Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Publishing Trends In Materials Science


Published on

Published in: Technology
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Publishing Trends In Materials Science

  1. 1. Publishing Trends in Materials Science(and how to maximize your success!)<br />Dave Flanagan<br />Wiley-VCH<br />
  2. 2. Outline<br />Biography and materials science at Wiley<br />Why publish?<br />Why peer review?<br />What editors look for<br />Preparing your submission<br />Accept, reject, or revise: how decisions are made and how to respond<br />Publishing ethics<br />Summary and discussion<br />
  3. 3. Outline<br />Biography and materials science at Wiley<br />Why publish?<br />Why peer review?<br />What editors look for<br />Accept, reject, or revise: how decisions are made and how to respond<br />Publishing ethics<br />Summary and discussion<br />
  4. 4. Biography<br />1995: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY)<br />BS, Medicinal Chemistry, Gary Wnek<br />2004: UMass Amherst (Amherst, MA)<br />PhD, Polymer Science & Engineering with Dave Tirrell<br />At Caltech 1998—2004<br />“Solid phase synthesis of graft copolymers of poly(thiophene)s and peptides containing 3-thienylalanine”<br />2004—present: Wiley-VCH (Weinheim, Germany)<br />Editor-in-Chief, Advanced Functional Materials<br />Deputy Editor, Advanced Materials<br />
  5. 5. Our Flagship Materials Science Journals材料科学头牌期刊<br />
  6. 6. Materials & Polymer Journals材料科学和聚合物方面的期刊<br />
  7. 7. Long Cooperation长久的合作<br />
  8. 8. Functional materials statistics<br />In 2009, on track for:<br />9000 submissions<br />10,000 pages<br />1500 articles<br />2,700,000 article downloads<br />
  9. 9. Increasing Submissions投稿量的增长<br />
  10. 10. Full-text downloads 全文下载<br />
  11. 11. Rejection Rates 拒绝采用率<br />
  12. 12. Published Articles from China年发表的来自中国的论文<br />
  13. 13. Published Articles from China年发表的来自中国的论文<br />
  14. 14. Impact Factors 影响因子<br />
  15. 15. Impact Factors:Communication Journals<br />
  16. 16. Impact Factors:Full paper journals<br />
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19. Why publish at all?<br />“Fame”<br />Recognition by your peers<br />“Fortune”<br />Promotions<br />Grant applications<br />Responsibility<br />To society<br />Taxpayer-funded research<br />Making your research public<br />Whitesides: “If your research does not generate papers, it might just as well not have been done.”<br />Papers provide the shoulders that others can stand on<br />
  20. 20. Why peer review?<br />To select items for publication<br />True/credible?<br />Important?<br />Relevant?<br />Communicated effectively?<br />Quality?<br />To improve the item for publication<br />Interpretation of results<br />Presentation<br />Critical feedback<br />New ideas<br />Competitive and cooperative<br />
  21. 21. Why peer review?<br />“[Peer review] is the worst form of [research evaluation] except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”<br />Winston Churchill, 1947 (paraphrased)<br />
  22. 22. What editors look for<br />What all editors look for:<br />Scope<br />Does the topic fit the journal?<br />Format<br />Communication, full paper, review…<br />What some journals require (to varying degrees):<br />Novelty<br />How different is it from previous work?<br />Importance<br />In those in specific field<br />To those in related fields<br />Interest<br />
  23. 23. What AM editors look for<br />Synthesis/fabrication<br />Is it a new material or material system?<br />Characterization<br />Is it fully characterized?<br />Properties<br />Does it have new properties that are superior to previously reported materials?<br />Application<br />Does it have a technological application or solve a scientific problem?<br />
  24. 24. How reviewers are chosen<br />Reviewer database<br />&gt;10,000 in Wiley-VCH database<br />Keywords, interests, history<br />Suggestions from authors<br />Very helpful!<br />Not just the big names please<br />From related papers<br />Cited in manuscript<br />Literature searches<br />Editor’s knowledge and experience<br />
