Findable, Usable, Reusable: IBM's Enterprise Content Technology Strategy for Smart Content

Michael Priestley
Michael PriestleyLead Information Architect
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
Findable, Usable, Reusable:
IBM’s Enterprise Content Technology Strategy
for Smart Content
Michael Priestley, Enterprise Content Technology Strategist
Congility 2014
Some charts borrowed from:
Andrea Ames, Alyson Riley, Ruth Kaufman
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
2
Important Disclaimer
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS PROVIDED FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
WHILE EFFORTS WERE MADE TO VERIFY THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION, IT IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT
WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
IN ADDITION, THIS INFORMATION IS BASED ON IBM’S CURRENT PRODUCT PLANS AND
STRATEGY, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY IBM WITHOUT NOTICE.
IBM SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF, OR
OTHERWISE RELATED TO, THIS PRESENTATION OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION.
NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED TO, OR SHALL HAVE THE
EFFECT OF:
• CREATING ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION FROM IBM (OR
ITS AFFILIATES OR ITS OR THEIR SUPPLIERS AND/OR
LICENSORS); OR
• ALTERING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICABLE
LICENSE AGREEMENT GOVERNING THE USE OF IBM SOFTWARE.
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
3
The story so far
Content matters
We all want the same thing
We have to work together to get it
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
4
Content matters
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
5
Scope creep
Information
Development
Council
•Product docs for
hardware and
software
Corporate
User
Assistance
•Product docs
for hardware
and software
•Embedded
assistance
Total Information
Experience
•Product docs for
hardware and
software
•Embedded
assistance
•Strategy across
technical content
providers (support,
training,
partnerWorld,
developerWorks,
RedBooks)
Enterprise
Content
•Product docs for
hardware and
software
•Embedded
assistance
•Strategy across
technical content
providers (support,
training,
partnerWorld,
developerWorks,
RedBooks)
•Strategy interlock
with marketing,
sales, services
•Strategy outreach
to intranet content
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
6
Technical content contributes to product success
Is your content doing its job?
What’s your product’s first impression?
How visible is your product?
Are your key product messages clearly visible in the content
ecosystem?
Who’s talking about your product? Where?
How much content do your customers have to wade
through? Are they finding what they need?
How rich is your product user interface? How smart?
Do you have product quality or customer satisfaction
challenges?
Are you getting lots of calls to Support?
How much traffic is your content generating for sales?
Does your content guide clients seamlessly through each
phase of the product lifecycle?
How do you know???
The user experience is not limited to
the design of the product user interface
Content drives client success throughout
the user’s journey and the IBM product lifecycle:
Successful, consumable products depend on
high value, high quality content
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
7
Technical content contributes to revenue
Research shows
using technical
content:
Generates 50%+ of
viable sales leads
[Forbes]
Encompasses 55%+
of sales cycle time
(vs. 21% spent
talking to sales
people)
[Marketing Interactions]
2nd most important
pre-sales activity for
technology buyers
[IDC]
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
8
Technical content contributes to revenue
IBM clients say it’s impactful:
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
9
culture process
content experience
technology
Content is a
strategic
IBM asset
Many sources
Many channels
Part of a complex
ecosystem
Watson
Support
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
10
Navigating the ecosystem requires a map (example shown here)
Many user journeys Many content types Many content
sources
Many content
channels
Evaluate Product overviews
Technical specs
Articles
Marketing
Development
Info development
Users
Marketing
developerWorks
Brand sites
Knowledge Center
Buy Purchase orders
License agreements
Finance
Legal
Ibm.com
Learn Tutorials
Training
Samples
Info development
Trainers
Business partners
Development
Users
Courses
Knowledge Center
Online training
Third-party courses
Third-party sites (eg youtube)
Use Product usage information
Embedded assistance
APIs and code samples
Info development
Development
Knowledge Center
Product UI
developerWorks
Troubleshoot Tech notes
Messages
Tech support
Development
Info development
Support portal
Knowledge Center
Product UI
Evangelize Articles
Comments, wikis, blogs, tweets,
etc.
