Kindly refer to final report submitted by Mr. Shah RukhKhan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation) ACE Lahore RegionLaho...
Kindly refer to Para No. 12 to 17-N and final report dated11.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACEH...
Kindly refer to Para No. 5 to 7-N and revised final report dated30.04.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Office...
Kindly refer to Para No. 10 to 13-N and final report dated15.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Hassan Raza Khan DDI ACE and Mr.Raee...
is available against both the accused namely Shahzad Ahmadconstable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector. Judical action against Shahza...
Kindly refer to final report dated 30.04.2012, submitted by Mr.Shafaqat Ali circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura.           Bri...
in accordance with shia law in their favour. So complainant beingaggrieved by this act of Patwari registered a case agains...
Kindly refer to para no. 37 to 43, 54 to 56 and revisedfinal report submitted by Mr. Shafaqat Ali Circle Officer ACESheikh...
After approval of Judicial Action bail before arrest wasmoved by one accused namely Gulfam Akhtar which was dismissedby Sp...
Brief facts of the case of that a case FIR No. 514/2009 u/s 496-A, 380 PPC PS Chunian District Kasur was registered agains...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)      OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMP...
Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUSDIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFOREISRAR AHMAD KHA...
To,      The Worthy Director,      Anti-Corruption Establishment,      Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject:    PROGRESS REPORT I...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLA...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT     OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT &              SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                ...
To,      The Worthy Director,      Anti-Corruption Establishment,      Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject:    REPORT IN `PETITI...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                               NAS...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF ABDUL SATTAR LANGAH   LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE                    LAHORE.   ...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                          MUHAM...
To,      The Worthy Director,      Anti-Corruption Establishment,      Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject:    REPORT IN FIR NO....
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                      MALIK MUH...
|To,       The Worthy Director,       Anti-Corruption Establishment,       Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject:     PROGRESS REP...
DIRECTORATE OF                           ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT                                LAHORE REGION LAHORE...
DIRECTORATE OF                            ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT                                 LAHORE REGION LAHO...
DIRECTORATE OF                            ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT                                 LAHORE REGION LAHO...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.                         MUHAMMAD ...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT    (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.                           BAGH AL...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR    AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.                       ...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.                         TANVEER M...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR    AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.                       ...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR    AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE            OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.                       ...
IN THE HONORABLECOURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT           & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                        ...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                               ...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                          MUHAM...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                          MUHAM...
Subject:    REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS            DIRECTOR,   ANTI  CORRUPTION   ESTABLISHMETN,         ...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                                KA...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                              M...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                              M...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                            MIA...
BEFORE MUZAFFAR MEHMOOD GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB    SECRETARY AUQAF & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS DEPARTMETNSubject:      NOTE   FOR...
by him through his free will specifically when he was on interim bailat the time of recovery so there is no element of coe...
Submitted for appropriate orders please.                                    MUNIR SHAHID                                  ...
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT   ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                          HAJI ...
ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT                                 LAHORE REGION LAHORETo              The Deputy Director (Leg...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                               SHAMS-UD-DIN ...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                      SHEIKH KHALID SAEED  ...
dated 11.08.2010 by fabricating Fard Badar No. 285 dated29.07.2010.            On the written complaint the matter was pro...
BEFORE MR.ISRAR AHMED THE LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV)      OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2016/...
Anti Corruption Establishment,    Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                            SHAMS-UD-DIN   ...
5.    That the role of respondent No. 02 whether he has committed           forgery by entering wrong mutation or not shal...
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMAD THE LEARNED CONSULTANT    OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB, LAHORE.REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2988/2011 ...
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION            LAHORE.In Re: -             Anwaar Hussain Vs The State          ...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.In Re: -    Muhammad Shahbaz Vs The Additio...
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE.In Re: -             Anwaar Hussain Vs The State              CASE FI...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.In Re:-     Muhammad Alyas Vs Deputy Directo...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                            Maqsood Ahmed  ...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                              ABDUL AZIZ   ...
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.                         MUHAMMMAD MAJEED  ...
To           The Worthy Director           Anti Corruption Establishment,           Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject:   CASUA...
Naveed tariq
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Naveed tariq

1,869 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,869
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Naveed tariq

  1. 1. Kindly refer to final report submitted by Mr. Shah RukhKhan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation) ACE Lahore RegionLahore. Brief facts of the case are that Case FIR No. 541/2009,offence u/s 420/468/471 PPC, Police Station Kahna Lahore wasregistered and investigated by local police and report u/s 173 Cr. PCwas submitted by the local police after having found the accusedguilty of the offence ans submit report u/s 173 Cr. PC to theprosecutor but report u/s 173 Cr. PC was sent back with theobservation by the Assistant District Public Prosecutor, with thyeobservation that public servant i.e. Muhammad Slaeem Patwari isinvolved in the commission of offence. So, the case was transferredto this establishment. The accused public servant has been expiredas per report of IO of local police namely Muhammad Akram ASI.The remaining accused persons are on bail. Judicial action as recommended by the IO in his finalreport may be approved against Nazir Ahmad, Abdul Rauf,Muhammad Sharif, Sadiq and Muhammad Akbar. Accused Muhammad Saleem Patwari has been expired socriminal proceeding against him automatically stand abated. However, Investigating Officer before submission ofchallan u/s 173 Cr. PC, following documents may be taken intopossession:- 1. Statement of present Halqa Patwari. 2. Attested copies of mutations in question. 3. Death Certificate of Muhammad Saleem Patwari (Deceased) MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
