Accurate Evaluation of HER-2 Ampli cation in FISH Images Poster at International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques, Thessaloniki

Media Integration and Communication Center
Media Integration and Communication CenterMedia Integration and Communication Center

IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques, Thessaloniki, Greece / Poster

Accurate Evaluation of HER-2 Amplification in FISH Images
                                                                A. Del Bimbo, M. Meoni, P. Pala
                                                  Dipartimento Sistemi e Informatica, University of Firenze, Italy


 Context and motivations
• Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a cytogenetic technique used to detect and localize the presence or
    absence of specific DNA sequences on chromosomes
•   A sample application of this technique targets the measurement of the amplification of the HER-2 gene within
    the chromosomes, that constitutes a valuable indicator of invasive breast carcinomas
•   This requires the application to a tumor tissue sample of two types of fluorescent probes that attach themselves
    to the HER-2 genes and to the centromere 17 (CEP-17), respectively
•   Estimation of HER-2 amplification is accomplished by measuring the ratio of HER-2 over CEP-17 markers within
    each nucleus
•   Inaccurate nuclei identification may severely bias the estimation of this ratio




                                                                                                            Adaptive threshold                                      Input Image




                                                                                                          Distance transform for
                                                                                                            markers extraction


                                                                                                                                                                   Spot extraction


                                                                                                            Marked Watershed




                                                                                                                Reliability score                                 Ratio evaluation




 A model for nuclei reliability

 Given a generic nucleus, its reliability score r is evaluated by       The reliability score of a generic nucleus is evaluated as:
 measuring the compliance of the shape and size of the nucleus
 with respect to a template model.                                                                                  (a−at)2         (e−et)2        (c−ct)2
                                                                                                                   − 2             − 2            − 2
 The reliability score of each nucleus is used so as to:                                                  r=e         σa       e      σe      e      σc


    • Regions corresponding to a potentially oversegmented
                                                                         • a is the area of the nucleus and at the area of the template model
     nucleus are recursively merged so as to better match the
                                                                         • e is the eccentricity of the nucleus and et the eccentricity of the template model
     actual shape and contour of the nucleus
                                                                         • c is the convexity of the nucleus and ct the convexity of the template model
    • Nuclei can be ordered by decreasing reliability scores so as to   Values of σa, σe and σc define the range of allowable deviations from template area and
     compute the ratio of HER-2 over CEP-17 markers using only          eccentricity. Values of parameters at, et and ct have been estimated by averaging the actual values
     the most reliable ones                                             measured on a training dataset.



 The Dataset                                                                Results
The dataset consists of 40 FISH images extracted from eight                  0,9                                                                             Classification accuracy is
slides of breast tissue samples. Each image is annotated by an                                                                                               measured through the
expert pathologist with a classification label corresponding to four          0,8                                                                             confusion matrix and is
different levels of HER-2 amplification:                                                                                                                       evaluated for the test dataset
 • No amplification (N), 17.5% of the dataset                                 0,7
                                                                                                                                                             using the optimal value of τr
 • Borderline (B), 10.0%                                                     0,6                                                                             identified on the training
 • Amplified (A), 25.0%                                                                                                                                       dataset.
 • Strong amplification (A+), 47.5%                                           0,5
                                                                                                                                                                  N       B    A A+
The system automatically classifies a generic image based on the
                                                                             0,4                                                                              N 1.0      0.0 0.0 0.0
average value ρ of the ratio extracted on nuclei with a reliability
                                                                                                                                                              B 0.0      1.0 0.0 0.0
score r higher than a threshold τr .                                         0,3
                                                                                                                                                              A 0.0      0.0 0.875 0.125
The optimal value of τr is computed by maximizing classification                    0    0,1   0,2   0,3   0,4     0,5    0,6       0,7   0,8        0,9
                                                                                                                                                              A+ 0.0     0.0 0.125 0.875
accuracy over a training dataset.


http://www.dsi.unifi.it/pala/                              http://www.micc.unifi.it/projects/her-2/                                      {delbimbo,meoni,pala}@dsi.unifi.it

