SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Innovative ways companies are using
design thinking
Jeanne Liedtka
P
roponents of design thinking, the process of continuously redesigning a business
using insight derived from customer intimacy, persuasively argue that it is a key
capability for revolutionary innovators and a potential source of sustainable
competitive advantage[1]. Several years ago a number of researchers at the University of
Virginia’s Darden Business School and the Design Management Institute published
Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers, in which we distilled what we
had learned from designers that we thought would be relevant to managers. In it, we offered
a view of the design thinking process as incorporating four questions (see Exhibit 1).
Each of the four questions – What is? What if? What wows? What works? – explored a
different stage of the design thinking process. ‘‘What is?’’ examined current reality. ‘‘What
if?’’ used the learning from that first stage to envision multiple options for creating a new
future. ‘‘What wows?’’ helped managers make some choices about where to focus first, and
‘‘What works?’’ took them into the real world to interact with actual users through small
experiments. These four questions had an accompanying set of ten design tools to help
managers navigate the question space (see Exhibit 2).
The design thinking process can be illustrated by combining the four basic questions, which
correspond to the four stages of the process, with the ten essential tools (see Exhibit 3).
But how widely is design thinking being adopted in leading companies and how effectively is
it being adapted in a variety of industries? That is the question that our team of researchers
set out to answer several years ago. We began our new research by interviewing boundary
spanners – leaders who operated at the intersection of design and business – in a number
of Fortune 100 organizations. Those conversations led us to conclude that the process of
‘‘innovation’’ in many large organizations could fairly be described as a battlefield in which
R&D, marketing and business development functions seemed to wrestling for control and
often work at cross-purposes with each other. And proponents of ‘‘design thinking’’ seemed
to be frequently caught in the crossfire.
Talking to managers at ten organizations that implemented design thinking
But the dysfunction was not universal, and in some corporations we found pockets of
cooperation between managers and designers who were achieving noteworthy successes
by working together. The stories they told inspired us. So we made a conscious decision to
focus our attention on ten organizations where design thinking was having an impact on
practice. Taking a cue from the design thinking process, we wanted to have a conversation
with successful managers about possibilities rather than constraints and about particulars
rather than generalities. Not that the constraints and the generalities they had to deal with
were not real and relevant. Focusing on them, however, did not seem to make anyone
smarter about what design thinking could produce – when implemented in the right
environment, with the right kinds of managers and designers working together, on the right
PAGE 40 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIP j VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014, pp. 40-45, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1087-8572 DOI 10.1108/SL-01-2014-0004
Jeanne Liedtka is a
Professor at the Darden
School at the University of
Virginia (LIEDTKAJ@
darden.virginia.edu). Her
latest book (with co-authors
Andrew King and
Kevin Bennett) is Solving
Problems with Design
Thinking: Ten Stories of
What Works (Columbia
Business School
Publishing, 2013) and her
previous book is Designing
for Growth: A Design Toolkit
for Managers (Columbia
Business Press, 2011).
kinds of issues. Taking another cue from the design thinking process we wanted to have
conversations that were abductive rather than deductive – ones that would encourage
managers to take some creative leaps and envision what might be. And so we elected to
report in detail on several inspiring stories of design thinking successes in real
organizations.
What we found inspired us to write a book, Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten
Stories of What Works. In it, we recount the cases of designers who wanted to share design
rather than hoard it and also on their work with managers who were open to new ways of
thinking and eager to learn. Instead of chronicling battles for control, these stories
illuminated the kinds of new ways of thinking and acting that design thinking made possible.
And these were happening, we discovered, in all kinds of organizations – business,
government and social sector – all around the world.
Exhibit 1 The four questions
What is? What if? What wows? What works?? $
Source: From Solving Problems with Design Thinking © 2013 Jeanne Liedtka, Andrew
King and Kevin Bennett. By permission of Columbia University Press
Exhibit 2 Ten design tools
Source: From Solving Problems with Design Thinking © 2013 Jeanne
Liedtka, Andrew King and Kevin Bennett. By permission of Columbia
University Press
Visualization
using imagery to envision
possibilities and bring them
to life
Journey Mapping
assessing the existing
experience through the
customer’s eyes
Value Chain Analysis
assessing the current value
chain that supports the
customer’s journey
Mind Mapping
generating insights from
exploration activities and using
those to create design criteria
Brainstorming
generating new possibilities
and new alternative business
models
1
2
3
4
5
Concept Development
assembling innovative elements
into a coherent alternative solution
that can be explored and evaluated
Assumption Testing
isolating and testing the key
assumptions that will drive the
success or failure of a concept
Rapid Prototyping
expressing a new concept in a
tangible form for exploration,
testing, and refinement
Customer Co-Creation
enrolling customers to participate
in creating the solution that best
meets their needs
Learning Launch
that lets customers experience the
creating an affordable experiment
new solution over an extended
period of time, to test key
assumptions with market data
6
7
8
9
10
VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjPAGE 41
We came away from the research with a clearer sense of the kinds of problems that design
thinking could solve and the many diverse ways it could be used. We also learned a lot about