  2. 2. Kindly refer to Para No. 12 to 17-N and final report dated11.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACEHead Quarter Lahore. Earlier final report was submitted by Mr. SD Khalid thethen DDI-III, ACE Lahore, for approval of judicial action against 12accused but legal branch raised some legal objection that determinethe role of each accused person, collect the evidence and record theirstatements u/s 161 Cr. PC. Meanwhile after the transfer of Mr. SDKhalid the then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, file was transferred to CircleOfficer Head Quarter for removal of objection raised by legal branchand submission of RFR. I have examine the file and found that CO/IO has notfulfill the requirement as raised by legal branch and record thestatement of only one accused namely Mushtaq Girdawar. Investigating Officer is directed to determine the role ofeach accused, record their statements u/s 161 Cr. PC, collectattested copies of mutations and sale deeds in question and submitRFR on merits, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
  3. 3. Kindly refer to Para No. 5 to 7-N and revised final report dated30.04.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACEHead Quarter Lahore. Earlier Judicial Action against Nasir Rauf, MuhammadArshad, Patwari, Muhammad Umair, Muhammad Akram andDepartmental action against Rasheed Ahmad, Patwari, MuhammadMansha, Girdawar, Saman Jan Tehsildar was approved by thecompetent authority on 12.03.2012. Meanwhile Muhammad Arshad,Patwari submitted an application before Worthy Director stating,thathe was not called to submit his defense verion and in he alsosubmitted some reports of revenue officials in his favour, on whichWorthy Director ask Ciricle Officer Head Quarter forcomments/report who after recording the version of MuhammadArshad Patwari, submitted a revised final report declaring himinnocent in this case. IO has already submitted an incompletechallan on 21.03.2012 in the court. Now he recommended to submitthe complete report u/s 173 Cr. PC, putting Muhammad ArshadPatwari in coloumn No.2 of report u/s 173 Cr. PC. I have gone through the record and final report dated12.03.2012, I endorse the recommendation of the IO and I.O may bedirected to submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court ofcompetent jurisdiction at the earliest, if agreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
  4. 4. Kindly refer to Para No. 10 to 13-N and final report dated15.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Hassan Raza Khan DDI ACE and Mr.Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE Head Quarter Lahore. Earlier Judicial Action against Shahzad Ahmad constableand Departmental action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector and IjazHussain Gillani DSP (Legal) was recommended by Mr. Riaz AhmadAssistant Director Investigation in his final report dated 12.04.2012,but subsequently His Lordship Mr. Justice Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvicalled Worthy Director General ACE Punjab on 08.05.2012, whoundertakes for constituting a team to investigate the issue andsubmit report in this regard within seven days and Worthy DG ACEPunjab constituted team comprising Mr. Hassan Raza DDI ACELahore and Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer Head Quarter,Lahore. They after conducting Investigation submitted a Final ReportDated 15.05.2012 and they differ with the opinion of previous IOand recommended Judicial Action against Shahzad Ahmadconstable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector and dropped case against IjazHussain Gillani DSP (Legal). After examining the record it transpired that earlier on09.02.2012 Mr. Zaffar Iqbal Judicial MagistrateSection-30,discharged the accused namely Ghulam Abbas inspector on09.02.2012 stating as under:- “It is clear from the record that till yet nomaterial evidence has been collected against the accusedregarding the commission of offence with malafide intentionand it is not in the interest of justice to curtail his liberty bysending him to judicial lock up. Hence, at this juncture, he isdischarged in this case. He is responsible public servant andthere is no chance of his escape. I.O. may take legal actionagainst him in accordance with law if he finds any materialevidence against him during investigation. Accused be releasedif not required in any other case.” I have gone through the record and final report dated15.05.2012, it reveals from order dated 25.11.2011 of HonorableLahore High Court, Lahore it was the responsibility of GhulamAbbas Inspector to hand over the parcel containing materialimportanat documents himself, negligence and criminal misconduct
  5. 5. is available against both the accused namely Shahzad Ahmadconstable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector. Judical action against ShahzadAhmad constable has already been recommended. Now investigatingteam has recommended Judicial Action against Ghulam AbbasInspector also and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP(Legal). I endorse the recommendation of the investigating teamand recommend Judicial Action against Ghulam Abbas Inspectorand dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal), if agreedplease. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:- The final report, opinion of ADP & file have been perused. Iendorse the opinion of ADP to approve judicial action against GhulamAbbas, Inspector & to drop the case against the Ejaz Hussain Gilani, DSPas he performed his duty diligently judicial action against ShahzadAhmed, Constable has already been approved. DEPUTY DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.W/DIRECTOR:-
  6. 6. Kindly refer to final report dated 30.04.2012, submitted by Mr.Shafaqat Ali circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura. Brief facts of the case of that one Syed Basharat Alisubmitted an application before circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura forraid against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari Halqa Madhkay on23.04.2012 . After getting permission from learned District & SesionsJudge Sheikhupura, who deputed Mr. Rana Sohail Learned JudicialMagistrate to conduct the raid as per law. Learned Magistrate after conducting the raid ordered toregister a criminal case against the said accused and then incompliance with the order of learned Judicial Magistrate CircleOfficer registered FIR No. 15/2012 offence u/s 161 PPC read with5/2/47 PCA at Police Station ACE Sheikhupura. Perusal of the record reveals that complainant has nopersonal work with the accused and has personal grudge with theaccused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and Learned Magistrate in hisraid proceeding at page 3 admitted that he was 10 feet away whenthe complainant handed over the money and he has not hear theconversation between them. According to the statement of theaccused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari, complainant has borrowed Rs.2000/0 from him, he further stated that complainant called me andasked for returning my money back and when I came he put themoney in my pocket and the raiding party arrest me withoutlistening any conversation. Previous motive behind the false implication of accusedhas also been established during the course of investigation as it hastranspired from the record that complainant intended to gettransferred/inherited the land measuring 6 Murabas inherited byhis deceased brother. On the plea that the female legal heirs left bythe deceased are not Muslim. But the Patwari inherited the property
  7. 7. in accordance with shia law in their favour. So complainant beingaggrieved by this act of Patwari registered a case against him. During the course of investigation complainant differedfrom his previous statement and filed an affidavit where in headmitted that he has revenge against the accused he registered acase against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and now he is notinterested to pursue the case, he further stated that he has noobjection to drop the said case. Circle Officer/IO has submitted his final report andstated that prosecution is wastage of time and he recommended todrop the case. I do hereby agree with the opinion of IO and andrecommend to drop the case and intiate the proceeding u/s 182Cr.PCagainst the complainant Syed Basharat Ali who wasted theprecious time of the agency, if agreed please. Hence, dropping thecase as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed tosubmit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court of competentjurisdiction at the earliest. Submitted for approval and further necessary action, ifagreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:- The file as well as opinion of AD(P) has been examined.The defense plea taken by the accused was firstly recorded by theraiding Magistrate and is established from record i.e. mutation NO.540 dated 18.05.2011 is also corroborated by the resiling affidavit ofcomplainant. In view of the recommendations of AD(P) at para No. 16are endorsed. ASIF ANJUM WARRAICH (DDP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.W/DIRECTOR:-
