN TERMS OF AHs FORMING OVERALL RATING AND PLACE BY PARAMETERS Note: when calculating the rating by parameters "Coverage of the oblast territory with AHs” and “Hromadas which amalgamated" the data of hromadas which were joined by other hromadas was accounted for Iv.-Frankivsk 14 Chernivtsi 7 Ternopil 8 Khmelnytskyi 2 Zakarpattia 20 Lviv 15 Volyn 5 Rivne 13 Zhytomyr 1 Chernihiv 3 Odessa 11 Kyiv 19 Vinnytsia 21 Kirovohrad 22 Cherkasy 21 Sumy 10 Kharkiv 18 Poltava 12 Kherson 13 Mykolaiv 9 Donetsk 16 Zaporizhzhia 6 Dnipropetrovsk 4 Luhansk 17 1-6 7-17 18-22 Place in overall rating INDICATOR 2 7 OBLAST Overall rating Overall place by parameters 1 2 3 4 Number of AHs Coverage of the oblast territory with AHs Hromada s which amalga- mated Number of AHs with population less than 5 thous.pers. ZHYTOMYR 1 2 1 1 11 KHMELNYTSKYI 2 5 2 2 8 CHERNIHIV 3 6 3 3 14 DNIPROPETROVSK 4 1 5 4 17 VOLYN 5 5 6 6 12 ZAPORIZHZHIA 6 6 4 5 18 CHERNIVTSI 7 11 9 8 7 TERNOPIL 8 4 7 7 19 MYKOLAIV 9 9 8 9 16 SUMY 10 10 10 11 13 ODESSA 11 13 14 14 5 POLTAVA 12 3 11 12 21 RIVNE 13 12 13 13 10 KHERSON 13 11 12 10 15 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 14 14 17 16 2 LVIV 15 7 18 17 9 DONETSK 16 16 15 15 6 LUHANSK 17 18 15 18 4 KHARKIV 18 17 20 21 1 KYIV 19 17 22 23 3 ZAKARPATTIA 20 19 23 24 1 VINNYTSIA 21 8 19 20 22 CHERKASY 21 12 16 19 22 KIROVOHRAD 22 15 21 22 20
  8. 8. RATING OF THE OBLASTS IN TERMS OF AHs FORMING KEY PARAMETERS Note: when calculating the rating by parameters "Coverage of the oblast territory with AHs” and “Hromadas which amalgamated" the data of hromadas which were joined by other hromadas was also accounted for INDICATOR 2 8 Oblast Parameter 1. Number of AHs Area of the oblast, sq.km Parameter 2. AREA OF AH, sq.km No. of hromadas in the oblast Parameter 3. HROMADAS WHICH AMALGAMATED Parameter 4. NUMBER OF AHs WITH POPULATION LESS THAN 5 THOUS. PERSONS Place by parame- ters 1-4 2015 2016 2017 Total No of AHs in 2015-2017 Total in 2015-2017 Total in 2015-2017 Total in 2015-2017 No of AHs No of AHs No. of AHs, incl. where first elections were called No of AHs in CEC AH area % Hromadas which amalga- mated % No. of AHs % VINNYTSIA 2 19 13 34 26513 3895,788 14,7 707 101 14,3 17 50 21 VOLYN 5 10 25 40 20144 9095,2 45,2 412 170 41,3 14 35 5 DNIPROPETROVSK 15 19 22 1 57 31914 15668,87 49,1 348 168 48,3 25 43,8 4 DONETSK 3 3 3 5 14 26517 5292,98 20 386 84 21,8 3 21,4 16 ZHYTOMYR 9 23 13 1 46 29832 16810,88 56,4 631 348 55,2 16 34,8 1 ZAKARPATTIA 2 1 3 6 12777 616,115 4,8 337 19 5,6 0 0 20 ZAPORIZHZHIA 6 10 20 1 37 27180 13655,26 50,2 299 135 45,2 17 45,9 6 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 3 8 12 1 24 13900 2341,737 16,8 516 108 20,9 3 12,5 14 KYIV 1 1 7 3 12 28131 2231,138 7,9 659 66 10 2 16,7 19 KIROVOHRAD 2 3 8 2 15 24588 2541,817 10,3 415 45 10,8 7 46,6 22 LUHANSK 2 1 5 3 11 26684 5330,982 20 332 61 18,4 2 18,5 17 LVIV 15 7 13 35 21833 3466,701 15,9 711 137 19,3 11 31,4 15 MYKOLAIV 1 19 9 1 29 24598 8917,292 36,3 313 105 33,5 12 41,4 9 ODESSA 8 3 14 25 33310 7205,6 21,6 490 108 22 5 20 11 POLTAVA 12 6 21 4 43 28748 7749,6 27 503 157 31,2 21 48,8 12 RIVNE 5 13 7 1 26 20047 4777 23,8 365 95 26 9 34,6 13 SUMY 1 13 14 28 23834 7771,629 32,6 419 131 31,3 10 35,7 10 