Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Amalgam1

2,922 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Amalgam1

  1. 1. 3/5/2012 ALLOY Versus AMALGAM • Alloy is a mixture of 2 or more metals Amalgam • AMALGAMMATION / TRITURATION – reaction when a silver based alloy is mixed with mercury, a liquid metal. • Dental Amalgam - Is an alloy that contains mercury as one of its component Why Amalgam?• Inexpensive ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES• Ease of use • Less technique sensitive • Esthetics, metallic color• Proven track record • More durable • No bonding to tooth surface – >100 years • Less costly • Extensive tooth preparation • Excellent abrasion and wear• Familiarity resistance• Life expectancy – 15 yrs • Tends to seal itself against• Resin-free leakage • Bacteria do not adhere to it – less allergies than composite as strongly as n composite Composition of Dental AmalgamIndications ( I,II,III, V,VI) Contraindications • Basic• Moderate to large • Esthetically prominent areas – Silver restoration of teeth – Tin• Restorations that are not in – Copper highly esthetic areas of mouth. – Mercury• Restorations that have • Other heavy occlusal contacts. – Zinc• Restorations that can’t be – Indium well isolated – Palladium• Pin retained 1
  2. 2. 3/5/2012 Basic Constituents Basic Constituents • Silver (Ag) – increases strength • Copper (Cu) – increases expansion – increases strength – Decrease setting time – reduces tarnish and corrosion • Tin (Sn) – decreased strength – reduces creep – decreases expansion • reduces marginal deterioration – increases setting time – Improves physical properties when compounded with Ag Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 Dental Materials - Saunders Tarnish Corrosion• Oxidation that attacks the surface of the Am and • Oxidation from interaction of 2 dissimilar extends slightly below the surface. metals in the presence of a solution• Contact with oxygen, chlorides, and sulfides in containing electrolytes the mouth. • Galvanism• Dark dull appearance but not destructive to Am • Oxidation of one of the metals• Palladium and Polishing may help reduce tarnish• The rougher the surface, the more it tends to tarnish Creep Basic Constituents • Mercury (Hg)• Refers to the gradual change in shape of the – activates reaction restoration from compression by the opposing – only pure metal that is liquid at room temperature dentition. – spherical alloys • require less mercury – smaller surface area easier to wet » 40 to 45% Hg – admixed alloys • require more mercury – lathe-cut particles more difficult to wet » 45 to 50% Hg Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 2
  3. 3. 3/5/2012 Other Constituents • Zinc (Zn) • Indium (In) • decreases oxidation of other elements – decreases surface tension – provides better clinical performance • reduces amount of mercury necessary • less marginal breakdown • reduces emitted mercury vapor – reduces creep and marginal breakdown – causes delayed expansion • if contaminated with moisture during condensation – increases strength Powell J Dent Res 1989 Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 Other Constituents Component High copper Alloy % Low copper alloy %• Palladium (Pd) Silver 40 -70 68 – 72 – reduced corrosion Tin 12 – 30 28 – 36 – greater luster Copper 10 – 30 4–6 Zinc 0-1 0-2 Mahler J Dent Res 1990 Classifications Copper Content• Based on copper content • Low-copper alloys• Based on particle shape – 4 to 6% Cu • High-copper alloys – thought that 6% Cu was maximum amount • due to fear of excessive corrosion and expansion – Now contain 10 to 30% Cu • at expense of Ag Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 3
  4. 4. 3/5/2012 Setting Reaction of Low Copper Low Copper Amalgam Amalgam• “traditional” “conventional” (β+γ ) + Hg γ1 + γ2 + unconsumed alloy particles (β+γ )• COMPOSITION: ( Black’s) γ – greek letter gamma• 65% SILVER - used to designate the AgSn alloy or gamma phase• 25% Tin γ1 – AgHg• < 6% copper γ2 – SnHg• 1% zinc Low Copper Amalgam High Copper Am • Compared with low copper alloys, this have become a material of choice. • Improved mechanical properties • Corrosion resistance • Better marginal integrity • Imroved performance in clinical trials High Copper Am Admixed• 2 types • “Blended” , “admix”, or “dispersion” • These are called admixed alloys• Admixed as they contain atleast 2 kinds• Single composition of particles • Am made from these powders is stronger than am made from lathe cut low copper powder, bec• Both types contain more than 6 wt % copper of inc in residual alloy particles and resultant dec in matrix • Silver-copper particles as well as the AgSn paricles probably act as strong fillers in Am. 4
