Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Can Social Tagging Be a Tool to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences?  |  KAIST GSCT  | 2011.04.07 Chae,...
“ Social tagging has been receiving widespread attention as a tool for creating new metadata on museum collections through...
Social Tagging , Museum,  Online Museum ,  Museum Website, Visitor-Oriented,  Information Management , Social Computing, T...
Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art (GMoMA) and we started a new project for social tagging
Building a testbed for collecting social tags 10th ~28th of February, 2010 (19days) http://cultureplanning.kaist.ac.kr/soc...
After the1st experiment, We organized workshops with GMoMA Curators (*1 st  workshop: 15/04/2010)  (*2 nd  work shop: 28/0...
Results from the experiment Light(6),Sunshine(5),Space(4),Loneliness(4),Sunlight(4),Empty(3),Room(3), Window(3),Angle(2),C...
? , 개미 , 거울 , 겨울 , 계곡 , 고독 , 골판지 , 공간 , 공포 , 공허 , 구름 , 국화 , 길 , 꽃 , 꿈 , 나무 , 나비 , 낚시 , 남극 , 누드 , 눈 , 단절 , 달 , 대비 , 대칭 , 도시...
But Certainly,  we realize the power of social tagging in art museum…
“ So, GMoMA decided to  apply social tagging system in their website” And we provide them new museum management strategies...
Museum Management Strategy 로마 ,  무대 ,  신전 ,  인도 ,  영웅 ,  꽃 ,  무대 ,  개선문 ,  글로벌 ,  신전 ,  신화 ,  개선문 ,  영웅 ,  풍자 ,  공연 ,  무대 ...
Museum Management Strategy Social Tags Public Collection Exhibition Curator Making Use of Social Tagging System <ul><li>Re...
Museum Management Strategy Social Tags Public Collection Museum A new way of Public Survey Making Use of Social Tagging Sy...
Chae, G. and Kim, J. (2011).  “ Rethinking Museum Management by Exploring the Potential of Social Tagging Systems in Onlin...
Before,
After,
Still, We can’t help but wonder…. “ Can Social Tagging Be a Tool to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences...
Related Works Emphasizing on Meaning, Structure and Facet (Classification) …
Our suggesting solution is applying  “ facetted tagging system”  for art museum tagging system. A sample of Mefeedia’s Fac...
Why do we use  “facetted tagging system”  for art museum tagging system? <ul><li>For the Audiece </li></ul><ul><li>structu...
Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure  Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing...
Black and White Mirror Winter Horror Cloud Road Flower Dream Tree Nude Snow Moon Contrast City Fairytale Cartoon Mosaic no...
  Research Title Facets (or Classification) Results of Application Facet  Tagging Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags (Schm...
<ul><li>Extrapolating six facets from the literature review </li></ul>Facets:  Background, Identification, Theme, Associat...
Black and White Mirror Winter Horror Cloud Road Flower Dream Tree Nude Snow Moon Contrast City Fairytale Cartoon Mosaic no...
Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure  Closed-Card Sorting Test 2. Evalua...
<ul><li>Purpose: Evaluating feasibility the six facets in categorizing social tags from the user’s point of view  </li></u...
Result from the Closed-Card Sorting Test <ul><li>Consistency of categorization between the participants: </li></ul><ul><ul...
Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure  Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing...
Example of analyzing a description of “Emergent Room” based on the six facets <ul><li>Can the six facets be useful for mus...
Result from Analyzing Artwork Descriptions  SFMOMA IMA MOMA GUGGENHEIM Average Average number of  facets implied in the ar...
Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure  Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing...
http://agarpe.cafe24.com/facet/ <ul><li>Twenty four artworks  were randomly selected from GMoMA and an online testbed was ...
Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure  Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing...
Idols on Narrative Stage,  Hong Youngin, 2007 Result from the Implementation Social Tags Hero(4), Circus(3), Myth3), Colla...
Non Titled, Lee Bul,  Cast polyurethane paint, two-way mirror, wood frame, 160*120*13, 2008 Result from the Implementation...
Erased-the sprout, Jungjungyup Oil Painting, 162*130, 2007  Result from the Implementation <ul><li>Facet tags give us clue...
After the Implementation, Another workshop was held with GMoMA Curators (*workshop: 09/02/2011)  For exploring potential o...
<ul><li>Does facetted tagging system has potential to  </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audi...