TERNOPIL 26 10 4 1 41 13823 5422,15 39,2 615 242 39,3 19 46,3 8 KHARKIV 0 4 8 12 31415 3676,001 11,7 458 57 12,4 0 0 18 KHERSON 1 11 14 1 27 28461 7208,612 25,3 298 95 31,9 11 40,7 13 KHMELNYTSKYI 22 4 13 1 40 20645 11148,52 54 605 322 53,2 10 25 2 CHERKASY 3 3 20 26 20900 3729,8 17,8 556 97 17,4 13 50 21 CHERNIVTSI 10 6 10 1 27 8097 2760,28 34,1 271 99 36,5 6 22,2 7 CHERNIHIV 5 11 21 37 31865 16396,04 51,5 569 297 52,2 14 37,8 3 TOTAL 159 207 299 27 692 575756 167129,6 29 11215 3247 29 247 35,7
  9. 9. 2362 Total number of starostas in amalgamated hromadas, out of those: INSTITUTE OF STAROSTAS IN AMALGAMATED HROMADAS Ivano- Frankivsk 81 (17) Zakarpattia 13 (5) Lviv 100 (29) Volyn 125 (7) Rivne 68 (19) Ternopil 200 (114) Chernivtsi 55 (12) Khmelnytskyi 264 (181) Zhytomyr 283 (0) Vinnytsia 66 (6) Odessa 81 (37) Mykolaiv 59 (5) Kherson 65 (5) Zaporizhzhia 95 (18) Dnipropetrovsk 104 (31) Kirovohrad 32 (4) Cherkasy 66 (12) Kyiv 29 (5) Kyiv city Chernihiv 238 (50) Sumy 103 (0) Poltava 93 (14) Kharkiv 45 (0) Donetsk 47 (14) Luhansk 50 (15) Crimea 100 (29) total number of starostas (elected starostas) 600 were elected INDICATOR 3 8
  10. 10. 512(+8)* hromadas are using tools for intermunicipal cooperation COOPERATION BETWEEN HROMADAS STATUS OF CONCLUDING INTERMUNICIPAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS 111(+3)* intermunicipal cooperation agreements 4 Number of hromadas that used the tools of intermunicipal cooperation (2) Number of intermunicipal cooperation agreements Ivano- Frankivsk 76 (10) Zakarpattia 4 (2) Lviv 5 (2) Volyn 25 (8) Rivne 2 (1) Ternopil 0 Чернівецька 0 Khmelnytskyi 12 (2) Zhytomyr 11 (5) Vinnytsia 2 (1) Odessa 9 (2) Mykolaiv 0 Kherson 0 Zaporizhzhia 2 (1) Dnipropetrovsk 8 (3) Kirovohrad 4 (2) Cherkasy 55 (6) Kyiv 5 (2) Kyiv city Chernihiv 22 (6) Sumy 2 (1) Poltava 229 (47) Kharkiv 35 (9) Donetsk 0 Luhansk 0 Crimea INDICATOR 4 10 * as compared to the previous month ЖКГ благоустрій пожежна безпека освіта, ох.здоровя, соцзабезпечення інше Housing and utilities Urban land development Fire safety Education, health care, social care Other AREAS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERMUNICIPAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS 23 22 16 13 37
  11. 11. 2015 2016 2017 45, 6 47,5 49,3 Share of local budgets (including transfers) in the consolidated budget of Ukraine, % 2014 2015 2016 2017 Own-source revenues of the local budgets, bln UAH 68,6 98,2 146,6 +29,6 (42%) +48,4 (49%) +27 (18%) RESULTS OF FINANCIAL DECENTRALISATION GROWTH OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS (2014 – 2017) INDICATOR 5.1 11 173,5 (fact for 11 months)
  12. 12. Own-source revenues in January-November 2017 as compared to January-November 2016, bln UAH(%) 131,9 173,5 +41,6 bln UAH (31,5%) 4,5 8,3 +3,8 bln UAH (by 1,8 times) 2016 2017 2016 2017 Ukraine 366 AHs INDICATOR 5.2RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS 12
