Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Annotators and Agents  in a Web-based Collaboratory:  Disclosing Cartographical Collections    Charles van den Heuvel, Vir...
MAPS and  MATCH-maps <ul><li>Aim: linking historical maps with contextual documents + assist users in retrieval </li></ul>...
annotators <ul><li>geneaologists, local historians, private collectors,  </li></ul><ul><li>Leiden University Library: rese...
agents
first experiment with agents
 
Thank You Charles van den Heuvel charles.vandenheuvel@vks.knaw.nl  Sandor Spruit sandor.spruit@cs.uu.nl  Leen Breure [emai...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

MW2010: Charles van den Heuvel et al., Annotators and Agents in a Web-based Collaboratory around Cartographical Collections in Cultural Heritage Institutions

1,434 views

Published on

This paper discusses two interrelated projects: Manuscript map Annotation and Presentation System (MAPS); and Multi-Agent Technology Contextualizing Historical Maps (MATCH-Maps). MAPS is based on a computer aided system that allows users to enrich manuscript maps with geo-references and annotations, and to link these to existing descriptions of archival documents. This bottom-up approach raises methodological questions regarding the authority of annotations and tags provided by professional versus non-professional researchers. In addition, users need to be able to search for contextual documents of old maps. For this purpose, we designed the multi-agent environment MATCH-Maps complements the MAPS system. It will assist curators in restoring connections between manuscript maps and contextual archival documents and help users in searching for maps. Due to 19th century archival practices, many manuscript maps lost their contexts when archivists separated them from the documents to which they belonged.

Cultural heritage institutions are unequipped to reconstitute these lost relationships on their own. Involving users on the basis of Web 2.0 principles seems a productive alternative. The annotations of users may provide valuable hints to the expertise of professional archivists. The multi-agent system will use annotation in suggesting possible links between manuscript maps and administrative documents. However, it will leave it to users and curators respectively to select and re-establish definitely their proper contexts.

Session: Actionable Research [research]

See http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/abstracts/prg_335002164.html

Published in: Technology
  • The full text of the paper accompanying this presentation from Museums and the Web 2010 is freely available on-line:

    van den Heuvel, C. et al., Annotators and Agents in a Web-based Collaboratory: Disclosing Cartographical Collections . In J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds). Museums and the Web 2010: Proceedings. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics. Published March 31, 2010. Consulted May 31, 2010. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/papers/heuvel/heuvel.html
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

MW2010: Charles van den Heuvel et al., Annotators and Agents in a Web-based Collaboratory around Cartographical Collections in Cultural Heritage Institutions

  1. 1. Annotators and Agents in a Web-based Collaboratory: Disclosing Cartographical Collections   Charles van den Heuvel, Virtual Knowledge Studio (KNAW), Sandor Spruit, Leen Breure, Hans Voorbij, Utrecht University, Netherlands Museum&Web 2010 Conference Denver 14-17 April 2010
  2. 2. MAPS and MATCH-maps <ul><li>Aim: linking historical maps with contextual documents + assist users in retrieval </li></ul><ul><li>annotation: combining formal description formats with bottom up tagging </li></ul><ul><li>(semi-) automatic linking using multi-agent technology </li></ul><ul><li>creating rules based on profiles of (historical) archive creators and users and typologies of maps </li></ul>
  3. 3. annotators <ul><li>geneaologists, local historians, private collectors, </li></ul><ul><li>Leiden University Library: researchers </li></ul><ul><li>National Archives – 85% of visitors = genealogist </li></ul><ul><li>observing annotating practices </li></ul>
  4. 4. agents
  5. 5. first experiment with agents
  6. 7. Thank You Charles van den Heuvel charles.vandenheuvel@vks.knaw.nl Sandor Spruit sandor.spruit@cs.uu.nl Leen Breure [email_address] Hans Voorbij [email_address]

×