SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 44
Download to read offline
Global Information Law and Practice
Internet Jurisdiction
January 6, 2020
professor michael geist
university of ottawa, faculty of law
Jurisdiction Case Study
Company A is a Hong Kong-based firm that sells network devices used in complex industrial
manufacturing. Several years ago, one of their engineers left the company and began using
company trade secrets to sell competing products as Company B. Company A has used the court
process to try to stop the competing activities, obtaining a series of court orders requiring that
Company B stop the sales of competing products. Company B has regularly ignored the court
orders and has proven difficult to shut down.
Frustrated by the situation, Company A seeks a court order requiring Google to stop including
Company B in its search index for all users. Google objects to the proposed court order. It argues
that:
(1) It is based in Mountain View, California and should not be subject to Hong Kong jurisdiction.
(2) Any potential order should be limited to Hong Kong residents accessing the search index
through its Google.hk site.
The judge in the case has limited knowledge of the Internet and new technologies. You have been
asked to assist in the adjudication of the case. You have been asked to answer the following
questions:
• Can the court assert jurisdiction over Google?
• If it can assert jurisdiction, what limits, if any, should govern the proposed court order?
“Competing Visions”
competing visions of internet law
• cyberspace as place
• Does it function separately from real space?
• Are governments powerless to regulate?
• Is this view driven by self-regulation?
• cyberspace as nothing new
• Is enforcement a concern?
• Are spillover effects greater online?
• Harmonization?
• cyberspace as regulated by technology
• If technology regulates, can technology be regulated?
competing visions of online commerce
• Whose law should apply in B2C e-commerce
transactions?
• The Law of the Consumer -- consumers won’t shop
online unless they enjoy local protections
• The Law of the Seller -- businesses won’t sell unless
they enjoy legal certainty and limited liability
competing visions of the role of courts
• When should a court be entitled to assert jurisdiction over
online activity?
• Contracts with local consumers
• Physical presence in the jurisdiction
• Targeting the local jurisdiction via the web
• Impact/effect on local jurisdiction
• Mere availability of content
• Should we differentiate by issue -- is intellectual property
different from e-commerce?
competing visions of governments
• Hands on vs. Hands off the Internet
• Limits of regulatory reach
– Domestic rules
– Global rules
• Appropriate Forum
Breadth of Internet jurisdiction issues
• Intellectual property
• Privacy/Data protection
• Cyber-crime
• E-commerce/Contracts
• Defamation
• Content regulation
“Borderless Internet”
<1>
January6internetjurisdiction
January6internetjurisdiction
Countries could assert
jurisdiction over foreign-
based websites
<2>
January6internetjurisdiction
Internet borderless –
technological solutions
viewed as ineffective
January6internetjurisdiction
<3>
January6internetjurisdiction
The Passive versus Active Test - U.S.
Inset Systems v. Instruction Set (1996)
• Massachusetts co. owns Inset.com; Connecticut
co. owns trademark
• Connecticut co. sues - court must determine
jurisdiction
• Massachusetts co. with no real presence
• Court says Internet like a continuous ad - asserts
jurisdiction
The Passive versus Active Test - U.S.
Bensusan Restaurants v. King (1996)
• Battle of the Blue Notes - NY Jazz club vs.
Columbia, MO local club
• Court examines Columbia club Web site - no
online tickets; just information
• No jurisdiction - passive site does not meet level
of foreseeability
The Passive versus Active Test - U.S.
Zippo v. Zippo Dot Com (1997)
• Cigarette lighter manufacturer (Pa.) vs. new
Internet company (Cal.)
