Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

CSSE 2009 - Teacher Volunteerism and Good Will: Local Teachers to Distance Education Responsibilities

480 views

Published on

Barbour, M. K. & Mulcahy, D. (2009, May). Teacher volunteerism and good will: Local teachers to distance education responsibilities. Roundtable presented at the annual Canadian Society for the Study of Education conference, Ottawa, ON.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

CSSE 2009 - Teacher Volunteerism and Good Will: Local Teachers to Distance Education Responsibilities

  1. 1. Teacher Volunteerism and Good Will: Local Teachers to Distance Education Responsibilities Michael Barbour, Wayne State University Dennis Mulcahy, Memorial University
  2. 2. Centre for Distance Learning and Innovation• 294 schools in 2005-06 – down from 472 in 1995-96• 76,763 students in 2005-06 – down from 142,332 in 1985-86• average school size is 220 pupils – 45% > 200 and 25% > 100• CDLI founded in December 2000• Synchronous – Online – 30% to 80% via virtual classroom• Asynchronous – Offline – remainder of their time via CMS – often independent “seat work” from their textbooks or assignments
  3. 3. Why School-Based Teacher?• Largely ignored in teacher education• Role has been found to be critical in the success of K-12 online learners• Newfoundland and Labrador have one of the most standardized models
  4. 4. Mediating Team• Technical - to provide initial maintenance and trouble- shooting for the CDLI computers (all major problems are handled by a district-level technician or by the CDLI)• Coach – to provide support (although not academic support) in gaining the independent learning and self- motivation skills that may be needed to succeed in the online environment• Administrative – to proctor tests and exams, monitor student attendance and behavior, and provide supervision• school administrator, technology teacher, secretary, custodian, and/or a student enrolled in the CDLI (i.e., e-tutor)
  5. 5. Methodology• Web-based survey – based on survey used in Barbour &Mulcahy (2004)• Weekly Logs – volunteers from survey – kept log for 4 weeks• Interviews – volunteers from survey – yet to be scheduled
  6. 6. Sample Schools M-Teachers Schools M-Teachers M-Teachers M-Teachers M-Teachers Participating Participating Completed Opted-Out Not ResponsiveDistrict 1 10 34 - - - - -District 2 32 83 20 46 17 7 22District 3 33 102 33 102 19 27 56District 4 21 62 20 58 16 9 33District 5 2 3 2 3 0 1 2Private 2 5 2 5 1 0 4SchoolsTotals 100 289 77 214 53 44 117
  7. 7. Sample• 77% of the schools representing 74% of the m- teachers• Response rate – 24.8%• Opted out – 20.6%• Unresponsive – 56.7%• Administrative – 60%• Technical – 21.7%• Coach – 18.3%
  8. 8. SurveyResultsTask M-Teachers TimeSupervising tests/exams/class 82.7% 58 minTracking down missing 44.2% 31 minassignments/homeworkRecording attendance or other 44.2% 17 minadministrative dataProviding content-based tutoring 42.3% 40 minProviding technology-based tutoring 50.0% 23 minProviding technical trouble shooting 73.1% 37 minSupervising science labs 15.1% 60 minPreparing and submitting tests/exams 18.9% 20 min
  9. 9. SurveyResultsAverage 2.34 hours per weekper m-teacherCDLI utilizes 5X14 timetable• 10 hours per 14 daysAverage m-teacher spends 65% or 2/3 course slot on their duties
  10. 10. Survey ResultsHow often do you access the any of your students course management systems?• Never – 60%• Couple of times a month – 15%• Once a month – 12%What do you access in the students CMS?• To check test dates and assignment deadlines• To check student marksHow often are you in communication with e-teachers of your students?• Couple of times a month – 38%• Once a month – 19%• Couple of times a week – 19%
  11. 11. Weekly Logs • 6 teachers • 4 weeksTask M-Teachers Average TimeSupervising tests/exams/class 5 teachers 80 min 16/16 weeksTracking down missing 2 teachers 2 minassignments/homework 3/16 weeksRecording attendance or other 3 teachers 3 minadministrative data 5/16 weeksProviding content-based tutoring 3 teachers 15 min 4/16 weeksProviding technology-based tutoringProviding technical trouble shooting 5 teachers 29 min 13/16 weeksSupervising science labsPreparing and submitting tests/exams 6 teachers 19 min 16/16 weeks
  12. 12. ResultsTask Survey Time Log Time 2004 StudySupervising tests/exams/class 58 min 80 min 58 minTracking down missing 31 min 2 min 28 minassignments/homeworkRecording attendance or other 17 min 3 min 27 minadministrative dataProviding content-based tutoring 40 min 15 min 12 minProviding technology-based tutoring 23 min - 30 minProviding technical trouble shooting 37 min 29 min 81 minSupervising science labs 60 min - -Preparing and submitting 20 min 19 min -tests/exams
  13. 13. Discussion & Initial Conclusions• m-teacher duties occupy significant amounts of teacher time• logs indicated less overall time than surveys• level of involvement has actually increased since pilot year
  14. 14. Future Research• survey – possible addition of District 1• 12 m-teachers have volunteered to be interviewed – June 2009
  15. 15. Assistant Professor Wayne State University, USA mkbarbour@gmail.comhttp://www.michaelbarbour.com

×