Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

A Question of Leadership: The Positioning of University Micro-credentials

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 20 Ad

More Related Content

Similar to A Question of Leadership: The Positioning of University Micro-credentials (20)

More from Mark Brown (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

A Question of Leadership: The Positioning of University Micro-credentials

  1. 1. The Positioning of University Micro-credentials Rory McGreal, Mark Brown, Don Olcott Jr. & Tim Read https://www.deviantart.com/tag/loneranger Athens, 20th October 2022
  2. 2. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Some images fair dealing or fair use
  3. 3. • Are micro-credentials right for my university? 2. What type of leadership and internal structures are required? 3. What business models and development strategies are required? 1. If so, how do you plan to strategically position them? 2022
  4. 4. 1. How do you plan to strategically position them?
  5. 5. 1. How do you plan to strategically position them? Greece EU Average What are your strategic drivers?
  6. 6. 1. How do you plan to strategically position them? Where do they fit?
  7. 7. 2. What type of leadership and internal structures are required?
  8. 8. Laissez-faire Transactional Transformative Effectiveness Engagement Who should be leading? ? 2. What type of leadership and internal structures are required?
  9. 9. • Mainstreams • Part of normal work • Strong alignment to macro-credentials NEW STRUCTURES WEAKNESSES ESTABLISH A PROFESSIONAL AND CONTINUING EDUCATION UNIT WHAT ARE YOUR OPTIONS? S O W T CREATE A COMPLETELY SEPARATE STANDALONE BUSINESS UNIT INCORPORATE INTO A CENTRAL ONLINE EDUCATION SUPPORT UNIT INTEGRATE INTO THE NORMAL FACULTY STRUCTURES AND DELIVERY MODEL STRENGTHS CURRENT STRUCTURES • Less flexibility • Added workload • Limited disruption to normal business • Greater coordination • Builds on current expertise • Reduced burden placed on academic staff STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES • Less flexibility • Added workload • Limited disruption to normal business • Specialist services • Clear business owner • Common business and resource allocation model WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS • Faculty disconnect • Leveraging industry links • Weaker nexus between research and teaching • Greater flexibility • Adopts a commercial business model • Easier to establish return on investment WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS • Little cross subsidisation • Outside of normal business • Loss of academic ownership H3 Innovation H1 Innovation H1 Innovation H2 Innovation How do you decide? 2. What type of leadership and internal structures are required?
  10. 10. 3. What business models and development strategies are required?
  11. 11. https://www.icde.org/publications-and-resources How well are they informed by the literature? 3. What business models and development strategies are required? Fixed Core
  12. 12. (Presant, 2020) 3. What business models and development strategies are required?
  13. 13. Sole Unit Sole Institution Peer Consortium NGO Led Industry Led OPM Led What models are you using or plan to implement and how successful are they? 3. What business models and development strategies are required? (Presant, 2020) Other
  14. 14. • What are the risks? • What could possibly go wrong? • Do you need to plan for an exit strategy? And… 3. What business models and development strategies are required?
  15. 15. Final comment…
  16. 16. Final comment… Entangled micro-credential discourses… Brown, 2022
  17. 17. Thank you Rory and Mark

×