What can we expect by applying “ facetted tagging system” for art museums?
We can develop facet based collection browser! You can easily browse the artworks! Idols on Narrative Stage,  Hong Youngin...
Creating a new tagging interface And this can construct public-oriented collection metadata Idols on Narrative Stage,  Hon...
What is the next step ?
1. Eliminate the ambiguities in facets  & Develop the better facetted tagging system ?
2. We want to know how the tags will be changed  if audience see the original artworks in museum
3. Public Curated Exhibition Based on tag DB, Planning a new modern art exhibition
References <ul><li>Bar-Ilan, J., et al. (2008). “Structured versus unstructured tagging: a case study”.  Online Informatio...
Thank You |  KAIST GSCT  | 2011.04.07 Q & A
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

MW2011: G. Chae +, Can Social Tagging Be a Tool to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences?

2,605 views

Published on

After the emergence of Web 2.0, online art museums have been evolving into participatory museums, in an attempt to increase the public’s participation through the utilization of social media. Among many types of social media, social tagging has been receiving widespread attention as a tool for reducing the semantic gap between curators and visitors, through the group knowledge obtained from the active participation of the public.

In this circumstance, Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art (GMOMA) embarked on an ongoing project with us to explore the potential of social tagging and applying it into museum management strategy. In the end of 2009, we built our own tag database based on the collections from GMOMA, and experiments were carried out by building a testbed on a website that was created to collect tags of 128 pieces of artworks.

After collecting the tags, we evaluated the feasibility of social tagging systems through workshops with curators from GMOMA. From the workshop we found the potentials of social tagging systems in museums through interviews and discussions with the curators, and identified the improvements that could be made in order to apply it to actual museums.
However, we discovered that while the number of tags increased, social tagging systems showed limitations in providing meaningful information and supporting semantic relationships between tags and museum collections.

The causes are as follows:

Lack of order, structure and depth in tags
Linguistic issues
Free forms of tags can cause ambiguity, chaos and noise
Spam tagsFailure to show the semantic relationships between tags; only provides an alphabetical list
Thus to achieve a participatory web and reflect the visitors’ semantic appreciation of museum collections, we conclude that the existing tagging systems should be supplemented. To improve the existing social tagging system and enhance the semantic appreciation in online art museum, our suggested solution is faceted tagging system which gives a guideline or schema to users when tagging the individual artworks. By collecting tags through the faceted tagging systems, we can automatically obtain a semantic structure and meaningful groups of tags. Before implementing the faceted tagging system and proving that it works, we had to make facets that cover the all the categories of art museum tags. We proceeded with card-sorting tests to extract and verify facets from the collected tag database. We retrieved six facets – “Background, Identification, Theme, Association, Emotion and Figure” – based on the semantic structure of tags, which were in a mess but now can be categorized into meaningful groups (facets).

Finally, user-tests are scheduled in order to prove that applying the six facets into the faceted tagging system can help to bridge the semantic gap between curators and audiences. For the user-tests, the same 128 artworks from the first experiment will be used, and we will compare the tags collected from the user-tests with the tags from the first experiment. Then we plan to discuss the feasibility of faceted tagging systems and its results – which we call structured tags – through a workshop with the curators from GMOMA.

  • Be the first to like this

MW2011: G. Chae +, Can Social Tagging Be a Tool to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences?