the specifics of how design outcomes could be measured and uncovered a set of
unexpected strategic contributions it was making.
How the boundary spanners use design thinking to solve problems
In our previous research, we had come at design thinking with a very specific lens: how to
use it to produce organic growth in business organizations. In this new research, it turned out
that using design thinking to achieve organic growth was just the start. We found that design
thinking was, in fact, also a problem solving process, not just an innovation process. And one
that could help any organization – not just for-profits – become more successful at
innovation.
Some of the organizations we studied used design thinking for internal challenges:
B Suncorp, one of Australia’s largest financial services firms, used it to drive a post-merger
integration process. They did this by creating a division-wide strategic conversation that
engaged every level of the organization and built alignment on strategy and vision using
the design tools of metaphor and storytelling.
B SAP, the German-owned business process management company, melded design
thinking with traditional approaches to strategy in order to compose and communicate
new strategies around the nebulous concept of Web 2.0.
B Toyota employed design thinking to analyze one of its West Coast customer-contact
centers from the ground up, engaging a cross-functional team of frontline call reps,
software engineers, business leaders and change agents in a redesign process that
transformed the service center experience for both customers and associates.
Other organizations were leveraging design thinking to engage customers more fully:
B 3M saw in design thinking a chance to reimagine the sales process in the materials
science business and equip their sales force with new tools to engage customers, moving
beyond a focus on presenting technical specs to one aimed at demonstrating the power
of new materials. The approach used design tools such as ethnography and visualization.
B Design thinking helped a team at IBM use insights generated from a wide-ranging study
of human interaction to transform that ubiquitous marketing event, the trade show, into a
Exhibit 3 Design tools
What is? What if? What wows? What works?
Source: From Solving Problems with Design Thinking © 2013 Jeanne Liedtka, Andrew King
and Kevin Bennett. By permission of Columbia University Press
PAGE 42jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjVOL. 42 NO. 2 2014
collaborative experience. Instead of a critique of the new model by the management
hierarchy, the design team prototyped and tested it with real customers.
B In a very unusual collaboration, a group of financial service executives from the largest
banks and insurance companies in France created an industry-wide innovation group, Le
Club Innovation Banque Finance Assurance, and teamed up with Ecole Parsons Paris
anthropologists and designers, to develop a more thorough understanding of the
industry-wide needs of the customers they served.
Still other organizations were bringing design thinking to management development and
individual skill building:
B A design-minded entrepreneur founded MeYouHealth, a start-up that partnered with an
established industry incumbent, Healthways, to figure out how to use social networking to
increase well-being by helping individuals take healthier practices one step at a time and,
in the process, teach the value that design thinking’s qualitative approaches could bring
to a highly quantitative corporate strategy.
B At Intuit, the Design Services Team led the effort to embed designing for customer delight
into its DNA, using design thinking to provide a set of principles and tools for engaging
employees across the organization to think more creatively, and experimentally, about
enhancing value for customers.
But as we discovered, it was not just for-profit organizations that were reaping the benefits of
design thinking. In Denmark, The Good Kitchen, a social service entity that fed the elderly
and infirm in the municipality of Holstebro, started out intending to update their menu, but
instead used a comprehensive design process to make a transformational change in every
aspect of their meal delivery service, and in the process, enhanced the motivation and
satisfaction of kitchen employees. And the city of Dublin, Ireland, embraced design thinking
as a way to improve civic engagement in revitalizing urban spaces, marshaling residents’
energy and ideas and developing them into tangible prototypes. More importantly, the
project showed how citizens could be equipped with the tools to help create their own future.
Learning to reframe the opportunity by asking more questions
In these stories, we saw some unexpected contributions that design thinking was making.
We started our research believing, as most managers do, that design thinking’s primary use
was producing better, more creative solutions to problems or in helping managers to
envision possibilities that they hadn’t seen before. That turned out to be true enough, but a
range of other outcomes we saw design thinking produce during the process of seeking
those solutions were equally, maybe even more, interesting.
One of the most significant of these was the way in which design tools – such as,
ethnographic interviewing, customer journey mapping and job-to-be-done analysis –
encouraged people to stay involved with the problem long enough to reframe the
opportunity. The Good Kitchen started out intending only to create a new menu. IBM just
wanted to make its trade shows more consistent with its ‘‘Smarter planet’’ strategy. Toyota
initially thought that a new database was all it needed. In each case, design thinking helped
the involved participants ask better, more penetrating questions that expanded the
boundaries of the search itself. If the path to innovative, exceptional solutions begins with
‘‘ Design tools – such as, ethnographic interviewing, customer
journey mapping and job-to-be-done analysis – encouraged
people to stay involved with the problem long enough to
reframe the opportunity. ’’
VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjPAGE 43
asking innovative questions, then the normal managerial tendency to rush through
questioning period as rapidly as possible may be the critical obstacle to actual finding an
ideal solution. Design thinking’s core principle, that would-be innovators first extensively and
patiently explore the question, proved to be invaluable, as Dublin’s Barry MacDevitt told us:
The design thinking approach forces you to stay in the question and not define exactly what the
problem is. We all have a tendency to jump to solution mode far too quickly, so the design thinking
approach forces you really to live in this unclear, sometimes very muddy place. This ends up
producing a much better understanding of the problem you’re trying to solve.
Spending time at the front end of the process exploring the question and its context paid big
dividends in producing more effective solutions in the organizations we studied.
How design thinking builds better teams
Another unexpected bonus of the design thinking approach was that it helped build better
teams. Contrary to the heroic, lone-genius myth of innovation is the reality that success is
often the result of a team effort. And we know that diversity – of perspectives, talents and
experiences – is the most reliable source of new thinking. But managing all that diversity is a
problem, and instead of producing better solutions, diverse teams often find themselves
locked in debates that end up with compromises that are actually worse than what any
individual could have produced. Economist and Nobel Laureate Herb Simon called this
phenomena ‘‘satisficing,’’ picking the least bad solution that everyone will agree to. Instead
of rising to new heights of creativity, teams sink to the lowest common denominator. But not
because they want to; they just cannot find a productive way to work with their differences.
Design thinking’s collaborative methodology and tools help teams to actively leverage their
differences in positive ways. Tools like mind-mapping encouraged them to align around their
assessment of current reality and the nature of promising possibilities and paved the way for
them to create a new future together. The creation of explicit design criteria laid assumptions
out in the open where they could be scrutinized definitively, and dialog was driven by data
rather than opinion. Prototyping and experimentation produced conversations with real
customers, a better source of information than PowerPoint presentations to colleagues in
conference rooms. And all of this market-based learning generated forward momentum and
energy for the project.
We also witnessed the positive impact when teams were able to identify and focus attention
on what really mattered to the people for whom they were trying to create value. Agreement
on what really mattered to these ‘‘customers’’ allowed teams to cut through the clutter,
confusion and information overload to achieve focus. Our research found that the biggest
obstacle to innovation in most organizations is not cut-throat competitors, fickle customers or
a stagnant economy – rather, it is bureaucracy and inertia. An amazing thing happens when
design teams combined engagement and alignment with focus. They produced another
invaluable asset for any organization trying to move innovative ideas through bureaucracies:
speed.
We came away from our research convinced that the highest payoff from adopting a
design-thinking approach was not necessarily in identifying a solution, but rather in
innovating how people worked together to envision and implement the new possibilities they
discovered.
‘‘ The highest payoff from adopting a design-thinking approach
was not necessarily in identifying a solution, but rather in
innovating how people worked together to envision and
implement the new possibilities they discovered. ’’
PAGE 44jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjVOL. 42 NO. 2 2014
Changing the conversation and the mindset
Design thinking’s most significant impact, we concluded, may well be the way it adds new
possibilities to the ongoing conversation between those doing the work and those controlling
the resources. Finding new opportunities for learning from this conversation is perhaps the
most productive path to innovation. The stories we heard impressed upon us the importance
of the kinds of changes in the conversation that design thinking processes produced:
B People talked about envisioning new possibilities together instead of pointing out
constraints or defending their personally favored recommendations.
B They spent time together exploring what was going on in the market today in order to
get alignment on a definition of the problem instead of jumping immediately to solutions.
B They shared deep primary data gathered from the customers they wanted to create value
for and mined it for deep insights instead of compiling web-based surveys that revealed
only superficial attitudes and opinions.
B They listened with the intent to understand their teammates’ perspectives and to build on
them instead of listening for weaknesses to use in their debates.
B Teams spent their time in meetings figuring out how to start small and learn instead of
trying instead to create the perfect plan before any action could be taken.
B They designed marketplace experiments instead of just arguing over PowerPoint
presentations in conference rooms. Then they actively searched for disconfirming data
instead of picking out the data that supported their ingoing hypothesis.
These changes we heard in the conversations reflected a significant change in the mindset
with which the managers and their design partners approached innovation, and set in
motion a series of behavioral changes that impacted the outcomes they produced.
And so we came away from our investigations convinced that design thinking has the
potential to be a game changer. Will it live up to its promise? That question will have to be
answered one organization at a time. But in at least ten companies, we know that it already
has.
Note
1. Roger Martin, The Design of Business (Harvard Business Review Press, 2009). See also Leavy, B.
(2010) ‘‘Design thinking – a new mental model of value innovation,’’ Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 38
No. 3, pp. 5-14; Martin, R. (2010) ‘‘Design thinking: achieving insights via the ‘knowledge funnel’’’,
Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 37-41; and Leavy, B. (2011) ‘‘Roger Martin explores three
big ideas: customer capitalism, integrative thinking and design thinking,’’ Strategy & Leadership,
Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 19-26.
Corresponding author
Jeanne Liedtka can be contacted at: LIEDTKAJ@darden.virginia.edu
VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjPAGE 45
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com
Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.

