 REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE Creating Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes,Healthy People: Initiating a Research Agendaon the B...
 REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT                    Transportation                          increased compu...
 REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE smaller areas. All this has had a        tems.45 To address some of           ties. To encourage...
 REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE think the modes of transporta-              An example is the “Southern              Extramural ...
 REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE 23. Spannhake EW, Reddy SP, Jacoby          United States: impact of socioeconomic       site; E...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5

Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health


Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health

  1. 1.  REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE Creating Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes,Healthy People: Initiating a Research Agendaon the Built Environment and Public Health Mounting evidence suggests | Shobha Srinivasan, PhD, Liam R. O’Fallon, MA, and Allen Dearry, PhD physical and mental health prob- lems relate to the built environ- ment, including human-modified THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT— cular disease, cancer) require Environmental Health places such as homes, schools, human-modified places such as such research efforts. These com- The scientific community’s workplaces, parks, industrial homes, schools, workplaces, parks, plex diseases are attributable to definition of “environmental areas, farms, roads and high- industrial areas, farms, roads and an interaction of genetic and en- health” also has changed in re- ways. The public health rele- highways—is our most important vironmental influences, and many cent years. Two decades ago, the vance of the built environment requires examination. habitat, since 80% of North of the latter can be directly con- study of environmental health fo- Preliminary research dem- Americans live in towns and cities nected to the built environment. cused almost exclusively on onstrates the health benefits of and spend 90% of their time in- While research has focused on chemical toxicants and their rela- sustainable communities. How- doors.1 To date, much discussion the negative public health conse- tionship to cancer and other ill- ever, the impact of mediating of the built environment has fo- quences of the built environment, nesses. Now the definition of en- and moderating factors within cused on the challenges of provid- there has been very limited focus vironmental health is much the built environment on health ing adequate transportation on the benefits of living in sus- broader, and researchers are must be explored further. Given (roads, highways, infrastructure, tainable communities. A research studying the effects on human the complexity of the built en- public transportation), urban agenda on the public health and health of the physical and social vironment, understanding its sprawl, air pollution due to in- quality-of-life benefits of sustain- environment, which includes is- influence on human health creased traffic, the lack of side- able communities is necessary. sues related to urban and rural requires a community-based, multilevel, interdisciplinary re- walks, and the diminishing natural development, appropriate uses of search approach. environment. New evidence, how- DEFINITIONS land, pesticide use, public trans- The authors offer recom- ever, increasingly recognizes that portation systems, and industrial mendations, based upon a re- even the places we live and work Built Environment development.11 This change is re- cent conference sponsored by clearly affect our health.2 Never- Scientists’ understanding of flected in the U.S. Department of the National Institute of Envi- theless, causal relationships be- the “built environment” has un- Health and Human Service’s ronmental Health Sciences tween the built environment and dergone several changes. Health (DHHS) Healthy People 201012 (NIEHS), for research and pol- specific human illnesses are often Canada’s10 definition of the built current definition of environmen- icy approaches, and suggest in- difficult to ascertain.3 environment has been modified tal health: teragency research alliances for Recent research explores the as follows and provides a frame- In its broadest sense, environ- greater public health impact. effect of improved built environ- work for this discussion: mental health comprises those (Am J Public Health. 