Users developerWorks
Comments, wikis, blogs, tweets,
etc.
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
11
We ask
lots of
questions
Authoring format
Authoring tool
CMS and type of use (CCM,
WCM, ECM, DB, Social...)
Translation tech and type
(human vs machine etc.)
Checking/testing tech
(quality, accessibility, etc.)
Publishing tools
Delivery formats and
channels
Analysis: roadmap to
adoption of content
standards for
interchange/reuse, adoption
of reuse hub and other
common tech
Facets
Sources/taxonomies
Metadata syntax
Granularity (collection,
chapter, page, section,
element)
Analysis: gaps and
roadmap to alignment
with key facets, common
source, and page-level
granularity
Current roles
Types of content (collections
and pages) and data
Value metrics and criteria
Quantities
Degree of structure
ClassificationContent Technology:
Content Types:
Granularity of source
Standards and governance
Product- or brand-level coordination
Analysis: opportunities for reuse - across
deliverables/formats, within/across
teams/products/disciplines, granularity
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
12
Build relationships and buy-in over time
What we do:
–Drive agreement on strategy
–Align taxonomies and content
models
–Validate tech direction
–Build PoCs
–Pilot capabilities
–Invest to fill gaps
–Coordinate investment to target
common requirements
Working with (just in past year):
–developerWorks
–partnerWorld
–ITSO (RedBooks)
–Training
–Marketing
–Sales
–HR
–Engineering
–All at different stages
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
13
We all want the same thing
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
14
But we use different words
Smart content
(Gilbane)
•Granular
•Semantically rich
•Useful across apps
•Meaningful for
collaborative interaction
Intelligent content
(Rockley)
•Structurally rich
•Semantically aware
•Discoverable
•Reusable
•Reconfigurable
•Adaptable
Chunked
Omni-
channel
Content
CollectionsClassification
Structured
Modular
Semanti
c
Adaptiv
e
Dynamic Enriched
Re-usable
Personalizable
Structured
Semanti
c
Adaptiv
e
Structured
Semanti
c
Dynamic
Adaptiv
e
Structured
Semanti
c
EnrichedDynamic
Adaptiv
e
Structured
Semanti
c
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
15
Example: summary of our requirements for marketing content
Optimized for:
– Findability within search experiences
– Usability in the context of personalized, adaptive
experiences
– Re-usability among compositions, channels, devices
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
16
Example: summary of our requirements for marketing content
Additional goals:
– A framework for content governance – a clear picture of
what we need to govern
– A content strategy language to use across technical
platforms, editors, experience designers and content
creators
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
17
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
18
Usable
Reusable
Findable
Common
standards,
processes,
and tools
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
19
Client view
Content matters
Usable
Reusable
Findable
I can search for
content based on
what I need, not
where it came
from
I want content that
helps me with my
goals
Content that
doesn’t matter to
me shouldn’t be
cluttering up the
screen
I can create my
own views and
collections
I find content
before I need to
search – right in
the interface of
the product
I can easily create
and share content
with others
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
20
Client challenges
Providing adaptive content delivery with support for runtime
filtering and variable substitution
Ensuring reused content doesn’t confuse search results –
knowing when to reuse at publish time versus runtime
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
21
Employee view
Make it easier to reuse content than to write from scratch
Usable
Reusable
Findable
I can find relevant
content from other
teams before
authoring starts
I use a common
design approach
and share assets
across disciplines
I optimize content
based on usage
metrics and
feedback
I use common
standards that
allow content to be
shared across
channels
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
22
Employee challenges
Managing content lifecycle across social/formal stages
Coordinating planning and design across disciplines
Applying cross-repository standards for content, search,
metadata
Creating incentives for creating reusable content for cases
where reuse crosses team boundaries
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
23
We have to work together
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
24
Challenge: Requirements change when scope changes
Department Company
Why should I coordinate with
other teams when it’s cheaper
and easier to go it alone?
When teams create duplicate or overlapping
content it’s bad for the company (inefficient) and
for the user (confusing)
Why should I pay extra to create
reusable content when some
other team gets the benefit?