  5. 5. 3/5/2012 Spherical High Copper Amalgams Particle Shape• Unlike admixed, each particle of these alloy • Lathe cut alloy powders have the same chemical composition  Formed by shaving particles from a block of the alloy by a• Thus , single composition alloys lathe• Single composition, high copper, spherical • Spherical  Formed by spraying molten dental amalgams alloy into an inert gas • Admixed  Mixture of the two .• Have only 1 shape  Alloy maybe made from• The particles are a combination of silver 60 wt different particle shapes to % , tin 27 wt %, copper 13 wt % and other increase packing efficiency and elements reduce amount of Hg needed to obtain a workable mix. Setting Transformation • Alloy + liquid Hg = chemical reaction • Mixture – putty like consistency • Gradually becomes firmer • Working time – the Am can be carved • Initial set – it can’t be carved any more • Once fully set , they are hard , strong and durable Properties of Amalgam Dimensional Change• Dimensional change • Severe contraction leaves marginal gap – initial leakage• Strength • post-operative sensitivity – reduced with corrosion over time• Corrosion  Expansion leads to post operative sensitivity due to pressure• Creep on pulp ADA specification No.1 requires amalgam neither contract or expand more than 20 um/cm Measured at 37 deg between 5 mins and 24 hours after beginning of trituration. Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 5
  6. 6. 3/5/2012 Dimensional Change Effect of Moisture contamination• Net contraction • If a zinc containing low copper, or high copper – type of alloy amalgam is contaminated by moisture during • spherical alloys have more trituration or condensation, a large expansion contraction can take place. – less mercury • after 3-5 days – condensation technique • greater condensation = higher contraction • may continue for months reaching values < 400 um. – trituration time • overtrituration causes higher contraction • DELAYED EXPANSION or SECONDARY EXPANSION Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 Strength Strength• Develops slowly • High compressive strength – 1 hr: 40 to 60% of maximum • Low tensile and shear strength – 24 hrs: 90% of maximum • Therefore• Spherical alloys strengthen faster • Am MUST be supported by tooth structure – require less mercury • Am needs sufficient bulk ( 1.5 or more)• Weak in thin sections – unsupported edges fracture Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 Corrosion Creep • Reduces strength • Slow deformation of amalgam placed under a constant load • Seals margins – load less than that necessary to produce fracture • Gamma 2 dramatically affects creep rate – slow strain rates produces plastic deformation • allows gamma-1 grains to slide • Correlates with marginal breakdown Sutow J Dent Res 1991 Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 6
  7. 7. 3/5/2012 Clinical performance of Am Creep Restoration• Slow change in shape • Small amt of leakage under amalgam is unique• caused by compression • Properly inserted – leakage decreases as restoration ages• High-copper amalgams have • Corrosion products form along the interface creep resistance between the tooth and the resto – prevention of gamma-2 phase Minimal Mercury Technique Mercury/alloy ratio Eames Technique• Historically, the only way to achieve smooth and • Most obvious method for reducing mercury plastic mixes was to use mercury considerably in content is to reduce the original mercury/ alloy excess of that desirable in final restoration. ratio.• For convenional mercury –added systems, 2 • Sufficient mercury must be present in the original techniques were employed to remove excess mix to provide a coherent and plastic mass after mercury trituration1. Removal of excess mercury was accomplished by • But low enough so that the mercury content is at squeezing or wringing themixed amalgam in a an acceptable level without the need to remove squeeze cloth an appreciable amt during condensation2. Additional excess mercury was worked to top • Mercury content of finished should be about 50% during condensation of each increment wt% with lesser amt for spherical alloy Proportioning Proportioning• Recommended mercury / alloy ratio for most • Mercury / alloy dispensers modern lathe cut alloy is approx 1:1 or 50% • Preweighed pellets or tablets mercury • Liquid mercury dispenser spherical alloys its closer to 42% mercury• Proper proportioning = proper mix 7