2003;93: ments on physical activity,4 The built environment includes aspects of human health, dis- 1446–1450) ease, and injury that are deter- asthma,5 obesity,6 cardiovascular our homes, schools, workplaces, parks/recreation areas, business mined or influenced by factors disease, lung cancer mortality,7 areas and roads. It extends over- in the environment. This in- and mental health.8,9 However, a head in the form of electric cludes not only the study of the transmission lines, underground direct pathological effects of pressing need remains for more various chemical, physical, and in the form of waste disposal concerted research to identify sites and subway trains, and biological agents, but also the mechanisms by which the built across the country in the form of effects on health of the broad highways. The built environment physical and social environ- environment adversely and posi- ment, which includes housing, encompasses all buildings, spaces tively impacts health and to de- and products that are created or urban development, land-use velop appropriate interventions to modified by people. It impacts and transportation, industry, indoor and outdoor physical en- and agriculture. reduce or eliminate harmful vironments (e.g., climatic condi- health effects. The growing tions and indoor/outdoor air Thus, the broader definition of health burden and attendant eco- quality), as well as social environ- “environmental health” encom- nomic costs associated with ments (e.g., civic participation, passes the “built environment” community capacity and invest- higher chronic disease incidence ment) and subsequently our within its scope and provides the (e.g., obesity, asthma, cardiovas- health and quality of life. context for future research.1446 | Reviewing the Evidence | Peer Reviewed | Srinivasan et al. American Journal of Public Health | September 2003, Vol 93, No. 9
  2. 2.  REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Transportation increased computer usage, con- and higher rates of crime, makingAND HEALTH In recent decades, US residents cern about crime, little contact neighborhoods less safe for walk- have had a greater reliance on with neighbors and geographic ing and in some cases resulting in Research on the connections cars and trucks, which burn fossil isolation have created communi- greater social isolation.37,38 Un-between the built environment fuels, for transportation needs. In- ties that are not interconnected.29 derstanding linkages between so-and health has largely focused creased vehicle use and the meth- This isolation may result in a lack cioeconomic inequity and healthon housing, transportation, and ods employed in energy genera- of social networks and diminished is essential to reducing exposuresneighborhood characteristics. tion contribute to air pollution social capital,31 which can con- to environmental hazards as wellThese research endeavors have that negatively impacts health.21 tribute to obesity, cardiovascular as disparities in health.also pointed out that the burden In sprawling communities, cars disease, mental health problems,of illness in the built environ- and trucks pollute the atmos- and increased rates of mortal- SUSTAINABLEment has been greater on lower phere with ground-level ozone ity.17,32–34 People who live in such COMMUNITIESsocioeconomic strata and minor- and particulate matter, contribut- isolated communities are oftenity populations. This section re- ing to human health problems unable to effect changes or deal While some research indicatesviews some of the literature in such as lung disease.22,27 People with crises or public health chal- the negative health impact of thethese areas. most affected by air pollution in- lenges. Studies suggest that a re- built environment, there is very clude older adults with pre- duction in childhood and adoles- limited research on the healthHousing existing respiratory disease,23 cent obesity, for example, through benefits of promoting sustainable The association between sub- children, especially those with various intervention and preven- communities. The President’sstandard housing and health has asthma,24 persons with inade- tion programs, would yield long- Council in 1993 offered a work-long been recognized.13,14 How- quate health care, and even term economic benefits.29,30 ing definition for sustainable com-ever, only recently has a growing healthy individuals who work munities as “healthy communitiesbody of evidence emerged sug- and exercise outdoors.24,25 Health Disparities where natural and historic re-gesting that physical and mental Higher dependence on motor In exploring the impact of the sources are preserved, jobs arehealth problems—anxiety, depres- vehicles also has resulted in built environment on public available, sprawl is contained,sion, attention deficit disorder, higher levels of congestion26 and health, research indicates that neighborhoods are secure, educa-substance abuse, aggressive be- increased motor and pedestrian the burden of illness is greater tion is lifelong, transportation andhavior, asthma, heart disease, injuries and deaths.27 Lack of safe among minorities and low- health care are accessible, and alland obesity—relate to the built sidewalks in growing urban areas income communities.17,29,32–33 citizens have opportunities to im-environment, particularly to poor has resulted in a reduction in the Lower–socioeconomic status prove the quality of their lives.”39urban planning and inadequate number of children walking or communities usually have limited The sparse research on sustain-housing.15,16 Inadequate housing, biking to schools.12 Today, only access to quality housing stock able communities suggests thatfor example, may indicate that in- 10% of children walk or bicycle and live in neighborhoods that diligent planning is needed tohabitants are under significant to school—a 40% reduction over do not facilitate outdoor activities create an environment that is con-physical and mental stress.13, 17 the last 20 years.28 Research indi- or provide many healthy food ducive