Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Networked for Life by Barry Wellman (NetLab) at mesh14


Published on

Networked for Life: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
A presentation by Barry Wellman (NetLab) as part of a session entitled Disconnecting from the Grid: Forward-thinking or Flawed Premise? at mesh14 in Toronto (May, 2014)

Published in: Lifestyle, Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Networked for Life by Barry Wellman (NetLab) at mesh14

  1. 1. Barry Wellman NetLab iSchool, University of Toronto
  2. 2. In a Nutshell  The Bad:  Fixed belief that we are becoming more disconnected as our silos break down  The Good  Realization that the triple revolution is creating new, less-silo’ed opportunities for connectivity  The Ugly  Doing the hard work of collecting systematic evidence to evaluate networked life
  3. 3. 4 Traditional Small Groups: Door-to-Door “Silos” • Old workgroups (& communities) based on - proximity, bureaucratic hierarchy, kinship •All observe and interact with all • Deal with only one group • Knowledge comes only from within the group – and stays within the group
  4. 4. 5 The Bad: Recurrent Claims That Things Are Always Falling Apart  From urbanization, bureaucratization, industrialization, capitalism/socialism & technological change – to the internet and mobile  Thomas Jefferson: great constitutionalist, but loved silos  "The mobs of great cities add just so much to the support of pure government, as sores do to the strength of the human body” (1784)  Ferdinand Tönnies (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, 1887) thru Robert Putnam (Bowling Alone, 2000) to Sherry Turkle (Alone Together, 2010)
  5. 5. The Good The Turn From Groups To Social Networks 6
  6. 6. The Triple Revolution  Three Phenomena Intertwined  1. Social Network: Reach Beyond Tight Groups:  More Multiplicity, Partial Attention, Less Boundaries  2. Internet: Personalization, Weakened Distance  3. Mobile-ization of Info & Communication  Hyper-Personal Body Appendages: Third Skin  Accessible To You  Available To Others  Networked Individualism 7
  7. 7. 8 18 Month Old Boys with their Favorite Toys: Mom’s Laptop & Dad’s iPhone
  8. 8. Person To Person: Networked Individualism  Mobile Phones, Portable Computing  Individual, not work group or household  Personalized networking  Tailored media interactions  Hyperconnectivity  Private concerns replace public  Online interactions linked with offline  Glocalization
  9. 9. 10 People Function as Networked Individuals With Partial Membership in Multiple Networks  .. and less as group or category members  Social ties & events organized around the individual rather than a social unit such as a family, neighborhood, school, or organization  The person has become the individual unit of social connectivity; and not the place,  be it workplace, school, or household  Agency: Each person operates own network  Mobile phones and internet allow person-to-person contact to supplement place-to-place communication  The social network revolution has provided the opportunities – and stresses – for people to reach beyond the world of tight groups
  10. 10. 11 Networked Individualism: Person-to-Person Structural Changes Linked as Individuals Less Groupiness More Agency Less Place Bound More Achieved, Less Ascribed
  11. 11. The New Media is The New Neighbourhood  Lines between info, communication have blurred  Geographic location is real, but less important  In addition to neighbours, workmates:  Most info-sharing transcends spatial & social boundaries  Networked individuals can exchange & create media  Projecting their voices to more extended audiences that become part of their social worlds
  12. 12. MIT Press 358 pp $14 (Kindle $9)
  13. 13. The Ugly: Actually Doing the Research  Fourth study of residents of East York, Toronto since 1968  In-depth interviews with 101 residents. Transcribed, anonymized  Research Issues  Nature of life in multiple teams  How does digital fit into ordinary life  And what does mobile add?  Home-work connectivity  Privacy concerns  Variations by age, gender, SES, family situations
  14. 14. Preliminary Findings  People value privacy – from each other, not institutions (NSA, Google)  Everyday use of digital media integrated with rest of life – use whatever is handy and appropriate  Multiple connectivity  Lots more this year as we analyze
  15. 15. 16 Networked Individual -- Nelu Handa @ Internet Café, Toronto