  13. 13. OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF 366 AHs in January-November 2017 and 2016, mln UAH RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS INDICATOR 5.2 13 Payments to the budget 366 ОТГ, Всього including: 159 AHs amalgamated in 2015 207 AHs amalgamated in 2016 Revenue Deviation Revenue Deviation Revenue Deviation 2016 2017 +/- % 2016 2017 +/- % 2016 2017 +/- % Total, including: 4 504,6 8 306,0 3 801,3 184,4% 2 938,0 3 916,5 978,4 133,3% 1 566,6 4 389,5 2 822,9 280,2% Personal income tax 1 540,0 4 583,4 3 043,3 297,6% 1 540,0 2 168,1 628,1 140,8% - 2 415,3 2 415,3 - Excise tax 655,6 728,9 73,2 111,2% 340,6 382,7 42,1 112,4% 315,1 346,2 31,2 109,9% Land fee 1 072,0 1 288,4 216,4 120,2% 513,8 602,4 88,6 117,2% 558,2 686,0 127,9 122,9% Single tax 964,4 1 314,3 349,9 136,3% 417,1 567,9 150,8 136,1% 547,2 746,4 199,2 136,4% Property tax 73,5 126,7 53,2 172,4% 34,1 57,8 23,7 169,4% 39,4 68,9 29,5 175,0%
  14. 14. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% місцеві податки і збори плата за землю єдиний податок податок на нерухоме майно Local taxes and fees growth rate in January-November 2017 as compared to January-November 2016 (by budget levels), in % and mln UAH Місцеві бюджети України Бюджети міст обласного значення Бюджети ОТГ 2869 5906,4 2701,2 349,9 216,4 1417 966,3 490,6 53,2 9770,3 4624,3 623,0 local taxes and fees land fee single tax property tax Local budgets of Ukraine Cities of oblast significance budgets AH budgets 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% Місцеві бюджети України Бюджети міст обласного значення Бюджети ОТГ 68,5 420,2796,1 Local budgets of Ukraine, total Budgets of the cities of oblast significance Budgets of AHs Administrative services fee growth rate in January-November 2017 as compared to January-November 2016 (by budget levels), in % and mln UAH 14 RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS. GROWTH RATE INDICATOR 5.3 +24,9% +26,5% +29,4% +13,5% +14,7% +20,2% +36,4% +38,3% +36,3% +71,8% +71,1% +72,4% +42,1% +77,7% +468,7% (almost 5 times)
  15. 15. Development budget expenditures per capita in January-October 2016 and 2017, UAH 719 739 434 1089 1023 656 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 грн. +51,5% +38,4% Increased by 1,5 times 15 Local budgets of Ukraine Budgets of the cities of oblast significance Budgets of AHs 2017 2016 RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION LOCAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDICATOR 5.4
  16. 16. 33,6 36,7 42,3 24,9 22,7 10,6 10,7 4,2 3,9 0 20 40 60 80 01.01.2017 01.10.2017 01.11.2017 Remaining funds of the local budgets of Ukraine, bln UAH RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION REMAINING FUNDS OF LOCAL BUDGETS, DEPOSITED FUNDS 16 INDICATOR 5.5 Treasury accounts, Special fund Treasury accounts, General fund 76,4 79,6 + 3,2 (increased by 4,1%) Deposit accounts, Special fund Deposit accounts, General fund
  17. 17. 1,7 2,4 2,9 1,2 1,2 0,3 0,3 0,2 0,2 0 1 2 3 4 5 01.01.2017 01.10.2017 01.11.2017 Remaining funds of general fund of the budgets of 366 AHs, bln UAH 9,2 6,7 8,1 3,3 3,2 6,2 6,2 1,1 1,1 0 5 10 15 20 01.01.2017 01.10.2017 01.11.2017 Remaining funds of the budgets of the cities of oblast significance, bln UAH RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION REMAINING FUNDS OF LOCAL BUDGETS, DEPOSITED FUNDS 17 INDICATOR 5.5 4,1 18,6 17,3 +1,3 (increased by 7,5%) 4,6 +0,5 (increased by 12,1%) Treasury accounts, Special fund Treasury accounts, General fund Deposit accounts, Special fund Deposit accounts, General fund