to the mental and physicalDilapidated housing—leaking cates that inadequate urban plan- options.35 Inequities in construc- well-being of humans as well aspipes, peeling paint, or cracks ning, including a dearth of bike tion and maintenance of low- the natural environment.40,41and holes in ceilings—may be a paths and sidewalks, has con- income housing, especially for These studies contend that healthstressor that affects the human tributed to an increasingly seden- Blacks, older persons, persons benefits exist when people comeimmune system.5,18 tary lifestyle for children, possibly with disabilities, and immigrants, into contact with the natural envi- Housing disrepair among the factoring into the growing rates of have resulted in insufficient ronment. The studies recommendpoor exposes them dispropor- childhood obesity.29 housing, poor quality housing, both the creation of green spacestionately to lead, pests, air pollu- overcrowding, and higher levels and the use of environmentallytants, contaminants, and greater Isolated Communities and of population density and health conscious construction.42social risks.5,13 Pest sightings in- Sedentary Lifestyles problems.16,36 Consequently, Some argue that urban sprawlcrease when buildings are dilapi- Mounting evidence suggests these communities may experi- has created more highways, thusdated, and no amount of clean- that there are social, health, and ence greater rates of respiratory causing greater air pollution.ing can remove the pest problem economic consequences to iso- disease, developmental disorders, With the expansion of urbanwhen such structural disrepair lated and sedentary lifestyles.30 obesity, chronic illnesses, and areas and the resultant sprawl,remains uncorrected. Further, Unfortunately, the physical and mental illness. agriculture has become more de-pesticide use in dilapidated struc- social construct of the urban envi- Also, studies have consistently pendent on the use of pesticidestures may jeopardize the health ronment promotes isolation.17 shown an association between a and mechanisms that can pro-of inhabitants.19,20 Higher rates of television viewing, deteriorated physical environment duce larger quantities of food inSeptember 2003, Vol 93, No. 9 | American Journal of Public Health Srinivasan et al. | Peer Reviewed | Reviewing the Evidence | 1447
  3. 3.  REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE smaller areas. All this has had a tems.45 To address some of ties. To encourage research in STRATEGIES FORdebilitating impact on human these gaps, the National Insti- this area, major recommenda- IMPLEMENTATIONhealth, resulting in greater rates tute of Environmental Health tions from the meeting includedof asthma and other respiratory Sciences (NIEHS) convened a the following: The built environment posesproblems. conference called the “Built En- many complex challenges that Accordingly, there have been vironment—Healthy Communi- • Develop effective measures involve physical and social envi-recommendations to develop ties, Healthy Homes, Healthy and indicators for sustainable ronments. In spite of researchgreen infrastructures to address People: Multilevel, Interdiscipli- communities. indicating that chronic diseasesthe ecological and social impacts nary Research Approaches,” in • Conduct multidisciplinary re- of the 20th century, such asof sprawl and their impact on July 2002 in Research Triangle search on the positive health im- heart disease, obesity, asthma,health.43 Examples of the princi- Park, North Carolina. The Na- pacts of sustainable and planned and others, are affected by howples behind incorporating green tional Institutes of Health’s Of- communities. we design, build, and sustainspaces and environmentally con- fice of Rare Diseases and Office • Assess the environmental our environment, many com-scious construction in the built of Behavioral and Social Sci- health benefits of efficient or al- munities and planners still doenvironment include using natu- ence Research cosponsored the ternate energy (for transporta- not fully understand the healthral daylight, solar collectors, pas- conference. tion, agriculture, architecture, consequences of environmentalsive cooling, and nontoxic mate- As its objective, the confer- community design, and so on). factors. This stems partly fromrials; harvesting rainwater; ence sought to delineate areas • Develop models to incorporate the sparse research concerninginstalling operable (openable) of research to better understand cost-effectiveness when adopting the health benefits of sustain-windows; creating pedestrian and the connection between specific environmentally sustainable able communities. Creatingbike greenways; and filling build- illnesses and health challenges technologies. communities that are consciousing structures with plants, water, in the built environment. A • Create coordinated programs of environmental health con-art, light, and natural air. Studies broad spectrum of participants among federal and nonfederal cerns may require partnershipsindicate health and occupational representing community organi- agencies that address research on and collaborations among poli-benefits from using some or all zations, state and local depart- the built environment. cymakers, governments, re-of these design principles ments of health, academic re- • Encourage multidisciplinary