DAP Fisheries Reform

739 views

Published on

DAP Fisheries Reform

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
739
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
44
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • DAP Fisheries Reform

    1. 1. Integrating Commercial and Recreational Sectors in Fishery Management Steve Choy Sean Guerin Erin Myers Ming Ng Jesse Patterson Advisor: Chris Costello Client: Environmental Defense University of California, Santa Barbara Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management
    2. 2. The Need for Fisheries Reform
    3. 3. Catch Shares <ul><li>Catch shares allocate the privilege to harvest a percentage share of the total catch to individual fishermen, communities, or associations </li></ul><ul><li>-Environmental Defense </li></ul><ul><li>“ Sustaining America’s Fisheries and Fishing Communities” </li></ul>
    4. 5. Conceptual Model Fishery Data Management Scenarios Economic Model Analysis Political Model Analysis Catch Distribution Social Score Political Score Environmental Score Economic Gain Environmental Model Analysis Social Model Analysis Catch Distribution
    5. 6. Management Scenarios Baseline Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Recreational Industry Recreational Industry Recreational Anglers Commercial Commercial Commercial Recreational Industry Commercial Recreational Industry Recreational Anglers Recreational Anglers Recreational Anglers
    6. 7. Calculating Demand <ul><li>Commercial </li></ul><ul><li>Recreational Industry </li></ul><ul><li>Recreational Anglers </li></ul>
    7. 8. kdsfksdjfk Economic Model – Determine willingness to pay for tags Commercial Demand Recreational Angler Demand (Private Boater) Recreational Angler Demand (Shore) Aggregate Recreational Angler Demand Recreational Industry Demand
    8. 9. $8.36 $6.66 Scenario 1 Commercial Demand Commercial TAC Recreational Industry Demand Recreational Industry Harvest
    9. 10. $7.32 Comm increases 5% Commercial Demand Recreational Industry Demand Aggregate Comm. and Rec. Industry Demand Aggregate Comm. and Rec. Industry TAC Commercial TAC Recreational Industry Harvest
    10. 11. Scenario 3 Summary $7.15
    11. 12. Economic Analysis – Gains from trade
    12. 13. Conceptual Model Fishery Data Management Scenarios Economic Model Analysis Political Model Analysis Catch Distribution Social Score Political Score Environmental Score Economic Gain Environmental Model Analysis Social Model Analysis Catch Distribution
    13. 14. Environmental, Social and Political Analysis <ul><li>Using Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) as a tool for comparison. </li></ul>Environmental Social Political
    14. 15. Environmental Model <ul><li>Stakeholders: </li></ul><ul><li>Commercial Industry </li></ul><ul><li>Recreational Industry </li></ul><ul><li>Recreational Anglers </li></ul><ul><li>Elements: </li></ul><ul><li>Biomass </li></ul><ul><li>Size Distribution </li></ul><ul><li>Habitat Impact </li></ul><ul><li>Bycatch </li></ul><ul><li>Discards </li></ul>
    15. 16. Social Model <ul><li>Aspects: </li></ul><ul><li>Jobs </li></ul><ul><li>Access/ Opportunity </li></ul><ul><li>Peripheral Effects </li></ul>
    16. 17. Political Model <ul><li>Acceptability: </li></ul><ul><li>Flexibility </li></ul><ul><li>Complexity </li></ul><ul><li>Costs </li></ul><ul><li>Sustainability </li></ul><ul><li>Enforceability </li></ul><ul><li>Ecosystem Health </li></ul><ul><li>Readiness: </li></ul><ul><li>Trade facilitation </li></ul><ul><li>Existing Organization </li></ul>
    17. 18. Final Results
    18. 19. Recommendation: Scenario 2 <ul><li>Positives </li></ul><ul><li>High gains from trade </li></ul><ul><li>Increase in stewardship </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Biomass </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Compliance </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Increases long term sustainability and short term profits in both industries </li></ul><ul><li>Generates Essential Fishery Information (EFI) </li></ul>
    19. 20. Scenario 2: A Closer Look <ul><li>Challenges </li></ul><ul><li>Potential size high-grading and discards </li></ul><ul><li>Setting accurate recreational and commercial harvest limits for species and species complexes </li></ul><ul><li>Increased complexity of regulation </li></ul>
    20. 21. The Wider Scope <ul><li>A fishery management system that integrates commercial and recreational sectors can result in greater benefits than a system that manages sectors separately. </li></ul>
    21. 22. Special Thanks and Acknowledgements to: <ul><li>Jeff Barr </li></ul><ul><li>Kate Bonzon </li></ul><ul><li>California Department of Fish and Game </li></ul><ul><li>Chris Callahan and the Sea Landing Crew </li></ul><ul><li>Marc Conte </li></ul><ul><li>Chuck Cook </li></ul><ul><li>Chris Costello </li></ul><ul><li>Jason Diamond and the Stardust crew </li></ul><ul><li>Environmental Defense </li></ul><ul><li>Rod Fujita </li></ul><ul><li>Chris Hoeflinger </li></ul><ul><li>Matt Kotchen </li></ul><ul><li>Marcus Lebeck </li></ul><ul><li>Merit McCrea </li></ul><ul><li>Maggie Ohstahl </li></ul><ul><li>Tom Raftican </li></ul><ul><li>David Stoms </li></ul><ul><li>Sustainable Fisheries Group </li></ul><ul><li>John Ugoretz </li></ul><ul><li>Das Williams </li></ul><ul><li>Oran Young </li></ul>
    22. 23. Sensitivity Analysis <ul><li>Commercial price/cost </li></ul><ul><li>Age </li></ul><ul><li>Tag price </li></ul><ul><li>Expected catch </li></ul><ul><li>Annual # of CPFV trips </li></ul><ul><li>Weights for MCA </li></ul>
    23. 24. Sensitivity Analysis Results – <ul><li>Low and high range for each demand curve </li></ul>
    24. 25. Sensitivity Analysis Results
    25. 26. MCA Results
    26. 27. Sensitivity Analysis <ul><li>Economic model was most sensitive to: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Commercial Costs </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Angler Age </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Economic Model was run using a high and low estimate to maximize and minimize the effects on distribution and gains from trade </li></ul><ul><li>Results then run through the Environmental and Social and then Political Model </li></ul><ul><li>Scenario 2 was still the favored scenario </li></ul>

    ×