Admin Overview Red Creek Dec 09


Published on

Learn about RTI.

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Admin Overview Red Creek Dec 09

  1. 1. RTI for Administrators: Preparing for Systems-Level Change Jim Wright
  2. 2. RTI & Literacy Interventions: Shakedown Cruise <ul><li>Definition: “a period of testing or a trial journey undergone by a ship, aircraft or other craft and its crew before being declared operational.” </li></ul>Source: Shakedown cruise. Wikipedia. Retrieved from
  3. 3. RTI Institute: Administrator Strand: Workshop Agenda RTI Overview Systems Change & Reluctant Teachers Web Resources to Support RTI Implementation
  4. 4. RTI Assumption: Struggling Students Are ‘Typical’ Until Proven Otherwise… <ul><li>RTI logic assumes that: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A student who begins to struggle in general education is typical , and that </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>It is general education’s responsibility to find the instructional strategies that will unlock the student’s learning potential </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Only when the student shows through well-documented interventions that he or she has ‘failed to respond to intervention’ does RTI begin to investigate the possibility that the student may have a learning disability or other special education condition. </li></ul>
  5. 5. RTI ‘Pyramid of Interventions’ Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 1: Universal interventions. Available to all students in a classroom or school. Can consist of whole-group or individual strategies or supports. Tier 2 Individualized interventions. Subset of students receive interventions targeting specific needs. Tier 3: Intensive interventions. Students who are ‘non-responders’ to Tiers I & II may be eligible for special education services, intensive interventions.
  6. 6. Tier I Instruction/Interventions <ul><li>Tier I instruction/interventions: </li></ul><ul><li>Are universal—available to all students. </li></ul><ul><li>Can be delivered within classrooms or throughout the school. </li></ul><ul><li>Are likely to be put into place by the teacher at the first sign that a student is struggling. </li></ul><ul><li>All children have access to Tier 1 instruction/interventions. Teachers have the capability to use those strategies without requiring outside assistance. </li></ul><ul><li>Tier 1 instruction/interventions encompass: </li></ul><ul><li>The school’s core curriculum and all published or teacher-made materials used to deliver that curriculum. </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher use of ‘whole-group’ teaching & management strategies. </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher use of individualized strategies with specific students. </li></ul><ul><li>Tier I instruction/interventions attempt to answer the question: Are classroom instructional strategies & supports sufficient to help the student to achieve academic success? </li></ul>
  7. 7. Tier 1: Classroom-Level Interventions <ul><li>Decision Point: Student is struggling and may face significant high-stakes negative outcome if situation does not improve. </li></ul><ul><li>Collaboration Opportunity: Teacher can refer the student to a grade-level, instruction team, or department meeting to brainstorm ideas – OR – teacher seeks out consultant in school to brainstorm intervention ideas. </li></ul><ul><li>Documentation: Teacher completes ‘Classroom Intervention Form’ prior to carrying out intervention. Teacher collects classroom data. </li></ul><ul><li>Decision Rule [Example]: Teacher should refer student to the next level of RTI support if the intervention is not successful within 8 instructional weeks. </li></ul>
  8. 8.
  9. 9. Complementary RTI Models: Standard Treatment & Problem-Solving Protocols <ul><li>“ The two most commonly used RTI approaches are (1) standard treatment and (2) problem-solving protocol. While these two approaches to RTI are sometimes described as being very different from each other, they actually have several common elements, and both fit within a problem-solving framework. In practice, many schools and districts combine or blend aspects of the two approaches to fit their needs.” </li></ul>Source: Duffy, H. (August 2007). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school . Washington, DC: National High School Center. Retrieved from p. 5
  10. 10. RTI Interventions: Standard-Treatment vs. Problem-Solving There are two different vehicles that schools can use to deliver RTI interventions: Standard-Protocol (Standalone Intervention). Programs based on scientifically valid instructional practices (‘standard protocol’) are created to address frequent student referral concerns. These services are provided outside of the classroom. A middle school, for example, may set up a structured math-tutoring program staffed by adult volunteer tutors to provide assistance to students with limited math skills. Students referred for a Tier II math intervention would be placed in this tutoring program. An advantage of the standard-protocol approach is that it is efficient and consistent: large numbers of students can be put into these group interventions to receive a highly standardized intervention. However, standard group intervention protocols often cannot be individualized easily to accommodate a specific student’s unique needs. Problem-solving (Classroom-Based Intervention). Individualized research-based interventions match the profile of a particular student’s strengths and limitations. The classroom teacher often has a large role in carrying out these interventions. A plus of the problem-solving approach is that the intervention can be customized to the student’s needs. However, developing intervention plans for individual students can be time-consuming.