Let’s bring the cost down by making authoring
and publishing capabilities separately orderable,
with scalable features
Why should I use a standards-
based solution when a
proprietary one works better out
of the box?
Proprietary content creates format-based silos –
barriers to reuse. They also create vendor lockin,
which creates a dependency on the vendor. This
reduces your future options and puts your
content at risk.
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
25
Why can’t we all just get along?
Tutorials
API docs
Trouble-
shooting
Prod
overviews
Tech
comm
Training
Development
Support
Marketing
LCMS
WCM
CCM
KB
Usage
Learning
site
Marketing
site
Support
site
Developer
site
Code
repo
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
26
What are the options?
1.
Build a
bigger
silo
2.
Conten
t as a
platfor
m
3.
Conten
t as a
service
4.
All of
the
above
1. Centralize where possible to provide a hub for
reuse
2. Use content standards so content can cross silo
boundaries
3. Provide content services to ease assembly of
new content deliverables and applications
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
27
Let’s try that again…
From any source, to any channel
Content reused across applications, applications reused across content
LCMS
WCM
CCMKB
Code
repo
Learning
site
Evaluating
site
Trouble
shooting
site
Developing
site
Tech
comm
Training
Development
Support
Marketing
Reuse
hub
Deploy new channels as needed
by role, industry, goal, etc.
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
28
Can we apply standards across formats?
Wiki
Word
markdown
Full
DITA
HTML5
XDITA
HDITA
markDITA
WorDITA
WiDITA
Lightweight DITA:
Coming soon to a
format near you
Marketing
Tech
comm
Development
Support
Training
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
29
If you love your content set it free
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
30
Backup
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
31
Client view
Content matters
Findable
– I can search for content based on what I
need, not where it came from - across
channels, filtered by my context and goals
– I find content before I need to search – right
in the interface of the product I’m using
Usable
– I want content that helps me with my goals
(learning how to X, doing X with Y,
troubleshooting…)
– I want content filtered to match my context
– I don’t want content that doesn’t matter to me
cluttering up the screen
Reusable
– I can create my own views and collections
– I can easily create and share content with
others
Challenges
– Providing adaptive content delivery with
support for runtime filtering and variable
substitution
– Ensuring reused content doesn’t confuse
search results – knowing when to reuse at
publish time versus runtime
Usable
Reusable
Findable
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
32
Employee view
Make it easier to reuse content than to write from scratch
Findable
– I can find relevant content from other teams
before authoring starts
– I apply common metadata to enable cross-
repository faceted search
– I measure SEO heuristically at authoring time
Usable
– I use a common design approach and share
assets across disciplines
– I optimize content based on usage metrics
and feedback
– I ensure consistency with predictable
structures based on content type
– I measure quality heuristically at authoring
time
Reusable
– I use common content standards that allows
content to be shared across channels
– I use link, variable, and metadata indirection
to separate content from context
Challenges
– Manage content lifecycle across social/formal
stages
– Coordinate planning and design across
disciplines
– Cross-repository standards for content,
search, metadata
– Create incentives for creating reusable
content for cases where reuse crosses team
boundaries
Usable
Reusable
Findable
© 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation
®
33
Legal
IBM and the IBM logo are trademarks of International Business Machines Corp., registered in
many jurisdictions worldwide. Other product and service names might be trademarks of IBM or
other companies. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the Web at “Copyright and
trademark information” at www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml
33
1 of 33

More Related Content

Similar to Findable, Usable, Reusable: IBM's Enterprise Content Technology Strategy for Smart Content(20)

Can Reuse Be Sexy?Can Reuse Be Sexy?
Can Reuse Be Sexy?
