Going places Voting Results

1,091 views

Published on

Published in: News & Politics, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Going places Voting Results

  1. 1. Voting Results and Analysis Board of Directors July 7, 2011
  2. 2. How People Voted <ul><li>Three ways to vote: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>At the Open Houses – October and November, 2010 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Online – Between November, 2010, and April, 2011 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Via mail survey – April, 2011 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Other input </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Phone survey – February through March, 2011 </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Voting Results
  4. 4. Open House Voting – 84 Votes
  5. 5. Online Voting – 535 Votes
  6. 6. Mail Survey – 607 Votes
  7. 7. Total Votes – 1,226 Votes
  8. 8. Voting Analysis
  9. 9. Asset-Based Development – 273 Votes <ul><li>People chose the Asset-Based Development scenario because… </li></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the positive notion of building on the Region’s existing assets </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the results of the performance indicator analysis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Below-average score for traffic congestion </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Above-average score for open space accessibility </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw the potential for increased accessibility to parks and jobs, resulting in decreased commute times </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw the potential for increasing the number of jobs in the Region </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They like the concentration of new development in areas with existing infrastructure </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the potential for open space preservation </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Infill/Conservation Development – 362 Votes <ul><li>People chose the Infill/Conservation Development scenario because… </li></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the emphasis on redevelopment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the emphasis on the preservation of open space – particularly the preservation of agricultural land </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked that some of the highest concentrations of new population and jobs would be centered on the City of Dayton </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw the concentration of development efforts in areas with existing infrastructure as more cost-effective </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw the potential for increased public transit options </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the increase in accessibility – especially to parks and employment centers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the results of the performance indicator analysis </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Mixed-Themes Development – 365 Votes <ul><li>People chose the Mixed-Themes Development scenario because… </li></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked having an option that mixed aspects from several different scenarios </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They wanted to see more preservation of open space – particularly agricultural land </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw an increased potential for the redevelopment of already developed and underused areas </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They liked the scenario’s future development pattern – which spreads concentrations of people and jobs throughout the Region and mainly along major transportation corridors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw the potential for an increase in alternative transportation methods </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>They saw the concentration of development efforts in areas with existing infrastructure as more cost-effective </li></ul></ul>

×