  8. 8. Kindly refer to para no. 37 to 43, 54 to 56 and revisedfinal report submitted by Mr. Shafaqat Ali Circle Officer ACESheikhupura. Brief facts of the case are that complainant, MuhammadIjaz s/o Muhammad Latif filed a petition u/s 22-A & 22-B Cr. PCalleging that he purchased 8-Kanals land from Sarfraz Ahmad,General Attorney on behalf of Ghazanfar Ali, but the sale deed wasgot registered from the original owner Ghazanfar Ali vide DocumentsNo. 13275, Book No.1, Volume No. 2548, Dated: 08.09.2005 andHalqa Patwari Gulfam Akhtar, after taking bribe money enteredmutation No. 3564 dated: 17.08.2005 in his favour and same wasattested by RO. He further alleged that Halqa Patwari, GulfamAkhtar with connivance of Ghazanfar Ali Seller, Arif Hussain andSarfraz Ahmad, prepare a forged Fard of his land and sell the sameto Arif Hussain through General Power of Attorney vide DocumentNo. 170 Book No.1, Volume No. 2733, Dated 10.01.2007 and heentered mutation No. 3814 Dated 17.02.2007 accordingly. HalqaPatwari while preparing record of rights in year 2006-2007,malafidely entered the no of junior mutation No. 3814 of ArifHussain inspite of his senior mutation No. 3564. After enquiry, case FIR No. 10/2010 dated 20.05.2010,offence u/s 420/468/471/109 PPC read with section 5/2/47 PCAwas registered against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Sarfraz AhmadGeneral Power of Attorney Ghazanfar Ali original Seller at PS ACESheikhupura, it was further approved that role of Mr. Riasat AliGirdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar shall be determinedduring the investigation. After completion of investigation, the then DDI-IIIrecommended Judicial action against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari,Ghazanfar Ali Original Seller, Arif Hussain Purchaser anddepartmental action against Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat AliGirdawar. the file was examined by ADL and DDL who differed withthe opinion of I/O. On their recommendations J/A was approvedagainst Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/Beneficiary),Sarfraz Ahmad GPA and departmental action against Riasat AliGirdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar.
  9. 9. After approval of Judicial Action bail before arrest wasmoved by one accused namely Gulfam Akhtar which was dismissedby Special Judge Anti-Corruption and Lahore High Court Lahore aswell. Subsequently accused Gulfam Akhtar moved anapplication to worthy Director General ACE Punjab forreinvestigation on 16.12.2011 and complainant Muhammad Ijaz alsomoved an application to worthy Director General ACE Punjab forreinvestigation to determine the role of Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar,Riasat Ali Girdawar. On the said applications worthy DirectorGeneral ACE Punjab ordered for reinvestigation of the case and theinvestigation again marked to Circle Officer ACE Sheikhupura, whorecorded the statements u/s 161 Cr. PC of Muhammad Nawazpresent Patwari Mouza Mandiali, Malik Rafaqat Ali Present Naib-Tehsildar, Gulfam Akhtar (accused), Sarfraz Ahmad GPA (accused),Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar (accused) and the statement of thecomplainant Muhammad Ijaz as well. Statements of the complainantand prosecution witnesses wherein fully corroborated the allegationsleveled in the complainant. Now Circle Officer has further recommended judicialaction against Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Malik Riasat Ali Girdawaragainst whom D/A was approved. In this way, now I.O recommendsjudicial action against all the accused Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, MalikSarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar, Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/Beneficiary), Arif Hussain Purchaser. Judicial action asrecommended may be approved and I.O may be directed to submitreport u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest. Submitted for approval and further necessary action, ifagreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
  10. 10. Brief facts of the case of that a case FIR No. 514/2009 u/s 496-A, 380 PPC PS Chunian District Kasur was registered againstMuhammad Shammoon etc. The investigation was with Fateh SherASI. The present complainant who is a real brother of one of theaccused of the said case, alleges that Fateh Sher, ASI, demandedand received Rs. 370000/- to declare his brother innocent in thesaid case but did not do the needful rather. The said case wascancelled after investigation conducted by Superintendent of PoliceDistrict Kasur. After preliminary enquiry No. 217/2010-KSR, FIR No.18/2011 PS Anti Corruption Establishment, Kasur was registered.Firstly the investigation was conducted by Circle Officer AntiCorruption Establishment Kasur, who recorded the statements ofthe complainant and prosecution witnesses wherein they fullycorroborated the allegations leveled in the complainant. Afterwardsthe investigation wsa entrusted to DDI ACE, Lahore. During thependency of investigation the accused got pre-arrest bail. During thehearing of bail petition, the complainant appeared before the courtand stated that his compromise has been affected with the accused.On his statement, bail was confirmed by the court. Now DDI has recommended to approve judicial action. Asthe pre-arrest bail has been confirmed by court and the court hasalso recorded the statement of complainant. Hence, judicial actionas recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed tosubmit report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest. Submitted for approval and further necessary action, ifagreed please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
  11. 11. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1027/2012, BY MALIK IFTIKHAR AHMAD S/O MALIK FEROZ ALI R/O 179/D, GUJAR COLONY, CHUNGI AMARSIDHU, LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments aregiven as under:-. Brief facts are that one Malik Iftikhar Ahmad has leveledallegation of corruption against Qasim Shah Secretary Union Council No.139, Green Town, Lahore etc vide written complaint No. 3022/2011. Afterreceiving complaint No. 3022/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted andthe said complaint was converted into regular inquiry vide Enquiry No.483/2011 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmad AssistantDirector (Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore. That after probing the matter on full length and hearing boththe parties Assistant Director (Inv) has recommended departmental Actionagainst the delinquents. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the redressal of the complainant has been made accordingly.The complaint in hand may be filed. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  12. 12. Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUSDIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFOREISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMANLAHORE. Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submittedthat above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing today i.e.15.05.2012, in which next date of hearing is 06.06.2012. That I haveattended the office of learned consultant and Honorable Consultant hasdirected to conclude the matter before 06.06.2012. (Original Notice No.2604 Dated 07.05.2012 is attached) That re-investigation of case FIR No. 239/11, Police StationKot Radha Kishan District Kasur is pending before the Circle Officer HeadQuarter, Lahore. Kindly direct the said officer to conclude the matterbefore 06.06.2012 and submit his report on 06.06.2012. Submitted for further necessary action please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.W/DDL
  13. 13. To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject: PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I attended the court of LearnedDistrict and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 13-04-2012, in contempt petition /Application titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore. That detail report was submitted by Rana Tariq MahmoodDeputy Director Legal on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District andSessions Judge, Lahore. That on 13-04-2012 Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahorehas passed an order and dismisses the said petition/Application. (Copy oforders is attached) Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. L/DDL
