Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Summer Work

379 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Summer Work

  1. 1. Brain Atlas Dan Diner
  2. 2. Introduction <ul><li>PET is a nuclear </li></ul><ul><li>imaging technique </li></ul><ul><li>A radiotracer is injected into subject, and the signal that it sends off is captured and measured to find out how much activity occurs and where </li></ul><ul><li>The information that is collected is used for brain study, and disorder analysis and diagnosis </li></ul>
  3. 3. ROI/VOI Mapping <ul><li>ROIs(Regions of Interest) are small regions mapped onto brains </li></ul><ul><li>Most common way of mapping is manual </li></ul><ul><li>Manual mapping is very time-consuming and requires highly-paid personnel (raters) </li></ul><ul><li>Raters have inter- and intra- subject variation </li></ul><ul><li>As PET scan quality increases, so does the time it takes for raters to do their job </li></ul>
  4. 4. <ul><li>PET has very poor spatial resolution </li></ul><ul><li>MRI has very high spatial resolution </li></ul><ul><li>ROIs are therefore mapped onto the MRI of a subject, onto which the PET scan is co-registered </li></ul>
  5. 5. MRI PET Co-Registered
  6. 6. Brain Atlases <ul><li>An “average brain” (co-registered PET/MRI) </li></ul><ul><li>Has all VOIs labeled manually onto it </li></ul><ul><li>These automated methods have been developed to label VOIs (Volumes of Interest) </li></ul><ul><li>Never have been as accurate as manual methods </li></ul><ul><li>Very precise - have no inter- or intra- subject variation </li></ul><ul><li>Take drastically less time to label a brain than manual methods </li></ul>
  7. 7. Brain Atlases <ul><li>Many imaging labs have their own, but we could not use another labs’ because each lab has different MRI acquisition and labeling techniques </li></ul><ul><li>Can be single- or multiple- subject template </li></ul><ul><li>Could be made for only one specific region or many </li></ul><ul><li>Probabilistic atlases tell you the probability of a certain voxel belonging to a certain ROI </li></ul>
  8. 8. Methods and M aterials: Subject and Image Acquisition <ul><li>MRIs and PETs from 176 subjects of past studies </li></ul><ul><li>123 from a 1.5 Tesla MRI </li></ul><ul><li>53 from a 3.0 Tesla </li></ul>
  9. 9. Image Analysis Setup <ul><li>Worked on a PowerMac G5 using Mac OS X 10.5.4 Leopard </li></ul><ul><li>Major Software used: </li></ul><ul><li>Matlab (R2007a) </li></ul><ul><li>FSLVIEW and FLIRT </li></ul><ul><li>ART </li></ul><ul><li>iView </li></ul>
  10. 10. Image Pre-Processing <ul><li>Raw MRI files were </li></ul><ul><li>copied to a common </li></ul><ul><li>folder </li></ul>
  11. 11. <ul><li>Previously made Gray Matter, </li></ul><ul><li>White Matter, and Cerebral Spinal Fluid Masks were multiplied(matrix multiplication) against the raw </li></ul><ul><li>files to get rid of all extraneous </li></ul><ul><li>material (neck, skull, dura matter) </li></ul>
  12. 14. <ul><li>Used iView to compare new images against raw ones </li></ul><ul><li>We did this to ensure that all extraneous material was gone and that no brain was accidentally segmented </li></ul><ul><li>I used a scale of 0-3 to rate the new images (0= perfect, 1=some dura, 2=much dura, 3=segmented brain) </li></ul><ul><li>Most images were 0s and 1s. </li></ul>
  13. 16. Normalization Procedure <ul><li>MNI template to which were were normalizing was reoriented towards raw MRI native space </li></ul><ul><li>New MRI images also normalized to this template </li></ul><ul><li>We examined the normalized images, and found that some were very well aligned, but others were misplaced or improperly warped </li></ul>
  14. 17. <ul><li>ART uses a 2-step process to warp MRIs: linear registration, then warp </li></ul><ul><li>Linear registration is rotations </li></ul><ul><li>Warping is dilations </li></ul><ul><li>Because the rotation was bad, we thought that the linear registration had gone wrong </li></ul><ul><li>We tried linear registration(first 9 Degrees of Freedom) with FLIRT, and then warping(up to 12 dof) with ART </li></ul>
  15. 18. <ul><li>The rotations came out looking good, but close inspection revealed that some leftover dura got warped into the new brain </li></ul>
  16. 19. <ul><li>An MRI with a particularly large amount of dura was manually cleaned, and then had FLIRT and ART run on it </li></ul><ul><li>The resulting image was perfect </li></ul>
  17. 20. Conclusion <ul><li>ART is very sensitive to extraneous material </li></ul><ul><li>all dura needs to be properly removed from all images before normalization </li></ul><ul><li>A better automatic method for cleaning up dura needs to be developed </li></ul>

×