  18. 18. STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT DYNAMICS OF STATE SUPPORT OF HROMADA DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDUP 2014 2015 2016 2017 0,5 0,8 3,3 5,0 2,9 3,0 3,5 1,0 1,5 4,0 0,27 0,65 Кошти ЄС на підтримку секторальної регіональної політики Кошти на будівництво футбольних полів Субвенція на розвиток медицини в сільській місцевості Субвенція на інфраструктуру об'єднаних територіальних громад Державний фонд регіонального розвитку Субвенція на соц. економ розвиток 0,5 bln UAH 3,7 bln UAH 7,3 bln UAH 14,9 bln UAH State support of hromada development and their infrastructure buildup increased by 30 times INDICATOR 6.1 18
  19. 19. 19 5,066 bln UAH distributed by the CMU. Incl. 333,5 mln. UAH for AH development 10446projects 5,085bln UAH are provisioned in the State Budget No. Oblast Distributed by the CMU Orders, mln UAH Number of the objects Transferred by MinFin, mln UAH 1 Vinnytsia 361,4 726 361,4 2 Volyn 162,0 347 162,0 3 Dnipropetrovsk 533,9 504 533,9 4 Donetsk 157,5 229 157,5 5 Zhytomyr 162,5 900 162,5 6 Zakarpattia 106,1 120 106,1 7 Zaporizhzhia 188,6 233 188,6 8 Ivano-Frankivsk 304,7 466 304,7 9 Kyiv 243,4 519 243,4 10 Kirovohrad 167,7 222 167,7 11 Luhansk 40,6 77 40,6 12 Lviv 288,9 784 286,9 13 Mykolaiv 144,6 418 144,6 14 Odessa 259,1 668 259,1 15 Poltava 176,2 378 176,2 16 Rivne 140,6 397 140,6 17 Sumy 180,0 591 180,0 18 Ternopil 85,7 216 85,7 19 Kharkiv 286,2 269 286,2 20 Kherson 115,3 174 115,3 21 Khmelnytskyi 197,3 484 197,3 22 Cherkasy 199,6 676 199,6 23 Chernivtsi 223,4 302 223,4 24 Chernihiv 211,9 595 211,9 25 Kyiv city 129,5 151 129,5 Total amount allocated 5 066,5 10446 5 064,5 Provisioned in the State Budget 5 085,0 Unallocated funds 18,5 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 361,4 162,0 533,9 157,5 162,5 106,1 188,6 304,7 243,4 167,7 40,6 288,9 144,6 259,1 176,2 140,6 180,0 85,7 286,2 115,3 197,3 199,6 223,4 211,9 129,5 Subvention allocation to regions for social and economic development of specific territories INDICATOR 6.2 STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT STATUS OF SUBVENTION ALLOCATION FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC TERRITORIES
  20. 20. 2046 (+162)* infrastructure projects STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT STATUS OF SUBVENTION ALLOCATION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE OF AHs BETWEEN PROJECTS 20 INDICATOR 6.3 * as compared to the previous month 366 AHs established in 2015-2016 1,492 (99,5%) (+0,031)* Bln UAH No Oblast Provisioned funds, thous. UAH Projects, approved by MinRegion No Amount, thous.UAH % of the provisioned subvention sum 1 Vinnytsia 45 705,6 55 45 671,8 99,9 2 Volyn 50 122,9 91 49 618,7 99,0 3 Dnipropetrovsk 135 017,0 147 134 992,7 100 4 Donetsk 41 845,9 31 41 845,9 100 5 Zhytomyr 155 132,4 217 153 406,0 98,9 6 Zakarpattia 14 551,8 20 14 551,8 100 7 Zaporizhzhia 70 918,8 104 70 680,5 99,7 8 Ivano-frankivsk 43 224,1 94 43 222,5 100 9 Kyiv 6 075,3 5 6 075,3 100 10 Kirovohrad 19 178,9 23 18 684,4 97,4 11 Luhansk 16 167,9 18 16 167,9 100 12 Lviv 63 497,2 118 63 468,4 100 13 Mykolaiv 90 567,0 116 90 168,6 99,6 14 Odessa 53 017,2 66 52 976,9 99,9 