  1. 1. Can Social Tagging Be a Tool to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences? | KAIST GSCT | 2011.04.07 Chae, Gunho / Kim, Jungwha agarpe,jungwhakim@kaist.ac.kr KAIST, Republic of Korea Making a Semantic Structure of Tags by Implementing the Facetted Tagging System for Online Art Museums
  2. 2. “ Social tagging has been receiving widespread attention as a tool for creating new metadata on museum collections through the participation and knowledge of the public. ” (Trant and Bearman 2006; Smith, 2006; Chun, 2006; Chan 2007)
  3. 3. Social Tagging , Museum, Online Museum , Museum Website, Visitor-Oriented, Information Management , Social Computing, Tagging, Folksonomy , Web 2.0, Participation, constructivist Learning , Social Indexing , Accessibility, Museum Communication, Steve.Musuem, Online Collection, Social Search, Information Science, Art Museum, Meaning Making , social media
  4. 4. Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art (GMoMA) and we started a new project for social tagging
  5. 5. Building a testbed for collecting social tags 10th ~28th of February, 2010 (19days) http://cultureplanning.kaist.ac.kr/socialtagging (based on steve-tagger 2.0) Results: No. of Artworks: 128 No. of Participants (Taggers): 168 No. of Tags: 14159
  6. 6. After the1st experiment, We organized workshops with GMoMA Curators (*1 st workshop: 15/04/2010) (*2 nd work shop: 28/04/2010) To find out what we gained from the experiment
  7. 7. Results from the experiment Light(6),Sunshine(5),Space(4),Loneliness(4),Sunlight(4),Empty(3),Room(3), Window(3),Angle(2),Calm(2),Lazy(2), Window with sunshine(2), Sunset(2),Composure(2),Afternoon(2),Chair(2),Working Room(2),cool(2) How can we interpret the tags from the audiece? What is their initial intention in tagging those words? … Tags Be gone, Boyeong jeong, Oil painting, 162*227.3, 2006
  8. 8. ? , 개미 , 거울 , 겨울 , 계곡 , 고독 , 골판지 , 공간 , 공포 , 공허 , 구름 , 국화 , 길 , 꽃 , 꿈 , 나무 , 나비 , 낚시 , 남극 , 누드 , 눈 , 단절 , 달 , 대비 , 대칭 , 도시 , 동양 , 동화 , 뒷모습 , 만화 , 모자이크 , 무서움 , 무제 , 무중력 , 바다 , 바람 , 반전 , 번짐 , 벚꽃 , 벽 , 병풍 , 봄 , 부조화 , 북한 , 빛 , 사과 , 사람 , 사진 , 산 , 산수화 , 새 , 선 , 선택 , 숫자 , 슬픔 , 시골 , 시원함 , 심오 , 심장 , 십장생 , 안개 , 액자 , 어머니 , 어지러움 , 엑박 , 여백 , 여성 , 여인 , 여자 , 여행 , 외로움 , 원 , 일본 , 자연 , 자유 , 자판기 , 전쟁 , 절벽 , 점 , 제사 , 조각 , 죽음 , 지도 , 징그러움 , 추상 , 타일 , 폐허 , 포도 , 폭포 , 풍경 , 피 , 핑크 , 하늘 , 합성 , 호수 , 혼란 , 홍수 , 환상 , 흑백 , 흙 Results from the experiment ? , 개미 ,Mirror,Winter, 계곡 , 고독 , 골판지 , 공간 ,Horror, 공허 ,Cloud, 국화 , Road , Flower , Dream , Tree , 나비 , 낚시 , 남극 ,Nude, Snow , 단절 ,Moon,Contrast, 대칭 ,City, 동양 ,Fairytale, 뒷모습 ,Cartoon,Mosaic, 무서움 ,nontitled, 무중력 , Sea , 바람 , 반전 , 번짐 , 벚꽃 , 벽 , 병풍 ,Spring, 부조화 , 북한 , Light ,Apple, 사람 , Photo , Mountatin , 산수화 , 새 , 선 , Choice , 숫자 ,Sorrow, 시골 , Cool , 심오 , Heart , 십장생 , 안개 , 액자 , Mother , 어지러움 , 엑박 , 여백 , 여성 , 여인 , Woman ,Travel, Lonley , 원 ,Japan, Nature , 자유 , 자판기 , War , 절벽 , 점 , 제사 , 조각 , Death , Map , 징그러움 , Abstract , 타일 , 폐허 , Grape , 폭포 , Scenary , 피 , 핑크 , Sky , 합성 , 호수 , 혼란 ,Flood, Fantasy , Black and White , 흙 What keywords can represent GMoMA’s collection? Why do they co-exist with each other? … Tag Clouds for the Top 100 Tags
  9. 9. But Certainly, we realize the power of social tagging in art museum…
  10. 10. “ So, GMoMA decided to apply social tagging system in their website” And we provide them new museum management strategies using social tagging system