Michael Priestley860 views
Let your content flowLet your content flow
Let your content flow
Michael Priestley984 views
Lightweight DITA: A pre/overviewLightweight DITA: A pre/overview
Lightweight DITA: A pre/overview
Michael Priestley1.9K views
EVOLVE'13 | Customer Success Story | Life Technologies | Blair HardieEVOLVE'13 | Customer Success Story | Life Technologies | Blair Hardie
EVOLVE'13 | Customer Success Story | Life Technologies | Blair Hardie
Evolve The Adobe Digital Marketing Community622 views
Toward a Unified Customer ExperienceToward a Unified Customer Experience
Toward a Unified Customer Experience
Jill Orofino304 views
Repurpose, Reuse, RefreshRepurpose, Reuse, Refresh
Repurpose, Reuse, Refresh
G3 Communications 1.4K views
IBM Watson Innovation Day BostonIBM Watson Innovation Day Boston
IBM Watson Innovation Day Boston
IBM Watson2.8K views
Serendipity Labs Corporate CoworkingSerendipity Labs Corporate Coworking
Serendipity Labs Corporate Coworking
John Arenas1.1K views
Cross-format content with Lightweight DITACross-format content with Lightweight DITA
Cross-format content with Lightweight DITA
Michael Priestley1.3K views
Architecting multi sided business 2Architecting multi sided business 2
Architecting multi sided business 2
Richard Veryard3.8K views

More from Michael Priestley(13)

The politics of information architectureThe politics of information architecture
The politics of information architecture
Michael Priestley220 views
Customer-centric content and Info 4.0Customer-centric content and Info 4.0
Customer-centric content and Info 4.0
Michael Priestley276 views
Does DITA need tags?Does DITA need tags?
Does DITA need tags?
Michael Priestley1.1K views
Does DITA need XML?Does DITA need XML?
Does DITA need XML?
Michael Priestley2.6K views
A lightweight DITA updateA lightweight DITA update
A lightweight DITA update
Michael Priestley1.1K views
Lightweight DITALightweight DITA
Lightweight DITA
Michael Priestley4.1K views
Feedable, Portable, Mashable, DITAbleFeedable, Portable, Mashable, DITAble
Feedable, Portable, Mashable, DITAble
Michael Priestley1.1K views

Recently uploaded(20)

Findable, Usable, Reusable: IBM's Enterprise Content Technology Strategy for Smart Content

  • 1. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® Findable, Usable, Reusable: IBM’s Enterprise Content Technology Strategy for Smart Content Michael Priestley, Enterprise Content Technology Strategist Congility 2014 Some charts borrowed from: Andrea Ames, Alyson Riley, Ruth Kaufman
  • 2. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 2 Important Disclaimer THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. WHILE EFFORTS WERE MADE TO VERIFY THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION, IT IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. IN ADDITION, THIS INFORMATION IS BASED ON IBM’S CURRENT PRODUCT PLANS AND STRATEGY, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY IBM WITHOUT NOTICE. IBM SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF, OR OTHERWISE RELATED TO, THIS PRESENTATION OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED TO, OR SHALL HAVE THE EFFECT OF: • CREATING ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION FROM IBM (OR ITS AFFILIATES OR ITS OR THEIR SUPPLIERS AND/OR LICENSORS); OR • ALTERING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT GOVERNING THE USE OF IBM SOFTWARE.