15 Poltava 59 161,9 100 58 109,7 98,2 16 Rivne 64 265,9 99 64 265,9 100 17 Sumy 54 607,4 72 54 319,9 99,5 18 Ternopil 115 491,2 166 113 328,1 98,1 19 Kharkiv 17 654,0 16 17 654,0 100 20 Kherson 52 113,8 78 52 076,1 99,9 21 Khmelnytskyi 167 031,2 215 166 408,7 99,6 22 Cherkasy 17 910,7 29 17 668,9 98,7 23 Chernivtsi 61 935,9 85 61 929,2 100 24 Chernihiv 84 806,0 81 84 788,9 100 TOTAL 1 500 000,0 2046 1 492 080,8 99,5 станом на 08.12.2017 99,9 99,0 100 100 98,9 100 99,7 100 100 97,4 100 100 99,6 99,9 98,2 100 99,5 98,1 100 99,9 99,6 98,7 100 100 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська % of the amount, distributed between projects, of the total subvention amount for AHs in the oblast
  21. 21. 3,5 bln UAH % of SFRD funds distributed between projects Provisioned SFRD funds in 2017 STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT STATUS OF DISTRIBUTION OF SFRD BETWEEN PROJECTS INDICATOR 6.4 21 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська м.Київ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 # Region Provisioned for project implementation, mln UAH Remaining undistribu ted funds, mln UAH*Total в т.ч. SFRD funds Local budget funds 1Vinnytsia 221 846,6 172 989,1 48 857,5 0,0 2Volyn 148 523,3 113 128,8 35 394,5 0,0 3Dnipropetrovsk 246 864,7 212 628,5 34 236,2 0,0 4Donetsk 312 150,7 279 137,4 33 013,3 0,0 5Zhytomyr 203 840,7 134 971,1 68 869,7 0,0 6Zakarpattia 169 199,1 136 726,6 32 472,5 0,0 7Zaporizhzhia 128 720,7 114 501,4 14 219,3 0,0 8Ivano-Frankivsk 179 863,4 149 822,7 30 040,7 0,0 9Kyiv 160 512,1 113 932,9 46 579,2 0,0 10Kirovohrad 71 674,4 63 599,0 8 075,4 0,0 11Luhansk 264 204,9 238 543,3 25 661,6 0,0 12Lviv 231 923,8 166 561,3 65 362,5 0,0 13Mykolaiv 90 818,9 75 692,9 15 125,9 0,0 14Odessa 205 499,3 156 838,4 48 660,9 0,0 15Poltava 174 665,6 93 889,3 80 776,3 0,0 16Rivne 150 993,5 126 104,6 24 889,0 0,0 17Sumy 174 385,0 120 089,7 54 295,3 0,0 18Ternopil 161 673,8 115 198,3 46 475,5 0,0 19Kharkiv 213 845,7 177 708,1 36 137,6 0,0 20Kherson 144 675,4 114 753,8 29 921,6 0,0 21Khmelnytskyi 186 281,9 139 812,5 46 469,4 0,0 22Cherkasy 118 627,2 81 135,3 37 492,0 0,0 23Chernivtsi 109 783,3 98 655,7 11 127,6 0,0 24Chernihiv 130 423,1 112 553,6 17 869,5 0,0 25 Kyiv city 467 456,6 191 025,7 276 430,9 0,0 TOTAL 4 668 453,8 3 500 000,0 1 168 453,8 0,0 *Note: the funds were fully allocated at the meetings of MinRegion commissions, which took place on 19.10.2017 (draft Order was sent to CMU for approval) and 30.11.2017 (draft Order was sent to central executive bodies for approval)
  22. 22. DECENTRALISATION IN EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT OF HUB SCHOOLS IN THE OBLASTS, INCLUDING IN AHs 457 (+7)* hub schools established, including 144 (+10)* — in AHs 24 Number of hub schools in the oblast (10) Number of hub schools in AHs 909 (+9)* hub school satellites, incl. 289 (+26) *— in AH 743 (+20)* school buses INDICATOR 7.1 22 * as compared to the previous month Ivano- FrankivskZakarpattia Lviv Volyn 24 (14) Rivne 0 Khmelnytskyi 15 (11) Zhytomyr 32 (18) Vinnytsia Odessa Mykolaiv Kherson Zaporizhzhia DnipropetrovskKirovohrad 7 (1) Kyiv 34 (0) Kyiv city Sumy 22 (5) Kharkiv Donetsk Crimea Ternopil Chernihiv Cherkasy Poltava 9 (8) 38 (3) 6 (1) 13 (7) 28 (10) 20 (9) 19 (2) 25 (7) 7 (4) 66 (6) 25 (10) 8 (0) 8 (2) 9 (6) 12 (5) 7 (2) Чернівецька Luhansk 23 (13) 1863 pupils with special training needs 480 (+7)* classes with inclusive education in hub schools 250 school buses are needed 36903 (+671)* pupils are taken to hub schools 2746 (+32)* classes with pupils number less than 10