  11. 11. Museum Management Strategy 로마 , 무대 , 신전 , 인도 , 영웅 , 꽃 , 무대 , 개선문 , 글로벌 , 신전 , 신화 , 개선문 , 영웅 , 풍자 , 공연 , 무대 , 서커스 , 글로벌 , 공연 , 풍자 , 화려함 , 서커스 , 콜라주 , 패러디 , 공연 , 개선문 , 공연 , 무대 , 신전 , 인도 , 영웅 , 서커스 , 신화 , 최근 작가는 사진작업을 새롭게 시작하고있다 . 정확히 말하면 디지털 이미지를 자신의 미학적 개념에 맞게 재구성하는 것이다 . 작가가 주목하고 있는 것은 일종의 ' 기념비적 조각 ' 들로서 , 종교적 기념조각이라 할 수 있는 ' 불상 ' 과 광화문의 ' 이순신 ' 을 비롯해 동서양의 다양한 동상을 차용한 후 거기에 현대판 옷을 입혀 전혀 다른 맥락의 인물을 창조하는 것이다 . 이 ' 기념물 ' 들은 역사 , 사회 , 문화일반의 관광적 시선 , 즉 발견의 시선에 의해 재맥락화되고 있다 . Existing Information Social Tags Making Use of Social Tagging System <ul><li>Building public oriented museum collection metadata </li></ul><ul><li>New ways of searching art museum collection </li></ul>Museum Collection Information Management Idols on Narrative Stage_ 소리 , 배우 , 그리고 아무것도 실존하지 않는 무대 , 홍영인
  12. 12. Museum Management Strategy Social Tags Public Collection Exhibition Curator Making Use of Social Tagging System <ul><li>Reflecting visitors’ perspective into exhibition planning </li></ul><ul><li>Tag based online exhibition </li></ul><ul><li>Tag tour application </li></ul>Public Oriented Curating
  13. 13. Museum Management Strategy Social Tags Public Collection Museum A new way of Public Survey Making Use of Social Tagging System <ul><li>Real-time public survey (Demographic differences, Rising issues, etc.) </li></ul><ul><li>Giving curators a chance to understand visitors </li></ul>A New Way of Public Survey
  14. 14. Chae, G. and Kim, J. (2011). “ Rethinking Museum Management by Exploring the Potential of Social Tagging Systems in Online Art Museums”. The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, Vol. 3, Number 3, pp.131–140.
  15. 15. Before,
  16. 16. After,
  17. 17. Still, We can’t help but wonder…. “ Can Social Tagging Be a Tool to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences?” Our answer is “it needs more”.
  18. 18. Related Works Emphasizing on Meaning, Structure and Facet (Classification) …
  19. 19. Our suggesting solution is applying “ facetted tagging system” for art museum tagging system. A sample of Mefeedia’s Faceted Tagging interface (G. Smith 2008) What is “facetted tagging system”? The tagging interface at buzzillions.com gives two facets (G. Smith 2008) Facette | Facets for Delicious by Peter Lai, 2009
  20. 20. Why do we use “facetted tagging system” for art museum tagging system? <ul><li>For the Audiece </li></ul><ul><li>structured tagging may be able to produce stronger user guidance , hence possibly resulting in higher quality descriptions. (Bar-Ilan et al. 2006) </li></ul><ul><li>information seekers in large domains of objects prefer meaningful groupings of related items , in order to quickly understand relationships and so decide how to proceed (Hearst 2006) </li></ul><ul><li>For the Museum curators and Staffs </li></ul><ul><li>Giving a chance to understand sematic structure of tags and tagger’s initial intention of tags </li></ul><ul><li>Building public-oriented collection metadata based on facetted tagging </li></ul>
  21. 21. Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing Artwork Description 2. Evaluating Feasibility of Facets Implementation Discussion 3. Implementing Facetted Tagging System
  22. 22. Black and White Mirror Winter Horror Cloud Road Flower Dream Tree Nude Snow Moon Contrast City Fairytale Cartoon Mosaic nontitled Sea Spring Light Apple Photo Mountain Choice Sorrow Cool Heart Mother Woman Travel Lonley Japan Nature War Death Map Abstract Grape Scenary Sky Flood Fantasy Manually matching each tags with artworks… And then trying to group them