Recommended

Abstract from medical image to 3 d entities creation by
Abstract from medical image to 3 d entities creationAbstract from medical image to 3 d entities creation
Abstract from medical image to 3 d entities creationSara Diogo
220 views3 slides
Update on HER2 testing by
Update on HER2 testingUpdate on HER2 testing
Update on HER2 testingDr. Pathmanathan
2.7K views29 slides
Aisha by
AishaAisha
AishaMusa Khan
1.1K views21 slides
BALKAN MCO 2011 - S. Beslija - Targeted therapy: trastuzumab and beyond by
BALKAN MCO 2011 - S. Beslija - Targeted therapy: trastuzumab and beyondBALKAN MCO 2011 - S. Beslija - Targeted therapy: trastuzumab and beyond
BALKAN MCO 2011 - S. Beslija - Targeted therapy: trastuzumab and beyondEuropean School of Oncology
2.6K views56 slides
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Metastatic Breast Cancer Forum 2016 by
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Metastatic Breast Cancer Forum 2016Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Metastatic Breast Cancer Forum 2016
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Metastatic Breast Cancer Forum 2016Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
887 views17 slides
What’s New With HER2? by
What’s New With HER2?What’s New With HER2?
What’s New With HER2?Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
1.4K views38 slides

More Related Content

Similar to Accurate Evaluation of HER-2 Ampli cation in FISH Images Poster at International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques, Thessaloniki

Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026 by
Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026
Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026es712
671 views17 slides
ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS by
ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY  USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY  USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS
ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS Daniel Wolff
187 views1 slide
Gene Expression Data Analysis by
Gene Expression Data AnalysisGene Expression Data Analysis
Gene Expression Data AnalysisJhoirene Clemente
7.6K views42 slides
Translational health research by
Translational health researchTranslational health research
Translational health researchKrishna Karri
256 views25 slides
Realism of image composits by
Realism of image compositsRealism of image composits
Realism of image compositsAliya Ibragimova
281 views35 slides
Accelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUs by
Accelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUsAccelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUs
Accelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUsPerhaad Mistry
822 views23 slides

Similar to Accurate Evaluation of HER-2 Ampli cation in FISH Images Poster at International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques, Thessaloniki(9)

Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026 by es712
Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026
Cervical cancer classification using gabor filters 1026
es712671 views
ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS by Daniel Wolff
ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY  USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY  USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS
ADAPTING METRICS FOR MUSIC SIMILARITY USING COMPARATIVE RATINGS
Daniel Wolff187 views
Translational health research by Krishna Karri
Translational health researchTranslational health research
Translational health research
Krishna Karri256 views
Accelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUs by Perhaad Mistry
Accelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUsAccelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUs
Accelarating Optical Quadrature Microscopy Using GPUs
Perhaad Mistry822 views
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER) by ijceronline
 International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)  International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
ijceronline324 views
High-Throughput Screening of mAb Charge Variants Using Microchip-CZE by PerkinElmer, Inc.
High-Throughput Screening of mAb Charge Variants Using Microchip-CZEHigh-Throughput Screening of mAb Charge Variants Using Microchip-CZE
High-Throughput Screening of mAb Charge Variants Using Microchip-CZE
PerkinElmer, Inc.1.2K views
Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in q band image by snehajit
Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in q band imageAutomatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in q band image
Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in q band image
snehajit1.4K views

More from Media Integration and Communication Center

ORUSSI: Optimal Road sUrveillance based on Scalable vIdeo by
ORUSSI: Optimal Road sUrveillance based on Scalable vIdeoORUSSI: Optimal Road sUrveillance based on Scalable vIdeo
ORUSSI: Optimal Road sUrveillance based on Scalable vIdeoMedia Integration and Communication Center
351 views1 slide
High dynamic images between devices and vision limits by
High dynamic images between devices and vision limitsHigh dynamic images between devices and vision limits
High dynamic images between devices and vision limitsMedia Integration and Communication Center
774 views179 slides
Interactive Video Search and Browsing Systems by
Interactive Video Search and Browsing SystemsInteractive Video Search and Browsing Systems
Interactive Video Search and Browsing SystemsMedia Integration and Communication Center
221 views1 slide
Interactive Video Search and Browsing Systems by
Interactive Video Search and Browsing SystemsInteractive Video Search and Browsing Systems
Interactive Video Search and Browsing SystemsMedia Integration and Communication Center
351 views6 slides

