SD ADN.v.1.02
•
0 likes•289 views
This document discusses networking requirements for a customer and compares traditional and software defined network options. It proposes a software defined application delivery network using virtualized firewalling, load balancing and routing. This is estimated to provide 50-70% lower capital expenses and 60-80% lower operating expenses compared to the traditional network option. Major players in software defined networking are also listed.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (7)
Similar to SD ADN.v.1.02
Similar to SD ADN.v.1.02 (20)
More from Nimit Shishodia
More from Nimit Shishodia (17)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
SD ADN.v.1.02
- 2. © Copyright Ecode Networks 2013 Customer Networking Requirements v Users to securely access business application via the internet through firewall. v Load balancing between the multiple data servers for business continuity. v Securing the data from the external threats. v Scalability for future expansion. v CAPex and TCO reduction using minimal hardware. v Simple flat architecture, easy to manage. 2
- 3. © Copyright Ecode Networks 2013 3 Customer Business Process
- 4. © Copyright Ecode Networks 2013 Available Networking Options for Customer User Data Transaction Server Farm Hardware Switching Internet Hardware Load balancing Hardware Firewalling/Routing Network_VM SDN Controller Internet User Data Transaction Orchestration Virtualized Firewall Virtualized Load Balancer Virtualized Routing Option1: Traditional Network Option2: Software Defined Network Intel X86 Server Application_VMs 4
- 5. © Copyright Ecode Networks 2013 Software Defined Application Delivery Network (SD-ADN) Value Propositions: 1) Low CAPEx/OPEx with soft firewalling, load balancing and packet forwarding. 2) Centralised control and virtualization of the network. 3) Facilitate faster deployments and ease of troubleshooting. 4) Openflow based path optimization, fault detection and resolution. 5) Simpler architecture with automated operations. 5
- 6. © Copyright Ecode Networks 2013 Cost Estimation Conclusion • Approx. ~ 50-70 % Reduction in CAPex using SDN. • Approx. ~ 60-80 % Reduction in Opex using SDN. Equipment Model Unit Unit Price (appox) Total (£) (appox) F5 Loadbalancer F5-‐1600 2 5840 11680 Juniper Firewall SRX 210 H 2 434 868 Professional Services (Design & Deployment) n/a 1 2000 2000 Annual Maintainnance Cost (Opex) n/a 1 4800 4800 Total 14550/-‐ Equipment Model Unit Unit Price Total (£) Dell X86 Server Precision 490 2 324 648 Evolve SDN OrchestraUon PlaVrom Evolve_v.2.0 2 280 560 Controller Big Switch 2 380 680 Professional Services (Design & Deployment) n/a 1 1600 1600 Annual Maintainance Cost (Opex) n/a 1 650 650 Total 4138/-‐ Traditional Network Costs Software Defined Network Costs 6
- 7. © Copyright Ecode Networks 2013 Major Players in the SDN Game 7 Adara Networks ADVA Optical Networking Alcatel-Lucent Arista Networks AT&T Avaya Big Switch Networks Brocade BT Group PLC Ciena Cisco Systems Colt Telecom Contrail Systems (Acquired by Juniper) Juniper Networks KDDI Korea Telecom Level 3 Microsoft Dell / Force10 Networks Deutsche Telekom DOCOMO Communications Laboratories Ecode Networks EMC Ericsson Everything Everywhere Extreme Networks F5 Facebook Fujitsu Gigamon Goldman Sachs Google Hitachi HP Huawei Technologies UK Co. Ltd. IBM Infoblox NEC Nicira (Acquired by VMware) Nokia Siemens Networks NTT Communications Oracle Orange Telecom Rackspace Radisys Radware Riverbed Technologies Samsung SK Telecom Swisscom Tail-f Systems Texas Instruments Verisign Verizon VMware Vodaphone Vyatta (acquired by Brocade) Yahoo