Creative and cultural clusters

1,677 views

Published on

Clusters in creative industries are believed to be completely different than clusters from other industries. This pe

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,677
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
52
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Creative and cultural clusters

  1. 1. Clusters in Creative Industries in EuropeDevelopment of a framework to measure outcomes and impact ofcreative cluster initativesDr. Sonja Kind, Dr. Gerd Meier zu Köckeriit – Institute for Innovation and TechnologyBerlin, September 6th 2012
  2. 2. Agenda• Presentation• Workshop 2
  3. 3. Sources of Innovation External Sources Internal Sources Source: IBM CEO Study 3
  4. 4. Added-values Provided by the Cluster Approach• Bundling regional competences of industry, academia and policy• Matching with internal or external partners• Stimulation of innovations processes between different actors• Collaborative product development / technology transfer• Project fund acquisition / fund raising• Information and experience exchange between the members• Training, education and recruiting• Support regarding internationalisation• Entrepreneurial supportThese added-values are especially relevant for SMEs 4 4
  5. 5. Main Types of Actors Gathered in a Cluster 5
  6. 6. Main Level of Intervention 6 Source: VDI/VDE-IT 2010
  7. 7. Current Trends in European Cluster PolicyCluster management organisations can considerably increase the impact of the clusterapproach Cluster management excellence is high on the agenda within Europe 7
  8. 8. The EU Strives towards a „New Strategy for Globally CompetitiveClusters and Networks“Current discussion on cluster management excellence in EuropeCluster managements play a decisive Key factors to stimulate cluster excellencerole for the cluster‘s success The key is an excellent cluster management•Relevance of the cluster managementhas been underestimated over years • Existence and implementation of a strategy for the further development of the cluster•After having initiated many cluster • Provision of professional servicesinitiatives recent years, the EU now is that address the needs of the clusterfocussing on improving the excellence members through the clusterof clusters. management • Sustainable financing of the cluster management organisation and appropriate staffing of the organisation Source: ECEI 8
  9. 9. Active Cluster Managements Tend to Provide Higher Impact onCompetitiveness of SME 9
  10. 10. Aim of the Study• To describe and compare clusters in cultural and creative industries with clusters from other industries• To develop a framework to measure outcomes and impact of cluster initiatives in the field of creative and cultural industries (CCI) throughout Europe.Working thesis• On one hand CCI clusters have some specific key features – like clusters in industries, too. On the other side CCI cluster are similar to other clusters.• Currently available frameworks to measure output, outcome and impact of non-CCI clusters are applicable to clusters from CCI (with minor adjustments). 10
  11. 11. Developing a Framework to Measure Outcomes and Impact ofClusters in the Field of Creative and Cultural Industries (CCI) 11
  12. 12. Developing a Framework to Measure Outcomes and Impact ofClusters in the Field of Creative and Cultural Industries (CCI) Describing and comparing clusters in cultural and creative industries with clusters from other industries 12
  13. 13. Key Issues and Challenges to stimulate CCI clusters Cross-cutting nature Work forms and business models Innovation Access to financing CCI Framework conditions Key issues and challenges… Main drivers Industry and Business structure …each of which are• Interdependency between major characteristic to CCI • Intrinsic motivation to create and small enterprises idealistic goals• High share of small businesses but not necessarily • Less profit-oriented and lack of• High share of freelancer exclusive. business orientation • Non-linear employment histories• High share of semi-professionals• High share of women 13
  14. 14. Comparison of CCI to non-CCI Clusters- Similarities and Differences -• Data sets were taken from a Pan-European cluster database, containing more than 250 Clusters (incl. 16 CCIs)• Internationally recognised indicators were used to describe and compare clusters and their organisations 14
  15. 15. Selection of CCI Clusters Regarded in the Benchmarking Portfolio CCI Cluster Country Cluster Druck und Printmedien Germany Cluster audiovisuelle Medien Germany Baden-Württemberg Connected e.V. Germany Virtual Dimension Center Fellbach Germany Innovative Experiences Norway DIGIBUSINESS Finland Finland InViO - Innovation network for knowledge-based experience economy Denmark Animation Hub Denmark Danish Sound Technology Network Denmark Innovation Network for Lifestyle, Home and Clothing Denmark Mazovian Printing and Advertising Cluster - COLOURFUL VALLEY Poland Total number of CCI cluster data available for the comparative investigations: 16 15
