Bark & co solicitors

493 views

Published on

It is reported that the Met Police will now investigate a News of The World link concerning the Daniel Morgan Murder (R v Vian & Others).
Details reported [here] in the Guardian
Mr Glen Vian, represented by Bark & Co, was acquitted in March 2011.
Fred Bunn has been instructed by Glenn Vian since the mid-2008. Not guilty verdicts were entered against MrVian and the other defendants, following complex and fiercely fought challenges to the Crown’s case during protracted pre-trial legal argument. The initial investigation into the murder of Daniel Morgan in 1987 was deeply flawed, and many compelling leads were not pursued properly or, in some cases, at all. The level of public resources expended in this most recent investigation is simply breathtaking. The Police bought the house next door to Mr Vian, in order to conduct thousands of hours of intrusive covert surveillance upon him and his family. They released false stories to the press in an effort to trigger incriminating conversations. When these efforts failed to produce any cogent evidence, a case was built against these defendants using “Supergrass” witnesses, and considerably flawed Serious Organized Crime & Police Act (SOCPA) agreements.

Published in: Business
4 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Good Examine and fascinating.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Cool. can I share this post to my blog? I'd appreciate it. Cheers!
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • it is so commendable hence I am going to bookmark it
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • I can see that you simply are putting a plenty of efforts into your blog.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
493
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
4
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Bark & co solicitors

  1. 1. BARK & CO SOLICITORS LONDON NEWS MET POLICE REVIEW DANIEL MORGAN MURDER OVER NEWS OF THE WORLD LINK, BARK & CO SOLICITORS LONDON, FRED BUNN, BARK AND CO SOLICITORS LONDON, GILES BARK JONESIt is reported that the Met Police will now investigate a News of TheWorld link concerning the Daniel Morgan Murder (R v Vian &Others).Details reported [here] in the GuardianMr Glen Vian, represented by Bark & Co, was acquitted in March2011.Fred Bunn has been instructed by Glenn Vian since the mid-2008. Not guilty verdicts were entered against MrVian and the otherdefendants, following complex and fiercely fought challenges to theCrown’s case during protracted pre-trial legal argument.
  2. 2. The initial investigation into the murder of Daniel Morgan in1987 was deeply flawed, and many compelling leads were notpursued properly or, in some cases, at all. The level of publicresources expended in this most recent investigation is simplybreathtaking. The Police bought the house next door toMr Vian, in order to conduct thousands of hours of intrusivecovert surveillance upon him and his family.
  3. 3. They released false stories to the press in an effort to trigger incriminatingconversations. When these efforts failed to produce any cogent evidence,a case was built against these defendants using “Supergrass” witnesses,and considerably flawed Serious Organized Crime & Police Act (SOCPA)agreements. It will come as no surprise to right thinking people to learnthat those of the worst character, facing many years in custody for crimesincluding drug trafficking and attempted murder, will say anything inorder to secure a massive reduction in their sentence and/or substantialfinancial benefits.
  4. 4. The position is very much worse where, as in this case, aSOCPA witness is told in advance what the case theory is, and simplyhas to repeat it to gain his reward. The defense has, in the course ofpre-trial legal arguments, been able to discredit the Crown’s case sothat, one by one, the evidence of these witnesses has been excludedby the trial Judge or abandoned by the Crown.
  5. 5. The recent legal arguments which preceded the collapse of the case were led byour defense team, based on a document found in the unused material by a solicitorof this firm.

×