  23. 23.   Research Title Facets (or Classification) Results of Application Facet Tagging Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags (Schmitz, 2006) Place, Activity, Depictions, Emotion, Response Place, Activity, Depictions, Emotion, Response Collaborative Classification of Growing Collections with Evolving Facets (Wu, 2007) Artifact, Location, Foreign Fairs, Topics, Year Location, Topics, Year Facetag: Integrating Bottom-up and Top-down Classification in a Social Tagging System (Quintarelli et al; 2007) Resource Types, Language, Themes, People, Purposes, Date People, Purposes, Date, Theme Tag Classification The structure of collaborative tagging systems (Golder and Huberman, 2005) Descriptive, Resource, Ownership/Source, Opinion, Self-reference, Task Organizing, Play and Performance Descriptive, Opinion Viewing Artwork Viewer tagging in art museums: Comparisons to concept and vocabularies of art museum visitors (Smith, 2006) Pictured people, Objects, Events, Actions, Simple mood, Emotions, Theme, Stories Pictured people, Objects, Events, Actions, Simple mood, Emotions, Theme The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development (Housen, 1983) Figure, Objects, Events, Story, Theme Figure, Objects, Events, Theme Facet Tagging Websites http://www.mefeedia.com Events, Language, People, Places, Topics Events, People, Places, Topics http://www.etsy.com (Ranganathan’s classicifacion) Space, Time, Material, Topic, Colors, Owners Space, Time, Material, Topic, Colors
  24. 24. <ul><li>Extrapolating six facets from the literature review </li></ul>Facets: Background, Identification, Theme, Association, Emotion and Figure
  25. 25. Black and White Mirror Winter Horror Cloud Road Flower Dream Tree Nude Snow Moon Contrast City Fairytale Cartoon Mosaic nontitled Sea Spring Light Apple Photo Mountain Choice Sorrow Cool Heart Mother Woman Travel Lonley Japan Nature War Death Map Abstract Grape Scenary Sky Flood Fantasy Manually matching each tags with artworks… And then grouping them into six groups Black and White Mirror Winter Horror Cloud Road Flower Dream Tree Nude Snow Moon Contrast City Fairytale Cartoon Mosaic nontitled Sea Spring Light Apple Photo Mountain Choice Sorrow Cool Heart Mother Woman Travel Lonley Japan Nature War Death Map Abstract Grape Scenary Sky Flood Fantasy Horror City Abstract Sorrow Death Cartoon Dream Cloud Background Identification Theme Association Emotion Figure
  26. 26. Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure Closed-Card Sorting Test 2. Evaluating Feasibility of Facets 3. Implementing Facetted Tagging System
  27. 27. <ul><li>Purpose: Evaluating feasibility the six facets in categorizing social tags from the user’s point of view </li></ul><ul><li>Subjects: Ten artworks with tags (Artworks were randomly chosen from GMOMA Collection) </li></ul><ul><li>20 experiment participants were each given five artworks and asked to classify the tags </li></ul>
  28. 28. Result from the Closed-Card Sorting Test <ul><li>Consistency of categorization between the participants: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>91% of the Tags were classified into the 6 facets </li></ul></ul><ul><li>More than 3 people categorized equally : 61% </li></ul><ul><li>More than 2 people categorized equally : 75% </li></ul>
  29. 29. Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing Artwork Description 2. Evaluating Feasibility of Facets 3. Implementing Facetted Tagging System
