Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

  1. 1. Imagine we decide it’s legal to for ourselves.
  2. 2. Imagine we decide to ourselves.
  3. 3. Perhaps there’s no anything.
  4. 4. Perhaps, our only negative element is .
  5. 5. If we redefine public ed, set ourselvesfrom: the 7 hours a day, 12 plus years, and an ongoing mindset, that comes from doing what we’re told .. ie: algebra
  6. 6. And instead focus on facilitatingon curating people and their … art..
  7. 7. Then, perhaps, we’ll have everyone being/becoming their own..getting themselves out of bed everyday,putting in their toward expertise, no extrinsic motivation needed.
  8. 8. People are naturally..our souls crave to rather than to memorize and regurgitate.
  9. 9. Imagine all the time, money, and ,that we currently spendon the current definition of public ed,and in the current ,…
  10. 10. … instead, being spent toward your ,on bettering/creating your .
  11. 11. What we’ve been up to, see …
  12. 12. a quiet revolution via one w/yourself daily. are you doing what matters? be you. one w/others daily/weekly. building community. be us. (3 min video)
  13. 13. the revolution?Many people are stressed, many from busy-ness and/or fear. will it happen?Where we value people, period. They have nothing to prove. will be the result?Happy people and gatherings that matter.
  14. 14. be you. be us.why whySetting people free, Setting communities free,to be themselves. to share howCreating (physical & mental) Creating (physical & mental)spaces of permission, where people have spaces of trust, where peoplenothing to prove. listen without an agenda.what whatMindful/indispensable people creating Gatherings that matter.brilliant *art. -soul peace -world peace *art = the thing you can’t not do be us collaboratory
  15. 15. Compulsory. choiceStay in the lines. whimsy mattersBe quiet. cha osOrderly. rhizomaticEfficient. breathtaking
  16. 16. how to ground theinevitable and encouraged …?
  17. 17. Perhaps we create an app available for free on the device of your choice… Of note: This app is nothing special, in fact, success will be that we no longer need it in a year’s time. There are amazing things going on everywhere, they currently however, are just not equitable. *As in Dewey’s definition of public ed: a democratic society.] Rather than waiting for all the current incredible innovations to scale, and even if they did would that suit everyone, why not scale each individual. Why not set individuals free to be their own start up. Perhaps that’s the equity we’re seeking.
  18. 18. So the app is a designated space for people to talk to themselves, tothink for themselves, to start using their heads. noticing the unlikely? dreaming boldly? connecting people and ideas? be you site detox
  19. 19. And then all that talking/typing/texting[presence sensing (Scharmer)] becomes datato create a trail, a mesh network, ofintentions/passions/connections.This mesh is then used for ongoingconnections, and perhaps even a new typeof credentialing. Jerry’s brain[more on intent (Searls), thanon present,honest signals &idcubed(Pentland)]instagrok via John T. Spencer
  20. 20. A or linkedin - ish - but via passion/ if... like tags are found within say 10 nodes from the center, then.... connect these people (or ideas/things even) via [text #, some notification - perhaps]
  21. 21. so imagine we redefine public ed: #1 - everyone is known by someone #2 - everyone talks to themselves daily – initially into this app
  22. 22. Perhaps then, we will be preparing people for the future, for the only certain thing, .Imagine if our only goal was to prepare people to be usefully ignorant (McWilliams),to know how to learn (Argyris), to .
  23. 23. Perhaps we worry less about managing things and people, and concentrate on best ways to .Lets facilitate this, no?Too many people seem to be asking if its legal for them to , to .
  24. 24. at a rough be app take 1 on sketchfu (video) be app flow p1 (drawing) or read through the following slides…
  25. 25. Opening app would give you the option to jump in or get a little help.
  26. 26. thenif If you know what to talk about, the next option you’d get would be to: talk into your device (say you don’t like typing at all) text (say you are in a space where you can’t talk) type (say you prefer a laptop over small device)
  27. 27. thenif If you don’t know what to talk about, the next option would suggest elements of self-directed learning: notice the unlikely (what have you noticed) dream boldly (what are you dreaming about) connect people/information/ideas (what/who have you connected) do what matters most (are you doing what matters)
  28. 28. thenif Say you pick notice, you would be given the option to jump in, or get a little help.