  11. 11. Tier 2: Supplemental (Standard-Protocol Model) Interventions <ul><li>Tier 2 interventions are typically delivered in small-group format. About 15% of students in the typical school will require Tier 2/supplemental intervention support. </li></ul><ul><li>Group size for Tier 2 interventions is limited to 4-6 students. Students placed in Tier 2 interventions should have a shared profile of intervention need. </li></ul><ul><li>The reading progress of students in Tier 2 interventions are monitored at least 1-2 times per month. </li></ul>Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools . Routledge: New York.
  12. 12. Tier 2: Supplemental Interventions <ul><li>Decision Point: Building-wide academic screenings </li></ul><ul><li>Collaboration Opportunity: After each building-wide academic screening, ‘data teams’ meet (teachers at a grade level; building principal; reading teacher, etc.) At the meeting, the group considers how the assessment data should shape/inform core instruction. Additionally, the data team sets a cutpoint to determine which students should be recruited for Tier 2 group interventions. NOTE: Team may continue to meet every 5 weeks to consider student progress in Tier 2; move students into and out of groups. </li></ul><ul><li>Documentation: Tier 2 instructor completes a Tier 2 Group Assignment Sheet listing students and their corresponding interventions. Progress-monitoring occurs 1-2 times per month. </li></ul><ul><li>Decision Rules [Example]: Student is returned to Tier 1 support if they perform above the 25 th percentile in the next school-wide screening. Student is referred to Tier 3 (RTI Team) if they fail to make expected progress despite two Tier 2 (group-based) interventions. </li></ul>
  13. 13.
  14. 14. Scheduling Elementary Tier 2 Interventions Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices. New York: Routledge. Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Grade K Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Grade 1 Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Grade 2 Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Grade 3 Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Grade 4 Classroom 1 Classroom 2 Classroom 3 Grade 5 Anyplace Elementary School: RTI Daily Schedule Option 3: ‘Floating RTI’:Gradewide Shared Schedule . Each grade has a scheduled RTI time across classrooms. No two grades share the same RTI time. Advantages are that outside providers can move from grade to grade providing push-in or pull-out services and that students can be grouped by need across different teachers within the grade. 9:00-9:30 9:45-10:15 10:30-11:00 12:30-1:00 1:15-1:45 2:00-2:30
  15. 15. Tier 3: Intensive Individualized Interventions (Problem-Solving Model) <ul><li>Tier 3 interventions are the most intensive offered in a school setting. About 5 % of a general-education student population may qualify for Tier 3 supports. Typically, the RTI Problem-Solving Team meets to develop intervention plans for Tier 3 students. </li></ul><ul><li>Students qualify for Tier 3 interventions because: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>they are found to have a large skill gap when compared to their class or grade peers; and/or </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They did not respond to interventions provided previously at Tiers 1 & 2. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Tier 3 interventions are provided daily for sessions of 30 minutes. The student-teacher ratio is flexible but should allow the student to receive intensive, individualized instruction. The academic or behavioral progress of students in Tier 3 interventions is monitored at least weekly. </li></ul>Source: Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools . Routledge: New York.
  16. 16. Tier 3: RTI Team <ul><li>Decision Point: RTI Problem-Solving Team </li></ul><ul><li>Collaboration Opportunity: Weekly RTI Problem-Solving Team meetings are scheduled to handle referrals of students that failed to respond to interventions from Tiers 1 & 2. </li></ul><ul><li>Documentation: Teacher referral form; RTI Team minutes form; progress-monitoring data collected at least weekly. </li></ul><ul><li>Decision Rules [Example]: If student has failed to respond adequately to 3 intervention trials of 6-8 weeks (from Tiers 2 and 3), the student may be referred to Special Education. </li></ul>
  17. 17.
