Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Connecting Neighbors with Social Media

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Neighbors Forums
Neighbors Forums
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 82 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Connecting Neighbors with Social Media (20)

Advertisement

More from Steven Clift (18)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Connecting Neighbors with Social Media

  1. 1. Connecting Neighbors, Building Communities, and RaisingVoices since 1994
  2. 2.  Welcome, Quick Survey, Numbers – 5 Min  Communicating to neighbors… Facebook Pages, E- Newsletters, etc. – Steven Clift – 15 Min  Crowd-Sourcing Strategies – Sm. Groups, Reports – 15 Min  Engagement among neighbors … Outreach, inclusion, and online engagement in St. Paul and Minneapolis via BeNeighbors.org – Corrine Bruning – 20 Min  Discussion andWhat’s Next Connections – 20 Min
  3. 3.  E-Democracy.org's mission:  Harness the power of online tools to support participation in public life, strengthen communities, and build democracy.  Creating online spaces for civic engagement since 1994.
  4. 4.  Social connections, family-friendly  Safety and crime prevention  Mutual benefit , sharing stuff  Greater voices and civic engagement  Social capital generator  Openness and inclusion (if done right)  = Stronger communities  Resources: Block Activities, Block Connectors, Locals Online, Soul of the Community
  5. 5. 1. Where you from? Place, affiliation? 2. Web page? Blog? 3. Facebook Page?Twitter? 4. Email Newsletter? Frequency? 5. Two-way online group/e-list? 6. Are residents creating private “electronic block clubs?” More than 5% of blocks?
  6. 6.  PewInternet.org:  81% Overall Online ▪ 84%White, 73% Black, 74% Latino, <30K still at 67%  Least connected ▪ No High School Diploma - 51% ▪ Over 65 - 54%  Where? ▪ At Home - 65% Broadband, 4% Dial-up ▪ 12% Other -Work/School/Library/Mobile-only(?)
  7. 7.  67% Overall ▪ 71%Women, 63% Men ▪ Facebook on slight decline among younger users  Only 16% useTwitter ▪ News and politics types, teen use outside eyes of parents using aliases  FYI - Pinterest, LinkedIN,YouTube, Reddit, Google+ beyond scope of presentation
  8. 8.  88% use Email overall - 58%Typical day  67% use SNS - 48% day , 8%Twitter  67% visit local/st/fed gov web - 13% Typ day  Lessons: ▪ Map out where to reach people and DON’T replace email newsletter with Facebook orTwitter (they are supplements) ▪ Reach people where they are online ▪ IMHO: Don’t drop print communication if you can afford to keep
  9. 9.  2013 Pew Civic Engagement in Digital Era Report – Analysis: bitly.com/pewcivic  More equity in discussing politics via social networking  Not so with taking action, contacting elected officials, media  IMHO: Neighborhoods are “public life” gateway to action
  10. 10. 27% of adult Net users (22% overall) use “digital tools to talk to their neighbors and keep informed about community issues.”  74% of those who talk digitally with their neighbors have talked face-to-face about community issues with their neighbors compared to 46% overall  Source: Neighbors Online study from PewInternet.org, 2010
  11. 11.  Neighborhood E-Lists/Forums – 7% Overall  Of 22% of ALL adults who “talk digitally with neighbors”: Only 12% under 30K, Over 75K 39%  Source: Neighbors Online study from PewInternet.org, 2010
  12. 12.  Neighborhood E-Lists/Forums – 7% Overall  Our view/experience – newer Net-using immigrants similar to Latino inclusion rate  Source: Neighbors Online study from PewInternet.org, 2010
  13. 13.  Disseminating information  Getting people involved with your organization and activities  Connect neighbors to each other online to strengthen community  Doing all of this inclusively across race, income, age, education levels
  14. 14.  Cherish this access  People at least scan subjects  Open rates - ~20%, click through 5%, some higher
  15. 15.  Pick a service provider ▪ MailChimp, Contstant Contact, thedatabank (MN) ▪ Simple BCC: option to start  Paper Sign-up Sheet – Create goals ▪ Meetings, Farmers Markets, Libraries, NNO, Door to Door  Resources ▪ http://mailchimp.com/resources ▪ http://www.e-benchmarksstudy.com
  16. 16.  For every 1,000 email subscribers they have:  149 Facebook Likers  53Twitter Followers
  17. 17.  Easy Sharing  Seek "Likes“  2-3+ posts wk (include image, different style thanTwitter  “Insights” stats