  29. 29. thenif If you know what to talk about in regard to noticing the unlikely, the next option you’d get would be to: talk into your device (say you don’t like typing at all) text (say you are in a space where you can’t talk) type (say you prefer a laptop over small device)
  30. 30. sam on noticing al on noticing thenif site on noticing If you don’t know what to talk about in regard to noticing the unlikely, the next option would offer you help with: how to notice, and why noticing matters
  31. 31. thenif Then you get the offer to go on noticing again, or get more help again. You can be done, or go back and talk about dreaming or connecting or doing. That’s the app idea so far. Emphasis on user friendliness and on usefulness via optional looping to whatever degree. Main drive, getting people to talk to themselves, to start thinking for themselves, to learn how to learn, become usefully ignorant.
  32. 32. We are attempting to offer a city with open resources: imagine city asAnd then provide a means to connect people: imagine per passion via Howard Gardner via Nikhil Goyal
  33. 33. So what do we need – for this app aspect of the quiet revolution? web access via phone, ipad, laptop, html – wifi bank? low cost/google/raspberry pi/olpc – recycles? perhaps offered as a gift from google or facebook, useable on any device
  34. 34. So what do we need – for this app aspect of the quiet revolution?And then.. meet up and decide/do what you can’t not do. …who can’t not do that same thing. …needed to do that thing.
  35. 35. a fewJoe & Miguel • Joe, age 15, uses the free wifi from the wifi bank and his free recycled cell, he texts one morning: I notice we waste water every time it rains. The public sprinklers keep running. I would love to fix that. • Miguel, age 72, a retired teacher, uses his laptop and types that afternoon: I noticed the sprinklers in the city run when it’s raining, I’m imagining saving tons of taxpayers money & water by fixing that, I want to connect to city people or whoever to figure out what can be done • That evening, Joe and Miguel receive each other’s text #, with the topic that connected them, other numbers if others mentioned the same/similar, and possibly a suggested location for meeting up. • Joe, would already have a mentor/facilitator (#1 be known by someone), but it may have initially been by appointment (ie: if everyone in our district was freed right now, 1:8 ratio, so we’d connect 8 kids to one adult just to get rolling). Joe & Miguel could hit it off and Miguel could become Joe’s person, or they could just fix the sprinkler problem and that would be it. • Depending on how things turn out.. one of the nodes on Joe’s future mesh network could be the company he started for sprinkler systems, or that he got into programming from this initial venture.
  36. 36. (cont)Julia & Vicki & Tom • Julia, age 12, uses a donated/recycled laptop and the donated wifi from wifi bank, to voice record the following before she goes to bed: I noticed a lot of my friends’ parents have cancer. They keep talking about early detection. I asked my mom and she said if you find out early on, the cancer can usually be cured, but that not enough people find out early. I also watched a video of a 17 year old that wrote a recipe to cure cancer and is now working at Stanford. I’m dreaming about finding ways to improve early detection. I want to connect to people who are experts at this and see what I can learn from them. • Vicki, age 25, uses her iphone and texts while waiting at the doctor’s office: I just found out my mom has cancer. They told her they didn’t find it soon enough and that it’s spreading too fast. I’ve got to research myself, find out some other answers for her. • Tom, age 7, uses his mom’s ipad and his family’s wifi access, to record the following: My mom has been doing this healing stuff my whole life. I’ve never believed in it before. But she started doing it with me, because I have/had asthma, and now I don’t have it anymore. I’m really interested in seeing if it can help people with cancer. • The app connects them in similar fashion as Joe & Miguel. • The mesh network created for each of these could have one small node representing their intense curiosity and that’s it. Or, it could be the start of an offshoot node, as they advance into the study of health and medicine. Either way, this cancer node could be detected by the app in a couple weeks by someone else talking to themselves about the same things and then they all receive notification of another potential connection.
  37. 37. (cont)George • George, now age 8, using donated device and wifi, talks daily about (you fill in the blank: building a treehouse, soccer, dancing, music). Everyone is sure he is doing nothing, that he will get behind (at math, … you fill in the blank), but we just let him keep talking and connecting. George ends up connecting to some amazing community people that help him (you fill in the blank: build a treehouse, build a soccer field or just play, learn to dance or play the piano or sing). Being known by someone sets George free and he starts to believe he can do anything. • George, now age 18, has a mesh network from the last 10 years, filled with all the amazing thinking and doing and connections he made. George knows what he wants to do next, and the last 3 years of his mesh network shows how he has prepared himself. Even better, because George has learned how to learn in the process of following his curiosity, he can handle anything he sets his mind to. Future employer, college admission, angel investor, et al, can access a more authentic and humane documentation of this if they so desire. Perhaps, the beginning of the intention economy (Searl). • Or better yet, perhaps George’s city is now so healthy and alive, that that is enough of a recommendation for him to get in places, if he so desires.Bunker Roy’s TED talk – The Barefoot Movement – models this credentialing via your community, how well are the people around youdoing.Deb Roy’s TED talk – The Birth of a Word – models the idea of tech helping us get back to us, it models our vision of a collaboratory space– and tech-infusing conversation so we can listen more deeply.Chimamanda Adichie’s TED talk – The Danger of a Single Story – models the need for conversation, being known by someone.
