Three Purposes of the Instructional Design Process


Published on

Three Purposes of the Instructional Design Process:

1. To identify the outcomes of the instruction
2. To guide the developing the instructional content (scope and sequence)
3. To establish how instructional effectiveness will be evaluated.

Published in: Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Three Purposes of the Instructional Design Process

  1. 1. Three Purposes of the Instructional Design Process 1. To identify the outcomes of the instruction 2. To guide the developing the instructional content (scope and sequence) 3. To establish how instructional effectiveness will be evaluated. Stages of Instructional Design Derived from Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Stage 1: Define instructional goals. A goal may be defined as a general statement of desired accomplishment. It does not specify exactly all of the components or steps or how each step will be achieved on the road to accomplishing the goal. Example Goals: (1) Students will master the procedure of a generic history and physical. (2) Students will understand the biochemistry of diabetes. Stage 2: Conduct an instructional analysis Identify what learning steps will be involved in reaching the goal. This is done through a task analysis, which identifies each step and the skills needed in order to complete that step, and an information processing analysis, which identifies the mental operations the learner needs to employ in performing that skill. The task analysis is performed by asking "What are all of the things the student must know and/or be able to do to achieve the goal?" Stage 3: Identify entry behaviors/learner characteristics Having determined via the instructional analysis which steps and skills the learner must accomplish, it is now necessary to identify the knowledge and skill level that the learner possesses at the outset. Although there may be pronounced differences from learner to learner in in their knowledge and skill levels, the instruction must be targeted as much as possible to the level of the learners' needs. Stage 4: Develop performance objectives. At this stage, it is necessary to translate the needs and goals into objectives that are sufficiently specific to guide the instructor in teaching and the learner in studying. In addition, these objectives form the blueprint for testing as a means of evaluating both the instruction and the learning that has occurred. Example: The student will be able to explain the role of the Krebs cycle to thermogenesis. Stage 5: Select an instructional method.
  2. 2. The purpose of selecting an instructional method is to identify and employ teaching strategies and techniques that most effectively achieve the performance objectives. Current educational theory and research support the use of instructional methods that make students active learners (e.g., lecture, lab, small group discussion, case-based study, simulations, independent study, etc.). Stage 6: Assemble instructional material. Once the instructional methodologies have been identified for each objective or unit of content, it is important to assemble the necessary instructional materials. The materials may be in various forms: print, computer, audio, audio-video, etc. Although the necessary instructional materials may already exist, they may need improvement or revision. For example, slides that have been used in the past but that have been problematic, need to be modified. The danger of settling on preexisting instructional materials is that some instructors may allow the materials to determine the direction of the instruction rather than vice versa. Currently, more instructors are using the Web as a way of making didactic information available to students, rather than using lectures or transcripts. Stage 7: Plan and conduct formative evaluation. Formative evaluation, evaluation that occurs from feedback while the instruction is in progress, provides data for revising and improving the instructional materials that were used and those that are yet to be used. It is important to remember that sometimes the plans that look so good on paper actually fail in practice. When possible, test instructional materials with one or a small group of students to determine how students use the materials, how much assistance they need, etc. Considering the teaching methods implemented and the course materials provided, are students learning what they should be? Stage 8: Plan and conduct summative evaluation. Summative evaluation, evaluation that occurs at the end of the instructional effort (unit, course, etc.), provides data on the effectiveness of the instructional effort as a whole. This is the evaluation that provides information on how the whole instructional unit enabled the learner to achieve the objectives that were established at the outset. Writing Performance Objectives Taken from Kibler, R.J., & Bassett, R.E. (1977). Writing performance objectives. In Briggs, L.J. (ed.), Instructional design (pp. 49 - 95). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  3. 3. It is important to distinguish between instructional goals and instructional objectives. Instructional goals are usually expressed in non-behavioral terms and are generally a more expansive vision than objectives. Objectives, on the other hand, are expressed in behavioral terms and are usually short-range outcomes. An objective is a description of a desired pattern of behavior for the learner to demonstrate. Despite the different approaches to writing performance objectives, most models include the following three components1 : 1. Action -- Identify the action the learner will be taking when he/she has achieved the objective (e.g., to identify; to measure). 2. Relevant Conditions -- Describe the relevant conditions under which the learner will be acting (e.g., "given the patient's history"; "with the use of the information from the laboratory results"). 3. Performance Standard -- List as many of the actual conditions as possible under which the objective is to be performed (e.g., "must be able to identify at least one possible treatment for the patient's illness by the end of the case study").