  18. 18. Advancing Through RTI: Flexibility in the Tiers <ul><li>For purposes of efficiency, students should be placed in small-group instruction at Tier 2. </li></ul><ul><li>However, group interventions may not always be possible because –due to scheduling or other issues—no group is available. (For example, students with RTI behavioral referrals may not have a group intervention available.) </li></ul><ul><li>In such a case, the student will go directly to the problem-solving process (Tier 3)—typically through a referral to the school RTI Team. </li></ul><ul><li>Nonetheless, the school must still document the same minimum number of interventions attempted for every student in RTI, whether or not a student first received interventions in a group setting. </li></ul>
  19. 19. Target Student ‘ Dual-Discrepancy’: RTI Model of Learning Disability (Fuchs 2003) Discrepancy 1: Skill Gap (Current Performance Level) Avg Classroom Academic Performance Level Discrepancy 2: Gap in Rate of Learning (‘Slope of Improvement’)
  20. 20. Implementing Response to Intervention in Secondary Schools: Key Challenges to Changing a System Jim Wright
  21. 21. RTI: Research Questions <ul><li>Q: What Conditions Support the Successful Implementation of RTI? </li></ul><ul><li>RTI requires: </li></ul><ul><li>Continuing professional development to give teachers the skills to implement RTI and educate new staff because of personnel turnover. </li></ul><ul><li>Administrators who assert leadership under RTI, including setting staff expectations for RTI implementation, find the needed resources, and monitor the fidelity of implementation. </li></ul><ul><li>Proactive hiring of teachers who support the principles of RTI and have the skills to put RTI into practice in the classroom. </li></ul><ul><li>The changing of job roles of teachers and support staff (school psychologists, reading specialists, special educators, etc.) to support the RTI model. </li></ul><ul><li>Input from teachers and support staff (‘bottom-up’) about how to make RTI work in the school or district, as well as guidance from administration (‘top-down’). </li></ul>Source: Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn’t be afraid to ask).. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 129–136.
  22. 22. Systems-Level Factors That Can Influence Failure of Students to Graduate <ul><li>“… many [models of dropout prevention] fail to recognize the role that school environmental factors play in school droput. For example, large school size is positively correlated with decreased attendance, lower grade point averages and standardized test scores, higher dropout rates, and higher crime than smaller schools serving similar children. School practices, such as tracking and grade retention, have a negative correlation with school completion rates independent of the student’s ability level. Other school-related factors such as high concentrations of low-achieving students and less qualified teachers are also associated with higher dropout rates.” </li></ul>Source: Jimerson, S. R., Reschly, A. L., & Hess, R. S. (2008). Best practices in developing academic local norms. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1085-1097). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. p. 1089
  23. 23. Preventing Your School from Developing ‘RTI Antibodies’ <ul><li>Schools can anticipate and take steps to address challenges to RTI implementation in schools </li></ul><ul><li>This proactive stance toward RTI adoption will reduce the probability that the ‘host’ school or district will reject RTI as a model </li></ul>
  24. 24. Middle & High School RTI: Targeting the Reform of Classroom Practices <ul><li>“ Restructuring efforts that appear promising are those that focus on changing what happens within classrooms, specifically on improving curriculum and instruction; however, programs typically welcomed by districts are those that accommodate the district and school.” </li></ul>Source: Jimerson, S. R., Reschly, A. L., & Hess, R. S. (2008). Best practices in developing academic local norms. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1085-1097). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. p.1090
  25. 25. Role of ‘School Culture’ in the Acceptability of Interventions <ul><li>“… school staffs are interested in strategies that fit a group instructional and management template; intensive strategies required by at-risk and poorly motivated students are often viewed as cost ineffective. Treatments and interventions that do not address the primary mission of schooling are seen as a poor match to school priorities and are likely to be rejected. Thus, intervention and management approaches that are universal in nature and that involve a standard dosage that is easy to deliver (e.g., classwide social skills training) have a higher likelihood of making it into routine or standard school practice.” </li></ul>Source: Walker, H. M. (2004). Use of evidence-based interventions in schools: Where we've been, where we are, and where we need to go. School Psychology Review, 33, 398-407. pp. 400-401
  26. 26. Engaging the Reluctant Teacher: Seven Reasons Why Instructors May Be Reluctant to Implement Classroom (Tier 1) RTI Interventions Jim Wright
  27. 27. ‘ Teacher Tolerance’ as an Indicator of RTI Intervention Capacity <ul><li>“ I call the range of students whom [teachers] come to view as adequately responsive – i.e., teachable – as the tolerance; those who are perceived to be outside the tolerance are those for whom teachers seek additional resources. The term “tolerance” is used to indicate that teachers form a permissible boundary on their measurement (judgments) in the same sense as a confidence interval. In this case, the teacher actively measures the distribution of responsiveness in her class by processing information from a series of teaching trials and perceives some range of students as within the tolerance.” (Gerber, 2002) </li></ul>Source: Gerber, M. M. (2003). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities . Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