More Related Content

What's hot

Best Practices Ideation
Best Practices IdeationBest Practices Ideation
Best Practices IdeationLithium
 
Embed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design Solutions
Embed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design SolutionsEmbed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design Solutions
Embed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design SolutionsHeath Keighran
 
Live the transformation you want to be_final v
Live the transformation you want to be_final vLive the transformation you want to be_final v
Live the transformation you want to be_final vAndrew Gregoris
 
IET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for Growth
IET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for GrowthIET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for Growth
IET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for GrowthInnomantra
 
IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016
IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016
IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016Chris Hall
 
Design Thinking - A critical review
Design Thinking - A critical reviewDesign Thinking - A critical review
Design Thinking - A critical reviewStephen Whyte
 
A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...
A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...
A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...MaureenWarikandwa
 
How to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinno
How to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinnoHow to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinno
How to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinnoBoard of Innovation
 
Coup d'osage
Coup d'osageCoup d'osage
Coup d'osageDosage
 
Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo
Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo
Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo Innomantra
 
What Can Design Bring to Strategy?
What Can Design Bring to Strategy?What Can Design Bring to Strategy?
What Can Design Bring to Strategy?Kathryn Best
 
Innovation Tool Box
Innovation Tool BoxInnovation Tool Box
Innovation Tool Boxkarimmoumen
 
Project Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema Experience
Project Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema ExperienceProject Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema Experience
Project Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema ExperienceBalaji Katakam
 
BMGI's Design Thinking Approach
BMGI's Design Thinking Approach BMGI's Design Thinking Approach
BMGI's Design Thinking Approach Prashant Joglekar
 
Leading In A Virtual World
Leading In A Virtual WorldLeading In A Virtual World
Leading In A Virtual WorldDr. Marc Sniukas
 
Creativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - Web
Creativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - WebCreativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - Web
Creativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - WebJacob Lennheden
 
Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency
Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency
Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency Brigitte Borja de Mozota
 

What's hot (20)

Best Practices Ideation
Best Practices IdeationBest Practices Ideation
Best Practices Ideation
 
Embed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design Solutions
Embed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design SolutionsEmbed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design Solutions
Embed Design Thinking in Co-Design for Rapid Innovation of Design Solutions
 
Live the transformation you want to be_final v
Live the transformation you want to be_final vLive the transformation you want to be_final v
Live the transformation you want to be_final v
 
IET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for Growth
IET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for GrowthIET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for Growth
IET-KPMG-INNOMANTRA -Reinventing Innovation Design Thinking Way for Growth
 
IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016
IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016
IBM AsiaPacific partner conference May 2016
 
Design Thinking - A critical review
Design Thinking - A critical reviewDesign Thinking - A critical review
Design Thinking - A critical review
 
A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...
A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...
A GUIDE FOR DESIGN THINKING IN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN A LARGE...
 
How to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinno
How to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinnoHow to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinno
How to kickstart your co-creation platform - 20 examples by @boardofinno
 
Coup d'osage
Coup d'osageCoup d'osage
Coup d'osage
 
Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo
Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo
Innomantra viewpoint -The End of CXOs Innovation Peekaboo
 
Innovation Presentation
Innovation PresentationInnovation Presentation
Innovation Presentation
 
What Can Design Bring to Strategy?
What Can Design Bring to Strategy?What Can Design Bring to Strategy?
What Can Design Bring to Strategy?
 
Art and Economy
Art and EconomyArt and Economy
Art and Economy
 
Innovation Tool Box
Innovation Tool BoxInnovation Tool Box
Innovation Tool Box
 
20 Innovation Tools
20 Innovation Tools20 Innovation Tools
20 Innovation Tools
 
Project Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema Experience
Project Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema ExperienceProject Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema Experience
Project Management Case Study – IDEO Redesigning Cineplanet Cinema Experience
 
BMGI's Design Thinking Approach
BMGI's Design Thinking Approach BMGI's Design Thinking Approach
BMGI's Design Thinking Approach
 
Leading In A Virtual World
Leading In A Virtual WorldLeading In A Virtual World
Leading In A Virtual World
 
Creativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - Web
Creativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - WebCreativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - Web
Creativity in Danish Businesses - CINC - Web
 
Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency
Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency
Article # 6 From Design Excellence to design as core competency
 

Similar to Innovative ways companies are using design thinking

Design Thinking Certification - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking Certification - MIT ID InnovationDesign Thinking Certification - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking Certification - MIT ID InnovationPankaj Deshpande
 
Business design creative research
Business design creative researchBusiness design creative research
Business design creative researchRenzo D'andrea
 
Design Thinking in Business - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking in Business - MIT ID InnovationDesign Thinking in Business - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking in Business - MIT ID InnovationPankaj Deshpande
 
THINGS Agency, The Company Profile
THINGS Agency, The Company ProfileTHINGS Agency, The Company Profile
THINGS Agency, The Company ProfileTHINGS
 
Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...
Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...
Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...Accenture Insurance
 
108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...
108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...
108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...Lia s. Associates | Branding & Design
 
Concept Design
Concept DesignConcept Design
Concept DesignCIIDslides
 
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docxDesign  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docxdonaldp2
 
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docxDesign  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docxcuddietheresa
 
stanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdf
stanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdfstanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdf
stanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdfDharam Mentor
 
Design Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID InnovationDesign Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID InnovationPankaj Deshpande
 
What is design thinking and how to apply it?
What is design thinking and how to apply it?What is design thinking and how to apply it?
What is design thinking and how to apply it?DariaPersell
 
Five Slides on Design Thinking
Five Slides on Design ThinkingFive Slides on Design Thinking
Five Slides on Design ThinkingOlivier Serrat
 
Design at Business Conference 2016 - Report
Design at Business Conference 2016 - ReportDesign at Business Conference 2016 - Report
Design at Business Conference 2016 - ReportDesign at Business
 

Similar to Innovative ways companies are using design thinking (20)

Design Thinking Certification - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking Certification - MIT ID InnovationDesign Thinking Certification - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking Certification - MIT ID Innovation
 
The Difference Engine 2014
The Difference Engine 2014The Difference Engine 2014
The Difference Engine 2014
 
Design thinking
Design thinkingDesign thinking
Design thinking
 
Business design creative research
Business design creative researchBusiness design creative research
Business design creative research
 
Design Thinking in Business - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking in Business - MIT ID InnovationDesign Thinking in Business - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking in Business - MIT ID Innovation
 
THINGS Agency, The Company Profile
THINGS Agency, The Company ProfileTHINGS Agency, The Company Profile
THINGS Agency, The Company Profile
 
Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...
Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...
Design in business: It’s not about creating something pretty. It’s about crea...
 
