Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Published on
Publishing the results of one’s research is an integral
part of the scientific process, yet scholarly journals are
often seen as black boxes by researchers. What happens to a
paper after it is submitted? Who is deciding on its fate?
What is the role of the journal editor and the editorial
office? How does the peer-review process work, and are its
core principles still relevant in today’s changing
publishing landscape? In this talk, I will endeavor to
discuss these and other aspects of scientific publishing
from a journal editor’s perspective, and I’ll share my
experience going from the research lab to the “other side”
of scientific publishing.
(Previous Version of this talk also online in slideshare. Few updates on current role of scholarly journal & alternative peer-review models)
Login to see the comments