Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Evolution of management

11,793 views

Published on

presentation

Published in: Technology, Business
  • its really gud....but i need alsotheories of elton mayo,herzberg and linkert
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Evolution of management

  1. 1. Evolution of Management<br />
  2. 2. 2000<br />The Technology-Driven Workplace<br />2010<br />1990<br />The Learning Organization<br />2000<br />1990<br />The Learning Organization<br />2010<br />1980<br />Total Quality Management<br />1970<br />Contingency Views<br />1950<br />Systems<br />2000<br />1940<br />Management Science<br />1930<br />Humanistic<br />1990<br />1890<br />Classical<br />1940<br />Management Perspectives Over Time<br />
  3. 3. 3<br />Classical Perspective<br />0<br />The early study of management. <br />19th – late 20th Century<br />Scientific Management<br />Bureaucratic Organizations<br />Administrative Principles<br />Very powerful, gave companies fundamental skill for high productivity<br />
  4. 4. Scientific Management<br />Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915), father of scientific management<br />Focus on improving efficiency and labor productivity<br />Workers could be retooled like machines<br />Managers would need to change<br />Incentive systems for meeting standards<br />Others added to the theories<br />
  5. 5. Characteristics of Scientific Management<br />General Approach<br />Developed standard method for performing each job.<br />Selected workers with appropriate abilities for each job.<br />Trained workers in standard method.<br />Supported workers by planning work and eliminating interruptions.<br />Provided wage incentives to workers for increased output.<br />Contributions<br />Demonstrated the importance of compensation for performance.<br />Initiated the careful study of tasks and jobs.<br />Demonstrated the importance of personnel and their training.<br />Criticisms<br />Did not appreciate social context of work and higher needs of workers.<br />Did not acknowledge variance among individuals.<br />Tended to regard workers as uninformed and ignored their ideas.<br />
  6. 6. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />6<br />Administrative Principles<br />0<br />Henri Foyal (1841-1925), French mining engineer, turned industrialist, and other contributors led the ideas<br />Fayol wrote down his own management practices<br />In the text, General and Industrial Management; 14 general principles were outlined<br />Fayol divided industrial activities into six groups- Technical, Commercial, Financial, Security, Accounting and Managerial <br />To perform six activities, Fayol identified five managerial functions : Planning, Organizing, Commanding, Coordinating, and Controlling<br />Fayol was first to emphasize need for management teaching and outlined 14 principles of management<br />
  7. 7. Administrative Principles &Henri Fayol’s 14 Points<br />Division of work<br />Authority<br />Discipline<br />Unity of command<br />Unity of direction<br />Subordination of individual interest for common good<br />Remuneration<br />Centralization<br />Scalar chain<br />Order<br />Equity<br />Stability and tenure of staff<br />Initiative<br />Esprit de corps<br />
  8. 8. 8<br />Bureaucratic Organizations<br />0<br />Max Weber (1864-1920), a German theorist and father of modern sociology, introduced the bureaucratic theories<br />He was concerned with managerial abuse of power and resources<br />He identified three types of authority or power- traditional, Charismatic and Rational or legal. <br />Weber opined Rational or legal authority is more efficient and adaptable to change<br />Selection and advancement would be focused on competence and technical qualifications<br />
  9. 9. 6 Characteristics of Weberian Bureaucracy<br />Labor is divided with clear definitions of authority and responsibility.<br />Positions are in hierarchy of authority.<br />Personnel are selected and promoted based on qualifications.<br />Acts and decisions are recorded in writing<br />Management is separate from the ownership.<br />Rules and procedures ensure reliable, & predictable behavior. Rules are impersonal and uniformly applied.<br />
  10. 10. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />10<br />6 Characteristics of Weberian Bureaucracy<br />0<br />
  11. 11. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />11<br />Humanistic Perspective<br />Led by Mary Parker Follett and Chester Barnard<br />It was Mary Parker Follett who defined management as getting things done through people<br />Importance of understanding human behaviors: needs, attitudes and social interactions<br />Human Relations Movement<br />Human Resources Perspective<br />Behavioral Sciences<br />0<br />
  12. 12. Humanistic Perspective<br />Emphasized understanding human behavior.<br />Dealt with needs & attitudes in the workplace.<br />Truly effective control comes from within the individual worker rather than authoritarian control.<br />Hawthorne Studies brought this perspective to forefront. <br />
  13. 13. Humanistic PerspectiveThree Sub-Fields<br /><ul><li>Human Relations Movement.
  14. 14. Human Resources Perspective.
  15. 15. Behavioral Sciences Approach.</li></li></ul><li>Hawthorne Studies<br />Human Relations Movement<br />Ten year study.<br />Four experimental & three control groups.<br />Five different tests.<br />Test pointed to factors other than illumination for productivity.<br />1st Relay Assembly Test Room experiment, was controversial, test lasted 6 years.<br />Interpretation, money not cause of increased output.<br />Factor that increased output, Human Relations.<br />
  16. 16. Hawthorne Studies<br />Study was initiated to at Hawthorne plant of Western Electric- an unit of AT&T to study effects of changes in lighting on productivity<br />Part of unit was divided into experimental group and control group<br />No change in lighting was effected in control group but light was enhanced in experimental group from 24 to 46 to 70’ candles- productivity went up in both groups<br />Then lighting of experimental group was reduced gradually to below normal but without any change in control group - productivity continued to increase in both groups<br />
  17. 17. Hawthorne Studies<br />Productivity of experimental group finally started to decline when lighting was reduced to moon light level and visibility got affected.<br />It proved that something other than lighting caused changes in productivity<br />Another experiment was conducted in Relay Assembly Test Room for 6 years. In this test relationship amongst rest, fatigue and productivity were also examined.<br />
