Sandel intro

4,724 views

Published on

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
4,724
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3,010
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
57
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Sandel intro

  1. 1. Justice Scenarios borrowed from Michael Sandel’s discussion guide
  2. 2. Rationale: We study Justice in order to understand why people believe what they believe. borrowed from Michael Sandel’s discussion guide
  3. 3. True or false? 1) Torture, as a matter of principle, is always morally wrong. borrowed from Michael Sandel’s discussion guide
  4. 4. ! True or false? Question 2: The morality of an action is determined by whether, compared to the other available options, it maximises the sum total of happiness of all the people affected by it. ! ! borrowed from Michael Sandel’s discussion guide
  5. 5. ! True or false? Question 3: It is always, and everywhere, wrong to cause another person's death - assuming they wish to stay alive - if this outcome is avoidable. ! ! borrowed from Michael Sandel’s discussion guide
  6. 6. ! ! True or false? Question 4: If you can save the lives of innocent people without reducing the sum total of human happiness, and without putting your own life at risk, you are morally obliged to do so. ! ! ! borrowed from Michael Sandel’s discussion guide
  7. 7. Suppose you are driving through a narrow tunnel and a worker falls onto the road in front of you. There is not enough time for you to stop. If you keep straight, you will hit the worker and kill him, but if you swerve left into oncoming traffic, you will collide with a school bus and kill at least five children. What’s the right thing to do? Does utilitarianism get the right answer?
  8. 8. Suppose ten thousand innocent civilians live next to a munitions factory in a country at war. If you bomb the factory, all of them will die. If you don’t bomb the factory, it will be used to produce bombs that will be dropped on fifty thousand innocent civilians in another country. What’s the right thing to do? Does utilitarianism get the right answer?
  9. 9. Suppose a man has planted a bomb in New York City, and it will explode in twenty-four hours unless the police are able to find it. Should it be legal for the police to use torture to extract information from the suspected bomber? Does utilitarianism get the right answer?
  10. 10. Now suppose the man who has planted the bomb will not reveal the location unless an innocent member of his family is tortured. Should it be legal for the police to torture innocent people, if that is truly the only way to discover the location of a large bomb? Does utilitarianism have the right answer?
  11. 11. When is utilitarianism correct and when is it not? Why? Can something be for the “greater good” and still be wrong?
  12. 12. Libertarian co`ncepts of Justice
  13. 13. Can you increase equality without decreasing liberty? ` ! Imagine a equal world of distributed resources. Everyone has the same stuff. Unfortunately, you are LeBron James. People want to pay you 5$ a game to play for them. Do you have to give it back? Why would you ever play basketball at all?
  14. 14. Is taxation for redistribution forced labor? ! Imagine you are Bill Gates and you are taxed for two hours and the money is given to a poor person. ` Are you now being forced--against your will--to work for that person? Does this make you a temporary slave?
  15. 15. Does taxation for redistribution violate historical definitions of justice? ! Imagine you worked very hard becoming a heart surgeon. Now, ` you make a lot of money saving lives. Should the government have the right to take your money and give it to someone else?
  16. 16. Under what conditions does a government have the right to take money from you and give it to someone else? What situations don’t qualify. • If you got the money ` illegally • If you broke the law • If the other person needed it to survive • If enough people voted to take it from you. • If the government were going to war and needed it to buy weapons
  17. 17. Immanuel Kant Kantian con`cepts of Justice
  18. 18. Imagine a storekeeper who could cheat a young child who comes to her shop but decides not to because ` she’s worried her customers find out. ! Is she acting morally?
  19. 19. Imagine a teacher who loves helping children because it makes ` him feel good. Is he acting morally?
  20. 20. Suppose someone rescues a child from drowning because he wants ` a reward. Is he acting morally?
  21. 21. What should we consider as a law ` of morality? The Categorical Imperative-- "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.
  22. 22. What about freedom and it’s connection to justice? ` ! •Is a person who is addicted to cigarettes free? •Is a person who eats a boatload of pistachio ice cream free ? •If the government tries to stop people from buying large sodas are they restricting freedom?
  23. 23. Liberal co` ncepts of Justice
  24. 24. ` Imagine the veil of ignorance John Rawls
  25. 25. 1st principle: ` ! Everyone should have the same rights and liberties.
  26. 26. 2nd principle: ` ! There should be equality of opportunity.
  27. 27. Should the children of rich parents be allowed to get very expensive, private math lessons, or singing lessons, or basketball lessons? What if such lessons give ` them a huge, unearned advantage in the race for jobs, careers, and wealth? Is it just for poor children to have much lower prospects as a result?
  28. 28. 3rd principle: ` ! There should be no differences in income and wealth, except those differences that make even the least advantaged members of society better off.
  29. 29. ! 1. Is it true that you can’t really claim credit for your upbringing? Surely, your habits and temperaments today are partly the result of your upbringing. Does this mean that you don’t really deserve what you get from making ` an effort? ! 2. Think of some of the advantages that you have in your life. Do you deserve them more than other people who lack them? If so, why? If not, should these advantages be provided to everyone?
  30. 30. ! 3. Do you think it’s unjust if some people do not get to vote in elections merely because they are a woman or merely because of the color of their skin? 4. Do you think it’s ` unjust if some people earn much less money and are much worse off than others merely because they are a woman or a member of a racial or ethnic minority? !
  31. 31. ! 5. If you answered “ yes” to the last two questions, do you think it’s also unjust if some people are much worse off than others merely because they were born with fewer talents or with a debilitating ` disease and the need for expensive medicines? Why should people be worse off merely because of the way they were born? ! !
  32. 32. Conservative co` ncepts of Justice
  33. 33. 1. "Belief in a transcendent order, or body of natural law, which rules society as well as conscience.” 2. "Affection for the proliferating variety and mystery of human existence, as opposed to the narrowing uniformity, egalitarianism, and utilitarian aims of most radical systems;” ` 3. "Conviction that civilized society requires orders and classes, as against the notion of a 'classless society'." Canons of Conservatism
  34. 34. 4. "Persuasion that freedom and property are closely linked: separate property from private possession, and the Leviathan becomes master of all." 5. "Faith in prescription and distrust of 'sophisters, calculators, and economists' who would reconstruct society upon abstract designs." ` 6. "Recognition that change may not be salutary reform: hasty innovation may be a devouring conflagration, rather than a torch of progress." Canons of Conservatism
  35. 35. FREEDOM TRADITION LAW GOD ` …or

×