  38. 38. high level conceptThe main aspiration of the app is to get people talking to themselves.The main function of the app is to then use that aloud thinking as data to: • Create (or help co-create) an ongoing mesh network for the individual. • Facilitate initial (& perhaps ongoing) connections within a community.The main benefits of the app: • As people are freed up (ie: from the compulsory aspect of public ed), the initial chaos can be grounded by tech’s ability to facilitate and connect mounds of data. • People will be connected within a community in order to do (create/discuss/learn about/etc) things that matter to them. While the app can facilitate people learning how to learn, (people pick - not sure) we do believe that people, w/o any prep or training, will sustain this ongoing connectedness. People are doing good and amazing things all over. People have amazing capabilities. Cognitive surplus (Shirky) abounds. Learning/curiosity are natural (Mitra). People do however, need time & space to connect per choice. And perhaps this grounding of chaos during this initial freedom.
  39. 39. (cont)so say • a person wakes up, (or does it at night, whenever) • does this self-reflection, via this app, what they are noticing, what they are dreaming about, who/what they want to connect, what they want to do, if they are doing what mattersimagine • by noon they get 5 text #s back, people in their community with similar thinking • they choose where and when to meet up • they get the stuff done that matters to them, in a day/week/month/year • their tech/self/mentor-automated mesh network leaves a trail of their thinking/doing/connecting
  40. 40. Just by us locally - ? If so, team, design/engineering/ project manager [road narrows, armory, kirill, lab people, …+Or work both virtually and locally, a team here connected to experts from all over [pentland, scharmer, anderson, michalski, …+Or offer selves as alpha and beta test site, to someone like google or facebook or or codeforamerica or techstars or.. ?
  41. 41. How do we get people? In our district alone, there are 15,000 students, 2000+ adults in school buildings 7 hours a day. Many are there only because it’s compulsory. If we redefine public ed to be: #1 be known by someone #2 talk to your self every day, we think we will find several players.Whoa, 15,000 even.. you think one app can ground that chaos? Yes we do. We’re thinking that’s what tech really wants to do, get us back to us. We think we are more capable of this at this point in time, because of what the web can do, what a network means, and what we’ve already seen with tech - take in huge amounts of data and facilitate that in ways we choose. [ie: Everest: - is currently the closest example of our dream app, but the phone service, and google, et al, have been using tech for this.. just not always/generally per our choice. However, we don’t really think it’s about an app or tech. The focus of being known by someone is at the core of what it means to be human. We can go way back in history, or scan the globe to see people practicing that. We see the app as a temporary jolt back to the natural. So say we divide our district out, it’s about 1 adult to 8 kids. Here’s a vision (see the pod starting at 2 min in) of what the current school buildings (or any space) could become to facilitate that at the onset.
  42. 42. How do we get people to talk to the app everyday? Again, take the 17,000 ish people in school buildings 7 hours a day, that now have permission to play, ie: this app is their ticket out the door, we think people will start talking to themselves. [And with reference to last question, the group each person belongs to would encourage that daily, at least in the beginning.] And maybe we can’t get people to talk to the app everyday. Maybe this doesn’t work. That’s what we want to know. This is a prototype of an idea. We’ve gyrated through different experiments over the last four years (me-videos, google doc, video recording), ways to journal or log thinking. This may not work, it’s just our next best idea. We would love to get feedback, especially on what might work better.What if people just go through the motions of talking to themselves? Say someone says they notice a fly on the wall, every day. Over time they could get bored, which is fine, we’ve found boredom to be a first step to detox. They could see that we are connecting them to entomologists and start wondering what might happen if they talk about what matters. They could (appear to) do nothing, which is fine, we believe there is never nothing going on. We believe that the world could change if people would start talking to themselves, at whatever level, and that the greater risk, is anything that keeps them from that.