  23. 23. 689 552 394 245 417 560 328 536 565 240 284 926 327 585 461 478 324 460 509 317 396 486 264 372 144 79 513 316 303 86 215 159 127 100 14 378 197 223 171 138 158 300 258 127 345 130 144 151 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні РДА заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні ОМС (міста обл. значення, ОТГ) DECENTRALISATION IN EDUCATION GENERAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS 10424 (-59)* (68,3%) 4845 (+17)* (31,7%) GEIs under control of LSG (cities of oblast significance, AHs) INDICATOR 7.2 23 general education institutions (GEI) under control of rayon administrations * as compared to the previous month # Oblast Number of GEIs Total including GEIs under control of rayon administratio ns Including GEIs under control of LSG (cities of oblast signifi-cance, AHs) 1 Vinnytsia 833 684 149 2 Volyn 635 534 101 3 Dnipropetrovsk 910 319 591 4 Donetsk 561 243 318 5 Zhytomyr 683 375 308 6 Zakarpattia 648 562 86 7 Zaporizhzhia 553 335 218 8 Ivano-frankivsk 692 533 159 9 Kyiv 681 552 129 10 Kirovohrad 348 248 100 11 Luhansk 292 278 14 12 Lviv 1216 891 325 13 Mykolaiv 524 337 187 14 Odessa 795 568 227 15 Poltava 607 434 173 16 Rivne 617 478 139 17 Sumy 476 321 155 18 Ternopil 758 459 299 19 Kharkiv 746 485 261 20 Kherson 441 300 141 21 Khmelnytskyi 730 391 339 22 Cherkasy 603 473 130 23 Chernivtsi 409 264 145 24 Chernihiv 511 360 151 TOTAL 15269 10424 4845 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська 82% 84% 35% 43% 55% 87% 61% 77% 81% 71% 95% 73% 64% 71% 71% 77% 67% 61% 65% 68% 54% 78% 65% 70% 18% 16% 65% 57% 45% 13% 39% 23% 19% 29% 5% 27% 36% 29% 29% 23% 33% 39% 35% 32% 46% 22% 35% 30% заклади освіти, що перебувають в управлінні РДА (%) заклади освіти, що перебувають в управлінні ОМС (міста обл. значення, ОТГ) (%) education institutions under control of rayon administrations (%) education institutions under control of LSG (city of oblast significance, AH) (%) Vinnytsia Volyn Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Zaporizhzhia Ivano-Frankivsk Kyiv Kirovohrad Luhansk Lviv Mykolaiv Odessa Poltava Rivne Sumy Ternopil Kharkiv Kherson Khmelnytskyi Cherkasy Chernivtsi Chernihiv
  24. 24. 689 552 394 245 417 560 328 536 565 240 284 926 327 585 461 478 324 460 509 317 396 486 264 372 144 79 513 316 303 86 215 159 127 100 14 378 197 223 171 138 158 300 258 127 345 130 144 151 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні РДА заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні ОМС (міста обл. значення, ОТГ) DECENTRALISATION IN EDUCATION GENERAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS INDICATOR 7.3 24 356 – GEIs were transferred to communal ownership of AHs 1911 general education institutions № Oblast Number of AHs Number of AHs that took GEIs into communal property The number of GEIs transferred to communal ownership of AHs The number of AHs