More from Media Integration and Communication Center(18)

Recently uploaded

Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ... by
Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ...Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ...
Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ...ShapeBlue
114 views12 slides
NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform by
NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform
NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform Mustafa Kuğu
287 views30 slides
GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N... by
GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N...GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N...
GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N...James Anderson
142 views32 slides
Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R... by
Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R...Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R...
Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R...ShapeBlue
105 views15 slides
Business Analyst Series 2023 - Week 4 Session 7 by
Business Analyst Series 2023 -  Week 4 Session 7Business Analyst Series 2023 -  Week 4 Session 7
Business Analyst Series 2023 - Week 4 Session 7DianaGray10
110 views31 slides
Keynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - Vates by
Keynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - VatesKeynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - Vates
Keynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - VatesShapeBlue
178 views15 slides

Recently uploaded(20)

Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ... by ShapeBlue
Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ...Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ...
Backup and Disaster Recovery with CloudStack and StorPool - Workshop - Venko ...
ShapeBlue114 views
NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform by Mustafa Kuğu
NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform
NTGapps NTG LowCode Platform
Mustafa Kuğu287 views
GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N... by James Anderson
GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N...GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N...
GDG Cloud Southlake 28 Brad Taylor and Shawn Augenstein Old Problems in the N...
James Anderson142 views
Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R... by ShapeBlue
Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R...Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R...
Setting Up Your First CloudStack Environment with Beginners Challenges - MD R...
ShapeBlue105 views
Business Analyst Series 2023 - Week 4 Session 7 by DianaGray10
Business Analyst Series 2023 -  Week 4 Session 7Business Analyst Series 2023 -  Week 4 Session 7
Business Analyst Series 2023 - Week 4 Session 7
DianaGray10110 views
Keynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - Vates by ShapeBlue
Keynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - VatesKeynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - Vates
Keynote Talk: Open Source is Not Dead - Charles Schulz - Vates
ShapeBlue178 views
Hypervisor Agnostic DRS in CloudStack - Brief overview & demo - Vishesh Jinda... by ShapeBlue
Hypervisor Agnostic DRS in CloudStack - Brief overview & demo - Vishesh Jinda...Hypervisor Agnostic DRS in CloudStack - Brief overview & demo - Vishesh Jinda...
Hypervisor Agnostic DRS in CloudStack - Brief overview & demo - Vishesh Jinda...
ShapeBlue93 views
Live Demo Showcase: Unveiling Dell PowerFlex’s IaaS Capabilities with Apache ... by ShapeBlue
Live Demo Showcase: Unveiling Dell PowerFlex’s IaaS Capabilities with Apache ...Live Demo Showcase: Unveiling Dell PowerFlex’s IaaS Capabilities with Apache ...
Live Demo Showcase: Unveiling Dell PowerFlex’s IaaS Capabilities with Apache ...
ShapeBlue52 views
Data Integrity for Banking and Financial Services by Precisely
Data Integrity for Banking and Financial ServicesData Integrity for Banking and Financial Services
Data Integrity for Banking and Financial Services
Precisely76 views
TrustArc Webinar - Managing Online Tracking Technology Vendors_ A Checklist f... by TrustArc
TrustArc Webinar - Managing Online Tracking Technology Vendors_ A Checklist f...TrustArc Webinar - Managing Online Tracking Technology Vendors_ A Checklist f...
TrustArc Webinar - Managing Online Tracking Technology Vendors_ A Checklist f...
TrustArc130 views
2FA and OAuth2 in CloudStack - Andrija Panić - ShapeBlue by ShapeBlue
2FA and OAuth2 in CloudStack - Andrija Panić - ShapeBlue2FA and OAuth2 in CloudStack - Andrija Panić - ShapeBlue
2FA and OAuth2 in CloudStack - Andrija Panić - ShapeBlue
ShapeBlue75 views
Confidence in CloudStack - Aron Wagner, Nathan Gleason - Americ by ShapeBlue
Confidence in CloudStack - Aron Wagner, Nathan Gleason - AmericConfidence in CloudStack - Aron Wagner, Nathan Gleason - Americ
Confidence in CloudStack - Aron Wagner, Nathan Gleason - Americ
ShapeBlue58 views
iSAQB Software Architecture Gathering 2023: How Process Orchestration Increas... by Bernd Ruecker
iSAQB Software Architecture Gathering 2023: How Process Orchestration Increas...iSAQB Software Architecture Gathering 2023: How Process Orchestration Increas...
iSAQB Software Architecture Gathering 2023: How Process Orchestration Increas...
Bernd Ruecker50 views
Updates on the LINSTOR Driver for CloudStack - Rene Peinthor - LINBIT by ShapeBlue
Updates on the LINSTOR Driver for CloudStack - Rene Peinthor - LINBITUpdates on the LINSTOR Driver for CloudStack - Rene Peinthor - LINBIT
Updates on the LINSTOR Driver for CloudStack - Rene Peinthor - LINBIT
ShapeBlue138 views
Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Practical Approach For CISOs by Priyanka Aash
Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Practical Approach For CISOsDigital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Practical Approach For CISOs
Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Practical Approach For CISOs
Priyanka Aash103 views

