Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Twyfords
Collaborative Governance Pathway
1st August, 2014
A new way for leaders and the ‘community of interest’ to
do bus...
Typical ‘Complex’ Scenarios
• No agreement on the scope of the plan
• Lots of uncertainty, disagreement around the data
• ...
“No one entity alone – no individual government (local,
state, or national), corporation, or NGO – can address
the sustain...
Collaboration moves beyond shared agreements to
become a process of shared creation – the groups should
create an understa...
"In these adaptive cases (ie complex
situations), reaching an effective solution
required learning by the stakeholders inv...
… deciding what can be influenced by the
community and what can’t
… determining the scope of the collaboration
collectivel...
Catherine Howe, @curiousc,
via Twitter, 31st July, 2014
Complex multidisciplinary
working
Unlock collective wisdom
Develop...
Reverse logic
Stakeholders support implementation
8
Stakeholders co-develop the strategy or plan
Stakeholders agree how th...
Collaborative Governance
Practical tools for
the process
• A decision-maker
commitment
statement
• A Complexitometer
• Appreciative
stakeholder map...
Iterative nature of Collaborative Governance
Commitment to Collaboration
Co-
define
Co-
design
Co-
create
Co-
deliver
13
“Leaders do not need to know all the
answers. They do need to ask the right
questions!”
Ronald A. Heifetz and Donald L. La...
Twyfords collaborative governance pathway; when business as usual is never likely to get you there with a complex situation.
Twyfords collaborative governance pathway; when business as usual is never likely to get you there with a complex situation.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Twyfords collaborative governance pathway; when business as usual is never likely to get you there with a complex situation.

1,259 views

Published on

So what is involved in approaching something wickedly complex and involves many stakeholders with deeply held differing perspectives? Check out this presentation and consider whether the time is right to do something quite different. It might seem risky, but in our experience it is the least risky approach you could take.

Published in: Business

Twyfords collaborative governance pathway; when business as usual is never likely to get you there with a complex situation.

  1. 1. Twyfords Collaborative Governance Pathway 1st August, 2014 A new way for leaders and the ‘community of interest’ to do business together on complex planning processes and “wicked problems”
  2. 2. Typical ‘Complex’ Scenarios • No agreement on the scope of the plan • Lots of uncertainty, disagreement around the data • No clear solution • Many perspectives and ways to look at the issues • Political leaders are very anxious • ‘Competing futures’ • Values and ethical considerations important • No clear path forward
  3. 3. “No one entity alone – no individual government (local, state, or national), corporation, or NGO – can address the sustainability issues we face. No one has sufficient resources. No one has sufficient understanding. And no one has sufficient credibility and authority to connect the larger networks of people and organisations that real change must engage.” Peter Senge – The Necessary Revolution
  4. 4. Collaboration moves beyond shared agreements to become a process of shared creation – the groups should create an understanding that didn’t exist previously and couldn’t be arrived at individually. Something is new that wasn’t there before, including transformation among the collaborators. Zorich, Diane, Günter Waibel, and Ricky Erway: 2008. ‘Beyond the Silos of the LAMs: Collaboration Among Libraries, Archives and Museums (PDF)’
  5. 5. "In these adaptive cases (ie complex situations), reaching an effective solution required learning by the stakeholders involved in the problem, who must then change their own behaviour in order to create a solution." Collective Impact- Stanford Social Innovation Review John Kania & Mark Kramer, 2011
  6. 6. … deciding what can be influenced by the community and what can’t … determining the scope of the collaboration collectively … assessing risks that certain interest groups pose to our plan … identifying who has an interest in this plan so we can invite their contribution … providing reasonable opportunities for people to provide feedback or input … co-designing how we will work with the ‘community of interest’ on this challenge … trying to obtain feedback on the merit of various options we are considering … co-creating possible solutions together … considering feedback provided by the community & possibly making changes … deliberating over possible solutions taking into account agreed criteria
  7. 7. Catherine Howe, @curiousc, via Twitter, 31st July, 2014 Complex multidisciplinary working Unlock collective wisdom Develop shared values No one person has the truth We will all have to walk away from the arrogance of professional knowledge and embrace humility in trying to shape a constantly changing reality Collaboration
  8. 8. Reverse logic Stakeholders support implementation 8 Stakeholders co-develop the strategy or plan Stakeholders agree how they will work together Stakeholders co-define what they want to achieve Sponsors believes collaboration is the way to go Stakeholders understand each other’s perspectives
  9. 9. Collaborative Governance
  10. 10. Practical tools for the process • A decision-maker commitment statement • A Complexitometer • Appreciative stakeholder mapping tool • Dilemma definition tool • Governance arrangements • Collaboration design template • Processes for dialogue and deliberation Implementation template with roles and responsibilities
  11. 11. Iterative nature of Collaborative Governance Commitment to Collaboration Co- define Co- design Co- create Co- deliver 13
  12. 12. “Leaders do not need to know all the answers. They do need to ask the right questions!” Ronald A. Heifetz and Donald L. Laurie 1996 ‘The Work of Leadership’ Implications for leaders

×