that passed the educational subvention to the rayon budget 1 Vinnytsia 33 19 75 4 2 Volyn 39 16 98 0 3 Dnipropetrovsk 53 34 130 4 4 Donetsk 9 6 52 1 5 Zhytomyr 45 32 188 2 6 Zakarpattia 6 3 20 0 7 Zaporizhzhia 34 16 47 0 8 Ivano-frankivsk 20 11 72 0 9 Kyiv 6 2 8 0 10 Kirovohrad 13 4 15 0 11 Luhansk 8 2 14 1 12 Lviv 33 22 133 0 13 Mykolaiv 21 18 79 3 14 Odessa 23 10 47 1 15 Poltava 32 18 85 0 16 Rivne 24 18 83 0 17 Sumy 27 14 46 3 18 Ternopil 40 34 219 2 19 Kharkiv 12 4 21 0 20 Kherson 24 11 47 3 21 Khmelnytskyi 33 26 243 0 22 Cherkasy 24 6 21 4 23 Chernivtsi 22 14 83 0 24 Chernihiv 33 16 85 2 TOTAL 614 356 1911 30 33 39 53 9 45 6 34 20 6 13 8 33 21 23 32 24 27 40 12 24 33 24 22 33 19 16 34 6 32 3 16 11 2 4 2 22 18 10 18 18 14 34 4 11 26 6 14 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Кількість ОТГ Кількість ОТГ, що прийняли у комунальну власність загальноосвітні навчальні заклади Number of AHs Number of AHs which took ownership over general educational institutions (GEI)
  25. 25. DECENTRALISATION IN HEALTH CARE CREATING HOSPITAL DISTRICTS 25 4 (4) Oblasts where hospital districts (and hospital councils) were created and their number Oblasts where hospital districts haven’t been created 63 hospital districts 40 (+1)* hospital councils in 17regions INDICATOR 8 Ivano- Frankivsk Zakarpattia Lviv Volyn Rivne Khmelnytskyi Zhytomyr Vinnytsia Odessa Kherson Zaporizhzhia Dnipropetrovsk Kirovohrad Kyiv Kyiv city Sumy Kharkiv Donetsk Luhansk Crimea Ternopil Chernihiv Cherksay Poltava Chernivtsi 5 4 (4) 4 (4) 4 (1) 4 (4)4 (4) 4 (3) 3 (3)3 3 3 (3) 3 (3) 5 5 (5) 5 (4) 3 (2) 1 * as compared to the previous month 15 (+1)* plans of hospital district development in 7 oblasts Mykolaiv
  26. 26. out of 787 cities of oblast significance and AHs only 88(+1)*LSG were delegated powers in architecture and construction control incl. 9 AHs were delegated powers in architecture and construction control DECENTRALISATION IN ARCHITECTURE CONTROL TRANSFER OF POWERS TO HROMADAS INDICATOR 9 26* as compared to the previous month % of LSGs in the oblast (cities of oblast significance and ATCs), which were delegated powers in architecture and construction control 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська м.Київ 10% 2% 15% 19% 6% 9% 5% 19% 74% 12% 5% 10% 4% 23% 11% 4% 6% 5% 21% 7% 13% 7% 8% 3% 100% Vinnytsia Volyn Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Zaporizhzhia Ivano-Frankivsk Kyiv Kirovohrad Luhansk Lviv Mykolaiv Odessa Poltava Rivne Sumy Ternopil Kharkiv Kherson Khmelnytskyi Cherkasy Chernivtsi Chernihiv Kyivcity № Oblast Cities of oblast significan ce AHs Number of LSGs, which received authority in the field of architectural and construction control Dynamics (+) to the previous period cities of oblast significa nce Village, settlement and town councils with popula-tion less than 50 thous. Total LSG Incl. AHs 1 Vinnytsia 6 33 3 1 4 1 - 2 Volyn 4 39 1 1 - 3 Dnipropetrovsk 13 53 6 4 10 3 - 4 Donetsk 27 9 7 7 1 - 5 Zhytomyr 5 45 2 1 3 1 - 6 Zakarpattia 5 6 1 1 - 7 Zaporizhzhia 5 34 2 2 - 8 Ivano-frankivsk 6 20 3 2 5 - 9 Kyiv 13 6 7 7 14 - 10 Kirovohrad 4 13 2 2 - 11 Luhansk 14 8 1 1 - 12 Lviv 9 33 3 1 4 - 13 Mykolaiv 5 21 1 1 - 14 Odessa 7 23 6 1 7 2 - 15 Poltava 6 32 2 2 4 - 16 Rivne 4 24 1 1 - 17 Sumy 7 27 2 2 - 18 Ternopil 4 40 2 2 1 19 Kharkiv 7 12 3 1 4 - 20 Kherson 4 24 2 2 - 21 Khmelnytskyi 6 33 5 5 - 22 Cherkasy 6 24 2 2 - 23 Chernivtsi 2 22 1 1 2 1 - 24 Chernihiv 4 33 1 1 - 25 Kyiv city 1 1 1 - TOTAL 173 614 67 21 88 9 1