  14. 14. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 848/2012, BY IQBAL HUSSAIN S/O MUSA R/O MODEL TOWN, LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments aregiven as under:-. That the complainant has filed an application before yourgood office and alleged that his properties situates at Kot Addu districtMuzaffar Garh, Jampur district Rajanpur, Kot Chutta District Dera GhaziKhan and concerned patwaris has prepared forged documents of abovementioned properties. The complainant further alleged that he filed anapplication before Anti-Corruption Department on 24th February 2012 butno material steps has been taken by the Anti-Corruption Department. It is pertinent to mention here that above allegations arewithin the jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Establishment, Dera GhaziKhan Region and complainant never filed any application before the officeof the respondent/Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, LahoreRegion, Lahore. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of DirectorAnti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore and report of theabove complaint may be sought from Director Anti-CorruptionEstablishment, Dera Ghazi Khan Region. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  15. 15. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. GHULAM MURTAZA VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts are that one Ghulam Murtaza has leveledallegations against Tehsildar Halqa Niaz Beg and others videcomplaint No. 12/2012 in the office of the respondent. That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985,preliminary inquiry was conducted by Ch. Maqbool Ahmad AssistantDirector (Inv). Who after examining the record submitted his finalreport and recommended to drop the said complaint on 08.03.2012,because the civil litigation is pending between the parties. That on the recommendations of the Investigating officercompetent authority/respondent has dropped the said complaint on21.03.2012.Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  16. 16. To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject: REPORT IN `PETITION U/S 22-A & 22-B, FILED BY MIAN SARFRAZ JAWA ADVOCATERespected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted thereport/comments in the court of Mr. Abdul Sattar Langah Sb LearnedAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 12-04-2012. That Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge has directed asunder:- “In view of comments submitted by Assistant Director Legal, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore, the respondents are directed to getrecord the verbatim statement of the petitioner and redress the grievance ofthe petitioner as per rules and law”(Attested copy of the orders is attachedherewith) Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore.L/DDL
  17. 17. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. NASIR MAQBOOL VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Tauqeer hasleveled allegation of corruption against Nasir Maqbool Qureshi etc. That regular enquiry No. 98/2012 dated 09.02.2012 wasentrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director Investigation. That Investigating officer has recorded the version of both theparties. The petitioner has joined the Inquiry and on last date of hearinghe requested for adjournment. That said enquiry is still pending due tolack of interest of the petitioner. That further action on the said enquiry may be taken as perAnti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetitioner may be directed to join the enquiry. So that the matter beconcluded as per law. In this circumstances petition in hand maykindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  18. 18. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF ABDUL SATTAR LANGAH LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MIAN SARFRAZ AFTAB JAWA VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that on the written complaint ofMian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate, preliminary inquiry was conducted bythe competent authority. That Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate has leveled allegationof corruption against Serwar Si PS Mangamandi, Lahore. After receivingcomplaint No. 997/12, preliminary enquiry was conducted by AssistantDirector Complaints, who vide its Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-997)2012/5008dated 22.03.2012, sought comments from CCPO, Lahore. (Copy enclosed)The redressal of grievance of the petitioner is under process and afterreceiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further action will be taken as perAnti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be disposed of. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  19. 19. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD YASIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin hasleveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PSBaghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminaryenquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide itsletter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seekingcomments from CCPO, Lahore. That after receiving the comments from CCPO Lahorecompetent authority has converted the complaint in to regular inquiryvide Inquiry No. 212/2012 on 27.03.2012 and the same was entrusted toMr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation). The grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and furtheraction may be taken as per law. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  20. 20. To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject: REPORT IN FIR NO. 200/2009, OFFENCE U/S 420Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted thereport/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahoretoday i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VSDirector ACE, Lahore. That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record theversion of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012. That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction ofLearned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concernedofficer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report besubmitted on 11.04.2012 in the court. Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore. L/DDL
  21. 21. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MALIK MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts are that one Muhammad Shahbaz son ofMuhammad Hanif has leveled allegations against Mian Absar DSPCircle Masti Gate and others vide complaint No. 559/2012 in theoffice of the respondent. That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985,preliminary inquiry is being conduct by the office of respondent andin this regard comments were sought from CCPO, Lahore vide LetterNo. ACE-LR-(C-559)-2012/3032 & 3033 Dated 23-02-2012. That the preliminary enquiry is entrusted to Mr. Shah RukhKhan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on 21-03-2012. Who has calledboth the parties to record their version on 04-04-2012. In view of above mentioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the applicant may be directed to attend the office of theEnquiry Officer on 04-04-2012. Under the circumstances, it isrespectfully prayed that the petition in hand may kindly bedismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  22. 22. |To, The Worthy Director, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject: PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012Respected Sir, It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted thereport/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahoretoday i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VSDirector ACE, Lahore. That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record theversion of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012. That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction ofLearned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concernedofficer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report besubmitted on 11.04.2012 in the court. Submitted for necessary further action please. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore.L/DDL
  23. 23. DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.To, The Haji Rana Fawad Ahmad Circle Officer, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.No. ACE-DDL-2012/ Dated:Subject: COMPLAINT NO. 357-1-12 FILED BY HAJI LIAQAT ALI R/O DISTRICT LAHORE- IN THE OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB I am directed to inform you by the office of the Learned OmbudsmanPunjab as under:- That one Haji Liaqat Ali S/O Hussain Khan filed a complaint No.357/1/12, against you before Ombudsman Punjab leveling some allegations offaulty investigation.(Copy of application is attached) That the complainant states that matter in case FIR No. 1916/2011,offence under section 420,468,471 PPC read with section 5/2/47 of PCA,Police Station Kahna, Lahore was under your investigation and you have notcompleted your investigation on merit. That in this regards Memo No. DAC-DD(Legal-19)2012/2699 Dated10.02.2012 was also received from Deputy Director Legal, Anti-CorruptionEstablishment, Punjab Lahore, wherein he has directed for submission ofreport& parawise comments in the said case. (Copy of Letter is attached) That the complaint was lastly fixed for hearing on 26.03.2012 and thesame was adjourned for 25-04-2012 You are therefore required to appearbefore Mr. Israr Ahmad Learned Consultant-IV, office of the OmbudsmanPunjab, Lahore along with written reply/parawise comments without anydelay. (MALIK NAVEED TARIQ) Assistant Director (Legal), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region Lahore.Copy for information:- 1. P.A. to Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. 2. P.A. to Director General Anti-Corruption Establishment, Punjab, Lahore.
