Third Time's the Charm: Thoughts on an EAD Revision

1,551 views

Published on

Presentation given at the Fall 2009 MARAC conference, giving preliminary thoughts on the upcoming revision of EAD.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,551
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Introduce myself Thank you for the invite Comment on Michelle and Jeanne’s presentations Overview: -Briefly review history of EAD development -Give an appraisal of the current state of EAD -Review likely changes -Offer some half baked ideas of possible changes
  • -International Standard for Archival Description (General) -Encoded Archival Description 1.0 -ISAD (G) revised -EAD 2002 -eliminated some unnecessary layers of encoding, -brought EAD up to compliance with ISAD (G)’s second edition -EAD 2002 schema – Replicated the existing tag set in W3C and Relax NG schema languages. -Enforced proper use of ISO country codes, date normalization patterns. -Introduced namespaces to EAD in a limited way -Namespace for EAD and xlink
  • -International Standard for Archival Authority Records (Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families) -Encoded Archival Context (Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families) -Who submitted comments on the draft CPF schema? -International Standard for Describing Functions -EAC-Functions -International Standard for Describing Institutions with Archival Holdings EAC-IAH [Mention EAG]
  • Collection Management Systems ICA-AtoM open source web app
  • Current state of affairs: EAD widespread and successful. It has proven that there is a need for archival data transmission standards and inspired work on related standards such as EAC-CPF. EAD is extremely flexible, and can accommodate a broad range of descriptive practices and traditions.
  • EAD’s flexibility - it’s initial selling point - has ultimately gotten us stuck. [discussion of difficulty to implement in CMS context] It also shows its age - doesn’t play well with others. Bit of a loner. Goals for a revison: -Simplify -Play nicely with others What are some likely changes?
  • [Add unit attribute to <extent>/<dimentions>, first check in tag library.] -Dimensions -Better way to handle this in VRA core? Not sure, need to investigate
  • [Add unit attribute to <extent>/<dimentions>, first check in tag library.] -Dimensions -Better way to handle this in VRA core? Not sure, need to investigate
  • -EAD Working Group being re-charged as part of Standards Committee re-missioning. -Will become Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Description -Call for volunteers will go out soon, if you area at all interested, please throw your name in the hat. -Once the new group is charged, hopefully at the Winter SAA Council meeting, revision will get under way in earnest. -Call for comments may go out earlier. -Please contribute! -Hope to complete the comment period by SAA annual meeting in DC., get started then.
  • Third Time's the Charm: Thoughts on an EAD Revision