  16. 16. Are They really Different? Comparison of CCI to non-CCI Clusters. Is it possible to adapt and apply the same frameworks for evaluation and impact assessment of clusters from other industries to CCI clusters? Or does the specificity and diversity of CCI demand for unique or even individual frameworks for each CCI sector? Our analysis aimed at the comparison of CCI clusters to other clusters: • What do clusters in CCI have in common with clusters from other industries? • If they are different, in what respect do they differ? • Are there any patterns, which are more characteristic for clusters from CCI? • Does the cluster management of clusters in CCI clusters operate differently compared to cluster managements from other industries? 16
  17. 17. Results of cluster comparison 17
  18. 18. Survey of some Structural Factors of Clusters Structural Creative Materials/ Biotech ICT Food Production Average Factors Industries Chemistry Year of the cluster 2006 2005 2004 2003 2005 2003 2005 management’s emergence Number of committed 75 70 95 80 90 60 70 members / key actors Regional concentration 75 % 96 % 90 % 80 % 75 % 90 % 90 % Driving force within the 4,0 2,85 3,62 3,82 3,81 4,0 3,72 cluster1 Degree of specialization of the 3,4 2,8 2,7 3,5 3,4 2,8 n. a. cluster2 Legal form of the cluster3 88 % 88 % 77 % 55 % 83 % 72 % 77 % Decentralised governance 38 % 31 % 60 % 33 % 27 % 44 % 38 % Public funding rate of the 62 % 88 % 66 % 64 % 60 % 50 % 61 % cluster management Strategy and strategic 4,4 3,3 4,6 3,8 4,7 4,6 4,1 planning of the cluster4 Number of values clearly 2 5 2 1 2 1 2 diverging from the average1 Scale 1: only research driven, 2: mainly research driven, 3: half-half, 4: mainly industry driven, 5: only industry driven.2 Scale 1: highly specialised, 2 specialisation given, 3: specialisation partly given, 4: broad scope (specialisation not real given), 5: very broad scope (no specialisation at all).3 Percentage of clusters belonging to a given technological domain having a certain given form. 184 Percentage of clusters having a more decentralised governance in place.
  19. 19. Survey of some Structural Factors of Clusters Structural Creative industries FactorsAge of the cluster CCI clusters do not tend to be younger (or older).managementNumber of committed CCI clusters do not stand out in terms of size. CCI clusters show a slightly higher thanmembers / key actors average number of committed participants. CCI Clusters differ with regard to someregionally agglomerated than other clusters.Regional concentration CCI clusters are significantly less structural factors,Driving force but only in some regards that are not limited to CCI within the CCI clusters are strongly driven by industry partners.clusterDegree of specialization of CCI clusters do not tend to be particularly specialized.the clusterLegal form of the cluster CCI clusters strongly tend to a dedicated legal form.Decentralised governance CCI clusters slightly tend towards more centralized governance structures.Public funding rate of the CCI clusters receive an average amount of public money compared to other clusters.cluster management They are neither more nor less dependent from public money than others.Strategy and strategic CCI clusters put strong emphasis on strategy development and its implementation (asplanning of the cluster the majority of the other clusters does).Number of values clearly CCI clusters diverge in only two aspects (the average is two, biotech clusters divergeddiverging from the average in five aspects). 19
  20. 20. Pattern of Main Objectives of Clusters from Different Industries 20
  21. 21. Example: Intensity and Spectrum of Services is SimilarIntensity of services in service categories offered by cluster managementorganisations (high index values stand for high intensity of services offered) Acquisition of external funds 4.00 3.50 Composite Service 3.00 Indicator Collaborative products and Internationalisation 2.50 technology development 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Matchmaking and networking with Information and experience external partners exchange -internal- Entrepreneurial support Human development Biotechnology New Materials and chemistry Production and engineering Information and communication Food industry (non-biotech) Creative Industries 21
  22. 22. CCI Cluster Managements only Show some Unique PatternsSummary of comparing cluster management services 22
  23. 23. WorkshopDeveloping a framework to measure outcomes and impact ofclusters in the field of creative and cultural industries (CCI) 23
  24. 24. What Can Be Measured / AssessedCluster actors Framework Conditions• Intensity of co-operation - Coherence and objectives of cluster• Competitiveness policy• Turnover / profit / employees - Economic and structural framework conditions• Innovation capabilities - Links between cluster policy and• Internationalization other innovation support measures• …… - …. Performance of cluster organisations -Strategy and implementation -Main objective and how to be fulfilled -Staff -Financial sustainability -Services and added values -….. 24 Source: VDI/VDE-IT 2010