• Zippo Dot Com sells subscriptions to Pa.
residents; no real space offices
• Court asserts jurisdiction - establishes passive vs.
active analytical framework
The Passive versus Active Test - U.S.
Zippo v. Zippo Dot Com (1997)
PASSIVE SITE
• Information only
• Little interactivity
• Multiple jurisdiction
claims not foreseeable
• Local site
ACTIVE SITE
• Full interactivity
• E-commerce oriented
• Sell or engage with
multiple jurisdictions
• Global/National
orientation
The Movement Toward a New Test
In Favour of Zippo
• Creates limits on Internet jurisdiction
• Based on foreseeability -- passive vs. active
become proxy for whether jurisdiction was
foreseeable
• Local laws matter
The Movement Toward a New Test
The Problems with Zippo
• Passive vs. Active often doesn’t work
• Test encourages perverse behaviour by
encouraging less interactivity
• Passive front end; Active back end
• Active sites becoming the norm
• Standards are constantly shifting -- test
doesn’t provide sufficient certainty
Post-Zippo
The Movement Toward a New Test
• GTE New Media Services Inc. v. Bellsouth Corp.
(2000) - examine whether residents actually
accessed site
• People Solutions, Inc. v. People Solutions, Inc.,
(2000) - must have actual sales to Texas residents
• Blakey v. Continental Airlines (2000) - harassment
on site caused effects within state
• Nissan Motor v. Nissan Computer (2000) - passive
site meets effects test
United States
Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion (2008) 10th Cir.
• eBay power sellers and copyright infringement claim
• Purposeful direction test:
(a) an intentional action, that was
(b) expressly aimed at the forum state, with
(c) knowledge that the brunt of the injury would be felt in the
forum state
(d) whether the plaintiff's injuries 'arise out of' the defendant's
contacts with the forum; and
(e) that the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend
traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
United States
Johnson v. Arden (2010) 8th Cir.
• Defamatory statement on a review website
• Court says Zippo instructive but insufficient :
“The website's accessibility in Missouri alone is
insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.”
• Adopts effects-based approach
United States
Zippo +
• Zippo still the starting point for most analysis
• Most courts amend by:
• Something greater than mere interactivity
• Targeting
• Effects
• Stream of commerce narrowed
Beyond Zippo
Post-Zippo
• Bangoura v. Washington Post (ONCA, 2005)
• Alleged defamation in Washington Post
• Published in U.S.; available online
• Target lives in Africa; later moves to Ontario
• Ontario lower court asserts jurisdiction -- “moving target” test?
• Washington Post’s quantification of risk?
Post-Zippo
• Bangoura v. Washington Post (ONCA, 2005)
• Appellate decision - overturns lower ct. decision
“it was not reasonably foreseeable in January 1997 that Mr.
Bangoura would end up as a resident of Ontario three years later.
To hold otherwise would mean that a defendant could be sued
almost anywhere in the world based upon where a plaintiff may
decide to establish his or her residence long after the publication
of the defamation."
High Court Cases - Australia
• Gutnick v. Dow Jones (HCA, 2002)
• Alleged defamation in Barrons (published by DJ)
• Published in the U.S.; accessible in print and online in Australia
• 1700 online subscribers in Australia; server located in NJ
• Case launched in Australia
• DJ has customer base (small) in Australia
• Court asserts jurisdiction -- High Court rules Australia entitled to
hear the case
• Case criticized by U.S. interests -- fear publication chill
High Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
• Facts as in our case study
• Court issues court order
• Asserts jurisdiction over Google
• Global court order – applies to full Google search index wherever
accessed
• Case goes to the Canadian Supreme Court (and is cited in
Dr. Yeung, Sau Shing Albert v. Google Inc)
High Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
