Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Millions of jobless Americans will soon be left without benefits

270 views

Published on

  • My personal experience with research paper writing services was highly positive. I sent a request to ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐ and found a writer within a few minutes. Because I had to move house and I literally didn’t have any time to sit on a computer for many hours every evening. Thankfully, the writer I chose followed my instructions to the letter. I know we can all write essays ourselves. For those in the same situation I was in, I recommend ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Millions of jobless Americans will soon be left without benefits

  1. 1. Current Event Article Choices Due Date: November 19, 2010 Article #1: From USA Today, November 11, 2010. Unions tell pilots to avoid body scanners at airports By Alan Levin, USA TODAY Pilot unions at two of the nation's largest airlines are advising their members not to submit to body scanners at airport security checkpoints as tension grows over what they see as intrusive or risky checks. Unions representing pilots at American Airlines and US Airways have advised their more than 14,000 members to avoid the scanners, which peer beneath clothing, and instead get a pat down from Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officers. That has created additional problems as some pilots have complained that the hand searches, which were altered by TSA starting Nov. 1, are invasive. One US Airways pilot said he felt as though he had been "sexually molested" by the pat down, said Mike Cleary, president of the US Airline Pilots Association. "Our members are just absolutely outraged," Cleary said. David Bates, president of American's Allied Pilots Association, said the TSA hand search is "a demeaning experience," but he also is urging his members to avoid the scanners. The unions have told members to ask that the pat downs be done in private. The unions argue that the machines are "intrusive" and that they could emit dangerous radiation. A recent Food and Drug Administration review found that the radiation level was so low — some machines emit no radiation — that it posed no health threat. The nation's largest pilot's union, the Air Line Pilots Association, is working with the TSA to find alternative screening methods but has not told members to avoid the scanners, President John Prater said. The controversy is the latest flare-up in a long battle by pilots to streamline or eliminate the screening they receive. They argue that if they receive background checks, they should be able to enter the airport without undergoing security checks. The TSA has tested such a program, but it is currently not funded. Prater says he is calling on airline CEOs and the government to pay for it. Not all security experts support giving pilots or other airline employees special dispensation at security checkpoints.
  2. 2. The TSA issued a statement saying its security measures must consider "our enemy is creative and willing to go to great lengths to evade detection." TSA Administrator John Pistole has been reviewing security policies since taking office recently and is discussing alternatives with pilots, the statement said. Article #2: From The Economist (economist.com) November 11, 2010 (No Author) Millions of jobless Americans will soon be left without benefits AFTER a summer of idling, America’s job-creation machine spluttered back into life in October. The economy added 151,000 jobs last month, its best performance since May. Private job growth rose even more, by 159,000, compensating for a continued decline in government payrolls. But the October surge was not enough to bring down America’s 9.6% unemployment rate. As a result, it looks as though severe joblessness will outlive the programmes intended to address it. America’s recession, a post-war record in terms of length and depth, has left the country with unprecedented long-term unemployment. In October 6.2m people were listed as having been out of work for more than six months, and the average duration of unemployment now stands at 34 weeks, well above the previous post-war record of 20.5 weeks. Government unemployment benefits keep up living standards among the jobless, and so help stabilise a weak economy by bolstering consumer demand. But America’s unemployment-insurance system can no longer cope with a problem of this size. Benefits normally last for just six months. When unemployment is high, extended benefits kick in, adding an additional 13 to 20 weeks of benefits, varying by state. During recessions the federal government will often go further. Thus in June 2008 Congress authorised a big package of emergency benefits, which now cover workers in 27 hard-hit states (those with unemployment rates above 8%) for up to 99 weeks. In the wake of a “normal” recession, that would be more than enough time for workers to find new jobs. This one has not been normal. The economy is still running 7.5m jobs short of its previous peak. A growing number of people are exhausting their unemployment benefits without finding new work. The problem will worsen sharply this winter, as the bulge of 5m workers who lost their jobs in the months after the financial meltdown of autumn 2008 notch up 99 weeks of unemployment. And in April, the emergency benefits all expire anyway. Congress has debated but failed to address the challenge posed by “the 99ers”. Republicans blocked in September the last serious effort to add a new tier of benefits beyond 99 weeks. Congress has been required regularly to reauthorise even the existing extra benefits and, with each renewal, passage has been harder. In February Jim Bunning, a Republican
  3. 3. senator from Kentucky, forced a delay to the renewal. When the deadline next came up, in early June, Congress at first failed to reapprove the programme, leaving 2.5m people without benefits for a time. Yet another showdown looms at the end of this month. Democrats may try to squeeze through a reauthorisation of the benefits in the “lame- duck” session between now and the end of the year, but Republicans, flushed from November’s electoral victories, are unlikely to give their support. Time is short, and other priorities, such as extending George Bush’s tax cuts, may come first. Republicans argue that benefits discourage people from seeking work, although economists at the Federal Reserve attribute less than one percentage point of the unemployment rate to this effect. Meanwhile, the National Employment Law Project estimates that 2m workers may lose their benefits by the end of the year. The total could rise to 4m by the end of April, when the existing emergency benefits programme expires and those still enrolled in it face the termination of their benefits. That will be bad for the economy, as well as the unemployed. Those without jobs or benefits may not show up on the monthly unemployment count: but they still suffer, and still spend a lot less.

×