  18. 18.  Streaming torrents. Chatty folks.  EdgeRank – FB decides per post, tips to get over 5% reach, $ option  Go to places where residents are online/on FB  Consider posting using your name over “brand” to make more personal at times
  19. 19.  Add Email news subscribe to Facebook Page  How do you link multiple channels? (4 Geeks)  WordPress.com (or .org) Blog  Add Subscribe to Blog email option or Feedburner  Use FB App RSS Graffiti to feed posts to FB Page  UseTwitterFeed to feed Blog post titles toTwitter  Problem: Not customizing approach to each service BUT at least you are reaching people
  20. 20.  Facebook Groups are different – two-way destination based on interest or identity  Some neighborhood associations have Groups not Pages  Classic “online groups” viaYahooGroups, E- Democracy Neighbors Forums  Private (0ften) exclusive to resident models – NextDoor, i-Neighbors, Front Porch Forum
  21. 21.  FB Pages as “Lapel Pins,” Groups for Action  Hurricane Sandy: http://bitly.com/sandygroups  Moore Oklahoma Tornado Safe FB Grp  Lesson: Localized best, better to have one before you need it
  22. 22.  Shift frame to open community exchange among neighbors  Breaking out of org/gov in center mode  Hosted by:  Individuals using whatever tool they like (e.g. Facebook Groups,YahooGroups, etc.)  Non-profits like E-Democracy.org  Commercial sites like NextDoor, Front Porch Forum
  23. 23.  Name, org, with ...  1.What online tools does your organization use to effectively engage the community?  2.What are the top two needs you want online engagement to address?  Take notes to report back common themes on #2
  24. 24.  3. How do you or might you connect with multicultural or lower income parts of your community online?  4. Are their specific new or niche audiences you seek to connect with online?  Report back common themes on 3 and 4
  25. 25. Photos from Jeff Wheeler, Star Tribune.
  26. 26.  “Local” online public places to:  share information, events, ideas  discuss neighborhood issues  gather diverse people in an open place  take action and promote solutions  Powered by two-way group communication  Over 50 neighbors/community forums in 18 communities across 3 countries today  “BeNeighbors.org” Inclusive Outreach Campaign
  27. 27.  Community Exchange  Seeking plumber, insurance, lawn care  Free couch, desk, cat,TV  Events – 4th July, NUSA picnic to nearest neighborhoods  Meal swaps, cooperative cooking  TV/Cable/Net options  Home hazardous waste  Job for Somali speaker  Lost puppy  Community Issues  Crosswalk Safety  Street Cars on East Lake  Community thanks  Airport noise  Candidate hello  Bridge replacement  One Minneapolis One Read  Bicycle safety  Youth movement
  28. 28.  Crime Prevention  Disaster Preparedness and Community Recovery  Emergency Preparedness and Response  Neighborly Mutual Benefit and Support  HealthCare and Long-term Care  Energy Efficiency  Environmental Sustainability  SeniorCare and Inter- generationalConnections  Small Business Promotion  Transportation  Local Food  Diverse Community Cohesion  Education and Community Service  Recent Immigrant and Refugee Integration and Support  Sustainable Broadband Adoption  Rural Community Building  Youth Employment and Experience  Community Building,Civic Engagement, and Social Capital  Details on the E-Democracy Blog
  29. 29. Imagine a shared e-mail box for your neighborhood: neighbors@inyourarea.org Visit: BeNeighbors.org
  30. 30.  E-mail  Web  Facebook  Twitter
  31. 31.  Via the web:  e-democracy.org  Or beneighbors.org ▪ Directory starting inTwin Cities ▪ Join via Facebook Option Available
  32. 32.  Via simple paper sign-up sheets  Sign up at local events, by neighbors, or when doorknocked.
  33. 33.  Public (vs. private groups)  Open access (vs. invite only)  Publicly searchable archive (vs. member only access)  Local scope  Encourage strong civility  Must use real names, accountability
  34. 34. City Hall In-person Conversations Shared on Facebook Your Networks Local Media Coverage Local Biz Neighbor#1 N E I G H B O R S Neighbors Forum OnlineJoin the Forum
  35. 35.  Define local purpose – one to two sentences sets tone, expectations  Recruit, recruit, recruit  Multi-tech access – bridge email, web divide with Facebook andTwitter access  More: http://e-democracy.org/if  Open with friendly round of introductions at 100 members  Volunteer local Forum Manager, train/support them  Real names, no name calling/personal attacks, facilitation with rules enforced