“The issue in this appeal is whether Google can be ordered, pending
a trial, to globally de-index the websites of a company which, in
breach of several court orders, is using those websites to unlawfully
sell the intellectual property of another company.”
High Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
“The Internet has no borders — its natural habitat is global. The only
way to ensure that the interlocutory injunction attained its objective
was to have it apply where Google operates — globally. As Fenlon J.
found, the majority of Datalink’s sales take place outside Canada. If
the injunction were restricted to Canada alone or to google.ca, as
Google suggests it should have been, the remedy would be deprived
of its intended ability to prevent irreparable harm. Purchasers
outside Canada could easily continue purchasing from Datalink’s
websites, and Canadian purchasers could easily find Datalink’s
websites even if those websites were de-indexed on google.ca. Google
would still be facilitating Datalink’s breach of the court’s order
which had prohibited it from carrying on business on the Internet.
There is no equity in ordering an interlocutory injunction which has
no realistic prospect of preventing irreparable harm.”
High Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
“Google’s argument that a global injunction violates international
comity because it is possible that the order could not have been
obtained in a foreign jurisdiction, or that to comply with it would
result in Google violating the laws of that jurisdiction is, with respect,
theoretical. As Fenlon J. noted, “Google acknowledges that most
countries will likely recognize intellectual property rights and view
the selling of pirated products as a legal wrong”
In the absence of an evidentiary foundation, and given Google’s right
to seek a rectifying order, it hardly seems equitable to deny Equustek
the extraterritorial scope it needs to make the remedy effective, or
even to put the onus on it to demonstrate, country by country, where
such an order is legally permissible. We are dealing with the Internet
after all, and the balance of convenience test has to take full account
of its inevitable extraterritorial reach when injunctive relief is being
sought against an entity like Google.”
High Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
“I have trouble seeing how this interferes with what Google refers to
as its content neutral character. The injunction does not require
Google to monitor content on the Internet, nor is it a finding of any
sort of liability against Google for facilitating access to the impugned
websites. As for the balance of convenience, the only obligation the
interlocutory injunction creates is for Google to de-index the Datalink
websites. The order is, as Fenlon J. observed, “only a slight
expansion on the removal of individual URLs, which Google agreed
to do voluntarily”. Even if it could be said that the injunction engages
freedom of expression issues, this is far outweighed by the need to
prevent the irreparable harm that would result from Google’s
facilitating Datalink’s breach of court orders.”
Highest Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
• Where should the onus lie?
• If Canada, who else?
• U.S. blocking order – threat to free speech?
• How to reconcile?
Highest Court Cases - Canada
Equustek Solutions v. Google
• Post-script:
– Google challenges in US court
– Failed attempt to enforce US order in Canada
Highest Court Cases - EU
Google v. CNIL (2019)
• Right to be forgotten – how far should an order
extend?
• EU rules cover EU, trade-offs on privacy vs.
freedom of expression do not apply on a global
basis
• Leaves door open to global orders that do account
for the trade-offs
How to Manage Jurisdictional Risk?
How to Manage Jurisdictional Risk?
• Contractual terms
• Real and substantial connection
• Technological tools (targeting/de-targeting)
• Cost of doing business
• Risk assessment of liability