  • 3. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 3 The story so far Content matters We all want the same thing We have to work together to get it
  • 4. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 4 Content matters
  • 5. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 5 Scope creep Information Development Council •Product docs for hardware and software Corporate User Assistance •Product docs for hardware and software •Embedded assistance Total Information Experience •Product docs for hardware and software •Embedded assistance •Strategy across technical content providers (support, training, partnerWorld, developerWorks, RedBooks) Enterprise Content •Product docs for hardware and software •Embedded assistance •Strategy across technical content providers (support, training, partnerWorld, developerWorks, RedBooks) •Strategy interlock with marketing, sales, services •Strategy outreach to intranet content
  • 6. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 6 Technical content contributes to product success Is your content doing its job? What’s your product’s first impression? How visible is your product? Are your key product messages clearly visible in the content ecosystem? Who’s talking about your product? Where? How much content do your customers have to wade through? Are they finding what they need? How rich is your product user interface? How smart? Do you have product quality or customer satisfaction challenges? Are you getting lots of calls to Support? How much traffic is your content generating for sales? Does your content guide clients seamlessly through each phase of the product lifecycle? How do you know??? The user experience is not limited to the design of the product user interface Content drives client success throughout the user’s journey and the IBM product lifecycle: Successful, consumable products depend on high value, high quality content
  • 7. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 7 Technical content contributes to revenue Research shows using technical content: Generates 50%+ of viable sales leads [Forbes] Encompasses 55%+ of sales cycle time (vs. 21% spent talking to sales people) [Marketing Interactions] 2nd most important pre-sales activity for technology buyers [IDC]
  • 8. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 8 Technical content contributes to revenue IBM clients say it’s impactful:
  • 9. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 9 culture process content experience technology Content is a strategic IBM asset Many sources Many channels Part of a complex ecosystem Watson Support
  • 10. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 10 Navigating the ecosystem requires a map (example shown here) Many user journeys Many content types Many content sources Many content channels Evaluate Product overviews Technical specs Articles Marketing Development Info development Users Marketing developerWorks Brand sites Knowledge Center Buy Purchase orders License agreements Finance Legal Ibm.com Learn Tutorials Training Samples Info development Trainers Business partners Development Users Courses Knowledge Center Online training Third-party courses Third-party sites (eg youtube) Use Product usage information Embedded assistance APIs and code samples Info development Development Knowledge Center Product UI developerWorks Troubleshoot Tech notes Messages Tech support Development Info development Support portal Knowledge Center Product UI Evangelize Articles Comments, wikis, blogs, tweets, etc. Users developerWorks Comments, wikis, blogs, tweets, etc.
  • 11. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 11 We ask lots of questions Authoring format Authoring tool CMS and type of use (CCM, WCM, ECM, DB, Social...) Translation tech and type (human vs machine etc.) Checking/testing tech (quality, accessibility, etc.) Publishing tools Delivery formats and channels Analysis: roadmap to adoption of content standards for interchange/reuse, adoption of reuse hub and other common tech Facets Sources/taxonomies Metadata syntax Granularity (collection, chapter, page, section, element) Analysis: gaps and roadmap to alignment with key facets, common source, and page-level granularity Current roles Types of content (collections and pages) and data Value metrics and criteria Quantities Degree of structure ClassificationContent Technology: Content Types: Granularity of source Standards and governance Product- or brand-level coordination Analysis: opportunities for reuse - across deliverables/formats, within/across teams/products/disciplines, granularity
  • 12. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 12 Build relationships and buy-in over time What we do: –Drive agreement on strategy –Align taxonomies and content models –Validate tech direction –Build PoCs –Pilot capabilities –Invest to fill gaps –Coordinate investment to target common requirements Working with (just in past year): –developerWorks –partnerWorld –ITSO (RedBooks) –Training –Marketing –Sales –HR –Engineering –All at different stages
  • 13. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 13 We all want the same thing
  • 14. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 14 But we use different words Smart content (Gilbane) •Granular •Semantically rich •Useful across apps •Meaningful for collaborative interaction Intelligent content (Rockley) •Structurally rich •Semantically aware •Discoverable •Reusable •Reconfigurable •Adaptable Chunked Omni- channel Content CollectionsClassification Structured Modular Semanti c Adaptiv e Dynamic Enriched Re-usable Personalizable Structured Semanti c Adaptiv e Structured Semanti c Dynamic Adaptiv e Structured Semanti c EnrichedDynamic Adaptiv e Structured Semanti c
  • 15. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 15 Example: summary of our requirements for marketing content Optimized for: – Findability within search experiences – Usability in the context of personalized, adaptive experiences – Re-usability among compositions, channels, devices
  • 16. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 16 Example: summary of our requirements for marketing content Additional goals: – A framework for content governance – a clear picture of what we need to govern – A content strategy language to use across technical platforms, editors, experience designers and content creators
  • 17. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 17
