Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

B O E 12112007

535 views

Published on

Board presentation on school accountability reports December 11, 2007

Published in: Education, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

B O E 12112007

  1. 1. School Accountability Reports (SAR) Presentation to BOE December 11, 2007
  2. 2. Colorado Accountability Systems Are you closing the achievement gap? (AYP)
  3. 3. Colorado Accountability Systems Are you providing a well- rounded educational experience? (Accreditation)
  4. 4. Colorado Accountability Systems Are you succeeding in core academic subjects? (SAR)
  5. 5. Colorado Accountability Systems
  6. 6. Colorado Accountability Systems
  7. 7. Colorado Accountability Systems
  8. 8. Colorado Accountability Systems
  9. 9. Colorado Accountability Systems
  10. 10. Colorado Accountability Systems
  11. 11. Colorado Accountability Systems
  12. 12. 2 Key Metrics
  13. 13. #1 Overall Academic Performance on State Assessments
  14. 14. Excellent High Average Low Unsatisfactory
  15. 15. #2 Academic Growth of Students
  16. 16. Significant Improvement Improvement Stable Decline Significant Decline
  17. 17. School Growth What percentage of students are making adequate growth in a school?
  18. 18. a year’s growth in a year’s time
  19. 19. Previous Method for Calculating “Improvement” Year 1 Year 2 Science (all grades) Science (all grades) Math (all grades) Math (all grades) Writing Eng/Sp (all grades) Writing Eng/Sp (all grades) Reading Eng/Sp (all grades) Reading Eng/Sp (all grades) All scores are used to calculate one rating. Year 1 rating is compared to year 2 rating to measure growth. SAR SAR
  20. 20. Change from “Academic Improvement” to “Academic Growth” Problems with this method: Students in year #2 were not the same as year #1.
  21. 21. Comparing Apples to Oranges Apples Year 1 Year 2
  22. 22. Is it fair to compare one year’s students to the next year’s if they are not the same students?
  23. 23. How to calculate for a student… Step#1: Figure out individual student % rank based on scale score for year #1. Step#2: Based on % ranking obtain student’s target score range for year #2. Step #3: Determine whether student made more than a year’s growth, made a year’s growth, or made less than a year’s growth.
  24. 24. How to calculate for a student… Step#1: Figure out individual student rank based on scale score for year #1. 75% 4th grade CSAP overall score is 626 in year #1
  25. 25. How to calculate for a student… Step#2: Based on % ranking obtain student’s target score range for year #2. 75% in year #2 (grade 5) is 656
  26. 26. 873 906 th th Reading: 4 to 5 grade 687- 626 625 75% 180 220
  27. 27. How to calculate for a student… Step #3: Determine whether student made more than a year’s growth, made a year’s growth, or made less than a year’s growth. 5th grade CSAP is 676…between 625 and 687 year’s growth
  28. 28. How to calculate for a school… Step #1: Calculate growth for all students in all relevant subjects (no science). Step #2: Determine the proportion of scores that are more than a year’s growth, a year’s growth, or less than a year’s growth. Step #3: Subtract the proportion less than a year’s growth from the proportion of more than a year’s growth. Step #4: Use the result to determine “Academic Growth of Students”
  29. 29. Step #1: Calculate growth for all students in all relevant subjects (no science).
  30. 30. Step #2: Determine the proportion of scores that are more than a year’s growth, a year’s growth, or less than a year’s growth. 33 students 5 gains (15%) 9 loss (27%) 19 stable (58%)
  31. 31. Step #3: Subtract the proportion less than a year’s growth from the proportion of more than a year’s growth. 15%-27%=-12%
  32. 32. Step #4: Use the result to determine “Academic Growth of Students” Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  33. 33. a year’s growth in a year’s time
  34. 34. Excellent High Average Low Unsatisfactory
  35. 35. Significant Improvement Improvement Stable Decline Significant Decline
  36. 36. 5 “Average”, 9 “Low”, and 1 “Unsatisfactory” 11 “Low” Schools
  37. 37. Average and Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  38. 38. Low and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  39. 39. Low and Significant Decline (CLA)(3-5) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  40. 40. Average and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  41. 41. Low and Stable (3-5) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  42. 42. Average and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  43. 43. Average and Significant Improvement Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to – 5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  44. 44. Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  45. 45. Low and Decline
  46. 46. Low and Decline (CLA)(6-8) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  47. 47. Average and Stable (6-7) Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  48. 48. Low and Stable Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  49. 49. Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to - 14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  50. 50. Low and Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  51. 51. Unsatisfactory and Significant Decline Significant >=15% Improvement Improvement 5.01 to 14.99 Stable +5.00 to –5.00 Decline -5.01 to -14.99 Significant <=-15.00 Decline
  52. 52. 2007 Highlights Kemp Elementary School moves to “Average” Hanson (6-7) is “Average” in its first year. Monaco and Alsup maintain three straight years of “Improvement” or “Significant Improvement”.
  53. 53. High Expectations
  54. 54. Standards-based Classrooms
  55. 55. Focused Professional Development
  56. 56. Data

×