More Related Content

What's hot

Joffe v-google-9th-cir-opin
Joffe v-google-9th-cir-opinJoffe v-google-9th-cir-opin
Joffe v-google-9th-cir-opinGreg Sterling
 
Internet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP Institute
Internet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP InstituteInternet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP Institute
Internet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP InstituteInternet Law Center
 
FTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobiFTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobiGreg Sterling
 
"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009
"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009
"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009canadianlawyer
 
Sarah Jamieson_corrections
Sarah Jamieson_correctionsSarah Jamieson_corrections
Sarah Jamieson_correctionsSarah Jamieson
 
SM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation Management
SM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation ManagementSM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation Management
SM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation ManagementInternet Law Center
 
Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011
Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011
Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings
Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings
Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings Christina Gagnier
 
Darren Chaker Computer Search Warrant
Darren Chaker Computer Search WarrantDarren Chaker Computer Search Warrant
Darren Chaker Computer Search WarrantDarren Chaker
 
Content, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked MediaContent, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked MediaJon Garon
 
We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...
We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...
We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...ForgeRock
 
Ethics in e commerce n it
Ethics in e commerce n itEthics in e commerce n it
Ethics in e commerce n itamitmitkar
 
Ecommerce legal exchange beijing
Ecommerce legal exchange beijingEcommerce legal exchange beijing
Ecommerce legal exchange beijingInternet Law Center
 
Child Porn Prosecution Darren-Chaker
Child Porn Prosecution Darren-ChakerChild Porn Prosecution Darren-Chaker
Child Porn Prosecution Darren-ChakerDarren Chaker
 

What's hot (20)

Joffe v-google-9th-cir-opin
Joffe v-google-9th-cir-opinJoffe v-google-9th-cir-opin
Joffe v-google-9th-cir-opin
 
Amazon Tax Wars
Amazon Tax WarsAmazon Tax Wars
Amazon Tax Wars
 
Washington's Privacy Tango
Washington's Privacy TangoWashington's Privacy Tango
Washington's Privacy Tango
 
Internet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP Institute
Internet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP InstituteInternet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP Institute
Internet Law 2014 - Presentation at CalBar IP Institute
 
FTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobiFTC Complaint v InMobi
FTC Complaint v InMobi
 
"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009
"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009
"Some 2009 Copyright Issues" June 4 2009
 
Sarah Jamieson_corrections
Sarah Jamieson_correctionsSarah Jamieson_corrections
Sarah Jamieson_corrections
 
SM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation Management
SM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation ManagementSM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation Management
SM Chamber of Commerce TechTalk: 5 Rules of Reputation Management
 
Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011
Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011
Développements récents en droit des technologies 8 novembre 2011
 
Spokeo v Robins
Spokeo v RobinsSpokeo v Robins
Spokeo v Robins
 
Krishna kumar singh
Krishna kumar singhKrishna kumar singh
Krishna kumar singh
 
Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings
Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings
Data Privacy: A Snapshot of Recent Federal Trade Commission Rulings
 
Darren Chaker Computer Search Warrant
Darren Chaker Computer Search WarrantDarren Chaker Computer Search Warrant
Darren Chaker Computer Search Warrant
 
Content, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked MediaContent, Control and Socially Networked Media
Content, Control and Socially Networked Media
 
We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...
We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...
We Know What You Did Last Summer (and Last Night) - ForgeRock Identity Live A...
 
Ethics in e commerce n it
Ethics in e commerce n itEthics in e commerce n it
Ethics in e commerce n it
 
Ecommerce legal exchange beijing
Ecommerce legal exchange beijingEcommerce legal exchange beijing
Ecommerce legal exchange beijing
 
New developments of trade mark law
New developments of trade mark lawNew developments of trade mark law
New developments of trade mark law
 
New developments of trade mark law
New developments of trade mark lawNew developments of trade mark law
New developments of trade mark law
 
Child Porn Prosecution Darren-Chaker
Child Porn Prosecution Darren-ChakerChild Porn Prosecution Darren-Chaker
Child Porn Prosecution Darren-Chaker
 

Similar to January6internetjurisdiction

Competition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial Enforcement
Competition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial EnforcementCompetition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial Enforcement
Competition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial EnforcementFlorence Competition Programme
 
Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10Matthew Asbell
 
The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data
The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data
The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data ARDC
 
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Bryan Beel
 
Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...
Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...
Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...MohammadLan
 
Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015
Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015
Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015SEO monitor
 
Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases
Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases
Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases Jay Kesan
 
IP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - Publication
IP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - PublicationIP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - Publication
IP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - PublicationDaniel Piedra
 
Trademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USA
Trademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USATrademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USA
Trademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USAProf. (Dr.) Tabrez Ahmad
 
Cle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxsw
Cle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxswCle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxsw
Cle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxswLaura Ewing-Pearle
 
Click-Wrap To Cost-Shifting
Click-Wrap To Cost-ShiftingClick-Wrap To Cost-Shifting
Click-Wrap To Cost-Shiftingagfortslideshare
 
Social Media Marketing 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 04 08 10Social Media Marketing 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 04 08 10Matthew Asbell
 