FiveSlidesonDesignThinking.pdf
FiveSlidesonDesignThinking.pdfFiveSlidesonDesignThinking.pdf
FiveSlidesonDesignThinking.pdf
 
108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...
108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...
108 190427 Bookclub Managing The Design Process by Terry Lee Stones Intro-Cha...
 
AuraTalk Issue 3
AuraTalk Issue 3AuraTalk Issue 3
AuraTalk Issue 3
 
UXLondon 2016 - Notes
UXLondon 2016 - NotesUXLondon 2016 - Notes
UXLondon 2016 - Notes
 
Concept Design
Concept DesignConcept Design
Concept Design
 
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docxDesign  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docx
 
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docxDesign  Thinking   Comes  of AgeThe approach, once.docx
Design Thinking Comes of AgeThe approach, once.docx
 
stanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdf
stanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdfstanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdf
stanford-design-thinking-brochure.pdf
 
Design Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID InnovationDesign Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID Innovation
Design Thinking for Innovation - MIT ID Innovation
 
What is design thinking and how to apply it?
What is design thinking and how to apply it?What is design thinking and how to apply it?
What is design thinking and how to apply it?
 
Five Slides on Design Thinking
Five Slides on Design ThinkingFive Slides on Design Thinking
Five Slides on Design Thinking
 
Tree of Business
Tree of BusinessTree of Business
Tree of Business
 
Design at Business Conference 2016 - Report
Design at Business Conference 2016 - ReportDesign at Business Conference 2016 - Report
Design at Business Conference 2016 - Report
 

Recently uploaded

Performance Management Notes for MBA Students
Performance Management Notes for MBA StudentsPerformance Management Notes for MBA Students
Performance Management Notes for MBA StudentsManickam Gajapathy
 
Improving Operations through Observation and Gemba Walks
Improving Operations through Observation and Gemba WalksImproving Operations through Observation and Gemba Walks
Improving Operations through Observation and Gemba WalksCIToolkit
 
What is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdf
What is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdfWhat is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdf
What is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdfBALASUNDARESAN M
 
The Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and Effect
The Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and EffectThe Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and Effect
The Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and EffectCIToolkit
 
Empowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging Leaders
Empowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging LeadersEmpowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging Leaders
Empowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging LeadersMahmoud Rabie
 
ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...
ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...
ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...AgileNetwork
 
Value Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process Optimization
Value Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process OptimizationValue Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process Optimization
Value Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process OptimizationCIToolkit
 
Organizations in a Future with Generative AI
Organizations in a Future with Generative AIOrganizations in a Future with Generative AI
Organizations in a Future with Generative AIKye Andersson
 
How the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the Studio
How the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the StudioHow the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the Studio
How the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the StudioChristopher Totten
 
An Important Step Toward Process Improvement
An Important Step Toward Process ImprovementAn Important Step Toward Process Improvement
An Important Step Toward Process ImprovementCIToolkit
 
Tackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna Rothman
Tackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna RothmanTackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna Rothman
Tackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna RothmanStefan Wolpers
 
A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem Solving
A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem SolvingA3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem Solving
A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem SolvingCIToolkit
 
Forget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outs
Forget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outsForget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outs
Forget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outsStephan Koning
 
Applying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous Improvement
Applying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous ImprovementApplying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous Improvement
Applying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous ImprovementCIToolkit
 
HR for Non HR_Learning and Development.
HR for Non HR_Learning  and Development.HR for Non HR_Learning  and Development.
HR for Non HR_Learning and Development.azischin
 
From Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EM
From Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EMFrom Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EM
From Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EMGloria Chow
 
Analyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value Mapping
Analyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value MappingAnalyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value Mapping
Analyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value MappingCIToolkit
 
Making Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity Diagrams
Making Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity DiagramsMaking Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity Diagrams
Making Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity DiagramsCIToolkit
 
Roadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint Presentation
Roadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint PresentationRoadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint Presentation
Roadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint Presentationgdscghrcem
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Performance Management Notes for MBA Students
Performance Management Notes for MBA StudentsPerformance Management Notes for MBA Students
Performance Management Notes for MBA Students
 
Improving Operations through Observation and Gemba Walks
Improving Operations through Observation and Gemba WalksImproving Operations through Observation and Gemba Walks
Improving Operations through Observation and Gemba Walks
 
What is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdf
What is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdfWhat is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdf
What is 5S principles of trainers for training institutions.pdf
 
The Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and Effect
The Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and EffectThe Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and Effect
The Role of Fishbone Diagram in Analyzing Cause and Effect
 
Empowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging Leaders
Empowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging LeadersEmpowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging Leaders
Empowering Resilience & Strategic Growth: Insights for Emerging Leaders
 
ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...
ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...
ANIn Coimbatore March 2024 | Agile & AI in Project Management by Dhilipkumar ...
 