  25. 25. ECEI – European Cluster Management Excellence Initiative Development of indicators for assessing the cluster management Excellence Working Group 2 European Commission www.cluster-excellence.eu Enterprise and Industry 25
  26. 26. Key Dimension to Assess Cluster Managements According to ECEI STRUCTURE OF THE CLUSTER CLUSTER MANAGEMENT, GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGY OF THE CLUSTER ORGANISATION FINANCING OF CLUSTER ORGANISATION SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CLUSTER ORGANISATION (SPECTRUM AND INTENSITY) CONTACT AND INTERACTION WITH RELEVANT PLAYERS ACHIEVEMENTS AND RECOGNITION OF THE CLUSTER ORGANISATION 26
  27. 27. Key Dimensions and Indicators I/III Dimension: STRUCTURE OF THE CLUSTER • Age of the cluster organisation • Legal form of the cluster organisation • Nature of the cluster: driving forces • Nature of the cluster: degree of specialisation • Composition of the cluster participants (committed participants) • Geographical concentration of the cluster participants (committed participants) • Utilisation of regional growth potential • International participants of the cluster • Nature of cooperation between cluster participants Dimension: CLUSTER MANAGEMENT, GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGY OF THE CLUSTER ORGANI- SATION • Clear definition of the roles of the cluster manager / implementation of a governing body / degree of involvement of the participants of the cluster in the decision making • Number of cluster participants per employee (full-time equivalents) of the cluster organisation • Human resource competences and development in the cluster organisation • Strategic planning and implementation processes • Thematic and geographical priorities of the cluster strategy 27
  28. 28. Key Dimensions and Indicators II/III Dimension: FINANCING OF THE CLUSTER MANAGEMENT • Share of different financial sources (public funding, chargeable services, membership fees and other private sources) in the total budget of the cluster organisation in relation to the age of the cluster • Financial sustainability of the cluster organisation Dimension: SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CLUSTER ORGANISATION (SPECTRUM AND INTENSITY) • Acquisition of third party funding • Collaborative technology development, technology transfer or R&D without third party funding • Matchmaking and exchange of experience among participants • Development of human resources • Development of entrepreneurship • Matchmaking and networking with external partners / promotion of cluster location • Internationalisation of cluster participants Dimension: CONTACTS AND INTERACTION WITH RELEVANT PLAYERS • Regular contacts with cluster participants • Integration of the cluster management organization in the local and national system of innovation • Customer and membership satisfaction 28
  29. 29. Key Dimensions and Indicators III/III Dimension: ACHIEVEMENTS AND RECOGNITION OF THE CLUSTER ORGANISATION • Number of external cooperation requests received by the cluster organisation • Institutional origin of external cooperation requests • Geographical origin of external cooperation requests • Characteristics of cooperation with other international clusters • Visibility in the press • Impact of the work of the cluster organisation on R&D activities of the cluster participants • Impact of the work of the cluster organisation on business activities of the cluster participants • Impact of the business-oriented services of the cluster organisation on SME participants • Degree of internationalisation of cluster participants • Effect of the work of the cluster organisation on international activities of the cluster participants 29
  30. 30. Developing a Framework to Measure Outcomes and Impact ofClusters in the Field of Creative and Cultural Industries (CCI) 30
  31. 31. Group Working: Assessing the Suitability of Existing IndicatorsExample Procedure •Each of you has 3 green and 3 red stickers which should be sticked on the flip charts. •The stickers are considered for rating: • green = indicator is well applicable for CCI cluster issues • red = indicator seems not to be suitable for CCI cluster issues Rating Indicators / criteria + - Cluster Management, Governance and Structure Number of cluster participants per employee (full-time equivalents) of the cluster organisation 31
  32. 32. Group Working: Assessing the Suitability of Existing Indicators Set of indicators asessing •cluster policy Cluster policy •the coherence and objectives of cluster policy •the strategy and future design of cluster policy •the objectives of clusters and cluster managenements •the performance of cluster managements Cluster initiatives and cluster management •the impact of cluster initiatives and cluster managements 32
  33. 33. Thank you very much for your attention! 33

×