The Gupta ReportComments and questions#MGHangout
Sgubu SamampelaWhen will the ANC learn that JZ is a liability thathas and will cost them dearly.
Puleng MosholiI find it impossible to believe that this was not anorder/ instruction that came down from NumberOne (JZ). Its insulting to all Saffers that they thinkwe are going to except the BS notion that twomiddle managers, with very limited authority andpowers, took it upon themselves to authorize thisillegal landing at Waterkloof. Why would they risktheir jobs and potential prison time for the Guptasif they hadnt been instructed to do so by higherups?
Ahmed VayejA cursory reading of the report highlights thefact that the SA taxpayer subsidized the weddingto the tune of millions of rands! The Gupta’smust have called in a lot of favours. The reportmakes no recommendations to recover themonies spent on a private wedding.
LydetektaAndersons SANDF union representative stated on radio 702 this morning thatshe was not interviewed by any of the investigators. I have just read thereport on the M&G website. Interesting. Despite terms of reference being tointerview the persons involved, the names of the persons interviewed arestated and the name of Lt. Col. Anderson is conspicuous by its absence. Allsources for statements are quoted, except Andersons. Despite never havingspoken to her she is quoted at length in the report (without any reference tosource) and is then condemned in the findings as having acted irregularly inconcert with our ambassador and the Indian High Commission - i.e. she hasbeen found responsible without even so much as an interview, in completecontravention of the inquirys own terms of reference. Hows that for a lack ofdue process? And she would have been the only one to shed any light on thealleged pressure from "number one"