Value Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process Optimization
Value Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process OptimizationValue Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process Optimization
Value Stream Map: A Visual Approach to Process Optimization
 
Organizations in a Future with Generative AI
Organizations in a Future with Generative AIOrganizations in a Future with Generative AI
Organizations in a Future with Generative AI
 
How the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the Studio
How the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the StudioHow the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the Studio
How the Heck do you Teach Level Design? Educating in the Studio
 
An Important Step Toward Process Improvement
An Important Step Toward Process ImprovementAn Important Step Toward Process Improvement
An Important Step Toward Process Improvement
 
Tackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna Rothman
Tackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna RothmanTackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna Rothman
Tackling Fake Agility w/ Johanna Rothman
 
A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem Solving
A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem SolvingA3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem Solving
A3 Thinking: A Structured Approach to Problem Solving
 
Forget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outs
Forget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outsForget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outs
Forget Fiverr : Fractional Employment the ins and outs
 
Applying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous Improvement
Applying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous ImprovementApplying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous Improvement
Applying the PDCA Cycle: A Blueprint for Continuous Improvement
 
HR for Non HR_Learning and Development.
HR for Non HR_Learning  and Development.HR for Non HR_Learning  and Development.
HR for Non HR_Learning and Development.
 
From Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EM
From Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EMFrom Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EM
From Command Line to Reporting Line: The Diary of a First-Time EM
 
Analyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value Mapping
Analyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value MappingAnalyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value Mapping
Analyzing and Monitoring Processes through Time Value Mapping
 
Capacity2 - Briefing and Facilitation training slides
Capacity2 - Briefing and Facilitation training slidesCapacity2 - Briefing and Facilitation training slides
Capacity2 - Briefing and Facilitation training slides
 
Making Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity Diagrams
Making Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity DiagramsMaking Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity Diagrams
Making Sense of Multiple Ideas with Affinity Diagrams
 
Roadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint Presentation
Roadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint PresentationRoadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint Presentation
Roadway to GDSC- Session 1 Powerpoint Presentation
 