  28. 28. Engaging the Reluctant Teacher: Seven Reasons Why Instructors May Resist Implementing Classroom RTI Interventions <ul><li>Teachers believe that their ‘job’ is to provide content-area instruction, not to implement individual interventions (Kamil et al., 2008). </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers believe that they lack the skills to implement classroom academic or behavioral strategies. (Fisher, 2007; Kamil et al., 2008). </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers feel that they don’t have adequate time to implement academic or behavioral interventions in the classroom. (Kamil et al., 2008; Walker, 2004). </li></ul>
  29. 29. Engaging the Reluctant Teacher: Seven Reasons Why Instructors May Resist Implementing Classroom RTI Interventions (Cont.) <ul><li>Teachers are not convinced that there will be an adequate instructional ‘pay-off’ in their content-area if they implement individual intervention strategies in the classroom (Kamil et al., 2008). </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers are reluctant to put extra effort into implementing interventions for students who appear unmotivated (Walker, 2004) when there are other, ‘more deserving’ students who would benefit from teacher attention. </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers are afraid that, if they use a range of classroom strategies (e.g., guided discussion) to promote academic skills, they will have difficulty managing classroom behaviors (Kamil et al., 2008). </li></ul>
  30. 30. Engaging the Reluctant Teacher: Seven Reasons Why Instructors May Resist Implementing Classroom RTI Interventions (Cont.) <ul><li>Teachers believe that ‘special education is magic’ (Martens, 1993). This belief implies that general education interventions will be insufficient to meet the student’s needs and that the student will benefit only if he or she receives special education services. </li></ul>
  31. 31. ‘ Scaling Up’: Four Stages of RTI Development Jim Wright
  32. 32. RTI Development: Four Stages of ‘Scaling Up’ <ul><li>Preparation. Planning activities & creating readiness in the school system for the RTI component. </li></ul><ul><li>Initial Implementation. Bringing the component into the school setting. </li></ul><ul><li>Institutionalization. Institutionalizing the RTI component as a part of routine school and district practices. </li></ul><ul><li>Ongoing Development/Updating. Ensuring that the RTI component stays current with changing revisions in state and federal guidelines and emerging findings in RTI research. </li></ul>Source: Ervin, R. A., & Schaughency, E. (2008). Best practices in accessing the systems change literature. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 853-873). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  33. 33. RTI Steering Committee: Using the Four Stages of ‘Scaling Up’ in Planning <ul><li>First, the RTI Steering Committee selects a series of ‘RTI Implementation Goals.’ These goals should be more general, global goals that will require attention through all stages of the RTI implementation process. </li></ul><ul><li>The RTI Steering Committee then takes each of the general RTI Implementation Goals and breaks the global goal into a series of specific subtasks. Subtasks are sorted by stage of implementation. </li></ul>
  34. 34.
  35. 35. RTI Implementation Planning Sheet: Example <ul><li>Stage 1: Preparation: List any preparation steps such as development of materials or staff training. </li></ul><ul><li>Examples of Preparation Tasks: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Download and preview DIBELS training materials from the official DIBELS website (” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Select district-level DIBELS trainers.” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Schedule sessions to train classroom teachers in grades K-4 to administer DIBELS assessments appropriate to their grade level.” </li></ul></ul>
  36. 36. RTI Implementation Planning Sheet: Example <ul><li>Stage 2: Initial Implementation: Describe the tasks required to actually implement the goal. </li></ul><ul><li>Examples of Initial Implementation Tasks: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Meet with the principal to schedule 3 DIBELS benchmarking days (fall/winter/spring) across the school year.” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Create DIBELS team of school-wide personnel to assist classroom teachers to collect DIBELS data on benchmarking days ” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Schedule grade-level data meetings at which teachers review DIBELS benchmarking data to determine which students will require more intensive intervention services for reading delays.” </li></ul></ul>
  37. 37. RTI Implementation Planning Sheet: Example <ul><li>Stage 3: Institutionalization: Once the goal is initially carried out successfully, devise a plan to weave various activities that support the goal into the day-to-day institutional routine of the school. </li></ul><ul><li>Examples of Institutionalization Tasks: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Set guidelines for classroom teachers to independently collect DIBELS data on any student falling significantly below grade level in reading skills and use that data to develop individualized reading interventions at Tier 1.” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Revise the elementary school report card format to allow for the entry of DIBELS benchmarking data.” </li></ul></ul>