  30. 30. Example of analyzing a description of “Emergent Room” based on the six facets <ul><li>Can the six facets be useful for museum curators </li></ul><ul><li>in reflecting the public’s viewpoint? </li></ul><ul><li>Subjects: Ten artworks, randomly selected from the highlight section of four museums’ website – SFMOMA, IMA, MOMA, and Guggenheim were analyzed. </li></ul>Museum MOMA Artist Robert Colescott Title Emergency Room Description Using a rich palette and articulated brush strokes, Colescott has depicted a chaotic emergency room, which he considers to be &quot;a vivid allegory for the whole country.&quot; Since the 1960s, Colescott has addressed social issues, particularly racial stereotypes, through narrative figuration. This scene is crowded with caricatured figures, including a priest holding a decapitated head, a skeleton receiving a blood transfusion, a gang of knife–wielding apes, and a doctor smoking as he administers an injection. The women in the painting are subject to violence and harassment, and one large, recumbent, objectlike woman in the background has bricks for flesh, skeletons for eyes, and factory smoke for hair. Facet 1. Background Since the 1960s Facet 2. Identification chaotic emergency room / a priest holding a decapitated head, a skeleton receiving a blood transfusion, a gang of knife–wielding apes, and a doctor smoking as he administers an injection. / women / large, recumbent, objectlike woman / bricks for flesh, skeletons for eyes, and factory smoke for hair Facet 3. Theme social issues, particularly racial stereotypes Facet 4. Association a vivid allegory for the whole country. / violence and harassment Facet 5. Emotion   Facet 6. Figure narrative figuration
  31. 31. Result from Analyzing Artwork Descriptions SFMOMA IMA MOMA GUGGENHEIM Average Average number of facets implied in the artworks’ descriptions 4.6 4.3 4.8 5.8 4.9
  32. 32. Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing Artwork Description 2. Evaluating Feasibility of Facets Implementation 3. Implementing Facetted Tagging System
  33. 33. http://agarpe.cafe24.com/facet/ <ul><li>Twenty four artworks were randomly selected from GMoMA and an online testbed was created for the experiment </li></ul><ul><li>During one week, 100 users participated in the experiment </li></ul><ul><li>Approximately 9400 tag s were collected, with an average of 391 tags per artwork. </li></ul><ul><li>Among all the tags, less than 2% of the total tags (165 tags) did not belong to any of the six facets and were classified as “etc” </li></ul>
  34. 34. Manual Indexing Research Process Literature Review 1. Constructing the Facet Structure Closed-Card Sorting Test Analyzing Artwork Description 2. Evaluating Feasibility of Facets Implementation Discussion 3. Implementing Facetted Tagging System
  35. 35. Idols on Narrative Stage, Hong Youngin, 2007 Result from the Implementation Social Tags Hero(4), Circus(3), Myth3), Collage(3), Satire (3), triumphal arch (2), Performance(2), Global(2), Flower(2), Rome(2), Stage(2), Temple(2), India(2), Parody(2), HongYoungIn(2), Dazzling(2) Facet tags Background Identification Theme Association Emotion Figure Greece(14) Statue(10) Hero(10) Mismatch(6) Unfocused(5) Collage(18) Ancient(14) God(9) Diversity(6) kitsch(5) Dignity(5) Photo(14) Medieval(12) General(6) Eastern and Western(5) Disturbance(5) insensibility(4) Magazine(7) Temple(10) Stage(6) Myth(5) Pop Art(4) Dazzling(4) Pop Art(7) Myth(7) Hero(6) Human(3) Greece(3) Inharmony(4) Paper(6) Modern(6) Flower(6) Chaos(3) Chaos(3) Fun(3) Canvas(4) Stage(6) Photo(4) Play(3) Dazzling(3) Gorgeous(3) Paints(2) Eastern and Western(5) Actor(4) Idol(2) Complex(3) Delight(2) Montage(2)