Innovative ways companies are using design thinking

  • 1. Innovative ways companies are using design thinking Jeanne Liedtka P roponents of design thinking, the process of continuously redesigning a business using insight derived from customer intimacy, persuasively argue that it is a key capability for revolutionary innovators and a potential source of sustainable competitive advantage[1]. Several years ago a number of researchers at the University of Virginia’s Darden Business School and the Design Management Institute published Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers, in which we distilled what we had learned from designers that we thought would be relevant to managers. In it, we offered a view of the design thinking process as incorporating four questions (see Exhibit 1). Each of the four questions – What is? What if? What wows? What works? – explored a different stage of the design thinking process. ‘‘What is?’’ examined current reality. ‘‘What if?’’ used the learning from that first stage to envision multiple options for creating a new future. ‘‘What wows?’’ helped managers make some choices about where to focus first, and ‘‘What works?’’ took them into the real world to interact with actual users through small experiments. These four questions had an accompanying set of ten design tools to help managers navigate the question space (see Exhibit 2). The design thinking process can be illustrated by combining the four basic questions, which correspond to the four stages of the process, with the ten essential tools (see Exhibit 3). But how widely is design thinking being adopted in leading companies and how effectively is it being adapted in a variety of industries? That is the question that our team of researchers set out to answer several years ago. We began our new research by interviewing boundary spanners – leaders who operated at the intersection of design and business – in a number of Fortune 100 organizations. Those conversations led us to conclude that the process of ‘‘innovation’’ in many large organizations could fairly be described as a battlefield in which R&D, marketing and business development functions seemed to wrestling for control and often work at cross-purposes with each other. And proponents of ‘‘design thinking’’ seemed to be frequently caught in the crossfire. Talking to managers at ten organizations that implemented design thinking But the dysfunction was not universal, and in some corporations we found pockets of cooperation between managers and designers who were achieving noteworthy successes by working together. The stories they told inspired us. So we made a conscious decision to focus our attention on ten organizations where design thinking was having an impact on practice. Taking a cue from the design thinking process, we wanted to have a conversation with successful managers about possibilities rather than constraints and about particulars rather than generalities. Not that the constraints and the generalities they had to deal with were not real and relevant. Focusing on them, however, did not seem to make anyone smarter about what design thinking could produce – when implemented in the right environment, with the right kinds of managers and designers working together, on the right PAGE 40 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIP j VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014, pp. 40-45, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1087-8572 DOI 10.1108/SL-01-2014-0004 Jeanne Liedtka is a Professor at the Darden School at the University of Virginia (LIEDTKAJ@ darden.virginia.edu). Her latest book (with co-authors Andrew King and Kevin Bennett) is Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works (Columbia Business School Publishing, 2013) and her previous book is Designing for Growth: A Design Toolkit for Managers (Columbia Business Press, 2011).
  • 2. kinds of issues. Taking another cue from the design thinking process we wanted to have conversations that were abductive rather than deductive – ones that would encourage managers to take some creative leaps and envision what might be. And so we elected to report in detail on several inspiring stories of design thinking successes in real organizations. What we found inspired us to write a book, Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works. In it, we recount the cases of designers who wanted to share design rather than hoard it and also on their work with managers who were open to new ways of thinking and eager to learn. Instead of chronicling battles for control, these stories illuminated the kinds of new ways of thinking and acting that design thinking made possible. And these were happening, we discovered, in all kinds of organizations – business, government and social sector – all around the world. Exhibit 1 The four questions What is? What if? What wows? What works?? $ Source: From Solving Problems with Design Thinking © 2013 Jeanne Liedtka, Andrew King and Kevin Bennett. By permission of Columbia University Press Exhibit 2 Ten design tools Source: From Solving Problems with Design Thinking © 2013 Jeanne Liedtka, Andrew King and Kevin Bennett. By permission of Columbia University Press Visualization using imagery to envision possibilities and bring them to life Journey Mapping assessing the existing experience through the customer’s eyes Value Chain Analysis assessing the current value chain that supports the customer’s journey Mind Mapping generating insights from exploration activities and using those to create design criteria Brainstorming generating new possibilities and new alternative business models 1 2 3 4 5 Concept Development assembling innovative elements into a coherent alternative solution that can be explored and evaluated Assumption Testing isolating and testing the key assumptions that will drive the success or failure of a concept Rapid Prototyping expressing a new concept in a tangible form for exploration, testing, and refinement Customer Co-Creation enrolling customers to participate in creating the solution that best meets their needs Learning Launch that lets customers experience the creating an affordable experiment new solution over an extended period of time, to test key assumptions with market data 6 7 8 9 10 VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjPAGE 41
  • 3. We came away from the research with a clearer sense of the kinds of problems that design thinking could solve and the many diverse ways it could be used. We also learned a lot about the specifics of how design outcomes could be measured and uncovered a set of unexpected strategic contributions it was making. How the boundary spanners use design thinking to solve problems In our previous research, we had come at design thinking with a very specific lens: how to use it to produce organic growth in business organizations. In this new research, it turned out that using design thinking to achieve organic growth was just the start. We found that design thinking was, in fact, also a problem solving process, not just an innovation process. And one that could help any organization – not just for-profits – become more successful at innovation. Some of the organizations we studied used design thinking for internal challenges: B Suncorp, one of Australia’s largest financial services firms, used it to drive a post-merger integration process. They did this by creating a division-wide strategic conversation that engaged every level of the organization and built alignment on strategy and vision using the design tools of metaphor and storytelling. B SAP, the German-owned business process management company, melded design thinking with traditional approaches to strategy in order to compose and communicate new strategies around the nebulous concept of Web 2.0. B Toyota employed design thinking to analyze one of its West Coast customer-contact centers from the ground up, engaging a cross-functional team of frontline call reps, software engineers, business leaders and change agents in a redesign process that transformed the service center experience for both customers and associates. Other organizations were leveraging design thinking to engage customers more fully: B 3M saw in design thinking a chance to reimagine the sales process in the materials science business and equip their sales force with new tools to engage customers, moving beyond a focus on presenting technical specs to one aimed at demonstrating the power of new materials. The approach used design tools such as ethnography and visualization. B Design thinking helped a team at IBM use insights generated from a wide-ranging study of human interaction to transform that ubiquitous marketing event, the trade show, into a Exhibit 3 Design tools What is? What if? What wows? What works? Source: From Solving Problems with Design Thinking © 2013 Jeanne Liedtka, Andrew King and Kevin Bennett. By permission of Columbia University Press PAGE 42jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjVOL. 42 NO. 2 2014
