Mba Presentation


Published on

Presentation tot he Metropolitan Builders Association looking at housing demand in Wisconsin and offering an analysis of new housing products in the Milwaukee and Denver markets.

Published in: Real Estate, Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Demographics, Density, and Housing in Wisconsin November 2, 2006 Michael Stumpf, AICP, CEcD - R.A. Smith & Associates / National Survey & Engineering
  • Mba Presentation

    1. 1. Is there a deficiency or is there a demand? Demographics, density, & housing in Wisconsin (With a comparison of Milwaukee and other communities)
    2. 2. Wisconsin vs. United States <ul><li>2005 Population </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin 5,536,201 (1.9%) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States 296,410,404 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Population Growth Rate </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin 3.2% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States 5.3% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>White Population </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin 90.2% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States 80.4% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Hispanic Population </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin 4.3% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States 14.1% </li></ul></ul>
    3. 3. Wisconsin vs. United States <ul><li>Home Ownership </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin 68.4% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States 66.2% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Housing in Multi-Unit Structures </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin 26.2% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States 26.4% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Median Value (2000) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin $112,200 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States $119,600 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Median Household Income (2003) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wisconsin $46,538 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>United States $43,318 </li></ul></ul>
    4. 4. Wisconsin’s Projected Growth <ul><li>Population </li></ul><ul><ul><li>5.56 million (2005) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>6.42 million (2030) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>850,000 increase </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2/3 organic growth </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Households </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2.19 million (2005) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2.67 million (2030) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>477,000 increase </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>19,100 annually </li></ul></ul>
    5. 5. Future Population Profile <ul><li>Older (and younger) </li></ul><ul><li>More racially diverse </li></ul><ul><ul><li>87.3% to 82.2% White, Non-Hispanic </li></ul></ul>
    6. 6. Wisconsin Building Permits <ul><li>2005 Statistics </li></ul><ul><ul><li>35,513 total units </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>73.6% single-family structures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>4.8% two-unit structures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2.9% three- and four-unit structures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>18.7% five or more unit structures </li></ul></ul>
    7. 7. Wisconsin Metropolitan Areas <ul><li>22,441 permits in metropolitan counties (63.2%) </li></ul><ul><li>13,072 permits in non-metropolitan counties (36.8%) </li></ul>
    8. 8. SE Wisconsin Building Permits <ul><li>Waukesha 14,220 </li></ul><ul><li>Milwaukee 11,287 </li></ul><ul><li>Kenosha 7,080 </li></ul><ul><li>Washington 6,629 </li></ul><ul><li>Racine 6,088 </li></ul><ul><li>Walworth 5,972 </li></ul><ul><li>Ozaukee 3,123 </li></ul>
    9. 9. 2007 Forecast (Money Magazine) <ul><li>All of the state’s metropolitan areas will continue to see an increase in home values </li></ul><ul><li>Growth is slowing </li></ul>
    10. 10. 2007 Forecast (Money Magazine) <ul><li>The slowdown is everywhere </li></ul><ul><li>Milwaukee is slower than most </li></ul><ul><li>US average forecast is 3.5% growth </li></ul>
    11. 11. Housing Affordability <ul><li>The Midwest is the most affordable region in the US </li></ul><ul><li>The Milwaukee market is still affordable </li></ul>
    12. 12. Population Density <ul><li>Density per square mile of land area </li></ul><ul><li>Based on county area measurement </li></ul><ul><li>More similar to older communities than to the recognized leaders in growth management </li></ul>
    13. 13. What have we built alike? <ul><li>Denver’s urban core </li></ul>
    14. 14. What have we built alike? <ul><li>Milwaukee’s urban core </li></ul>
    15. 15. What have we built alike? <ul><li>Denver suburbs </li></ul>
    16. 16. What have we built alike? <ul><li>Milwaukee suburbs </li></ul>
    17. 17. What might we build? <ul><li>Traditional Neighborhood Development </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Few examples in Wisconsin </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Madison – Milwaukee </li></ul></ul>
    18. 18. Traditional Neighborhoods <ul><li>Compact </li></ul><ul><li>Mixed-use </li></ul><ul><li>Walkable </li></ul>
    19. 19. Conservation Development <ul><li>Preserve open space </li></ul><ul><li>Infrastructure costs </li></ul><ul><li>Sustainable practices </li></ul><ul><li>Density bonuses </li></ul>
    20. 20. Cottage Housing <ul><li>Small units </li></ul><ul><li>Green space </li></ul><ul><li>Good design </li></ul><ul><li>Young market </li></ul>
    21. 21. True Mixed Use <ul><li>Commercial – Residential – Industrial – Live/Work </li></ul>
    22. 22. Questions <ul><li>How will the demand for housing change as our population changes? </li></ul><ul><li>Are we offering the housing options desired by the market? </li></ul><ul><li>Are alternative approaches to housing not common because they are not wanted; or if they were built, would they sell? </li></ul><ul><li>Do we simply like our detached homes on large lots too much to change? </li></ul><ul><li>Do we need to change? </li></ul><ul><li>Are we creating workforce housing? </li></ul>