Conversation with Matt Leighninger - IAP2 Australasia 2012

711 views

Published on

Presentation on online engagement and the need for long-term public participation planning

1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
711
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
32
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • The DDC network includes practitioner organizations, operating foundations, and academic researchers
  • This is the challenge – and opportunity – we all face, no matter what kinds of organizations we lead or belong to
  • Face-to-face and online communication enrich one another; surveys show that online use increases desire for face-to-face communication. Name other partners?
  • Refer to Using Online Tools guide
  • Refer to Using Online Tools guide
  • Refer to Using Online Tools guide
  • Refer to Using Online Tools guide
  • “ Embedded in the DNA of online tools are two values: democracy and transparency”
  • Change slide
  • Show movie here Systems, not just tools
  • E-democracy.org work in Frogtown and Cedar-Riverside
  • Conversation with Matt Leighninger - IAP2 Australasia 2012

    1. 1. A Conversation with Matt Leighninger:Online Tools and Long-term Plans for Engagement IAP2 Australasia October 11, 2012
    2. 2. The Deliberative Democracy Consortium
    3. 3. Slides available at:www.slideshare.net/mattleighninger Guides: http://bit.ly/M1pvMp http://bit.ly/iwjgqn
    4. 4. The big picture: Two impacts of the Internet1. Empowering individual citizens (web, email – wrapped up in other changes)2. Empowering citizengroups (Facebook,Twitter, other socialmedia)
    5. 5. First impact: How have citizens* changed? More educated More skeptical – different attitudes toward authority Have less time to spare Better able to find resources, allies, information* “citizens” = residents, people
    6. 6. Second impact allows for new forms of engagement More sustained Larger, more diverse numbers of people Easier for ‘engagers’ – recruitment doesn’t have to start from scratch More open to ideas from the ‘engaged’ Need joint planning for engagement infrastructure – not just tools
    7. 7. What is not changing Need for face-to-face relationships Need for an overall engagement plan Importance of partnering with other groups, organizations, institutions
    8. 8. Questions or comments?
    9. 9. How much is the Internet changing how you do P2?
    10. 10. Digital divides (plural) Overall, Internet access growing Different people use different hardware Different peoplego to differentplaces on theInternet Communities justas complex onlineas off
    11. 11. What online tools can do: Help citizens gather data
    12. 12. What online tools can do: Helppeople generate and rank ideas
    13. 13. What online tools can do: Help people visualize options
    14. 14. What onlinetools can do:Help sustain communityconnections
    15. 15. Common mistakes Treating Internet as a one-way medium Not enough recruitment Transparency without proactive engagement Gathering ideas and not implementing them
    16. 16. Questions or comments?
    17. 17. What have your successes – and challenges – been with online engagement?
    18. 18. Successes, limitations of engagement so farSuccesses: Making policy decisions, planning Catalyzing citizen action Building trust Fostering new leadershipChallenges: Time-consuming (especially recruitment) Unsustainable (usually not intended to be) Meets goals of ‘engagers,’ not ‘engaged’ Doesn’t change the institutions Limited impact on equity Trust, relationships fade over time
    19. 19. Why plan for more sustainable kinds of engagement?1. Sustain the benefits2. Allow the ‘engaged’ to set the agenda3. Better address inequities4. Increase community attachment and economic growth5. Increase residents’ sense of legitimacy and “public happiness”
    20. 20. Community engagement planners should consider some key building blocks:
    21. 21. As always, recruitment is 90% of the work
    22. 22. Questions or comments?
    23. 23. Questions to consider1. Does your community already have some building blocks in place?2. Are there other building blocks that might be useful?3. If you were to begin creating a long-term plan for your community, who would you work with?4. What do you need to help you get started?
    24. 24. Resources• www.participedia.net• www.deliberative-democracy.net• www.soulofthecommunity.org• www.everydaydemocracy.org• www.publicagenda.org• www.kettering.org• On Facebook: “Deliberative Democracy Consortium” group page• The Next Form of Democracy
    25. 25. Resources (continued)• On YouTube: the DDC channel• Using Online Tools to Engage – and Be Engaged by – the Public at http://bit.ly/iwjgqn• Planning for Stronger Local Democracy at bit.ly/M1pvMp – and other resources at www.nlc.org

    ×