  24. 24. DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORETo, The Assistant Director (D), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Pubjab, Lahore.No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/Dated:Subject: COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF DIRECTION Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated21.02.2012, on the subject cited above. In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed tothe undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report hasbeen submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore will besubmitted on 28.03.2012. Copy of report is enclosed herewith for your kindinformation. DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL) ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
  25. 25. DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORETo, The Assistant Director (D), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Pubjab, Lahore.No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/Dated:Subject: COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF DIRECTION Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated21.02.2012, on the subject cited above. In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed tothe undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report hasbeen submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore on28.03.2012. Copy of report submitted in the office of Ombudsman Punjab isenclosed herewith for your kind information. DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL) ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE
  26. 26. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. MUHAMMAD IRSHAD VSDIRECTORE GENERAL ANT-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT.SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 706/2012Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments aregiven as under:-. Brief facts of the complaint are that Enquiry NO. 197/2010,against Muhammad Irshad EST Govt. Elementary School Maher ChandWala District Kasur was under probe in the office of Deputy Director, ACEKasur and Circle Officer Kasur was Enquiry Officer in the said complaint. That it is pertinent to mention here that the said EnquiryOfficer has recommended for dropping the said inquiry and the same isstill pending for final approval of the competent authority. It is furthersubmitted that allegations of harassment by the complainant are baseless. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand may be filed. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  27. 27. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. BAGH ALI BHATTI VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORESUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1159/2011Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/commentshad already been submitted in complaint No. 4776/2010, which was onthe same subject matter. Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at PoliceStation ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. Afterlodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer HeadQuarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare theaccused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons. That the investigating officer has submitted the dischargereport under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide RoadCertificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious and thecomplainant may be directed to approach the concerned court and thecomplaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-CorruptionEstablishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  28. 28. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. BAGH ALI BHATTI VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORESUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4776/2010Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are givenas under. Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at PoliceStation ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. Afterlodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer HeadQuarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare theaccused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons. That the investigating officer has submitted the dischargereport under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide RoadCertificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious and thecomplainant may be directed to approach the concerned court and thecomplaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-CorruptionEstablishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  29. 29. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. TANVEER MAHMOOD VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORESUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 3419/2011Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are givenas under. Brief facts of the case are that one Tanveer Mahmood has fileda complaint No. 3419/2011. He submitted in his complaint that he hassubmitted an application before respondent vide Enquiry No. 42/2011,but the respondent No. 1, is not interested to proceed further. That after perusal of the record it reveals that the saidEnquiry is relating to somew one else and is not related to thecomplainant Tanveer Mahmood. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of DirectorAnti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  30. 30. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. NAZAR ELAHI VS DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORESUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1988/6/11Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are givenas under. Brief facts are that one Nazar Elahi has leveled allegation ofcorruption against Akhtar Hussain Stenographer vide written complaintNo. 159/2011. After receiving complaint No. 159/11, preliminary enquirywas conducted and the said complaint was converted into regular inquiryvide Enquiry No. 31/2011 and the same was entrusted to Deputy Director(Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara. That after probing the matter on full length and hearing boththe parties Deputy Director (Inv), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okarahas recommended for dropping the said enquiry and the competentauthority dropped the same on 27.02.2012, vide letter No. ACE-LR-(E-31/11/OK)-2012/323 That allegations of corruption was not proved by thecomplainant Nazar Elahi, against the respondent Akhtar Hussain In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of DirectorAnti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  31. 31. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE. RANA ANWAR HUSSAIN VS RANA IRSLAN KHANSUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4016/11Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are givenas under. That complainant has leveled some personal allegationsagainst the then Circle Officer Rana Irslan Khan who is repatriated to hisparent department and the said complaint was filed after the repatriationof the said delinquent official. That said delinquent is now serving inMotorway Police, he can explain the allegations himself and office of theDirector Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore has noconcern with the said delinquent official. In view of abovementioned submissions it is most respectfullyprayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of DirectorAnti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  32. 32. IN THE HONORABLECOURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. HIDAYAT BIBI VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Mst. Hadayat Bibi has leveledallegation of corruption against 1) Muhammad Jahngir 2) MuhammadSaleem, Secretary Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore 3)Administrator Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore. Afterreceiving complaint No. 3887/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted andprima facie allegations of corruptions were made out. That competentauthority/respondent has approved regular enquiry against abovementioned accused persons and complaint No. 3887/11 was convertedinto regular enquiry vide enquiry No. 45/2012 dated 21.01.2012 and thesame was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazai Assistant Director(Inv) on 21.01.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice both theparties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner alongwith her witnesses may jointhe investigation for recording her statement and matter will be decidedafter hearing both the parties on merit. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  33. 33. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. ALLAH DITTA VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Allah Ditta has filed apetition under section 22-A & 22-B for compliance of order of thisHonorable Court Dated 04.10.2011. He further submitted that he hassubmitted an application alongwith order of this Honorable Court videDiary No. 5264/2011, Dated 28.11.2011 but the respondent No. 1, is notinterested to proceed further. After perusal of the record it reveals that an applicationsubmitted by petitioner was already decided vide enquiry No. 237/2011.The said enquiry was decided by Assistant Director (Investigation) and thesame was dropped vide letter NO. ACE-LR-(E-237/2011/L)2011/11318dated 03.11.2011. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  34. 34. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD YASIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin hasleveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PSBaghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminaryenquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide itsletter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seekingcomments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the petitioneris under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore furtheraction may be taken as per law. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  35. 35. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Ishaq hasleveled allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Younis PS GarhiShahu Lahore etc. After receiving complaint No. 3833/11, preliminaryenquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide itsletter No. ACE-LR-(C-3833) 2011/13136 dated 24.12.2011 seekingcomments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the petitioneris under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore furtheraction may be taken as per law. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  36. 36. Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFORE ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN LAHORE. Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submittedthat above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing on 22.02.2012, inwhich next date of hearing is 10.03.2012. That Honorable Consultant hasadjourned the said complaint for 10.03.2012 with the direction toconclude the matter till next date of hearing. Submitted for further necessary action please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.W/DDL