  • 18. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 18 Usable Reusable Findable Common standards, processes, and tools
  • 19. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 19 Client view Content matters Usable Reusable Findable I can search for content based on what I need, not where it came from I want content that helps me with my goals Content that doesn’t matter to me shouldn’t be cluttering up the screen I can create my own views and collections I find content before I need to search – right in the interface of the product I can easily create and share content with others
  • 20. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 20 Client challenges Providing adaptive content delivery with support for runtime filtering and variable substitution Ensuring reused content doesn’t confuse search results – knowing when to reuse at publish time versus runtime
  • 21. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 21 Employee view Make it easier to reuse content than to write from scratch Usable Reusable Findable I can find relevant content from other teams before authoring starts I use a common design approach and share assets across disciplines I optimize content based on usage metrics and feedback I use common standards that allow content to be shared across channels
  • 22. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 22 Employee challenges Managing content lifecycle across social/formal stages Coordinating planning and design across disciplines Applying cross-repository standards for content, search, metadata Creating incentives for creating reusable content for cases where reuse crosses team boundaries
  • 23. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 23 We have to work together
  • 24. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 24 Challenge: Requirements change when scope changes Department Company Why should I coordinate with other teams when it’s cheaper and easier to go it alone? When teams create duplicate or overlapping content it’s bad for the company (inefficient) and for the user (confusing) Why should I pay extra to create reusable content when some other team gets the benefit? Let’s bring the cost down by making authoring and publishing capabilities separately orderable, with scalable features Why should I use a standards- based solution when a proprietary one works better out of the box? Proprietary content creates format-based silos – barriers to reuse. They also create vendor lockin, which creates a dependency on the vendor. This reduces your future options and puts your content at risk.
  • 25. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 25 Why can’t we all just get along? Tutorials API docs Trouble- shooting Prod overviews Tech comm Training Development Support Marketing LCMS WCM CCM KB Usage Learning site Marketing site Support site Developer site Code repo
  • 26. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 26 What are the options? 1. Build a bigger silo 2. Conten t as a platfor m 3. Conten t as a service 4. All of the above 1. Centralize where possible to provide a hub for reuse 2. Use content standards so content can cross silo boundaries 3. Provide content services to ease assembly of new content deliverables and applications
  • 27. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 27 Let’s try that again… From any source, to any channel Content reused across applications, applications reused across content LCMS WCM CCMKB Code repo Learning site Evaluating site Trouble shooting site Developing site Tech comm Training Development Support Marketing Reuse hub Deploy new channels as needed by role, industry, goal, etc.
  • 28. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 28 Can we apply standards across formats? Wiki Word markdown Full DITA HTML5 XDITA HDITA markDITA WorDITA WiDITA Lightweight DITA: Coming soon to a format near you Marketing Tech comm Development Support Training
  • 29. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 29 If you love your content set it free
  • 30. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 30 Backup
  • 31. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 31 Client view Content matters Findable – I can search for content based on what I need, not where it came from - across channels, filtered by my context and goals – I find content before I need to search – right in the interface of the product I’m using Usable – I want content that helps me with my goals (learning how to X, doing X with Y, troubleshooting…) – I want content filtered to match my context – I don’t want content that doesn’t matter to me cluttering up the screen Reusable – I can create my own views and collections – I can easily create and share content with others Challenges – Providing adaptive content delivery with support for runtime filtering and variable substitution – Ensuring reused content doesn’t confuse search results – knowing when to reuse at publish time versus runtime Usable Reusable Findable
  • 32. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 32 Employee view Make it easier to reuse content than to write from scratch Findable – I can find relevant content from other teams before authoring starts – I apply common metadata to enable cross- repository faceted search – I measure SEO heuristically at authoring time Usable – I use a common design approach and share assets across disciplines – I optimize content based on usage metrics and feedback – I ensure consistency with predictable structures based on content type – I measure quality heuristically at authoring time Reusable – I use common content standards that allows content to be shared across channels – I use link, variable, and metadata indirection to separate content from context Challenges – Manage content lifecycle across social/formal stages – Coordinate planning and design across disciplines – Cross-repository standards for content, search, metadata – Create incentives for creating reusable content for cases where reuse crosses team boundaries Usable Reusable Findable
  • 33. © 2010, 2014 IBM Corporation ® 33 Legal IBM and the IBM logo are trademarks of International Business Machines Corp., registered in many jurisdictions worldwide. Other product and service names might be trademarks of IBM or other companies. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the Web at “Copyright and trademark information” at www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml 33