Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Pure Energy Consultants, LLCField Development Plan of Texas   Creek Oriskany Sandstone       Client: Shell (Fm. East Resou...
Introduction• Deliverables:  1) Reservoir Characterization  2) Reservoir Development Options w/ Economics• Findings:  1) O...
Reservoir Characterization                                       -OGIP = 5.8 Bscf                                       -S...
History Match
History Match                                                                1600000                                     G...
Development Options1) Production to Abandonment  -Add Wells  -No Additional Wells2) Gas Storage
Abandonment StrategyFor P abandonment of 500psi:1) Addition of One Well (Two Test Locations)                  VS2) Produce...
TW-1
Incremental Economics TW-1                           TW- 1                  • Gas produced 4.31                    BCF    ...
TW-2
Incremental Economics TW-2                           TW- 2                 • Gas produced 4.28                   BCF      ...
Economics of Abandonment• Plan Produce Original Three Wells to Abandonment  Pressure (500 psi)• Abandonment Date• Total Ga...
Gas Storage StrategyNp, Pressures at inject-Burst pressure (FG work)Working Gas: OGIP-Np = 5.8-3.9 = 1.9 BscfNo new wells,...
Gas Storage Results• Losing X % per cycle• -(Storage Cost + Summer Buy Price)*Vinj• + (Winter Sell Price)*Vprod• -12.5% *V...
Economics                                             at t=0 Gas Produced vs. Injected Produced                           ...
Economics Summer Price   $3.75 Winter Price   $4.75
EconomicsCycle       Money loss               Cycle       Gas loss (ft3)          Cycle       % Gas Loss (ft3)        1   ...
Conclusions-OGIP:-Reserves:-Abandonment Economics-Gas Storage Economics
Questions
Support Slides
Delciotto 2 History Match                       1600000                                            Delciotto 2            ...
Delciotto 1 History Match                                             250000                    Delciotto 1               ...
Graham 2 History Match1600000                          Graham 2140000012000001000000 800000                               ...
Pure Energy Consultants, LLC                    • Gas Produced                       3.86 BCF                    • Recover...
Pure Energy Consultants, LLC
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Png 492 pec final-presentation

577 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Png 492 pec final-presentation