Sopa (stop online piracy act)
Sopa (stop online piracy act)Sopa (stop online piracy act)
Sopa (stop online piracy act)kmcintire84
 
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
The seven mistakes 14.11.2011
The seven mistakes 14.11.2011The seven mistakes 14.11.2011
The seven mistakes 14.11.2011Pod Legal
 
Gold Coast North Chamber of Commerce
Gold Coast North Chamber of CommerceGold Coast North Chamber of Commerce
Gold Coast North Chamber of CommercePod Legal
 
E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...
E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...
E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...Cengage Learning
 

Similar to January6internetjurisdiction (20)

Pls 780 week 3
Pls 780 week 3Pls 780 week 3
Pls 780 week 3
 
Competition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial Enforcement
Competition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial EnforcementCompetition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial Enforcement
Competition Law and SEP: Testing the Limits of Extra-Territorial Enforcement
 
Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 03 24 2010 Updated 04 08 10
 
The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data
The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data
The Importance of Good Plumbing for Collaborative Research Data
 
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
 
Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...
Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...
Business Law Alternate Edition Text and Summarized Cases 12th Edition Miller ...
 
Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015
Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015
Legal challenges of the current digital times by Catalin Suliman | SemDays 2015
 
Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases
Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases
Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases
 
IP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - Publication
IP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - PublicationIP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - Publication
IP & Business Presentation - Daniel Piedra - Publication
 
Trademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USA
Trademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USATrademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USA
Trademark Infringements in E-commerce: A Comparative Study of India, China & USA
 
Cle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxsw
Cle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxswCle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxsw
Cle social media_byod_bigdata_ethics_sxsw
 
Click-Wrap To Cost-Shifting
Click-Wrap To Cost-ShiftingClick-Wrap To Cost-Shifting
Click-Wrap To Cost-Shifting
 
Social Media Marketing 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 04 08 10Social Media Marketing 04 08 10
Social Media Marketing 04 08 10
 
2015 Intellectual Property (IP) Year in Review
2015 Intellectual Property (IP) Year in Review2015 Intellectual Property (IP) Year in Review
2015 Intellectual Property (IP) Year in Review
 
Sopa (stop online piracy act)
Sopa (stop online piracy act)Sopa (stop online piracy act)
Sopa (stop online piracy act)
 
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
 
The seven mistakes 14.11.2011
The seven mistakes 14.11.2011The seven mistakes 14.11.2011
The seven mistakes 14.11.2011
 
Gold Coast North Chamber of Commerce
Gold Coast North Chamber of CommerceGold Coast North Chamber of Commerce
Gold Coast North Chamber of Commerce
 
Pls780 week 2
Pls780 week 2Pls780 week 2
Pls780 week 2
 
E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...
E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...
E-Discovery: How do Litigation Hold, BYOD, and Privacy Affect You? - Course T...
 

More from mgeist

The Truth About ACTA
The Truth About ACTAThe Truth About ACTA
The Truth About ACTAmgeist
 
Canadian Copyright Reform in Context
Canadian Copyright Reform in ContextCanadian Copyright Reform in Context
Canadian Copyright Reform in Contextmgeist
 
Why Copyright?
Why Copyright?Why Copyright?
Why Copyright?mgeist
 
Copyright Choices and Voices
Copyright Choices and VoicesCopyright Choices and Voices
Copyright Choices and Voicesmgeist
 
New Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished Business
New Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished BusinessNew Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished Business
New Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished Businessmgeist
 
The Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in CanadaThe Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in Canadamgeist
 
The Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in CanadaThe Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in Canadamgeist
 

More from mgeist (7)

The Truth About ACTA
The Truth About ACTAThe Truth About ACTA
The Truth About ACTA
 
Canadian Copyright Reform in Context
Canadian Copyright Reform in ContextCanadian Copyright Reform in Context
Canadian Copyright Reform in Context
 
Why Copyright?
Why Copyright?Why Copyright?
Why Copyright?
 