  37. 37. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. KAMRAN AFZAL VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Kamran Afzal has leveledallegation of corruption against SI Asghar Ali PS Shahdra Town, Lahore.After receiving complaint No. 4031/11, preliminary enquiry wasconducted by the Deputy Director (Inv-I), both the parties were summonedfor 03.01.12. Despite of calling again and again the complainant KamranAfzal could not appear before the Deputy Director Investigation. Therespondent Asghar Ali SI stated that the complainant conducts thegambling at club and he as per law registered FIR No. 1259/11 andrecovery was also affected from him. He further states that thecomplainant is blackmailing just to avoid the further proceedings. Theallegation of corruption against Asghar Ali SI was not proved in the saidpreliminary enquiry. That allegation of corruption was not proved against therespondent SI Asghar Ali competent authority dropped the complaint on06.01.2012. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  38. 38. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMAD ARIF VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one MuhammadArif has leveled allegation of corruption against Asif Ali Patwari HalqaManga Mandi Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 2055/11, preliminaryenquiry was conducted by Deputy Director (Inv-III) Anti CorruptionEstablishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Respondent Asif Ali Patwari deniedthe allegations regarding receipt of illegal gratification of Rs. 5000/- forissuance of Fard. He stated that the land is still in the name of SardarBibi (Mother of the complainant and inheritance mutation of the mother ofthe complainant has not yet been sanctioned. He further stated that headvised the complainant that inheritance mutation may be sanctionedfrom competent authority before issuance of Fard and the complainant getangry and he filed this application malafidely. Prima facie allegations oftaking illegal gratification could not be established, even then competentauthority has referred the matter in question to the AssistantCommissioner for enquiry and necessary action as per law, vide letter No.ACE-LR-(C-2055) 2011/10033 dated 05.10.2011. The petitioner mayapproach to the Assistant Commissioner. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  39. 39. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUNAWAR KHAN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Munawar Khan has leveledallegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Yasin PS Civil Line,Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3396/11, preliminary enquiry wasconducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11582 dated 15.11.2011and Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11962 dated 24.11.2011 was sentto CCPO Lahore for enquiry report which was received vide Diary No.1659/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 16.12.2011 in which inquiry officer statedthat ……………“business relation has been existed betweencomplainant and Mian Autos. During Investigation complainanthas withdraw his application and denied any claim against SIMuhammad Yasin”……, and allegation of corruption against MuhammadYasin SI was not proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendentof Police Investigation Civil Line Division, Lahore. That being non-disclosure of allegations and allegations ofcorruption was not proved by the complainant Munawar Khan against therespondent SI Muhammad Yasin competent authority dropped thecomplaint on 06.01.2012. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  40. 40. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MIAN QAISAR AZIZ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Mian Qaisar Aziz hasleveled allegation of corruption against SI Waseem PS Lower Mall, Lahore.After receiving complaint No. 3239/11, preliminary enquiry wasconducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3239) 2011/13070 dated 24.12.2011was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry which was received vide Diary No.178/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 28.01.2011 and allegation against WaseemSI proved in the said enquiry conducted by Superintendent of PoliceInvestigation Iqbal Town Division, Lahore. That respondent approvedregular enquiry against Waeem SI vide regular enquiry No. 113/2012dated 13.02.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmad Ch.Assistant Director (Inv) on 21.02.2012. The investigating officer has issuednotice both the parties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner may approach to theinvestigating officer for recording his statement and matter will be decidedafter hearing both the parties on merit. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  41. 41. BEFORE MUZAFFAR MEHMOOD GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB SECRETARY AUQAF & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS DEPARTMETNSubject: NOTE FOR PERSONAL HEARING IN THE PREPRESENTATION FILED BY DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE AGAINST THE OMBUDSMAN’S ORDER DATED 10.08.2011 Kindly refer to notice No. PS/Secy A&RA/1-9/2012 dated16.01.2012 issued by your good self on the subject noted above. Facts in brief are that case FIR No. 183/2004 was registeredagainst the complainant/accused namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem,Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore alongwith other co accusedpersons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authorityand incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of LearnedSenior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005. On13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaininginterim bail and produced receipts Nos 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and 1978dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/= (3,00000+1,40000)deposited by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzledamount due against him to the I.O with his free consent which were takeninto possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through recoverymemo dated 13.04.2005 placed at page 317-C. On 19.04.2005interim bail of complainant/accused was cancelled by the LearnedSenior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore as withdrawn and hisarrest was effected by the I.O through Zimni No. 81 para NO. 1dated 19.04.2005. The Learned Senior Special Judge AntiCorruption Lahore vide order dated 20.04.2005 sent thecomplainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem ElectricalSupervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore to judicial lockup and the caseis subjudic in the court of law. I have examined the case on legal as well as factualaspects and found that on prima facie proving the allegations caseFIR No. 183/2004 PS ACE, Lahore was registered against thecomplainant/accused after approval of competent authority. Duringinvestigation sufficient incriminating material to connect theaccused with the embezzlement was collected by the I.O and therecovery of Rs. 440000/- was effected from him which was produced
  42. 42. by him through his free will specifically when he was on interim bailat the time of recovery so there is no element of coercion ormaladministration on the part of I.O at the time of recovery asalleged in the complaint. Since the matter is subjudice in the court of competentjurisdiction, the jurisdiction of Learned Ombudsman Punjab isbarred to entertain the complaint U/S 9 (1)(a) of “The Punjab Officeof the Ombudsman Act,1997” which is as under:- “Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Ombudsman: - (i) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees. Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or enquiry into any matter which:- (a) are subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him”. In view of above, it is a fit case for filing of Representationto the Governor, Punjab Lahore U/S 32 of the Punjab Office of theOmbudsman Act,1997. Matter may therefore, be entrusted to theLearned DD(P), ACE, Lahore Region for futher proceedings but afterbringing the matter into knowledge of the Worthy DG ACE, PunjabLahore as a copy of impugned order dated 10.08.2011 has also beensent to him. Last date of limitation for filing OFRepresentation to the Governor, Punjab, Lahore againstorder dated 10.08.2011 passed by the LearnedOmbudsman Punjab, Lahore is going to 09.09.2011.