  27. 27. INDICATOR 10DECENTRALISATION IN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROVISION 27 For 3 q. of 2017: +42 new Centres and regional subdivisions 51 ASCs already operate in AHs 723 Distribution of ASCs between authorities which established them Ivano- Frankivsk Zakarpattia Lviv Volyn Rivne Khmelnytskyi Zhytomyr Odessa Mykolaiv Kherson Zaporizhzhia DnipropetrovskKirovohrad Kyiv Kyiv city Sumy Kharkiv Donetsk Luhansk Crimea Ternopil Chernihiv Cherkasy Poltava Chernivtsi 22 40 27 Vinnytsia 18 40 25 24 21 33 37 17 41 24 22 33 285625 29 32 25 45 17 15 27 - total number of created ASCs 468 — Rayon state administrations 65 — Oblast centres and Kyiv city 133 — Cities of oblast significance 57 — other LSG (incl. 48 — in AHs) 723
  28. 28. DECENTRALISATION IN SOCIAL POLICY 40 Regional social services centres, established by AHs 1 Social services division, social care division, social services provision sectors in AHs (3) Social services centres for families, children and youth 428 positions of social workers in 216 AHs INDICATOR 11 28 Oblast No of AHs Submission of documents for for assignment of all types of social support CreationofremoteworkplacesbyPension Fundforprovisionofpensionservices (numberofAHs)* Social services imrovement introduction of social workers into the staffing structure Performing the functions of controlling compliance with labour law** Protection of children rights in executive bodies of city, settlement and village councils of AHs Noofpersonswhich performthefunctions Noofstarostaswhich performthefunctions NoofAHs Noofexperts Nooflabour inspectors Creationofchildren’s affairsoffices Noofpublicofficials delegatedthepowers (incaseoffailureto createoffices) Vinnytsia 33 0 33 16 14 23 8 0 15 Volyn 39 27 39 8 10 10 2 0 12 Dnipropetrovsk 53 56 17 17 20 40 6 4 32 Donetsk 9 24 13 4 5 30 3 2 2 Zhytomyr 45 154 170 11 13 20 1 6 25 Zakarpattia 6 6 8 3 0 0 4 0 11 Zaporizhzhia 34 23 26 10 12 22 2 0 14 Ivano-frankivsk 20 11 35 3 10 29 2 2 6 Kyiv 6 6 5 2 2 2 - 4 2 Kirovohrad 13 21 20 3 3 9 - 2 10 Luhansk 8 7 27 0 3 5 - 0 0 Lviv 33 37 44 23 12 12 6 0 16 Mykolaiv 21 60 7 13 9 31 - 1 14 Odessa 23 18 33 6 3 5 1 13 5 Poltava 32 42 31 4 9 13 2 0 0 Rivne 24 42 39 6 13 19 2 0 8 Sumy 27 64 35 15 5 5 3 7 4 Ternopil 40 15 43 14 21 21 - 0 11 Kharkiv 12 13 24 1 4 16 3 0 10 Kherson 24 40 32 12 9 24 4 0 21 Khmelnytskyi 33 60 238 16 10 26 3 1 20 Cherkasy 24 5 0 8 5 8 2 0 2 Chernivtsi 22 41 23 10 16 49 4 1 16 Chernihiv 33 13 14 9 8 9 1 2 11 Kyiv city 614 785 956 214 216 428 59 45 267 * - according to data of Pension Fund ** - according to data of State Labour Service Kherson 1 Zaporizhzhia 4 Dnipropetrovsk 1 Kharkiv 3 Donetsk (1) Luhansk Odessa 1 Kirovohrad 1 (1) Sumy 1 Cherkasy Poltava 1 (2) Mykolaiv 10 Kyiv 1 Chernihiv (1) Ivano- Frankivsk 3Zakarpattia 1 Lviv 1 (1) Volyn Rivne (1) Khmelnytskyi 4 (3) Zhytomyr 16 (2) Vinnytsia Ternopil (1) Chernivtsi Crimea 175 labour inspectors of LSGs, out of those 59 in AHs

×