  18. 18. Hawthorne Studies<br />First the normal productivity was measured<br />Then production based pay system was introduced without any change in working conditions for 8 weeks<br />Then two rest pauses of 5 minutes each were introduced at 10 am and 2 pm<br /> In next stage girls were given light lunch during pauses<br />In next stage workday was reduced by half hour<br />In next stage workday was reduced by one hour<br />In next stage 5 day week initiated<br />Gradual rise in output continued till here<br />
  19. 19. Hawthorne Studies<br />Then original work pattern without any pause, lunch and full work hrs introduced and productivity measured for 12 weeks.<br />Productivity declined but not to original levels meaning physical conditions did not have impact<br />Change in output could be related to attitudes and social factors at work place<br />Workers enjoyed getting attention. This is known as Hawthorne effect.<br />
  20. 20. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />19<br />Human Relations Movement<br />0<br />Control comes from the individual worker rather than authoritarian control<br />The Hawthorne studies found increased output due to managers’ better treatment of employees<br />Money mattered a great deal<br />Productivity increased from feelings of importance<br />Created a focus on positive treatment of employees<br />
  21. 21. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />20<br />Human Resources Perspective<br />0<br />Emphasizes understanding human behavior, needs and attitudes in the workplace.<br />Perspective came from the idea that cows gave more milk when they were more satisfied<br />Maintains an interest in worker participation. <br />Focus on job tasks and theories of motivation<br />Reduce dehumanizing or demeaning work<br />Allow workers to use full potential <br />Main contributors: Abraham Maslow and Douglas McGregor<br />Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs<br />McGregor’s Theory X/Theory Y<br />
  22. 22. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs<br />
  23. 23. Abraham Maslow sought to explain why a need become driving at some time and some other needs at some other time<br />Maslow’s answer is that human needs are arranged in a hierarchy, from the most pressing to the least pressing<br />Physiological needs - food, shelter most potent<br />Psychological needs like safety, social, esteem and self actualisation are potent in that order<br />It says that person shall fulfill its most important need first at least to a minimum level and only then the next level need shall activate<br />
  24. 24. Organizational<br />Examples<br />General<br />Examples<br />Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy<br />Self-<br />actualization<br />Challenging Job<br />Self-fulfillment<br />Esteem<br />Job Title<br />Status<br />Belonging<br />Friends<br />Friendship<br />Safety<br />Retirement Plan<br />Stability<br />Physiological<br />Shelter<br />Wages<br />Based on needs satisfaction<br />
  25. 25. Douglas McGregor’s Theory X & Theory Y<br />Theory X <br />People are lazy<br />People lack ambition <br />Dislike responsibility<br />People are self-centered<br />People don’t like change<br />People need close supervision<br />Theory Y <br />People are energetic<br />People want to make contributions<br />People do have ambition<br />People will seek responsibility<br />Consider work as natural as rest & play<br />
  26. 26. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />25<br />Theory X and Theory Y<br />0<br />
  27. 27. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />26<br />Behavioral Sciences Approach<br />0<br />Scientific methods that draw from sociology, psychology, anthropology, economics and other disciplines<br />Focus on human behavior and interaction<br />Organizational development came from behavioral sciences approach<br />Applied behavioral sciences to improve organizational health and effectiveness<br />
  28. 28. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />27<br />Management Science Perspective<br />0<br />Developed to meet changing and dynamic environment created from WWII<br />Engaged mathematics, statistics and quantitative techniques to aid in decision making<br />Increased study of management led by Peter Drucker<br />Use of technology and programming for optimizing operations<br />Introduced new subsets of management:<br />Operations Research<br />Operations Management<br />Information Technology<br />
  29. 29. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />28<br />Recent Historical Trends<br />0<br />Systems Theory. A holistic view of management as a interrelated parts to achieve a common purpose.<br />Contingency View. Successful resolution of organizational problems depends on situations.<br />Total Quality Management. Management of the total organization to deliver quality.<br />
  30. 30. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />29<br />The Systems View of Organizations<br />0<br />
  31. 31. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />30<br />Contingency View of Management<br />0<br />
  32. 32. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />31<br />Total Quality Management<br />0<br />W. Edward Deming, known as the father of the quality movement<br />US initially scoffed at Deming<br />During the 1908s and 1990s, quality became a focus to meet global competition<br />Four key elements of quality management:<br />Employee involvement<br />Focus on customer<br />Benchmarking<br />Continuous improvement<br />
  33. 33. Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning.  All rights reserved.<br />32<br />The Learning Organization<br />0<br />Learning aids in the adaptation to change<br />Peter Senge began the discussion about the learning organization<br />All employees are engaged in identifying and solving problems<br />Learning increases the capacity to learn and grow<br />Move from efficiency to solving problems<br />
  34. 34. 33<br />Managing the Technology-Driven Workplace<br />0<br />Most work is performed on computers in today’s workplace<br />Companies use technology to communicate and collaborate<br />Key technologies in today’s workplace:<br />Supply Chain Management<br />Customer Relationship Management<br />Outsourcing<br />
  35. 35. 34<br />Supply Chain for a Retail Organization<br />0<br />
  36. 36. Management Science Perspective<br />Emerged after WW II.<br />Distinguished for its application of mathematics, statistics to problem solving.<br /><ul><li>Operations Research emerged.
  37. 37. Operations Management emerged.
  38. 38. Management Information Systems emerged.</li>

×