  • 4. collaborative experience. Instead of a critique of the new model by the management hierarchy, the design team prototyped and tested it with real customers. B In a very unusual collaboration, a group of financial service executives from the largest banks and insurance companies in France created an industry-wide innovation group, Le Club Innovation Banque Finance Assurance, and teamed up with Ecole Parsons Paris anthropologists and designers, to develop a more thorough understanding of the industry-wide needs of the customers they served. Still other organizations were bringing design thinking to management development and individual skill building: B A design-minded entrepreneur founded MeYouHealth, a start-up that partnered with an established industry incumbent, Healthways, to figure out how to use social networking to increase well-being by helping individuals take healthier practices one step at a time and, in the process, teach the value that design thinking’s qualitative approaches could bring to a highly quantitative corporate strategy. B At Intuit, the Design Services Team led the effort to embed designing for customer delight into its DNA, using design thinking to provide a set of principles and tools for engaging employees across the organization to think more creatively, and experimentally, about enhancing value for customers. But as we discovered, it was not just for-profit organizations that were reaping the benefits of design thinking. In Denmark, The Good Kitchen, a social service entity that fed the elderly and infirm in the municipality of Holstebro, started out intending to update their menu, but instead used a comprehensive design process to make a transformational change in every aspect of their meal delivery service, and in the process, enhanced the motivation and satisfaction of kitchen employees. And the city of Dublin, Ireland, embraced design thinking as a way to improve civic engagement in revitalizing urban spaces, marshaling residents’ energy and ideas and developing them into tangible prototypes. More importantly, the project showed how citizens could be equipped with the tools to help create their own future. Learning to reframe the opportunity by asking more questions In these stories, we saw some unexpected contributions that design thinking was making. We started our research believing, as most managers do, that design thinking’s primary use was producing better, more creative solutions to problems or in helping managers to envision possibilities that they hadn’t seen before. That turned out to be true enough, but a range of other outcomes we saw design thinking produce during the process of seeking those solutions were equally, maybe even more, interesting. One of the most significant of these was the way in which design tools – such as, ethnographic interviewing, customer journey mapping and job-to-be-done analysis – encouraged people to stay involved with the problem long enough to reframe the opportunity. The Good Kitchen started out intending only to create a new menu. IBM just wanted to make its trade shows more consistent with its ‘‘Smarter planet’’ strategy. Toyota initially thought that a new database was all it needed. In each case, design thinking helped the involved participants ask better, more penetrating questions that expanded the boundaries of the search itself. If the path to innovative, exceptional solutions begins with ‘‘ Design tools – such as, ethnographic interviewing, customer journey mapping and job-to-be-done analysis – encouraged people to stay involved with the problem long enough to reframe the opportunity. ’’ VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjPAGE 43
  • 5. asking innovative questions, then the normal managerial tendency to rush through questioning period as rapidly as possible may be the critical obstacle to actual finding an ideal solution. Design thinking’s core principle, that would-be innovators first extensively and patiently explore the question, proved to be invaluable, as Dublin’s Barry MacDevitt told us: The design thinking approach forces you to stay in the question and not define exactly what the problem is. We all have a tendency to jump to solution mode far too quickly, so the design thinking approach forces you really to live in this unclear, sometimes very muddy place. This ends up producing a much better understanding of the problem you’re trying to solve. Spending time at the front end of the process exploring the question and its context paid big dividends in producing more effective solutions in the organizations we studied. How design thinking builds better teams Another unexpected bonus of the design thinking approach was that it helped build better teams. Contrary to the heroic, lone-genius myth of innovation is the reality that success is often the result of a team effort. And we know that diversity – of perspectives, talents and experiences – is the most reliable source of new thinking. But managing all that diversity is a problem, and instead of producing better solutions, diverse teams often find themselves locked in debates that end up with compromises that are actually worse than what any individual could have produced. Economist and Nobel Laureate Herb Simon called this phenomena ‘‘satisficing,’’ picking the least bad solution that everyone will agree to. Instead of rising to new heights of creativity, teams sink to the lowest common denominator. But not because they want to; they just cannot find a productive way to work with their differences. Design thinking’s collaborative methodology and tools help teams to actively leverage their differences in positive ways. Tools like mind-mapping encouraged them to align around their assessment of current reality and the nature of promising possibilities and paved the way for them to create a new future together. The creation of explicit design criteria laid assumptions out in the open where they could be scrutinized definitively, and dialog was driven by data rather than opinion. Prototyping and experimentation produced conversations with real customers, a better source of information than PowerPoint presentations to colleagues in conference rooms. And all of this market-based learning generated forward momentum and energy for the project. We also witnessed the positive impact when teams were able to identify and focus attention on what really mattered to the people for whom they were trying to create value. Agreement on what really mattered to these ‘‘customers’’ allowed teams to cut through the clutter, confusion and information overload to achieve focus. Our research found that the biggest obstacle to innovation in most organizations is not cut-throat competitors, fickle customers or a stagnant economy – rather, it is bureaucracy and inertia. An amazing thing happens when design teams combined engagement and alignment with focus. They produced another invaluable asset for any organization trying to move innovative ideas through bureaucracies: speed. We came away from our research convinced that the highest payoff from adopting a design-thinking approach was not necessarily in identifying a solution, but rather in innovating how people worked together to envision and implement the new possibilities they discovered. ‘‘ The highest payoff from adopting a design-thinking approach was not necessarily in identifying a solution, but rather in innovating how people worked together to envision and implement the new possibilities they discovered. ’’ PAGE 44jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjVOL. 42 NO. 2 2014
  • 6. Changing the conversation and the mindset Design thinking’s most significant impact, we concluded, may well be the way it adds new possibilities to the ongoing conversation between those doing the work and those controlling the resources. Finding new opportunities for learning from this conversation is perhaps the most productive path to innovation. The stories we heard impressed upon us the importance of the kinds of changes in the conversation that design thinking processes produced: B People talked about envisioning new possibilities together instead of pointing out constraints or defending their personally favored recommendations. B They spent time together exploring what was going on in the market today in order to get alignment on a definition of the problem instead of jumping immediately to solutions. B They shared deep primary data gathered from the customers they wanted to create value for and mined it for deep insights instead of compiling web-based surveys that revealed only superficial attitudes and opinions. B They listened with the intent to understand their teammates’ perspectives and to build on them instead of listening for weaknesses to use in their debates. B Teams spent their time in meetings figuring out how to start small and learn instead of trying instead to create the perfect plan before any action could be taken. B They designed marketplace experiments instead of just arguing over PowerPoint presentations in conference rooms. Then they actively searched for disconfirming data instead of picking out the data that supported their ingoing hypothesis. These changes we heard in the conversations reflected a significant change in the mindset with which the managers and their design partners approached innovation, and set in motion a series of behavioral changes that impacted the outcomes they produced. And so we came away from our investigations convinced that design thinking has the potential to be a game changer. Will it live up to its promise? That question will have to be answered one organization at a time. But in at least ten companies, we know that it already has. Note 1. Roger Martin, The Design of Business (Harvard Business Review Press, 2009). See also Leavy, B. (2010) ‘‘Design thinking – a new mental model of value innovation,’’ Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 5-14; Martin, R. (2010) ‘‘Design thinking: achieving insights via the ‘knowledge funnel’’’, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 37-41; and Leavy, B. (2011) ‘‘Roger Martin explores three big ideas: customer capitalism, integrative thinking and design thinking,’’ Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 19-26. Corresponding author Jeanne Liedtka can be contacted at: LIEDTKAJ@darden.virginia.edu VOL. 42 NO. 2 2014 jSTRATEGY & LEADERSHIPjPAGE 45 To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
  • 7. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.