  43. 43. Submitted for appropriate orders please. MUNIR SHAHID Representative Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  44. 44. IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. HAJI ABDUL REHMAN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the case are that one Abdul Rehman has leveledallegation of corruption against SI Ghulam Abbas PS Muslim Town,Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3151/11, preliminary enquiry wasconducted and letter No. 11205 dated 01.11.2011 was sent to CCPOLahore for enquiry which was received on 24.12.2011 and allegationagainst Ghulam Abbas SI proved in the said enquiry conducted bySuperintendent of Police Investigation Iqbal Town, Lahore. Thatrespondent approved regular enquiry against Ghulam Abbas SI videregular enquiry No. 69/2012 dated 28.01.2012 and the same wasentrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on07.02.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice for 16.02.2012.The petitioner may approach to the investigating officer for recording hisstatement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties onmerit. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thepetition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  45. 45. ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORETo The Deputy Director (Legal), Directorate of Anti Corruption Establishment, Punjab, Lahore. No.ACE-LR-2012/ Dated:-Subject: SUBMISSION OF REPORT REGARDING COMPLAINT NO. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.Respected Sir, It is submitted that petition u/s 22-A & 22-B filed byMst. Horran Bibi W/o Nazar Khan is pending before Mr. MuhammadIjaz Butt Addition District & Sessions Judge Lahore in which nextdate of hearing is fixed on 10.02.2012. Final report regardingcomplaint No. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 is required by the verbalorder of the Court. Kindly depute any officer to submit the same in the courtand oblige. Submitted please. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment Lahore Region Lahore
  46. 46. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. SHAMS-UD-DIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.Respectfully Sheweth:- BRIEF FACTS Brief facts of the complaint are that complainant Shams-ud-Din as alleged that Zulafiqar Patwari has received Rs. 30000/- from himas illegal gratification to record the stay order proceedings in RevenueRegister and after getting the bribe he entered the stay order Vide RaptNo. 4 dated 04.09.2005 in Roznamcha. On his complaint enquiry wasinitiated against the said Patwari who appeared in person before enquiryofficer and has denied the allegations leveled on him. After probing thematter final report was submitted by Rao Pervaiz Akhtar the thenAssistant Director (Inv) on 19.12.2011. Legal branch after examining the final report and file on05.01.2012 raised some legal objections and recommended that after re-enquiring the matter revised final report be submitted. Competentauthority passed order on 11.01.2012 for compliance of objections raisedby legal branch and file entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmed Assistant Director(Inv) on 13.01.2012, who is probing the matter and the same will befinalized soon. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt application being based on false facts and information be kindlybe dismissed. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  47. 47. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. SHEIKH KHALID SAEED VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE REGION LAHORE ETC.REPORT IN PETITION UNDER SECTION 22-A & 22-B OF CR PCSUBMITTED BY MALIK NAVEED TARIQ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR(LEGAL) ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGIONLAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- That complainant submitted an application to ChiefMinister Punjab which was entrusted to respondent No. 1 by PSO toChief Minister Punjab. Wherein the applicant requested to probe thematter and take legal action against the accused persons. Thecomplainant Sh. Khalid Saeed R/o 85-The Mall, Imtiaz Plaza videproperty No. 85/108-R19-S has alleged that M/S Imran AshrafRevenue Officer, Abdul Khaliq Qanongo, Irfan Ali Patwari MouzaMozang Lahore. He further stated that Record Keeper Data GunjBakhsh Town, Lahore have made forged and bogus mutation andchanged the Khasra No. 2113 & 2114 of his property measuring 6Marla 24 Sqft, in-connivance with his opponent party and revenuefunctionaries in-connivance with the beneficiaries issued Fard forsale of property in Khasra No. 2113 through Rapt Roznamcha 831
  48. 48. dated 11.08.2010 by fabricating Fard Badar No. 285 dated29.07.2010. On the written complaint the matter was probed by theenquiry officer S.D. Khalid Deputy Director (Inv) Anti CorruptionEstablishment, Lahore Region, Lahore vide enquiry No. 167/2011who after hearing both the parties submitted his final report on16.07.2011. Enquiry officer has recommended that the matterpertains to demarcation of property and parties have alreadyinvoked the jurisdiction of Civil Court, no criminal misconducts onthe part of any public servant regarding preparation of Fard Badarcould be substantiated during enquiry and the matter was referredto the Additional Collector, District Lahore for further necessaryaction as to the allegations regarding demarcation of property etc. Inthis regard letter No. ACE-LR-(E-167/11/L)-2011/8397 dated10.09.2011 was sent to the Additional Collector, District Lahorewherein it is referred that:- “After due process, the Competent Authority have approved that the matter may be referred to your good office at your own end as to the allegations regarding demarcation of property etc. under intimation to this office”.PRAYER: Under the circumstances, petition being without anylawful cause of action, is prayed to be disposed of. Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  49. 49. BEFORE MR.ISRAR AHMED THE LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2016/11 SUBMITTED BY CH. MUHAMMADNAEEM.Respectfully Sheweth:- Kindly refer to notice No. 2016-11 dated 14.11.2011on thesubject noted above. It is submitted that case FIR No. 183/04 was registeredagainst the complainant/accused namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem,Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi town, Lahore alongwith other co-accusedpersons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authorityand incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of LearnedSenior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005. On13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaininginterim bail and produced receipts Nos. 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and 1978dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/-(300000+140000) depositedby him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled amount dueagainst him to the I.O with his free consent which were taken intopossession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through recovery memodated 13.04.2005. On 19.04.2005 interim bail of complainant/accusedwas cancelled by the Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption,Lahore as withdrawn and his arrest was effected by the I.O through ZimniNo. 81 para No. 01 dated 19.04.2005. The Learned Senior Special JudgeAnti Corruption, Lahore vide order dated 20.04.2005 sent thecomplainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem Electrical Supervisor,TMA Ravi, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case is subjudice in the courtof law. The order dated 10.08.2011 passed by your good self as to theexclusion of the name of complainant namely Ch. Muhammad Naeemfrom the subject enquiry has been challenged thoroughrepresentation/appeal before the Honorable Governor Province of Punjab,Lahore which is pending for adjudication. MUNIR SHAHID Representative
  50. 50. Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  51. 51. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. SHAMS-UD-DIN VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC. PARAWISE REPLY ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. 01Respectfully Sheweth:- 1. That the contents of para No. 01 are admitted to extent that the petition was filed by the petitioner and the Honorable Court was pleased to pass an order dated 20.09.2011. 2. That the contents of para No. 2 are correct to extent that in compliance of court order dated 20.09.2011, Enquiry bearing No. 555/2011 initiated in the Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore and on 06.10.2011 the petitioner and defendant No. 02 put their attendance on the order sheet. 3. That the contents of para 03 are totally false and frivolous as it is mentioned in para No. 02 that enquiry bearing No. 555/2011 has already been initiated against respondent No. 02 who has dully made his appearance on 06.10.2011. Copy of order sheet is annexed for kind perusal of this Honorable Court which is reflective of the fact that the respondent No. 02 has marked his attendance. 4. That the contents of para No. 04 are vehemently denied being false.
