Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

University fund cuts - issue management


Published on

This presentation was put together for a university in-class talk about issues management. The issue I used was the university funding cuts and I demonstrated the ways that the University of Gloucestershire (UK) could employ an issues management strategy.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

University fund cuts - issue management

  1. 1. Issue of the week<br />
  2. 2. An issue is:<br />"An unsettled matter (which is ready for a decision) or a point of conflict between an organisation and one or more publics.“<br />Cornelissen (2009, p10)<br />
  3. 3. University Funding Slashes<br />The issue:<br />On the 2nd February it was announced by the HEFC that University funds are to be slashed by nearly £1bn.<br />
  4. 4. In the news:<br />The Guardian<br />BBC News<br />The Telegraph<br />Politics Home<br />Blog Posts:<br />Left Foot Forward<br />Touchstone blog<br />P.H.Davis blog<br />
  5. 5. Social media mentions<br />Story was linked closely to the closure of one of Pfizer's UK sites as critics believe that cuts are sending out the same message.<br />
  6. 6. C4 News’ Economics Editor,<br />Faisal Islam, tweeted this on 2nd February<br />Faisal has 12k followers<br />More than 100 others tweeted this<br />
  7. 7. Social Media Monitoring<br />
  8. 8. Why is it important forevery organisationto have a issues managementplan in place?<br />
  9. 9. The Development of an Issue into a Crisis (Cornelissen, 2009, p.216)<br />PRESSURE<br />Latent<br />Active<br />Intense<br />Crisis<br />TIME<br />
  10. 10. One issue = several issues<br />Higher tuition fees but a lower quality of education?<br />Students unable to get a place at University<br />Cutting research budgets; critics say it could be devastating to the UK economy<br />
  11. 11. Issue Amplification<br />Conversation<br />Behaviour change<br />Further sharing<br />
  12. 12. UoG spending issues / scandal – October 2010<br /><br />
  13. 13. Constituencies<br />Internals <br /><ul><li>Current students
  14. 14. University lecturers and university staff</li></ul>Externals<br /><ul><li> Applicant / hopeful students
  15. 15. Families of hopefuls
  16. 16. Suppliers
  17. 17. The government (inc the HEFC)
  18. 18. UCAS</li></li></ul><li>Issues Management Plan<br />Source:Paul Gillions, 2009, p.380<br />Who are we<br />talking to?<br />What do we want to tell them?<br />What supporting <br />material do we need?<br />
  19. 19. Issues Management Plan<br />Source:Paul Gillions, 2009, p.380<br />Who will be our messengers?<br />When and where will the contact be made?<br />What do we expect to<br />happen as a result?<br />
  20. 20. General Issues Management Plan<br />Source:Cornelissen, 2009, p.218<br />Issues Management Process:<br />Environmental scanning<br />Issue identification and analysis<br />Issue-specific response strategies<br />Evaluation<br />
  21. 21. Environmental scanning<br />DESTEP analysis:<br /><ul><li> Demographic
  22. 22. Economic
  23. 23. Social
  24. 24. Technological
  25. 25. Ecological
  26. 26. Political</li></ul>SWOT analysis:<br /><ul><li>Strengths
  27. 27. Weaknesses
  28. 28. Opportunities
  29. 29. Threats</li></li></ul><li>Issues Identification & Analysis<br />To identify emerging and potential issues after analysing the current environment.<br />Constituencies should be identified in order to shape relevant issue management strategies.<br />Four categories of stakeholders:<br /><ul><li> Problematic stakeholders – those who oppose the organisation but have little or no importance / power
  30. 30. Antagonistic stakeholders – those who oppose the organisation and hold power
  31. 31. Low priority stakeholders – those who are likely to support the organisation but have little power / influence
  32. 32. Supporter stakeholders – those who support the organisation and have importance, power or influence. </li></li></ul><li>UoG Constituencies<br /><ul><li>Problematic stakeholders – outsiders with no involvement with the university
  33. 33. Antagonistic stakeholders – non-peaceful student activists
  34. 34. Low priority stakeholders – suppliers
  35. 35. Supporter stakeholders – current students, potential students, lecturers and staff, The Government, UCAS</li></li></ul><li>Issue-specific Response Strategies<br />Three types of response strategy<br />A buffering strategy – to stonewall and issue and delay its development<br />2. A bridging strategy – where organisations are open to change and adhere to the stakeholder expectation<br />3. An advocacy strategy – to try and change stakeholder expectation and opinion<br />
  36. 36. Bridging Strategy<br /><ul><li> Government decision
  37. 37. Dealing with the issue
  38. 38. The UoG adapting the issue
  39. 39. Transparency
  40. 40. Actively engaging with vital constituencies about their expectations</li></li></ul><li>Evaluation<br />An overall evaluation to see whether stakeholders opinions or expectations were changed at the time of crisis.<br />Organisations need to understand what ‘stage’ the issue is at.<br />All organisations need an issues management plan in place in the case of an issue arising.<br />
  41. 41. Any Questions?<br />