Copyright Choices and Voices
Copyright Choices and VoicesCopyright Choices and Voices
Copyright Choices and Voices
 
New Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished Business
New Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished BusinessNew Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished Business
New Media, New Doctrines...Unfinished Business
 
The Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in CanadaThe Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in Canada
 
The Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in CanadaThe Case for Fair Use in Canada
The Case for Fair Use in Canada
 

Recently uploaded

Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxMYDA ANGELICA SUAN
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?TechSoup
 
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptxCapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptxCapitolTechU
 
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptxSandy Millin
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfYu Kanazawa / Osaka University
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...CaraSkikne1
 
Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.
Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.
Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.EnglishCEIPdeSigeiro
 
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxEducation and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxraviapr7
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxDr. Santhosh Kumar. N
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxraviapr7
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education  and Educational PhilosophyPhilosophy of Education  and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education and Educational PhilosophyShuvankar Madhu
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICESayali Powar
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphNetziValdelomar1
 
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentXsasf Sfdfasd
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
 
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptxCapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
CapTechU Doctoral Presentation -March 2024 slides.pptx
 
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
2024.03.23 What do successful readers do - Sandy Millin for PARK.pptx
 
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdfP4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
P4C x ELT = P4ELT: Its Theoretical Background (Kanazawa, 2024 March).pdf
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
 
Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.
Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.
Easter in the USA presentation by Chloe.
 
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptxEducation and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
Education and training program in the hospital APR.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 10pptx.pptx
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
 
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptxClinical Pharmacy  Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
Clinical Pharmacy Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy, Concept of clinical pptx
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
 
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education  and Educational PhilosophyPhilosophy of Education  and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
 
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quizFinals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
Finals of Kant get Marx 2.0 : a general politics quiz
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
 
