Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

MJH STaR Chart

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

MJH STaR Chart

  1. 1. By Constance McGuire
  2. 2. <ul><li>STaR Chart </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Who, What, When </li></ul></ul><ul><li>STaR Chart at MJH </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Results </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Trends </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Goals & Objectives </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Summary </li></ul><ul><ul><li>TX STaR Chart allows us to….. </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. <ul><li>Teachers </li></ul><ul><li>Campuses </li></ul><ul><li>Districts </li></ul>
  4. 4. <ul><li>Teachers </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Complete online survey, annually </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Helps determine professional growth </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. <ul><li>Campuses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Accumulation of teacher results </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Helps determine funding/budget </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vision alignment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Each element can be rate as Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, or Target Tech </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. <ul><li>Districts </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Determine need for grants </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Determine need for resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vision alignment </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. <ul><li>Measures progress of integration of technology into the curriculum </li></ul><ul><li>Supports No Child Left Behind, Title II, Part D </li></ul><ul><li>Aligned with Texas Long Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020 </li></ul><ul><li>Supported by State Board of Education Certification </li></ul><ul><li>What?? </li></ul>
  8. 8. <ul><li>Annually </li></ul><ul><li>Voluntary </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2004-2005 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2005-2006 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Required </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Start of 2006-2007 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Teachers must take survey! </li></ul></ul><ul><li>When?? </li></ul>
  9. 10. <ul><li>Trends? </li></ul><ul><li>Goals & Objectives? </li></ul><ul><li>Let’s look at the graph!! </li></ul>2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 Teaching & Learning (T & L) 15 14 14 Educator Preparation & Development (EP) 13 11 11 Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support (LAIS) 15 15 11 Infrastructure for Technology (I for T) 15 19 20
  10. 12. <ul><li>Trends? </li></ul><ul><li>Goals & Objectives? </li></ul>
  11. 13. <ul><li>Trends? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Increase in Infrastructure for Technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Decrease in all other areas over time </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Weakest area is Educator Preparation & Development </li></ul></ul>
  12. 14. <ul><li>Goals and Objectives? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Increase all areas to Target Tech status </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Allocate budget for technology professional development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Allocate time for teacher preparation for integration of technology into curriculum </li></ul></ul>
  13. 15. <ul><li>Compare growth over time </li></ul><ul><li>Align curriculum with Long Range Plan </li></ul><ul><li>Comply with NCLB </li></ul><ul><li>Set goals and objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Align campus and district technology plan </li></ul><ul><li>Allocate appropriate resources for technology </li></ul>