A T T Wireless Complaint


Published on

My letter to AT&T corporate regarding issues with their upgrade policy and overall discrepancies between online and store capabilities.

Published in: Business, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

A T T Wireless Complaint

  1. 1. Michael Interbartolo League City, TX 77573 July 13, 2010 Randall L. Stephenson CEO AT&T 208 S.Akard St Dallas, TX 75202 Dear Randall L. Stephenson: I writing to you today as both a customer (account #XXXXX) and concerned shareholder with regards to the inefficiency on how AT&T handles account changes and phone upgrades. In this digital age of account management and online ordering it was dismaying to find I had to interact with several people to resolve my issue when a fully capable website could have handled the matter with a few simple clicks. I am not adverse to talking to people but as a shareholder the fact that I had to deal with a sales rep, a customer service rep and a rebate processing person it seems a waste of company resources and runs the risk of alienating current and future customers. Well, Randall, here is what happened: 1.I wanted to upgrade my wife’s phone to a new smartphone (HTC Aria) and change the plan from a family plan to individual plan as I no longer need my line due the work cellphone I am provided. 2.I had what I figured were two options: order via the website or go to a corporate store. I had ruled out one of those suspect websites like Letstalk.com based on complaints of feature slamming and other issues. Customer Roadblock #1 - Unfortunately while the AT&T website offered the path to upgrade the phone it was not able to change my plan from family to individual which was frustrating, but since there was a corporate store locally I didn’t think it was too much of an issue. Shareholder Concern #1 - In order to provide our customers a streamlined and complete account management experience it behooves us to allow them full flexibility to manage their service. The website should not require additional interaction with a customer service rep to complete a transaction as this increases operating cost and customer frustration. 3.So I went to the local corporate store (1333 W Bay Area Blvd #300, Webster, TX 77598) confident they could meet my needs only to leave disappointed and out more money than expected. Customer Roadblock #2 - As per AT&T policy corporate stores are not allowed to terminate phone lines only customer service reps via phone can do that. So now I found myself with a disjointed wireless account since the sales rep was able to switch my wife’s line to an individual plan, but had to leave my unwanted line on an orphaned family plan. Shareholder Concern #2 - Our corporate stores should strive and be able to provide our valued customers everything they need to upgrade, manage and while it is a shame to lose them, account termination. To require the customer to leave the store with an incomplete need is both a sub optimal effort on our part and risks customer alienation. We should strive that no customer leaves dissatisfied and frankly I did. Customer Roadblock #3 - Per AT&T policy corporate stores do not match or in some cases even offer the same deals as what is offered by the AT&T website. So instead of the $100 instant online rebate for my phone I had to pay an extra $100 at purchase and wait 6-8 weeks for a rebate center to process my claim and send me a Visa Card. Unlike the gentleman next to me who walked out without buying a phone because he had found a better deal at another AT&T authorized store I foolishly went along with the poor deal and filled out the rebate form. I honestly wished I had walked out and just gone home to use the website to purchase the phone since either way I was still going to have to call customer service to have the phone line plan resolved. Shareholder Concern #3 - There is enough competition in the wireless market place between suspect online stores and other carriers that we should not be competing with ourselves and risk losing customers when one part of the company structure offers deals another part can not match. The inequality between the website offers and in store deals is as unacceptable as it is bad for business. How many other customers have the corporate stores let walk away without buying like the man next to me because they couldn’t match a deal online at our own corporate website? If the website can process an
  2. 2. instant rebate, why should a consumer who buys from our store have to wait 6-8 weeks for the same rebate? Not only are we asking some customers to wait but there is also the additional overhead of paying the rebate processing center to fulfill the rebate request. I would postulate we probably lose more customers to this inequality than the money saved by those who forget to mail in the rebate form. 4.So now I am waiting for the rebate center to process my $100 rebate, frustrated as a customer and appalled at the ineffiencieis of the system, the cost overhead and the potential for lost customers. If the system worked the way it should only one person would have been involved in the whole process instead of the three I had to deal with. a.If I had complete control to manage my account online then the plan would have been modified as I wished and a warehouse order fulfillment worker would have been the only thing between me and my phone aside from the fedEx person to handle the delivery. b.If the corporate store was fully capable I would have walked out with phone, the plan I wanted and an instant rebate to get me the phone for the price I was expecting. I think you will understand, Randall, why as both a customer and shareholder this incident reflects poorly on AT&T and how it services the needs of its customers. There is enough customer churn due to competition and various exclusive phones that AT&T does not need to be alienating it’s own customers or providing sub par service to exacerbate the churn. Nor do we need to be paying employees that can only do part of the job. A fully capable corporate store could have handled my needs and saved on the redundant customer service and rebate processing costs. I ask that you evaluate the philosophy and operational restrictions levied on the corporate stores and strive to resolve the inequity between online, customer service and brick and mortar. While at the birth of digital age this might have been acceptable I find it to be poor corporate strategy and financially irresponsible in this era. I await your response which I hope is less than the 6-8 weeks I must wait for the rebate check. Sincerely, Michael Interbartolo AT&T Wireless customer since 2001 AT&T Shareholder since 1985