searchers, communities, andthrough lowering workplace searchers, and federal agencies programs for training and re- health specialists with interdis-stress and employee absenteeism, participated. They discussed the search within governmental and ciplinary perspectives.enhancing and preserving land, state of the science and explored nongovernmental agencies. Awareness of environmentalreducing energy waste, and re- future directions in conducting • Improve communication and health consequences requiresducing expenditures by having research on the built environ- partnership strategies among var- not only collaborative partner-lower energy and maintenance ment and health. Speakers de- ious entities; especially encour- ships but also the adoption ofcosts.44 These studies have ar- scribed current research and ex- age community participation in multidisciplinary research ap-gued that these kinds of sustain- amined connections between research endeavors. proaches to environmentalable communities may in the the built environment and • Develop multilevel techniques health, such as studies that in-long run translate into a healthier human health and discussed of measurement and longitudinal clude public health researchers,economy. challenges in developing sustain- models of analysis for assessing health professionals, architects, able communities that seek to the impact of the built environ- builders, planners, and trans-ADDRESSING THE balance the social, economic, ment on sustainable communi- portation officials. Such multi-CHALLENGES cultural, and ecological infra- ties. These measures and models disciplinary coalitions would be structure with human health should account for individual, better equipped to develop indi- Current research on the rela- and development. community, and systemic vari- cators and measures of sustain-tionship between urban design The conference participants ables including biological factors, able communities and to eluci-and human illness is inconclu- derived their major recommen- socioeconomic factors, and date their association withsive and requires further explo- dations from current literature; neighborhood and physical envi- environmental health.39,46ration. There is limited research they found gaps in the literature ronment variables. These coalitions may be betteron measures and methods to and research on sustainable • Identify factors and variables equipped to: (1) determinequantify the health benefits of communities, and they found that mediate and moderate built what constitutes safe neighbor-improved urban planning, in- that it focuses predominantly on environment health effects. hoods, (2) determine what con-cluding an examination of land- the adverse health effects of the • Study methods and channels to stitutes safe and affordableuse policies that could support built environment, with very lit- translate research findings into housing, (3) provide greensustainable and nonpolluting tle focus on the positive health policy and to the community-at- space for people to enjoy whereagricultural and industrial sys- impacts of sustainable communi- large that improve public health. they live and work, and (4) re-1448 | Reviewing the Evidence | Peer Reviewed | Srinivasan et al. American Journal of Public Health | September 2003, Vol 93, No. 9
  4. 4.  REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE think the modes of transporta- An example is the “Southern Extramural Research, National Institute of 9. Weich S, Blanchard M, Prince M,tion and travel from one place California Environmental Health Environmental Health Sciences, Research Burton E, Erens B, Sproston K. Mental Triangle Park, NC. health and the built environment: cross-to another. Project,”48 a collaborative effort Requests for reprints should be sent to sectional survey of individual and con- Since 1993, the NIEHS has between Communities for a Bet- Shobha Srinivasan, PhD, Scientific Pro- textual risk factors for depression. Br Jsupported a series of transla- ter Environment and the Univer- gram Administrator, National Institute of Psychiatry. 2002;180:428–433. Environmental Health Sciences, 111 TWtional research programs de- sity of Southern California Envi- 10. Health Canada, Division of Child- Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12233 (MD hood and Adolescence. Natural andsigned to establish sustainable ronmental Health Center.49 Their EC-21), Research Triangle Park, NC Built Environments. Ottawa: Health Can-mechanisms for educating the partnership successfully provided 27709 (e-mail: sriniva2@niehs.nih.gov). ada; 2002. Available at: http://www. This article was accepted April 30,public about environmental evidence to Los Angeles city hc-sc.gc.ca/dca-dea/publications/ 2003. healthy_dev_partb_5_e.html. Accessedhealth issues and for supporting planners concerning adverse August 8, 2003.individual and community in- health effects of air pollution on Contributors 11. Olden K. The complex interactionvolvement in the identification children in low-income, largely All authors contributed equally in con- of poverty, pollution, and health status. ceptualizing this paper. S. Srinivasan wasand investigation of environmen- minority areas where oil refiner- primarily responsible for writing the ar- The Scientist, February 16, 1998.tal health concerns. The NIEHS ies were located. In so doing, the ticle. A. Dearry and L. R. O’Fallon 12. Healthy People 2010: Understandingdeveloped the translational re- partnership helped keep the oil helped with writing and reviewing the and Improving Health. Washington, DC: article. US Dept of Health and Human Services;search programs to foster part- refineries from reopening. 