Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

my court case food files state vs ragu paswan c

186 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

my court case food files state vs ragu paswan c

  1. 1. THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE BARNALA ��������� �������������������� State Through Govt. Food Inspector ���������������������������������� ���������������������������������� ���� ����� Complainant ���������������������������������� ������������ Versus Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager � of Dabha ) Neem Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road, Barnala������������������������������ ���������������� ���������������������������������� ���������������������������������� ������������� �� . ��� Accused Complaint u/s 7/16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.I.954 and U/ r 24 & 50 of the PFA. Act .Rules 1.955. Respectefully it is submitted 1. That I Manjinder Singh Dhillon ,the Complainant has been appointed as Government Food Inspector and also notified through Punjab Government vide Gazette notification � o.FD(2)PB,98/14766 dated 15/10/1998 to seize samples under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954 in the state of Punjab. Notification photo copy Annexure as I������������������� 2. That I am also authorized to launch prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954 in the state of Punjab and notified through Punjab Government Gazette notification no.10/10/89-4 HB- lV/34197 dated 3/10/1999.���������������������������� ��������������������������� ���������������������������������� ������������Notification photo copy Annexure as II������������������������������� 3. That on 1/5/2008 I the complainant inspected the premises of��������������������������������� ��������������
  2. 2. Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager � of Dabha ) Neem Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road, and was found keeping approx. 10 Kg of curd (Dahi) in silver pateela to sale the public for human consumption. � 4.That I disclosed my Identity to the accused � as Government Food Inspector and asked him to show the valid License for sale of milk and milk products as required under provisions of law under Rule 24 of P.F.A Rules,1955 but he failed to show the same����������������������������������� ������������������ 5 That accused was found carrying approx. 10Kg of cow milk in a silver����� pateela. �� f That a request was made to the persons present � for joining the proceedings of food sampling procedure as public witness,but none agreed����������������������������������� �������������������� �������������������������������������� �������������������������������������� ����������������� 6. That I served the notice on Form VI in writing to take sample of cow Milk which. was signed by me and also signed by � the accused Orignal Form six(VI) is Annexured as III 7. That I purchased 600 gm of curd from the silver patella containing approx. 10Kg of Curd by cutting vertically and the � entire component was taken and churned �� then added preservative into the churned curd � and made a payment of Rs.12/- and a payment receipt was prepared at the spot which was signed by me and by the accused������������������������������ ���� ���������������������������������� ������������� original receipt is Annexure as IV 8 . That the 600 gm of churned curd divided into three equal parts approx. 200gm each into three neat clean & dry glass bottles. A spot memo was prepared which was signed by me and by � the accused original spot memo is Annexure as V��������������������������������� �������������������� 9 .That each sample bottle was labeled, fastened and wrapped in a strong thick paper .The edges of paper were pasted on the sides of each sample portions and affixed with the help of
  3. 3. Gum������������������������������������ �������������������������������������� �� 10.That three paper slip issued by the State Health Authority �� having same serial slip no.20927 duly signed by Local Health Authority , Barnala along with his code no. BS/ 90/ 08 written on the slip itself. Each slip were pasted on the each sample portions with the help of gum covering the mouth of each sample and were further secured by means of strong thread. The all the sample portions were sealed at the spot on the five distinct places bearing the seal impression MSD ���������������������������������� 11.That the signature of the accused were taken on the each sample portion in a manner that half the signature appears on wrappers of the sample portions and half on the paper slip wrapped on the same sample portions � too signed in similar manner���������������������������������� ������������������������ 12.That on reaching the office of LHA, Barnala on the same day I prepared � five copies of Memorandum � Form VII � and � three seal impressions of the Seal used to seal sample portions were affixed upon form VII � original copy is Annexure as VII� ���������������������������������� ��������������������������������� 13 .That one sealed sample portion along with the copy of Form VII Bearing the three seal Impressions were sent to Public Analyst Punjab Chandlgarh through special messenger Sh.Manjil Singh, of Civil Surgeon office , Barnala In the same day evening���������������������������������� ���������������������������������� 14 That a sealed envelop containing one copy of Form VII bearing the seal impression of the seal used to seal the samples was sent separately through same special messenger 15. That the remaining sample portions and Form VII were deposited at the office ol LHA. Barnala on the same day evening, which were seals intact 16. That on receiving the Report of the Public Analyst on Form III ,ln which the Public Analyst Punjab Chandlgarh is of the opinion that the content of the sample contains 7.3% milk-solid- not-Fat ��� � against the minimum prescribe standard of � �� 9.0 % The contents of the sample are therefore Adulterated .
  4. 4. Original Report is Annexure as VII 17. . That � the accused � � Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager � of Dabha ) Neem Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road, Barnala � according to law is fully responsible � day to day, sale, work and conduct of business of the selling curd � for human consumption. 18. That accused � Raggu Paswan � s/o Sh.Mohinder Paswan (Manager� of Dabha ) Neem Walian the Dhaba ,Raikot-Barnala Road, Barnala� � has committed offence under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954 ,action may kindly be taken against him under section 7/16 of PFA,Act,1954.and under rule 50 of PFA,Rules 1955 by stocking � cow Milk for sale to public for human consumption without any valid license It is further prayed that since this offence facts under section 16 which shall be tried In summary trial procedure as said under section 262-265 of Cr.PC.1973 That the Complaint is submitted for disposal In accordance with law,please LIST OF WITNESSES 1.ManJinder Singh Dhillon, Govt. Food Inspector,Barnala 2.Sh.Harbajan Singh .Dealing Food Clerk O/o Civil Surgeon Barnala 3.Dr.BaIbIr Singh Local Health Athourity ,Barnala 4.Sh.yuvraj Singh, PubIic Analyst Punjab.Chandlgarh 5 Sh. Manjlt Singh .Special messenger/o Civil Surgeon Barnala ANNEXURES Complaint in two copies 1. Photocopy of Notification of seizing samples Annexure as - 2. Photocopy of Notification of launching prosecution Annexure II 3. Original copy of Form Six is Annexure as -Ill 4 .Original copy of receipt is Annexure as -IV 5. Original copy of spot memo is Annexure as - V 6Orignal copy of Form seven is Annexure as - VI 7.Orignal Report of Public Analyst is Annexure as - VII������������������������������������� �������������������������������������� �������������������������������������� ������������� . ������������������������� �������������������������������������� ��������������� COMPLAINANT �������������������������������������� ��������������������������������������
  5. 5. �������������������������������������� ����������������������������������� ������������������� . ������������������� �������������������������������������� ����������������� Manjinder Singh Dhillon �������������������������������������� ������������������������������������ (Government Food Inspector) ������������������������������� �������������������������������������� �������������������� Barnala That Complainant being a Public Servant have to Perform multifarious duties and Is unable to attend this Hon � Court on each and every date of hearing of this case ,hence my presence on each and every date of hearing of this case may kindly be exempted and APP attached with this Hon � Court may be allowed to appear on my behalf. However I may be summoned as when so required ������������������������������ �������������������������������������� ������������������������������� ���������������� COMPLAINANT �������������������������������������� ����������������������������������� Manjinder Singh DhilIon �������������������������������������� �������������������������������� (Government Food Inspector) ������������������������� �������������������������������������� ������������������������ Barnala

×