  1. 1. Pure Energy Consultants, LLCField Development Plan of Texas Creek Oriskany Sandstone Client: Shell (Fm. East Resources) Date: 7 April 2011 Mike Cronin Matt Minemier 716-479-2722 814-222-1854 mbc5043@psu.edu mtm5097@psu.edu Zach Fidurko Naser Saleh 716-378-5970 814-441-1599 zmf5005@psu.edu nbs5043@psu.edu
  2. 2. Introduction• Deliverables: 1) Reservoir Characterization 2) Reservoir Development Options w/ Economics• Findings: 1) OGIP = 5.8 Bscf 2) Economics - Gas Price ($4/Mscf) • Gas Storage Infeasible • Infill Drilling Sub-Economic 3) Recommend Depleting Field to 500psi with Existing Wells.
  3. 3. Reservoir Characterization -OGIP = 5.8 Bscf -Swcon = 25% -Thickness = 30ft -Net Pay = 15ft -Porosity = 5% -GWC at 6200ftStructure Map with Water Saturation:Looking NW
  4. 4. History Match
  5. 5. History Match 1600000 Graham 2 1400000• Cumulative Gas Cumulative Production (MMscf) 1200000 Produced vs. Time 1000000 800000 Graham 2 600000 Modeled 400000 200000 0 1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011 -200000 Time (Days) • Daily Gas Produced 16000 Graham 2 14000 vs. Time 12000 Daily Production (mscf) 10000 8000 Historical 6000 Modeled 4000 2000 0 1/22/2010 -2000 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011 Time (Days)
  6. 6. Development Options1) Production to Abandonment -Add Wells -No Additional Wells2) Gas Storage
  7. 7. Abandonment StrategyFor P abandonment of 500psi:1) Addition of One Well (Two Test Locations) VS2) Produce Existing Wells Until Depleted
  8. 8. TW-1
  9. 9. Incremental Economics TW-1 TW- 1 • Gas produced 4.31 BCF • Recovery Factor 74 % • At $4 Mscf additional revenue will equal $1.8 million • Cost to Drill Well (from East AFE) $ 1.3 million • NPV @ 10 % give $-325,946 • ROR equals 3.3 % NPV=Net Present Value ROR=Rate of Return
  10. 10. TW-2
  11. 11. Incremental Economics TW-2 TW- 2 • Gas produced 4.28 BCF • Recovery Factor 73% • At $4 Mscf additional revenue will equal $1.68 million • Cost to Drill Well (from East AFE) $ 1.3 million • NPV @ 10 % give $-355,968 • ROR equals 3.2 % NPV=Net Present Value ROR=Rate of Return
  12. 12. Economics of Abandonment• Plan Produce Original Three Wells to Abandonment Pressure (500 psi)• Abandonment Date• Total Gas Produced BCF• At $4 Mscf - Producing to Abandonment - Stopping Production @ 1000 psi for injection
  13. 13. Gas Storage StrategyNp, Pressures at inject-Burst pressure (FG work)Working Gas: OGIP-Np = 5.8-3.9 = 1.9 BscfNo new wells, convert existing wells to injectors-6month injection/production cycling
  14. 14. Gas Storage Results• Losing X % per cycle• -(Storage Cost + Summer Buy Price)*Vinj• + (Winter Sell Price)*Vprod• -12.5% *Value of Unproduced Accessible Gas
  15. 15. Economics at t=0 Gas Produced vs. Injected Produced 6.00E+09 5.00E+09 4.00E+09Cumulative Gas SC (ft^3) 3.00E+09 Production 2.00E+09 Injection 1.00E+09 0.00E+00 12/27/2014 5/10/2016 9/22/2017 2/4/2019 6/18/2020 10/31/2021 -1.00E+09 Date
  16. 16. Economics Summer Price $3.75 Winter Price $4.75
  17. 17. EconomicsCycle Money loss Cycle Gas loss (ft3) Cycle % Gas Loss (ft3) 1 -7.67E+06 1 1.90E+09 1 14.98537127 2 -8.90E+06 2 2.27E+09 2 28.18611201 3 -9.20E+06 3 2.44E+09 3 39.47369726 4 -9.07E+06 4 2.52E+09 4 48.29953467
  18. 18. Conclusions-OGIP:-Reserves:-Abandonment Economics-Gas Storage Economics
  19. 19. Questions
  20. 20. Support Slides
  21. 21. Delciotto 2 History Match 1600000 Delciotto 2 1400000 Cumulative Production (MMscf) 1200000 1000000 800000 Historical 600000 CMG 400000 200000 0 1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011 -200000 Time (Days) 14000 Delciotto 2 12000 10000 Daily Production (mscf) 8000 Del 2 Hist 6000 CMG 4000 2000 0 1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011 -2000 Time (Days)
  22. 22. Delciotto 1 History Match 250000 Delciotto 1 200000 Cumulative Production (MMscf) 150000 100000 CMG Historical 50000 0 1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011 -50000 Time (Days) 3000 Delciotto 1 2500 Daily Production (mscf) 2000 1500 Del 1 1000 CMG 500 0 1/22/2010 5/2/2010 8/10/2010 11/18/2010 2/26/2011 -500 Time (Days)
  23. 23. Graham 2 History Match1600000 Graham 2140000012000001000000 800000 Graham 2 600000 Modeled 400000 200000 0 1/22/2010-200000 3/13/20105/2/20106/21/2010 8/10/2010 9/29/2010 11/18/2010 1/7/20112/26/201116000 Graham 2140001200010000 8000 Historical 6000 Modeled 4000 2000 0 1/22/20103/13/2010 5/2/2010 6/21/20108/10/20109/29/2010 11/18/20101/7/2011 2/26/2011-2000
  24. 24. Pure Energy Consultants, LLC • Gas Produced 3.86 BCF • Recovery Factor 67% • With no additional Wells
  25. 25. Pure Energy Consultants, LLC

×