2001. Also available at: http://health.nerships and alliances among The Northern Manhattan En- gov/healthypeople/document. Accessed Acknowledgmentsvarious relevant parties keen on vironmental Justice Partner- July 24, 2003. The recommendations contained in thisunderstanding the effects and ship49 in New York is another article were the result of a meeting 13. Sharfstein J, Sandel M, Kahn R, sponsored by National Institute of Envi- Bauchner H. Is child health at riskrisks to human health from ex- such project; it involves partner- ronmental Health Sciences, Office of while families wait for housing vouch-posure to physical and social en- ships between the West Harlem Rare Diseases and the Office of Behav- ers? Am J Public Health. 2001;91:vironmental agents. Environmental Action and Co- ioral and Social Science Research, Na- 1191–1192. tional Institutes of Health. The NIEHS has defined lumbia University. The partner- 14. Thomson H, Petticrew M, Morrisontranslational research as the ships have succeeded not only D. Health effects of housing improve- References ment: systematic review of interventionconversion of findings from in conducting research in the 1. Hancock T. Indicators of environ- studies. BMJ. 2001;323:187–190.basic, clinical, or epidemiological community to assess the effects mental health in the urban setting. Can 15. Raffestin C, Lawrence R. An eco-environmental health science re- of diesel pollution but also in ef- J Public Health. 2002;93:45–51. logical perspective on housing, healthsearch into information, re- fecting policy change for rerout- 2. Wilson A, Seal JL, McManigal LA, and well-being. J Sociol and Soc Welfare. Lovins LH, Cureton M, Browning WD. 1990;17:143–160.sources, or tools that can be ap- ing buses and placing a time Green Development: Integrating Ecologyplied by health care providers limit for idling of buses and and Real Estate. New York, NY: John 16. Fullilove MT, Fullilove RE. What’s housing got to do with it? Am J Publicand community residents to im- trucks in neighborhoods.49 Wiley; 1998. Health. 2000;90:183–184.prove public health outcomes in These partnerships have al- 3. Hodgson M. Indoor environmental exposures and symptoms. Environ 17. Bashir SA. Home is where theat-risk neighborhoods. In addi- lowed these projects to develop harm is: inadequate housing as a public Health Perspect. 2002;110:663–667.tion, the NIEHS has given spe- a more comprehensive and health crisis. Am J Public Health. 2002; 4. Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, 92:733–738.cial attention to ensuring that multidisciplinary research Killingsworth RE. How the built envi-the information is culturally rel- agenda and also initiate inter- ronment affects physical activity: views 18. Lehmann I, Thoelke A, Weiss M et from urban planning. Am J Prev Med. al. T cell reactivity in neonates from anevant and understandable.47 vention and prevention pro- East and a West German city—results of 2002;23:64–73. In various programs under the grams to impact public health. the LISA study. Allergy. 2002;57: 5. Rauh VA, Chew GL, Garfinkel RS. 129–36.auspices of translational research, Such multi-disciplinary endeav- Deteriorated housing contributes tosuch as the “Community-Based ors could lead to a greater un- high cockroach allergen levels in inner- 19. Cummins SK, Jackson RJ. The city households. Environ Health Perspect. built environment and children’sParticipatory Research, Health derstanding of the costs of un- 2002;110(suppl):323–327. health. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;Disparities, and Environmental healthy indoor environments 48:1241–1252. 6. Morland K, Wing S, Diez Roux A,Justice program,” some research (not only schools and work- 20. Kreiger J, Higgins DL. Housing and Poole C. Neighborhood characteristicsendeavors address aspects of the places but also hospitals and in- associated with the location of food health: time and again for public healthbuilt environment. These re- vehicle environments), the stores and food service places. Am J action. Am J Public Health. 2002;92: Prev Med. 2002;22:23–29. 758–768.search projects involve various health consequences of urban 7. Pope CA III, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, 21. Bell ML, Davis D, Cifuentes L etcombinations of partnerships sprawl and associated housing, et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary al. International expert workshop on theamong environmental health re- transportation and societal en- mortality, and long-term exposure to analysis of the economic and publicsearchers, social scientists, health ergy use.50,51 fine particulate air pollution. JAMA. health impacts of air pollution: work- 2002;287:1131–1141. shop summary. Environ Health Perspect.care providers, public health de- 2002;110:1163–1168.partments, and communities. 8. Halpern D. More Than Bricks and About the Authors Mortar? Mental Health and the Built En- 22. Frumkin H. Urban sprawl andThey are multidisciplinary in Shobha Srinivasan, Allen Dearry, and vironment. London, England: Taylor and public health. Public Health Rep. 2002;their scope. Liam R. O’Fallon are with the Division of Francis; 1995. 117:201–217.September 2003, Vol 93, No. 9 | American Journal of Public Health Srinivasan et al. | Peer Reviewed | Reviewing the Evidence | 1449