  43. 43. (cont)How do we fund it? I have started a kickstarter project to potentially fund this or at least kick it off. For tech - they do need a prototype, not just a rendering. Their site reads: Looks like youre building a Design or Technology project. Cool! Kickstarter requires additional information from projects in these categories so that backers can make informed decisions about the projects they support. To launch, you must include: Who you are. Projects are about people. Let backers know who you are, especially your experience and background. The project video, project bio, and project description are good places to highlight this. A functional prototype. Projects in the back-of-a-napkin or 3D-rendering phase are too early to raise funds on Kickstarter. Have a prototype? Showcase it in your project video and with images in the project description. A clear plan. How and where will you be making your project? Share the details on how you will complete it. This must be established prior to launch. We hope to have this in use this fall. The more expertise and/or sharing and/or backing we can get, the sooner we can prototype. We’ve had rough estimates of 300,000 to 500,000 and 3 months. And we do have this listed in funding via our collaboratory doc - which is written with the idea we would get 20 mill-ish of no strings attached moneys.
  44. 44. (cont)How do we keep people safe? Anyone participating and not already in the public ed system, would have gone through the district’s volunteer screening. These spaces would be within school buildings and/or designated meet up spaces downtown (ie: maker space, writing lab, video/graphic/photo lab, pi lab, etc.) so they would already be populated with other volunteers and/or district employees. I must add, I dont see the app as special or even long lasting. I see it simply as a means to bump us out of the classroom and out of the curriculum, without people freaking out about the danger of randomness. I dont think I even see the app as facilitating our learning how to learn for very long. I do believe that is natural.. if we just stop all the busy-ness, and start talking to ourselves, listening. I guess Im thinking if the fear of people dying from the randomness is alleviated, for even just a short period of time, just long enough to see the capabilities of people, we will be blown away and sold out to the naturalness of it. We will be ready to risk more. Every day. For it. In fact, I think we will realize what a risk we have been taking everyday for many years now, in not encouraging people to think for themselves, to connect per choice. So ironically, I see the app as a means for us to get out of an incredibly unsafe environment. The human spirit is at great risk. No?
  45. 45. (cont)It appears all these connections will be from like-minded thinking, what about thepossibilities of connecting adjacent or random thinking? The app is simply to jumpstart connections. We’re thinking people will be blown away by the like-minded thinkers/experts in our own town, and that will allure them to continue talking. If we get people who can also program randomness into the app, super. That is where magic happens. We do have a local event, via our homeless collective, in November, that is seeking the same goal: being known by someone. We’re thinking the timing is perfect to play out, face to face and random connections, just to see where they lead.Do you have an executive summary? Am working on a short version statement/summary in doc form. Any one want to help with that?.. : )How can I help? Offer insight, connect us to people, help with funding (kickstarter when we launch) or donations (recycled devices, donated bandwidth). Help us prototype when we have a prototype app. Help us offer up examples of individual mesh networks, (like i am doing on the brain via Jerry’s brain) by starting today to create your own mesh on whatever works for you. Maybe you already have one and you could send a link. ( grazie guys.
  46. 46. live links here already exist that might be of help • hourschool - alex pappas and ruby ku • insta grok - kirill kireyevpeople: • project m - marc obrien (pie lab) & john bielenberg• kosta - started – • playborhood palomar5 – wifi bank • neighborland• gregory hill - st louis – wifi • i wish this was poverty-stricken - the disruption • myblocknyc dept • seeclickfix• pentland – sociometer – honest • signals • code academy• scharmer –theory u - • skillshare • popuphood encing • tradeschool• optimizely - dan siroker from • scavnger google, seth bannon – amicus • - ish - to facilitate ongoing gatherings instigator collective - more links to connections/ideas gregory - 7 tools to build apps Jodhbir -
  47. 47. more From Rob – live links here And some inspiration for further steps, examples of some of the above (almost all of which, if digital, is free):A few questions: 1. Brian Eno and Peter Schmidts "Oblique Strategy Cards" How about an analog option the digital app (some included in theinspiration list below)? 2. IDEOs Method Cards How about pushing the user from the app as much aspossible? Send them to an 3. Drift Deckinteresting Twitter account a set of curated feeds) or them to another app for thoughts, collectingbookmarks, taking pictures, etc.? 4. SuperBetter How about having the user co- the app by reconfiguringit in some way or another 5. A variety of Situationist-inspired and related apps:(adjusting the font, the color, the Serendipitor and, the start page, etc.) or by Drift constructing it on their WalkSpace (not exactly sure how that Crowsflight work with the digital, but Wanderlust Stories been sitting on an ide for Situationist App [Banned :( ]giving people a candy tin (like Blockboard and having them addthings to it like a library card, a 6. Even though I know you already know it and have it, Keri Smiths How to Be an Explorer of the World:museum pass, a tiny compass, a, a little notebook, apersonal totem a la Inception, 7. Animal Superpowersetc.)?
  48. 48. ?