  36. 36. Non Titled, Lee Bul, Cast polyurethane paint, two-way mirror, wood frame, 160*120*13, 2008 Result from the Implementation Social Tags Machine(12), Infinity(4), Matrix(3), Handcuffs(3), Stocked(2), Mirror(2), Metal(2), Robot(2), Building(2), Cube(2), Transformer(2), Piano(2) Background Identification Theme Association Emotion Figure Future(25) Machine(26) City(9) 차가움 (6) 차가움 (16) 철 (12) Virtual Space(17) City(12) 차가움 (8) 특이함 (5) 무감각 (5) 컴퓨터그래픽 (11) 가상공간 (5) 건물 (9) 혼란 (6) 혼란 (5) 삭막함 (4) 그래픽 (8) 4 차원 (5) Robot(4) 혼돈 (4) 어두움 (3) 무서움 (3) 쇠 (6) 우주 (5) 철 (3) 미래 (4) 복잡함 (3) Coldness(2) 물감 (4) 현대 (4) 컴퓨터 (3) 불안 (3) 질서 (2) 딱딱함 (2) Metal(4) City(3) 아파트 (3) 어두움 (3) Computer(2) 메마름 (2) 종이 (4) Computer(3) Metal(3) 잿빛도시 (2) 도시화 (2) 폐쇄 (2) 플라스틱 (3) 겨울 (3) 기계장치 (3) 빨려들어감 (2) 멸망 (2) 두려움 (2) 컴퓨터 그래픽 (3) 사이버 (3) 미로 (2) 메마름 (2) Machine(2) 무감정 (2) 프린트 (2) 입체 (2) 건축 (2) 단단함 (2) 알수없음 (2) 혼란 (2) 액자 (2) 미로 (2) 톱니 (2) 현대문명 (2) Coldness(2) 답답함 (2) 사진 (2) Matrix(2) 알수없음 (2) 알수없음 (2) Future(2) 어지러움 (2) 컴퓨터 (2) world of dimensions(2) 설계 (2) 어두엄 (1) 삭막함 (2) 기이한 조합 (1) 디지털 프린트 (2) 그래픽 (2) 현실 (2) 보이지않는손 (1) Virtual Space(2) 낯선 감정 (1) 조형 (2) 5 차원 (2) 레고 (2) 롤러코스터 (1) Robot(2) 도발 (1) 알수없음 (2) 빛 (1) 인위적 (2) Virtual Space(1) 비인간화 (2) 경이 (1) 찹쌀떡 (1) virtual space(1) 액자 (2) 복잡함 (1) Matrix(2) 공허함 (1) 컴퓨터프로그래밍 (1)
  37. 37. Erased-the sprout, Jungjungyup Oil Painting, 162*130, 2007 Result from the Implementation <ul><li>Facet tags give us clues for interpreting the semantic structure of tags </li></ul><ul><li>We can guess the initial intention of taggers when they tag </li></ul><ul><li>It shows relation among tags by grouping them into facets </li></ul>Social Tags Potato(5), Death(5), Worm(4), Creepy(4), Sprout(2), Empty(2), Dream(2), Chicken(2), Poison(2), Flea(2), Goat(2), Start(2), Lamb(2), Bean(2) Background Identification Theme Association Emotion Figure 하늘 (29) Potato(11) Life(16) Life(9) Creepy(6) 물감 (24) 현대 (10) 양 (10) Start(5) Potato(4) 알수없음 (4) 수채화 (9) 환상 (8) 뿌리 (9) 탄생 (5) 곤충 (4) 무감각 (3) 유화 (7) Sea(7) 사람 (9) 몽상 (4) Sea(3) 사랑 (3) 색연필 (6) 알수없음 (5) 싹 (6) 곤충 (4) Cloud(2) 독특함 (2) 종이 (5) 마음 (4) Cloud(6) 알수없음 (3) Start(2) 이상함 (2) 채색 (4) 태초 (4) 씨앗 (5) 생명력 (2) 희망 (2) 안타까움 (2) 캔버스 (3) 동화 (3) 벌레 (4) 붕 떠있는 (2) 푸른여백 (2) Peace(2) 알수없음 (3) 자궁 (2) 곤충 (4) 발아 (2) Creepy(2) 무의식 (2) 연필 (2) 물 (2) 콩 (3) Peace(2) 하늘 (2) 오묘함 (2) 색칠 (2) 뱃속 (2) 알수없음 (3) 무중력 (2) 모호 (2) 공허함 (2) 한지 (1) 만화 (2) 하늘 (3) Creepy(2) 꿈 (2) 신비 (2) 네모낳다 (1) 땅 속 (2) 고구마 (2) 생명의 탄생 (2) 신호등 (1) 슬픔 (2) 페인트 (1) 가상의 공간 (1) 뇌 (2) 뿌리내리다 (2) 기괴하나 아름답다 (1) 모호 (2) 신선하다 (1) 어떤 공간 (1) 게 (2) 난해함 (1) 가족 (1) 푹신함 (2) 그래픽 (1)
  38. 38. After the Implementation, Another workshop was held with GMoMA Curators (*workshop: 09/02/2011) For exploring potential of “ facetted tagging system” for art museums
  39. 39. <ul><li>Does facetted tagging system has potential to </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce the Semantic Gap between Curators and Audiences? </li></ul>Possibility <ul><li>facetted tags “were extremely interesting in that it was easier to see the intentions of the users” </li></ul><ul><li>because tags were grouped, “it would be possible to use such information when user’s search or categorize artwork.” </li></ul><ul><li>“ it would be possible to understand the semantic relation between tags in tag clouds created for facetted tagging.” </li></ul>Things to be improved <ul><li>“ there is a chance that the requirement of users to classify tags into one of six facets might make them feel like a taking a test and become a drawback from freely appreciating art” </li></ul><ul><li>facets themselves can trigger ambiguities” “the distinction between ‘association’ and ‘emotion’ were unclear.” </li></ul>Q
  40. 40. What can we expect by applying “ facetted tagging system” for art museums?