    1. 1. Third Time’s the Charm: Thoughts on an EAD Revision ________________________ Michael Rush Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University MARAC Fall 2009 Meeting October 30, 2009
    2. 2. <chronlist> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><ul><li>ISAD (G) (1994) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>EAD 1.0 DTD (1998) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ISAD (G), 2nd ed. (1999) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>EAD 2002 DTD </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>EAD 2002 Schema (2006) </li></ul></ul>
    3. 3. <relatedmaterial> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><ul><li>ISAAR (CPF) (1996, 2004) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>EAC-CPF (2009) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ISDF (2008) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>EAC-F (20??) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ISDIAH (2008) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>EAC-IAH (?) (20??) </li></ul></ul></ul>
    4. 4. <relatedmaterial> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><ul><li>Archivists’ Toolkit </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Archon </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ICA-AtoM </li></ul></ul>
    5. 5. <appraisal> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 Photo by catdonmit . Licensed under Creative Commons.
    6. 6. <appraisal> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 Photo by lu_lu . Licensed under Creative Commons.
    7. 7. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 Reduce/Eliminate Mixed Content EAD: <p> <persname>Barack Obama</persname> was elected <occupation>President of the United States of America</occupation> in <date>2008>.</p> EAC-CPF: <p><span localType=&quot;persname&quot;>Barack Obama</span> was elected <span localType=&quot;occupation&quot;>President of the United States of America</span> in <span localType=&quot;date&quot;>2008</span>.</p>
    8. 8. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li>Allow Namespace Interoperability ( the Archival Turducken ) </li></ul><ul><li>Embed other </li></ul><ul><li>XML schemas: </li></ul><ul><li>EAC-CPF </li></ul><ul><li>MODS? </li></ul><ul><li>Dublin Core? </li></ul><ul><li>PREMIS? </li></ul><ul><li>Replace <bioghist> </li></ul><ul><li>with <cpf:biogHist>? </li></ul>Photo by Phil Romans . Licensed under Creative Commons.
    9. 9. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 Improve Date Handling EAD Examples: <unitdate normal=“1969-11-10”> November 10, 1969 </unitdate> <unitdate normal=“1914/1918”>1914-1918</unitdate> EAC-CPF Examples: <date standardDate=&quot;1969-11-10&quot;>November 10, 1969</date> <dateRange> <fromDate standardDate=&quot;1914&quot;>1914</fromDate> <toDate standardDate=&quot;1918&quot;>1918</toDate> </dateRange>
    10. 10. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li>Eliminate non-descriptive elements and attributes </li></ul><ul><ul><li><head> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>@label </li></ul></ul>
    11. 11. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li>Simplify </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Settle on <c> or c01/c02/c03 etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Eliminate <table> and <list>? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Eliminate recursive elements </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li><scopecontent <scopecontent> <scopecontent> … </li></ul></ul></ul>
    12. 12. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li>Camel Case </li></ul><ul><ul><li><titleproper>  <titleProper> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><archdesc>  <archDesc> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><scopecontent>  <scopeContent> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><acqinfo>  <acqInfo> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><separatedMaterial>  <separatedMaterial> </li></ul></ul>
    13. 13. <revisiondesc> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 Strict Vs. Loose Photo by Jabony . Licensed by Creative Commons.
    14. 14. <!-- <revisiondesc> --> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li>Make Containers Explicit </li></ul><ul><ul><li><c> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><did> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><container type=“Box”>1</container> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><unittitle>Peanut Butter</unittitle> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li></did> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li></c> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><c> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><did> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><container type=“Box”>1</container> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><unittitle>Jelly</unittitle> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li></did> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li></c> </li></ul></ul>
    15. 15. <!-- <revisiondesc> --> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <containers> <container id=“b1” type=“Box”>1</container> <container id=“b2” type=“Box”>2</container> <container id=“b3” type=“Box”>3</container> </containers> … <c><did> <containerPointer target=“b1”/> <unittitle>Peanut Butter</unittitle> </did></c> <c><did> <containerPointer target=“b1”/> <unittitle>Peanut Butter</unittitle> </did></c>
    16. 16. <!-- <revisiondesc> --> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li>Clarify <physdesc> </li></ul><ul><li><did> </li></ul><ul><ul><li><unittitle>Bust of Van Gogh</unittitle> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><physdesc>1 linear foot (1 box), 12” x 6” x 18”, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Marble, damage to ear</physdesc> </li></ul></ul><ul><li></did> </li></ul><ul><li>OR </li></ul><ul><li><did> </li></ul><ul><ul><li><unittitle>Bust of Van Gogh</unittitle> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><physdesc> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><extent>1 linear foot (1 box)</extent>, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><dimentions>12” x 6” x 18”</dimensions>, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><physfacet>Marble, damage to ear</physfacet> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li></physdesc> </li></ul></ul><ul><li></did> </li></ul>
    17. 17. <!-- <revisiondesc> --> _________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><li><did> </li></ul><ul><ul><li><unittitle>Bust of Van Gogh</unittitle> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><extent type=“linear” unit=“feet”>1</extent> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><extent type=“parallel”>1 box</extent> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><dimensions> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><height>12</height> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><width>6</width> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><depth>18</depth> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><dimensions> </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li><physfacet>Marble, damage to ear</physfacet> </li></ul></ul><ul><li></did> </li></ul>
    18. 18. <bibliography> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><ul><li>Daniel Pitti </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Rare Book School Class “Designing Archival Description Systems” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>EAC Working Group </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>EAD Working Group </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Denizens of the EAD listserv </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Conversations with many archivists </li></ul></ul>
    19. 19. <change> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 Comments? Want to help? Photo by Zervas . Licensed under Creative Commons.
    20. 20. </ead> ______________________________________ 30 Oct 2009 <ul><ul><li>Mike Rush </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://twitter.com/mike_rush </li></ul></ul>

    ×