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
 

January6internetjurisdiction

  • 1. Global Information Law and Practice Internet Jurisdiction January 6, 2020 professor michael geist university of ottawa, faculty of law
  • 2. Jurisdiction Case Study Company A is a Hong Kong-based firm that sells network devices used in complex industrial manufacturing. Several years ago, one of their engineers left the company and began using company trade secrets to sell competing products as Company B. Company A has used the court process to try to stop the competing activities, obtaining a series of court orders requiring that Company B stop the sales of competing products. Company B has regularly ignored the court orders and has proven difficult to shut down. Frustrated by the situation, Company A seeks a court order requiring Google to stop including Company B in its search index for all users. Google objects to the proposed court order. It argues that: (1) It is based in Mountain View, California and should not be subject to Hong Kong jurisdiction. (2) Any potential order should be limited to Hong Kong residents accessing the search index through its Google.hk site. The judge in the case has limited knowledge of the Internet and new technologies. You have been asked to assist in the adjudication of the case. You have been asked to answer the following questions: • Can the court assert jurisdiction over Google? • If it can assert jurisdiction, what limits, if any, should govern the proposed court order?
  • 4. competing visions of internet law • cyberspace as place • Does it function separately from real space? • Are governments powerless to regulate? • Is this view driven by self-regulation? • cyberspace as nothing new • Is enforcement a concern? • Are spillover effects greater online? • Harmonization? • cyberspace as regulated by technology • If technology regulates, can technology be regulated?
  • 5. competing visions of online commerce • Whose law should apply in B2C e-commerce transactions? • The Law of the Consumer -- consumers won’t shop online unless they enjoy local protections • The Law of the Seller -- businesses won’t sell unless they enjoy legal certainty and limited liability
  • 6. competing visions of the role of courts • When should a court be entitled to assert jurisdiction over online activity? • Contracts with local consumers • Physical presence in the jurisdiction • Targeting the local jurisdiction via the web • Impact/effect on local jurisdiction • Mere availability of content • Should we differentiate by issue -- is intellectual property different from e-commerce?
  • 7. competing visions of governments • Hands on vs. Hands off the Internet • Limits of regulatory reach – Domestic rules – Global rules • Appropriate Forum
  • 8. Breadth of Internet jurisdiction issues • Intellectual property • Privacy/Data protection • Cyber-crime • E-commerce/Contracts • Defamation • Content regulation
  • 10. <1>
  • 13. Countries could assert jurisdiction over foreign- based websites
  • 14. <2>
  • 16. Internet borderless – technological solutions viewed as ineffective
  • 18. <3>
  • 20. The Passive versus Active Test - U.S. Inset Systems v. Instruction Set (1996) • Massachusetts co. owns Inset.com; Connecticut co. owns trademark • Connecticut co. sues - court must determine jurisdiction • Massachusetts co. with no real presence • Court says Internet like a continuous ad - asserts jurisdiction
  • 21. The Passive versus Active Test - U.S. Bensusan Restaurants v. King (1996) • Battle of the Blue Notes - NY Jazz club vs. Columbia, MO local club • Court examines Columbia club Web site - no online tickets; just information • No jurisdiction - passive site does not meet level of foreseeability
  • 22. The Passive versus Active Test - U.S. Zippo v. Zippo Dot Com (1997) • Cigarette lighter manufacturer (Pa.) vs. new Internet company (Cal.) • Zippo Dot Com sells subscriptions to Pa. residents; no real space offices • Court asserts jurisdiction - establishes passive vs. active analytical framework
  • 23. The Passive versus Active Test - U.S. Zippo v. Zippo Dot Com (1997) PASSIVE SITE • Information only • Little interactivity • Multiple jurisdiction claims not foreseeable • Local site ACTIVE SITE • Full interactivity • E-commerce oriented • Sell or engage with multiple jurisdictions • Global/National orientation
  • 24. The Movement Toward a New Test In Favour of Zippo • Creates limits on Internet jurisdiction • Based on foreseeability -- passive vs. active become proxy for whether jurisdiction was foreseeable • Local laws matter
  • 25. The Movement Toward a New Test The Problems with Zippo • Passive vs. Active often doesn’t work • Test encourages perverse behaviour by encouraging less interactivity • Passive front end; Active back end • Active sites becoming the norm • Standards are constantly shifting -- test doesn’t provide sufficient certainty
  • 27. The Movement Toward a New Test • GTE New Media Services Inc. v. Bellsouth Corp. (2000) - examine whether residents actually accessed site • People Solutions, Inc. v. People Solutions, Inc., (2000) - must have actual sales to Texas residents • Blakey v. Continental Airlines (2000) - harassment on site caused effects within state • Nissan Motor v. Nissan Computer (2000) - passive site meets effects test
  • 28. United States Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion (2008) 10th Cir. • eBay power sellers and copyright infringement claim • Purposeful direction test: (a) an intentional action, that was (b) expressly aimed at the forum state, with (c) knowledge that the brunt of the injury would be felt in the forum state (d) whether the plaintiff's injuries 'arise out of' the defendant's contacts with the forum; and (e) that the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
  • 29. United States Johnson v. Arden (2010) 8th Cir. • Defamatory statement on a review website • Court says Zippo instructive but insufficient : “The website's accessibility in Missouri alone is insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.” • Adopts effects-based approach