  41. 41. We can develop facet based collection browser! You can easily browse the artworks! Idols on Narrative Stage, Hong Youngin, 2007 Background Rome , Stage, Temple, India, Winter, Farm, NY, Seoul, War, River, Mountatin Theme Myth , triumphal arch , apple Hero, Satire, Stage, Circus, Global, Peace, Warmhearted, Love Emotion Satire, Dazzling, Horrified, Scary, Cold, Cool, Creepy, Cute, Sad Identification Hero, Flower, stage, triumphal arch, Global, Temple, coin, Pig, boy, red, Jeans, Time square Association triumphal arch, Performance, Stage, Myth, India, Hero,, Circus Global, Figure Circus, Collage, Parody, Performance, Contrast, Photo, Sculpture
  42. 42. Creating a new tagging interface And this can construct public-oriented collection metadata Idols on Narrative Stage, Hong Youngin, 2007 Background Rome , Stage, Temple, India Add Tags:_______________ Theme Myth , triumphal arch , Hero, Satire , Stage, Circus, Add Tags:_______________ Emotion Satire, Dazzling Add Tags:_______________ Identification Hero , Flower , stage, triumphal arch, Global, Temple, Add Tags:_______________ Association triumphal arch, Performance , Stage, Myth, India , Hero,, Circus Add Tags:_______________ Figure Circus, Collage, Parody, Performance Add Tags:_______________
  43. 43. What is the next step ?
  44. 44. 1. Eliminate the ambiguities in facets & Develop the better facetted tagging system ?
  45. 45. 2. We want to know how the tags will be changed if audience see the original artworks in museum
  46. 46. 3. Public Curated Exhibition Based on tag DB, Planning a new modern art exhibition
  47. 47. References <ul><li>Bar-Ilan, J., et al. (2008). “Structured versus unstructured tagging: a case study”. Online Information Review , Vol. 32, Issuse 5, pp.635 – 647. </li></ul><ul><li>Chan, S. (2007). Tagging and Searching-Serendipity and museum collection databases. In D. Bearman and J. Trant (eds.). Museums and the Web 2007: Proceedings. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, 2007.   http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/chan/chan.html </li></ul><ul><li>Chun, S., et al. (2006). Steve. museum: an ongoing experiment in social tagging, folksonomy, and museums. Museums and the Web 2006: Proceedings. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, 2006. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2006/papers/wyman/wyman.html </li></ul><ul><li>Durbin, G. (2003). Using the Web for Participation and Interactivity, Museum and Web 2003: Proceedings. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, 2003. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2003/papers/durbin/durbin.html </li></ul><ul><li>Golder, S. and B, Huberman. (2005). The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Arxiv preprint cs/0508082. </li></ul><ul><li>Chae, G. and Kim, J. (2011). “Rethinking Museum Management by Exploring the Potential of Social Tagging Systems in Online Art Museums”. The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, Vol. 3, Number 3, pp.131–140. </li></ul><ul><li>Hearst, M. (2006). “Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration”. Communications of the ACM , Vol. 49, Issue 4, pp.59 – 61. </li></ul><ul><li>Housen, A. (1983). The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development . Ed.D. Thesis, Harvard University Graduate School of Education, UMI number 8320170. </li></ul><ul><li>Quintarelli, E., et al. (2007). “Information architecture: Facetag: Integrating bottom-up and top-down classification in a social tagging system”. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , Vol. 33, Issue 5, pp.10–15. </li></ul><ul><li>Schmitz, P. (2006). “Inducing ontology from flickr tags”. In Proceedings of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop in conjunction with the 15th International Conference on the World Wide Web. </li></ul><ul><li>Smith, G. (2007). Tagging: people-powered metadata for the social web . New Riders. </li></ul><ul><li>Smith, M. (2006). “Viewer tagging in art museums: Comparisons to concepts and vocabularies of art museum visitors”. In Advances in classification research, vol. 17: Proceedings of the 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. </li></ul><ul><li>Trant, J. and B. Wyman. (2006). “Investigating social tagging and folksonomy in art museums with steve. Museum”. the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (WWW'06). </li></ul><ul><li>Wu, H., et al. (2007). “Collaborative classification of growing collections with evolving facets”. Proceedings of the 18th conference on Hypertext and hypermedia HT 07 </li></ul><ul><li>Xu, Z., et al. (2006). “Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions”. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (WWW'06) </li></ul>
  48. 48. Thank You | KAIST GSCT | 2011.04.07 Q & A

×