Accurate Evaluation of HER-2 Ampli cation in FISH Images Poster at International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques, Thessaloniki

  • 1. Accurate Evaluation of HER-2 Amplification in FISH Images A. Del Bimbo, M. Meoni, P. Pala Dipartimento Sistemi e Informatica, University of Firenze, Italy Context and motivations • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a cytogenetic technique used to detect and localize the presence or absence of specific DNA sequences on chromosomes • A sample application of this technique targets the measurement of the amplification of the HER-2 gene within the chromosomes, that constitutes a valuable indicator of invasive breast carcinomas • This requires the application to a tumor tissue sample of two types of fluorescent probes that attach themselves to the HER-2 genes and to the centromere 17 (CEP-17), respectively • Estimation of HER-2 amplification is accomplished by measuring the ratio of HER-2 over CEP-17 markers within each nucleus • Inaccurate nuclei identification may severely bias the estimation of this ratio Adaptive threshold Input Image Distance transform for markers extraction Spot extraction Marked Watershed Reliability score Ratio evaluation A model for nuclei reliability Given a generic nucleus, its reliability score r is evaluated by The reliability score of a generic nucleus is evaluated as: measuring the compliance of the shape and size of the nucleus with respect to a template model. (a−at)2 (e−et)2 (c−ct)2 − 2 − 2 − 2 The reliability score of each nucleus is used so as to: r=e σa e σe e σc • Regions corresponding to a potentially oversegmented • a is the area of the nucleus and at the area of the template model nucleus are recursively merged so as to better match the • e is the eccentricity of the nucleus and et the eccentricity of the template model actual shape and contour of the nucleus • c is the convexity of the nucleus and ct the convexity of the template model • Nuclei can be ordered by decreasing reliability scores so as to Values of σa, σe and σc define the range of allowable deviations from template area and compute the ratio of HER-2 over CEP-17 markers using only eccentricity. Values of parameters at, et and ct have been estimated by averaging the actual values the most reliable ones measured on a training dataset. The Dataset Results The dataset consists of 40 FISH images extracted from eight 0,9 Classification accuracy is slides of breast tissue samples. Each image is annotated by an measured through the expert pathologist with a classification label corresponding to four 0,8 confusion matrix and is different levels of HER-2 amplification: evaluated for the test dataset • No amplification (N), 17.5% of the dataset 0,7 using the optimal value of τr • Borderline (B), 10.0% 0,6 identified on the training • Amplified (A), 25.0% dataset. • Strong amplification (A+), 47.5% 0,5 N B A A+ The system automatically classifies a generic image based on the 0,4 N 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 average value ρ of the ratio extracted on nuclei with a reliability B 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 score r higher than a threshold τr . 0,3 A 0.0 0.0 0.875 0.125 The optimal value of τr is computed by maximizing classification 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 A+ 0.0 0.0 0.125 0.875 accuracy over a training dataset. http://www.dsi.unifi.it/pala/ http://www.micc.unifi.it/projects/her-2/ {delbimbo,meoni,pala}@dsi.unifi.it