  52. 52. 5. That the role of respondent No. 02 whether he has committed forgery by entering wrong mutation or not shall be determined during the course of enquiry. 6. That the contents of para No. 06 are fabricated as respondent No. 02 appeared in the enquiry firstly on 06.10.2011, 26.10.2011, 19.11.2011, 21.11.2011 and lastly on 28.11.2011. 7. Legal. Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that thecontempt application being based on false facts and information be kindlybe dismissed. Deputy Director (Inv-III) On behalf of respondent (No. 01) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  53. 53. BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMAD THE LEARNED CONSULTANT OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB, LAHORE.REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2988/2011 SUBMITTED BY MALIKMUHAMMAD SAQIB ANJUM.Respectfully Sheweth I have honor to refer to your notice No. 2988/2011 dated29.10.2011 on the subject noted above. The above titled complaint does not pertain to Anti CorruptionEstablishment, Lahore Region rather the same relates to District Narowalwhich falls within jurisdiction of Anti Corruption Establishment,Gujranwala Region, Gujranwala. It is therefore, requested that further correspondence in thematter may be made with the concerned office. Deputy Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. No.ACE-LR-2011/ Dated:- A Copy is forwarded to the Director (Legal), Anti CorruptionEstablishment, Punjab, Lahore for information with reference to his memoNo. DG-ACE-DIR-L-(79)-2011/17865 dated 12.11.2011. Deputy Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  54. 54. IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE.In Re: - Anwaar Hussain Vs The State CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE.Subject: APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC.Respectfully Sheweth:- 1. That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC for today. 2. That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011. 3. That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the investigation evidence is required to be collected as allegedly huge loss to Government exchequer is involved. 4. That interest of justice demand that the investigation be based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate time is required. In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed thatfurther appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigationand submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice. Deputy Director (Inv-I), Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore Deputy Director (Legal), Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  55. 55. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.In Re: - Muhammad Shahbaz Vs The Additional Director Anti Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC Report on behalf of respondentRespectfully Sheweth:- The facts in brief are that the petitioner submitted acomplaint against Amanat Ullah ASI PS Shahdara Lahore under theallegation voiced in the petition. On the receipt of the complaint the matterhas been referred to the CCPO for obtaining his comments and reportalongwith the counter version of the ASI. On the receipt of the comments/report and counter version of the ASI, further proceedings will beconducted in accordance with law and rules. The petitioner is prematureand is liable to be dismissed. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  56. 56. IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE.In Re: - Anwaar Hussain Vs The State CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE.Subject: APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC.Respectfully Sheweth:- 5. That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC for today. 6. That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011. 7. That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the investigation evidence is required to be collected as allegedly huge loss to Government exchequer is involved. 8. That interest of justice demand that the investigation be based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate time is required. In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed thatfurther appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigationand submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice. Deputy Director (Legal), Deputy Director (Inv-I),Anti Corruption Establishment, Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore Lahore Region, Lahore
  57. 57. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTTADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.In Re:- Muhammad Alyas Vs Deputy Director Anti Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC Report on behalf of respondentRespectfully Sheweth:- The contention of the petitioner contained in para 2 of thepetition is not correct because the application/complaint annexed withthe petition has never been received in ACE. It is therefore, requested that the petitioner may be directed toattend the ACE alongwith the complaint supported by an affidavit forfurther action by the ACE in accordance with ACE Rules 1985. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
  58. 58. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. Maqsood Ahmed VS DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.Respectfully Sheweth:- Brief facts of the complaint filed by Maqsood Ahmed againstMuhammad Yousaf Khokhar etc are that the father of the complainantMuhammad Jahangir was owner of property No. NE-XVI-153-S-15/1/RH,who has died and now the property is in possession of his legal heirs.Malik Muhammad Ijaz by giving heavy bribe to excise inspectorMuhammad Yousaf Khokhar got prepared a forged PT-1 S-No.5307/1dated: 01-01-2006 in his name. The complainant requested that the samemay be cancelled. On receipt of this complaint the same was marked as complaintNo.1744/2011 in the Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region,Lahore. After due process and probe the competent authority vide hisorder that dated: 02-06-2011 directed to refer the same to the departmentand incompliance of that order the instant complaint was referred toDirector General Excise and Taxation vide this office Memo,No.ACE-LR(C-1744)/2011-4768 dated 10-06-2011 for disposal at their end. The complaint has been referred to Excise Department on02.06.2011 where as the order of this Honourable court was passed on03-06-2011. In view of the above mentioned circumstances now thecomplaint is lying with Director General Excise and Taxation for itsadjudication. It is humbly prayed that petition in hand may kindly be dismissed. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  59. 59. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. ABDUL AZIZ VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to thenon receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, thereport/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court. It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition maykindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could besubmitted. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  60. 60. IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE. MUHAMMMAD MAJEED VS DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE.Respectfully Sheweth:- With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to thenon receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, thereport/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court. It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition maykindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could besubmitted. Representative Zulafqar Ali (ASI) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
  61. 61. To The Worthy Director Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.Subject: CASUAL LEAVERespected Sir, With due respect and profound regards it is submittedthat I have to go to Layyah to look after my father. So, I can notattend the office on 09.04.2012 to 10.04.2012. Kindly grant me twodays casual leave with permission to leave the station. I shall be highly thankful to you. MALIK NAVEED TARIQ Assistant Director (Legal) Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, LahoreL/DDL:-

×