  38. 38. RTI Implementation Planning Sheet: Example <ul><li>Stage 4: Ongoing Development/Updating: The RTI model is steadily evolving as new research indicates better methods for data collection, intervention planning, etc. The RTI Implementation Plan should include Ongoing Development/Updating tasks--ongoing activities to ensure that the district’s practices confirm to best practices over time. </li></ul><ul><li>Examples of Ongoing Development/Updating Tasks: </li></ul><ul><li>“ Monitor the DIBELS website ( on a regular basis to ensure that district DIBELS monitoring practices align with those recommended by DIBELS developers.” </li></ul><ul><li>“ Monitor DIBELS research published in peer-reviewed education journals to track DIBELS standing in the research community as an RTI progress-monitoring tool.” </li></ul><ul><li>“ Visit the National Center on Student Progress Monitoring website ( regularly to stay abreast of the site’s rating of DIBELS materials in comparison to similar progress-monitoring materials from other organizations or companies.” </li></ul>
  39. 39. Two recommended RTI websites <ul><li>New York State RTI Technical Assistance Center: </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>National Center on RTI </li></ul>
  40. 40. Ideas to Build Teacher Understanding and Support for RTI Jim Wright
  41. 41. <ul><li>Offer RTI information to teachers in a series of short presentations or discussion forums </li></ul><ul><li>A common mistake that schools make in rolling out RTI is to present their teachers with RTI information in a single, long presentation—with little opportunity for questions or discussion. Instead, schools should plan a series of RTI information-sharing sessions with teachers throughout the school year. Any large-group RTI training sessions (e.g., at faculty meetings) should be kept short, to ensure that the audience is not overwhelmed with large volumes of information. Consider using smaller instructional team or department meetings as a vehicle for follow-up presentations, discussion, and teacher questions about RTI. </li></ul>
  42. 42. <ul><li>Offer RTI information to teachers in a series of short presentations or discussion forums </li></ul><ul><li>ACTION STEP: Create a year-long RTI information-sharing plan. Determine what RTI information your school would like to present to staff, as well as the degree of faculty input and discussion needed. Then draft a year-long plan to communicate with staff about RTI. Each year, update the plan to keep faculty updated about implementation of the RTI model. </li></ul>
  43. 43. <ul><li>Present RTI as a coordinated, schoolwide approach to address long-standing teacher concerns about struggling students </li></ul><ul><li>Schools should consider framing RTI as a broad, schoolwide solution to help teachers to better instruct, motivate, and manage the behaviors of struggling learners. Teachers want fewer class disruptions, more uninterrupted instructional time, higher performing students, targeted supplemental academic help for students who need it, and better communication among educators about the needs of all students. As schools make the case for RTI, they should demonstrate how it will help teachers to manage the day-to-day challenges that they face in their classrooms. </li></ul>
  44. 44. <ul><li>ACTION STEP: Get feedback from teachers about their classroom concerns. Find opportunities to engage teachers in productive discussions about what they see as the greatest challenges facing them as instructors. Note the teacher concerns that surface most often. For each teacher concern, generate ideas for how an RTI model in your school might help teachers with that issue. Craft these ideas for instructor support into ‘talking points’ and include them in your school’s RTI presentations. </li></ul><ul><li>Present RTI as a coordinated, schoolwide approach to address long-standing teacher concerns about struggling students </li></ul>
  45. 45. <ul><li>Solicit teacher input when building your school’s RTI model </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers are a valuable resource that schools should tap when implementing RTI. When schools solicit teacher questions about RTI, include teachers on planning teams to help to develop the RTI process, and treat teacher objections or concerns about RTI as helpful feedback rather than stubborn resistance, those schools send the message that teachers are full partners in the RTI planning process. </li></ul>
  46. 46. <ul><li>ACTION STEP: Include teachers on the RTI Leadership Team. One of the best ways to ensure that teachers have input into the RTI development process is to include teacher representatives on the RTI Leadership Team, the group that oversees the district’s implementation of RTI. </li></ul><ul><li>Solicit teacher input when building your school’s RTI model </li></ul>
  47. 47. <ul><li>Link all significant school and district initiatives to RTI </li></ul><ul><li>RTI is a comprehensive, proactive model to identify and assist struggling students. Yet teachers may erroneously perceive RTI as just another ‘program’ that is likely to last for only a short time and then disappear. Any RTI training for staff should make the point that RTI is not a single-self contained program but is actually an all-inclusive and flexible framework for student support that encompasses all existing student support programs and strategies. </li></ul>
  48. 48. <ul><li>ACTION STEP: Organized all school programs under the RTI framework. Schools should present RTI as an elastic multi-tier problem-solving framework. First, the school lists all of its significant current programs or initiatives intended to assess or intervene with students with academic or behavioral needs. The school then assigns each of the programs or initiatives to Tier 1, 2, or 3 in the RTI framework. The message for staff is that, while specific programs may come and go, the overarching RTI model is both adaptable and durable--and that much of the power of RTI rests on its potential to integrate a series of isolated programs into a larger unified and coordinated continuum of student support. </li></ul><ul><li>Link all significant school and district initiatives to RTI </li></ul>
  49. 49. NYSED RTI Guidance Memo: April 2008
  50. 50.