  36. 36.  Members: Forum provides new information and alternative viewpoints  Elected officials pay attention to forum posts  Community organizations who actively participated found it relevant and rewarding  Range and depth of conversations dependent on forum members’ willingness to share opinions, ask questions, and seek input
  37. 37.  1. Online spaces for neighbors to connect with each other in the ways that they want  2. Spaces as representative as possible of the neighborhoods, 10%+ of households  3. More people having a voice, who often do not have a voice in their neighborhood  4. Engagement that builds trust, bridges, and social capital
  38. 38.  Goal: Recruit and engage 10,000+ Saint Paulites by end of 2014  Focus outreach on highly diverse, immigrant and low-income communities  Knight Foundation funded, 625K 3 year grant (through end of 2014)  Applied Ford lessons
  39. 39.  Utilize grassroots community organizing techniques to bring a diversity of neighbors onto the forums.  Bring in around 3000 new members over the summer and begin building relationships in Saint Paul communities.  Hire ~10 multi-lingual outreach team members working 15 hours a week
  40. 40. 1. Research and set goals 2. Intensive recruitment and training 3. Utilized open access tools to manage logistics increasing mobility and capacity of team (GDocs, Dropbox, etc.) 4. Major on the ground outreach! 5. Remembering to think long term about empowerment and voice 55
  41. 41. 56
  42. 42.  46% People of Color  17% Foreign Born  Lower income areas, renters, etc.
  43. 43. 59
  44. 44. 60
  45. 45. 61
  46. 46.  More pictures in our slide show. 63
  47. 47.  ~3,000 memberships in-person in 2012, 800 online  129Tracked Summer Outreach Events:  917 via door-knocking in 20 targeted areas  692 via 39 different community events  340 via 28 community locations (libraries, etc.)  182 via 10 National Night Out sites  89 via 4 ethnic soccer matches  76 via 12 community members  After ~12% error rate in e-mail addresses, opt-outs
  48. 48.  Over 50% of paper sign-up form survey responses were from people of color  Surname analysis shows 30%+ of targeted forums appear to be from racial/ethnic communities (Asian, Latino, East African)  Demographic participant survey planned
  49. 49.  All 17 St. Paul neighborhoods (District Councils) covered with online neighborhood spaces, 3 outside our network  6,000 Forum Memberships, up from 3200 = +266% in St. Paul, 1,000+ more on original city-wide St. Paul Issues Forum  Minneapolis 0ver 9200 memberships  Detailed Blog Post, Insider Google Doc
  50. 50.  266% increase in St. Paul (blue) memberships in 2012  Mpls (red) all volunteer “organic” word of mouth growth
  51. 51.  Initial utilization of volunteers  Partnerships need to grow beyond links  Forum engagement staffing delayed to ‘13  Light guidance for contractors, more hands on needed  Logistics of hand processing 3,000 paper sign-ups
  52. 52.  Build volunteer capacity in forum engagement to developing deeper relationships in community - goal: Forums that better reflect the diversity of neighbors in the “virtual room.”  Ensure partnerships are mutually beneficial  Execute an intense forum engagement plan 74
  53. 53.  Forum Manager  NeighborGreeter  Neighborhood Linker  http://e-democracy.org/getinvolved  SocialCoordinator  Cultural Connector  Community Reporter 75
  54. 54. 76
  55. 55.  Almost complete  Need for community to understand the work that we do and the commitment we have, to ensure the space is open to ALL and is a resource for theWHOLE community  More pictures, videos, stories, blogs,Twitter, Facebook, etc
  56. 56.  Meeting in person  Volunteers taking pride and ownership in their forum service  Forum members from all backgrounds see their forums as valuable and helping to build stronger communities  Going deep in Minneapolis and elsewhere  Communities of Practice  Sharing our lessons widely
  57. 57. Public outreach http://beneighbors.org Webinars, training: http://e-democracy.org/learn http://e-democracy.org/practice
  58. 58.  We’d love to connect with you more!  StevenClift - clift@e-democracy.org  Corrine.bruning@e-democracy.org  612-229-4471  OnTwitter @edemo  More: e-democracy.org/contact 81

×