  • 30. United States Zippo + • Zippo still the starting point for most analysis • Most courts amend by: • Something greater than mere interactivity • Targeting • Effects • Stream of commerce narrowed
  • 32. Post-Zippo • Bangoura v. Washington Post (ONCA, 2005) • Alleged defamation in Washington Post • Published in U.S.; available online • Target lives in Africa; later moves to Ontario • Ontario lower court asserts jurisdiction -- “moving target” test? • Washington Post’s quantification of risk?
  • 33. Post-Zippo • Bangoura v. Washington Post (ONCA, 2005) • Appellate decision - overturns lower ct. decision “it was not reasonably foreseeable in January 1997 that Mr. Bangoura would end up as a resident of Ontario three years later. To hold otherwise would mean that a defendant could be sued almost anywhere in the world based upon where a plaintiff may decide to establish his or her residence long after the publication of the defamation."
  • 34. High Court Cases - Australia • Gutnick v. Dow Jones (HCA, 2002) • Alleged defamation in Barrons (published by DJ) • Published in the U.S.; accessible in print and online in Australia • 1700 online subscribers in Australia; server located in NJ • Case launched in Australia • DJ has customer base (small) in Australia • Court asserts jurisdiction -- High Court rules Australia entitled to hear the case • Case criticized by U.S. interests -- fear publication chill
  • 35. High Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google • Facts as in our case study • Court issues court order • Asserts jurisdiction over Google • Global court order – applies to full Google search index wherever accessed • Case goes to the Canadian Supreme Court (and is cited in Dr. Yeung, Sau Shing Albert v. Google Inc)
  • 36. High Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google “The issue in this appeal is whether Google can be ordered, pending a trial, to globally de-index the websites of a company which, in breach of several court orders, is using those websites to unlawfully sell the intellectual property of another company.”
  • 37. High Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google “The Internet has no borders — its natural habitat is global. The only way to ensure that the interlocutory injunction attained its objective was to have it apply where Google operates — globally. As Fenlon J. found, the majority of Datalink’s sales take place outside Canada. If the injunction were restricted to Canada alone or to google.ca, as Google suggests it should have been, the remedy would be deprived of its intended ability to prevent irreparable harm. Purchasers outside Canada could easily continue purchasing from Datalink’s websites, and Canadian purchasers could easily find Datalink’s websites even if those websites were de-indexed on google.ca. Google would still be facilitating Datalink’s breach of the court’s order which had prohibited it from carrying on business on the Internet. There is no equity in ordering an interlocutory injunction which has no realistic prospect of preventing irreparable harm.”
  • 38. High Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google “Google’s argument that a global injunction violates international comity because it is possible that the order could not have been obtained in a foreign jurisdiction, or that to comply with it would result in Google violating the laws of that jurisdiction is, with respect, theoretical. As Fenlon J. noted, “Google acknowledges that most countries will likely recognize intellectual property rights and view the selling of pirated products as a legal wrong” In the absence of an evidentiary foundation, and given Google’s right to seek a rectifying order, it hardly seems equitable to deny Equustek the extraterritorial scope it needs to make the remedy effective, or even to put the onus on it to demonstrate, country by country, where such an order is legally permissible. We are dealing with the Internet after all, and the balance of convenience test has to take full account of its inevitable extraterritorial reach when injunctive relief is being sought against an entity like Google.”
  • 39. High Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google “I have trouble seeing how this interferes with what Google refers to as its content neutral character. The injunction does not require Google to monitor content on the Internet, nor is it a finding of any sort of liability against Google for facilitating access to the impugned websites. As for the balance of convenience, the only obligation the interlocutory injunction creates is for Google to de-index the Datalink websites. The order is, as Fenlon J. observed, “only a slight expansion on the removal of individual URLs, which Google agreed to do voluntarily”. Even if it could be said that the injunction engages freedom of expression issues, this is far outweighed by the need to prevent the irreparable harm that would result from Google’s facilitating Datalink’s breach of court orders.”
  • 40. Highest Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google • Where should the onus lie? • If Canada, who else? • U.S. blocking order – threat to free speech? • How to reconcile?
  • 41. Highest Court Cases - Canada Equustek Solutions v. Google • Post-script: – Google challenges in US court – Failed attempt to enforce US order in Canada
  • 42. Highest Court Cases - EU Google v. CNIL (2019) • Right to be forgotten – how far should an order extend? • EU rules cover EU, trade-offs on privacy vs. freedom of expression do not apply on a global basis • Leaves door open to global orders that do account for the trade-offs
  • 43. How to Manage Jurisdictional Risk?
  • 44. How to Manage Jurisdictional Risk? • Contractual terms • Real and substantial connection • Technological tools (targeting/de-targeting) • Cost of doing business • Risk assessment of liability