  8. 8. 3/5/2012 Proportioning Trituration• Disposable amalgam capsules• Preportioned mercury Trituration• OBJECTIVEs : • Sphrerical or irregular low copper alloy – low speed• To provide a proper amalgamation of mercury and • High copper – high speed alloy• Achieve a workable mass at a minimum time • AMALGAMATOR Speed:• Reduce particle size leading to faster and more • Low – 3200-3400 cycles/min complete amalgamation • Medium – 3700-3800 cycles/min • High – 4000-4400 cycles/min• Capsules serves as mortar • INCREASED TRITURATION TIME = DECREASED• a cylindrical metal or plastic piston serves as the pestle WORKING AND SETTING TIME Dentist-Controlled Variables • Manipulation – trituration – condensation – burnishing – polishing 8
  9. 9. 3/5/2012 Trituration Mercury content • Mixing time • Sufficient mercury should be mixed with the – refer to manufacturer alloy to coat the alloy particles and to allow a recommendations thorough amalgamation. • Overtrituration – “hot” mix • Each particle of the alloy must be wet by the • sticks to capsule mercury; otherwise a dry , granular mix results – decreases working / setting time – slight increase in setting contraction • Any excess of mercury left in the restoration • Undertrituration can produce a marked reduction in strength – grainy, crumbly mix  Properly triturated – warm, smoth- max strength , smooth Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003 Condensation Hand Condensation • GOAL: • Never touch with bare hands • To compact the alloy into the prepared cavity • Gloves so that greatest possibitlity of density is attained • Immediatley condensed once inserted in the cavity • Mercury rich layer is brought to the surface of the restoration, so that successiv elayers bond • With sufficient pressure to each other • Ave force applied: 13.3-17.8 N or (3-4 lb) • A fresh amalgam mix should be condensed within 3-4 mins Condensation Carving and Finishing• All amalgams except spherical alloys are • Reproduce proper tooth anatomy condensed by small condensers to reduce voids • Immediately after condensation • After carving = SMOOTHED by.. BURNISHING• Spherical alloys: large increments and condensers to fill entire cavity. • Burnish the surface and margins • After , it will still be rough at a microscopic level • FINAL POLISHING – after 24 hours 9
  10. 10. 3/5/2012 Side Effects of mercury Allergy• Am restoration is possible bec of mercury. • Antibody – antigen reaction • Itching,• The use of mercury has raised concerns as • Rashes well as alleged side effects that may be • Sneezing sustained by patients who received amalgam • Difficulty in breathing restorations • Swelling • Contact Dermatitis or Coombs’Type IV hypersensitivity • But these are experienced by less tha 1% of treated population. Toxicity Toxicity• It is still thought that mercury toxocity from • The most significant contribution to mercury dental restoration is cause of certain undiagnosed assimilation from dental amalgamis illnesses • VAPOR PHASE • Encounter is brief• And a real hazard may exist for dentists and • Mercury vapor amt – NO EFFECT level dental assistants when mercury vapor is inhaled • The threshold value for mercury industry workers- during mixing and placement of amalgam. • 350 -500 ug per dya ( 40 hr /wk)• Improvements in encapsulation technology, scrap • Patients get far below the values by US federal got storage, elimination of carpets and other mercury • Max level occupational exposure (safe) 50 um per retention sites cubic meter of air per day Potential hazards form mercury can be reduced by:• Mercury in blood • Well ventilated Operatory• Patients w/ Am – 0.7 ng/ml• Patients w/o Am- 0.3 ng/ml • Well sealed containers ( Am scraps, capsules)• 1 saltwater meal per wk raised mercury level in blood : • Proper disposals• From 2.3 to 5.1 ng/ml • Spilled mercury- cleaned up as soon as posiible• Daily normal intake of Hg:• 15 um – food • Mercury suppressant powders• 1 ug – air • If comes in contact with skin – wash with soap• 0.4 ug - water and H2O 10

×