  5. 5.  REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE 23. Spannhake EW, Reddy SP, Jacoby United States: impact of socioeconomic site; Environmental Justice—Project De-DB, Yu XY, Saatian B, Tian J. Synergism factors and population density. Environ scriptions page. Available at http://between rhinovirus infection and oxi- Health Perspect. 2002;110:419–425. www.niehs.nih.gov/translat/envjust/dant pollutant exposure enhances air- ej-desc2.htm#shepard. Accessed July 37. Taylor RB, Harrell, AV. Physicalway epithelial cell cytokine production. 24, 2003. Environment and Crime. Washington,Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110: DC: National Institute of Justice; 1996. 50. Kjellstrom T, Corvalan C. Frame-665–670. work for the development of environ- 38. Kuo Fe, Sullivan WC. Environment24. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland mental health indicators. World Health and crime in the inner city: does vege-F, et al. Asthma in exercising children Stat Q. 1995;48:144–154. tation reduce crime? Environ and Behav.exposed to ozone: a cohort study. 2001;33:343–367. 51. Corvalan C, Kjellstrom T, SmithLancet. 2002;359:386–391. KR. Health, environment and sustain- 39. Clinton WJ. Executive Order25. Redd SC. Asthma in the United able development: identifying links and 12852. President’s Council on Sustain-States: burden and current theories. En- indicators to promote action. Epidemiol- able Development. 1993. Available atviron Health Perspect. 2002;110(suppl): ogy. 1999;10:656–660. http://envirotext.eh.doe.gov/data/eos/557–560. clinton/19930629.html. Accessed July26. Zein SR, Geddes E, Hemsing S, 31, 2003.Johnson M. Safety benefits of traffic 40. Labonte R. A holosphere ofcalming. Transportation Res Rec. 1997; healthy and sustainable communities.1578:3–10. Also available at: http:// Aust J Public Health. 1993:17:4–12.ite.org/traffic/documents/tcir0209.pdf.Accessed July 24, 2003. 41. Hancock T. Healthy communities must also be sustainable communities.27. Ewing R, Pendall R, Chen D. Mea- Public Health Rep. 2002;115:151–156.suring sprawl and its impact. WashingtonDC: Smart Growth America; 2002. 42. Pederson RM, Robertson A, deAlso available at: http://www. Zeeuw H. Food, health and the urbansmartgrowthamerica.org/sprawlindex/ environment. Rev Environ Health. 2000;sprawlindex.html. Accessed July 24, 15:231–247.2003. 43. Benedict MA, McMahon ET. Green28. Killingsworth RE, Lamming J. De- Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for thevelopment and public health. Urban 21st Century. Sprawl Watch Clearing-Land. July 2001:12–17. house Monograph Series. Washington, DC: Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse;29. Goran, MI, Treuth MS. Energy ex- 2000.penditure, physical activity, and obesityin children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 44. Hedge A. Where are we in under-2001;48:931–953. standing the effects of where we are? Ergonomics. 2000;43:1019–1029.30. Wang G, Dietz WH. Economicburden of obesity in youths aged 6 to 45. von Schirnding YE. Health-and-17 years: 1979–1999. Pediatrics. 2002; environment indicators in the context109:81–85. of sustainable development. Can J Pub- lic Health. 2002;93:9–15.31. Hawe P, Shiell A. Social capitaland health promotion: a review. Soc Sci 46. Cappon D. Criteria for healthyMed. 2000;51:871–885. urban environments. Can J Public Health. 1991;82:249–258.32. Fullilove MT. Promoting social co-hesion to improve health. J Am Med 47. National Institute of EnvironmentalWoman’s Assoc. 1998;53:72–76. Health Sciences, Division of Extramural Research and Training. Environmental33. Kawachi I. Social capital and com- Justice: Partnerships for Communication.munity effects on population and indi- Available at http://www.niehs.nih.gov/vidual health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; translat/envjust/envjust.htm. Accessed896:120–130. July 24, 2003.34. Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeco- 48. Porras C. The Southern Californianomic status and health: what we know Environmental Health Project. Nationaland what we don’t. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Institute of Environmental Health Sci-1999;896:3–15. ences, Division of Extramural Research35. King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, and Training Web site; EnvironmentalEyler AA, Sallis JF, Brownson RC. Per- Justice—Project Descriptions page.sonal and environmental factors associ- Available at http://www.niehs.nih.gov/ated with physical inactivity among dif- translat/envjust/ej-desc2.htm#porras.ferent racial-ethnic groups of US Accessed July 24, 2003.middle-aged and older-aged women. 49. Shepard P. The Northern Manhat-Health Psychol. 2000;19:354–364. tan Environmental Justice Partnership:36. Leaderer BP, Belanger K, Triche E, expanding the community driven re-et al. Dust mite, cockroach, cat, and dog search agenda. National Institute of En-allergen concentrations in homes of vironmental Health Sciences, Division ofasthmatic children in Northeastern Extramural Research and Training Web1450 | Reviewing the Evidence | Peer Reviewed | Srinivasan et al. American Journal of Public Health | September 2003, Vol 93, No. 9