A sample of holistic scoring rubric


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
1 Comment
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

A sample of holistic scoring rubric

  1. 1. Holistic gradingHolistic grading methods assume that an essay is other than a sum of particularparts so we read the essay as a whole. the holistic scoring guide describes thecharacteristics of excellent, good and not-so-good essays.Samples of Holistic Scoring Rubrics The essay clearly states a position, provides support for the position,Excellent raises a counter argument or objection, and refutes it. The evidence, both writer in support of the position and in refutation of counterpositions, is 6 persuasive and original (that is, drawn from the students own observations, not borrowed). The essay tackles a significant objection or counterargument, not a trivial one. The relationships between position, evidence, counterargument, and refutation are clear, and the essay does not contain extraneous or irrelevant information. The essay states a position, supports it, raises an objection or Good counterargument, and refutes it. The essay may, however, contain one or writer more of the following ragged edges: evidence is not uniformly persuasive 5 or original; the counter-argument is not a very serious threat to the position; one has to read between the lines to see relationships between ideas and some ideas seem out of place or irrelevant. The essay states a position and raises a counterargument, but their is well Average developed. The objection or counterargument considered may lean toward Writer the trivial. The essay may also seem disorganised. Nonetheless, the essay 4 should receive a 4 in acknowledgement of the cognitive complexity of the task. It is more difficult to address arguments and counterarguments than it is simply to support one line of argument. The essay states a position, provides strong and original evidence Fair supporting the position, and is well organised. However, the essay does writer not address possible objections or counterarguments. Thus, even though 3 the support seems stronger and the essay may be more well organised than the 4 essay, it should not receive more than a 3. The essay states a position and provides some support, but it doesnt do it Weak very well. Evidence is scanty, general, trivial or not original. The essay writer achieves its length largely through repetition of ideas and inclusion of 2 irrelevant information. The overall impression is that the essay has been dashed off at the last minute. Very The essay does not state the students position on the issue. Instead, it weak restates the position presented in the assignment and summarizes the writer evidence discussed in the text or in class. The essay may include an 1 occasional I agree with, but it provides nothing beyond what was said in class or in the readings. The essay receives a 1 rather than a 0 because there may be some merit to being able to summarise what the author of the text said.Source : Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. and Habeshaw, T, (1986). 53 Interesting Ways to AssessYour Students. Technical and Educational Services:Bristo, pp. 11-26. ~1~
  2. 2. Holistic Scoring RubricsScore Description Demonstrates complete understanding of the problem. All requirements of task are included 5 in response. Demonstrates considerable understanding of the problem. All requirements of task are 4 included. 3 Demonstrates partial understanding of the problem. Most requirements of task are included. 2 Demonstrates little understanding of the problem. Many requirements of task are missing. 1 Demonstrates no understanding of the problem. 0 No response/task not attempted.Holistic Scoring RubricA - EXCELLENT (85 - 100) - A Markedly Exceptional Performance • a comprehensive grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated, including an in-depth understanding of the relevant concepts, theories, and issues related to the topic addressed • an awareness of differing view-points is demonstrated and a rigorous assessment of these undertaken where relevant • an ability to think critically is demonstrated in the analysis, synthesis and evaluation of relevant information . a thoughtful statement of position is presented and defended through logical arguments and carefully selected supportive detail; the arguments presented build to a consistent conclusion • originality, insight, and creativity are demonstrated; the paper goes beyond repeating what others have said and contributes something new to our understanding of the topic • a clear, fluent, and concise style highlights a well-written, tightly argued, and logically structured essay • a virtually flawless mastery of all aspects of grammar, structure, and style is demonstratedB - SUPERIOR (70 - 84)- Clearly Above Average Performance • a thorough grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated. • an awareness of differing view-points is demonstrated and an assessment of these attempted where relevant . the paper goes beyond description to interpretation, analysis, synthesis and evaluation • a position is adopted and logically argued; appropriate supporting detail is supplied • a clear style which communicates well (but may contain occasional or minor flaws in the mechanics of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc.) is evident in the logical presentation of a reasonable argumentC - SATISFACTORY (55 - 69) - A Fully Competent Paper ~2~
  3. 3. • a basic grasp of the subject matter is demonstrated • accurate information incorporating relevant sources and references is conveyed • a position is adopted and logically argued • an adequate attempt at analysis, synthesis, interpretation or evaluation is evident • an acceptable style demonstrates an awareness of, and attention to, the principles of paragraph development, sentence structure, grammar and spelling, etc.D - POOR (40 - 54) - A Marginally Acceptable Paper • a lack of familiarity with the subject matter is demonstrated through the omission of key material, or through the misinterpretation of important concepts, theories or issues • a lack of critical thinking is evident in a paper which is more descriptive than interpretive; or in which the analysis and synthesis are logically flawed; or in which there is a reliance on assertion; or in which the relevance of supporting detail is questionable • a position is not taken, is hard to determine, or is inconsistent with arguments or information presented in the paper • there is a lack of originality and an over-reliance on material presented in class or in the assigned readings • written expression requires improvement in basic communication skills; or written communication is marred by inflated diction, overly complex sentence structures, or an obtuse style.F - FAILING (0 - 39) - An Unacceptable Performance • a basic lack of understanding of the subject matter is demonstrated through gross misinterpretation or omissions • there is little attempt to go beyond description; or interpretation and analysis demonstrates gross error in logic or supporting detail • little or no factual material is presented; or material presented contains gross factual error; or is completely irrelevant • written expression is disorganized, incoherent, poorly expressed,_and contains unacceptably frequent or • serious errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling OR • an attempt is made to use other authors work without providing proper acknowledgment • an attempt is made to hand in a paper from another course • an attempt is made to write a paper on a topic other than that approved in writing by the instructor (marking criteria compiled by R. Runte and K. Mazurek) ~3~