  51. 51. “ The Regents policy framework for RtI: Defines RtI to minimally include: Appropriate instruction delivered to all students in the general education class by qualified personnel. Appropriate instruction in reading means scientific research-based reading programs that include explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, reading fluency (including oral reading skills) and reading comprehension strategies. Screenings applied to all students in the class to identify those students who are not making academic progress at expected rates.”
  52. 52. “ Instruction matched to student need with increasingly intensive levels of targeted intervention and instruction for students who do not make satisfactory progress in their levels of performance and/or in their rate of learning to meet age or grade level standards. Repeated assessments of student achievement which should include curriculum based measures to determine if interventions are resulting in student progress toward age or grade level standards. The application of information about the student’s response to intervention to make educational decisions about changes in goals, instruction and/or services and the decision to make a referral for special education programs and/or services.”
  53. 53. “ Written notification to the parents when the student requires an intervention beyond that provided to all students in the general education classroom that provides information about the: -amount and nature of student performance data that will be collected and the general education services that will be provided; -strategies for increasing the student’s rate of learning; and -parents’ right to request an evaluation for special education programs and/or services.”
  54. 54. “ The Regents policy framework for RtI: Defines RtI to minimally include: Requires each school district to establish a plan and policies for implementing school-wide approaches and prereferral interventions in order to remediate a student’s performance prior to referral for special education, which may include the RtI process as part of a district’s school-wide approach. The school district must select and define the specific structure and components of its RtI program, including, but not limited to the: -criteria for determining the levels of intervention to be provided to students, -types of interventions, amount and nature of student performance data to be collected, and -manner and frequency for progress monitoring.”
  55. 55. Core Instruction , Interventions , Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out <ul><li>Core Instruction. Those instructional strategies that are used routinely with all students in a general-education setting are considered ‘core instruction’. High-quality instruction is essential and forms the foundation of RTI academic support. NOTE: While it is important to verify that good core instructional practices are in place for a struggling student, those routine practices do not ‘count’ as individual student interventions. </li></ul>
  56. 56. Core Instruction, Interventions , Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out <ul><li>Intervention. An academic intervention is a strategy used to teach a new skill, build fluency in a skill, or encourage a child to apply an existing skill to new situations or settings. An intervention can be thought of as “a set of actions that, when taken, have demonstrated ability to change a fixed educational trajectory” (Methe & Riley-Tillman, 2008; p. 37). </li></ul>
  57. 57. Core Instruction, Interventions , Accommodations & Modifications: Sorting Them Out <ul><li>Accommodation. An accommodation is intended to help the student to fully access and participate in the general-education curriculum without changing the instructional content and without reducing the student’s rate of learning (Skinner, Pappas & Davis, 2005). An accommodation is intended to remove barriers to learning while still expecting that students will master the same instructional content as their typical peers. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Accommodation example 1: Students are allowed to supplement silent reading of a novel by listening to the book on tape. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Accommodation example 2: For unmotivated students, the instructor breaks larger assignments into smaller ‘chunks’ and providing students with performance feedback and praise for each completed ‘chunk’ of assigned work (Skinner, Pappas & Davis, 2005). </li></ul></ul>
  58. 58. Core Instruction, Interventions , Accommodations & Modifications : Sorting Them Out <ul><li>Modification. A modification changes the expectations of what a student is expected to know or do—typically by lowering the academic standards against which the student is to be evaluated. Examples of modifications: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Giving a student five math computation problems for practice instead of the 20 problems assigned to the rest of the class </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Letting the student consult course notes during a test when peers are not permitted to do so </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Allowing a student to select a much easier book for a book report than would be allowed to his or her classmates. </li></ul></ul>
  59. 59. Building Teacher Capacity to Deliver Tier 1 Interventions: An 8-Step Checklist Jim Wright