Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 36 Ad

More Related Content

Similar to The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work (20)

More from Mark Brown (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work

  1. 1. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Mark Brown Eamon Costello & Prajakta (Lily) Girme 8th December 2022 The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work
  2. 2. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash “Quality is an elusive term for which there is a wide variety of interpretations depending upon the views of different stakeholders.” (Schindler, et al., 2015, p. 4) The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work
  3. 3. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash What does a quality student learning experience look like in the post COVID-19 digital era? BIG question… The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work
  4. 4. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash • What QA standards and processes are required for blended, hybrid and online learning? Three sub-questions… The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work
  5. 5. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash • What QA standards and processes are required for blended, hybrid and online learning? • Are our existing QA standards sufficient? Three sub-questions… The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work
  6. 6. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash • What QA standards and processes are required for blended, hybrid and online learning? • Are our existing QA standards sufficient? • Do they need to differ from those already in place for more traditional delivery modes? Three sub-questions… The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work
  7. 7. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash • Quality concerns are not new • Delivery mode is not the key factor • Definition wars are largely unproductive The Quality Challenge of Digital Education: Enabling [Tertiary] Education Providers to Make it Work Three assumptions…
  8. 8. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Quality concerns are not new… https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/why-we-need-to-reconsider-the-value-of-the-virtual-classroom-1.4059247 Oct 2019
  9. 9. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash 2002 2004 2005 Quality concerns are not new…
  10. 10. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Delivery mode is not the key factor… https://eddl.tru.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/PreparingDigitalUniversity-George-Siemens.pdf 2015 “Distance education, when properly planned, designed, and supported by the appropriate mix of technology and pedagogy, is equivalent to, or in certain scenarios more effective than, traditional face-to-face classroom instruction” (p. 11). 2004
  11. 11. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Delivery mode is not the key factor… “The overarching paradox is that online and distance education systems with their digital content and the persistent record of online transactions provide a rich source of evidence to enable quality assurance and audit processes. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2015/10879/pdf/Ossiannilsson_et_al_2015_Qualitymodels.pdf
  12. 12. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Delivery mode is not the key factor… “The overarching paradox is that online and distance education systems with their digital content and the persistent record of online transactions provide a rich source of evidence to enable quality assurance and audit processes. If open and distance learning were the current dominant mode of Higher Education… the challenge would lie in how to quality assure a form of education in which interactions at the core of the system were ephemeral, highly dependent on personal interpretation by the teacher and student and seldom directly monitored” (Ossiannilsson, et al., 2015, p. 16). https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2015/10879/pdf/Ossiannilsson_et_al_2015_Qualitymodels.pdf
  13. 13. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Definition wars are largely unproductive… “Importantly, the learner’s location is a key determinant in naming the mode” (Johnson, Seaman & Poulin, 2022, p. 106) https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/3565 On-campus Off-campus
  14. 14. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Definition wars are largely unproductive… K I S S On-campus Off-campus
  15. 15. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash QA / QE Processes Resources I n p u t s O u t p u t s Gap Digital Education - Macro-Level - Meso-Level - Micro-Level - Nano-Level • Multifaced and multifunctional • Highly contextualised • Institutions are central • Owned & distributed across institutions • Conversational, shares experiences and involves feedback loops • Dynamic as part of a living and thriving quality culture Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash The Quality Challenge of Digital Education
  16. 16. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash • EUA Digi-HE Project • OECD Digital HE Project • QQI QA Statutory Guidelines Project The Quality Challenge of Digital Education Three QA initiatives…
  17. 17. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash 2021 https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/digi-he%20desk%20research%20report.pdf
  18. 18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923647.2018.1417658 • An abundance of QA frameworks • Many common dimensions shared across the different QA frameworks • Absence of output measures of QA Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Only 12%
  19. 19. 2022 Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/digital-higher-education_f622f257-en
  20. 20. • Online education: teaching and learning predominantly takes place off-campus, either synchronously or asynchronously, or in combination. • Hybrid education: teaching and learning involves a mix of on-campus and off-campus study, with some synchronous online delivery. • Blended education: teaching and learning predominantly takes place on-campus through face-to-face study with some asynchronous delivery. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash
  21. 21. Including Ireland Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash
  22. 22. https://mfhea.mt/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Guidelines-for-FHEI-V1.pdf Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash
  23. 23. (Brown, 2022) Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash • Lack of Implementation Guide • Lack of Action Plan • Limited research on whether they are used by institutions and if so, how • Lack of alignment with mainstream QA requirements
  24. 24. Most Common Least Common (Brown, 2022) Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Aggregated summary…
  25. 25. Closing the evaluation loop by giving data back Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash
  26. 26. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash 2018
  27. 27. https://digitelpro.eadtu.eu/images/IO5A1_Student_Readiness_for_Digital_Learning_Literature_Review_FINAL_250822_1.pdf Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash
  28. 28. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash What in a single word is the most important quality consideration that you would like to see in the new QQI guidelines?
  29. 29. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash What else is missing? Gap analysis…
  30. 30. Photo by Tom Pottiger on Unsplash Where to from here… Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash
  31. 31. Photo by Tom Pottiger on Unsplash Where to from here… Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash To Make it W ork 2021
  32. 32. Photo by Tom Pottiger on Unsplash 2018 2022 Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Where to from here…
  33. 33. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Where to from here… What does a quality student learning experience look like in the post COVID-19 digital era?
  34. 34. Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash Where to from here… Chocolate is always the answer no matter what the question!
  35. 35. Key references Staring, F., Brown, M., Bacsich, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2022). Digital higher education: Emerging quality standards, practices and supports, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 281, OECD Publishing, Paris,https://doi.org/10.1787/f622f257-en. Volungevičienė, A., Brown, M., Greenspon, R., Gaebel, M., & Morrisroe, A. (2021). Developing a High-Performance Digital Education System: Institutional Self-Assessment Instruments. European University Association, Brussels. Beirne, E., Mac Lochlainn, C., Brown, M., & Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M. (2022). Student readiness for online learning: A systematic literature review. Report published for DigiTel Pro, European Assoication for Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU), Maastricht, The Netherlands. Simunich, B., E. McMahon, L. Hopf, B. Altman and W. Alicia Zimmerman (2021), “Creating a Culture of Online Quality: The People, Policies, and Processes that Facilitate Institutional Change for Online Course Quality Assurance”, American Journal of Distance Education, DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2021.2010021 Ossiannilsson, E., K. Williams, A. Camilleri and M. Brown (2015), Quality models in online and open education around the globe: State of the art and recommendations. International Council for Open and Distance Education, Oslo, Norway. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557055.pdf Esfijani, A. (2018), “Measuring quality in online education: A metasynthesis”, American Journal of Distance Education, 32/1, pp. 57- 73, DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2018.1417658
  36. 36. Go raibh maith agaibh! Thank you Photo by Rae Wallis on Unsplash

×