  25. 25. What reviewers look for<br />Is the motivation clear?<br />Is the motivation important?<br />Is the work novel and original?<br />Are the conclusions supported by the data?<br />Are the results important?<br />Are the results interesting?<br />Are there ethical questions?<br />Is the presentation clear?<br />
  26. 26. What reviewers look for<br />Reviewers can recommend:<br />Accept without change<br />Accept, but with revisions<br />Reject, but could be reconsidered after major revisions<br />Reject<br />
  27. 27.
  28. 28. Planning your manuscript<br />“A paper is not just an archival device for storing a completed research program; it is also a structure for planning your research in progress.”<br />Whitesides, “Writing a Paper”, 2004.<br />
  29. 29. Planning your manuscript<br />Use an outline to plan a paper, including the data.<br />Ideas<br />Figures<br />Schemes<br />Data<br />Questions<br />Hypotheses<br />Objectives<br />References<br />…<br />
  30. 30. Planning your manuscript<br />Organize into three piles:<br />Introduction: Why did I do it?<br />Results and Discussion: What did I do?<br />Conclusions: What does it mean?<br />Organize each pile:<br />Organize the data<br />Sketch figures<br />Put things in order<br />Important: Figure out what data / figures / results are still needed to complete the outline—and complete the paper<br />This becomes an iterative process between you and your advisor, collaborators, etc. of refining the outline.<br />
  31. 31. Preparing your submission<br />Selecting the journal<br />Preparing your manuscript<br />Figures<br />Text<br />Writing the cover letter<br />Submitting the package<br />
  32. 32. Selecting the journal<br />Journal Impact Factor is not everything!<br />What are the implications of your research?<br />How important will others find your research?<br />In your field?<br />In related fields?<br />Where do you read papers related to your research? Which do you like the most?<br />What is the scope of your candidate journal?<br />What is the format of your candidate journal?<br />
  33. 33. Selecting the journal<br />What is the journal’s policy on prior publication?<br />In peer-reviewed printed journals<br />In peer-reviewed online-only journals<br />In printed conference proceedings<br />In online-only conference proceedings<br />In online preprint servers<br />On your website<br />
  34. 34. Preparing the figures<br />Figures (and schemes, tables, equations) are critical:<br />Figures summarize the results<br />Figures are “read” first<br />By editors, by referees, by readers<br />The text in the paper is secondary!<br />The text explains the data in the figures<br />
  35. 35. Preparing the figures<br />Figures should be designed for<br />Clarity<br />Simplicity<br />Impact<br />
  36. 36. Preparing the figures<br />
  37. 37. Preparing the figures<br />Bitmaps<br />Also called raster, continuous tone<br />Used for photos, micrographs, SEM, TEM, AFM, …<br />Tiff usually preferred<br />Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro, GIMP<br />Vector graphics<br />Also called line art<br />Used for plots, graphs, chemical structures, schemes, …<br />EPS or WMF common<br />Illustrator, Excel, PowerPoint, ChemDraw, gnuplot, Origin<br />
  38. 38. Preparing the text<br />Consult the guide for authors<br />Look at a recent copy of the journal<br />Obtain a style guide<br />ACS Style Guide<br />Chicago Manual of Style<br />Use the text to explain the data, figures, schemes organized in the outline<br />Not arranged chronologically, but by importance<br />Consider a native English speaker or copyediting service<br />
  39. 39. Abstract and keywords<br />Abstract and keywords are more important than ever<br />At time of submission<br />Summarizing the results<br />Identifying relevance and scope<br />Identifying potential referees<br />After publication<br />Indexing and searching<br />Papers need to be found to have an impact!<br />
  40. 40. Preparing the text<br />RTF or Word .doc<br />Microsoft Word<br /><br />AbiWord…<br />Reference manager software<br />EndNote<br />BibTeX<br />LaTeX<br />Check journal guidelines first<br />Manuscript formatting<br />Journal template<br />Double-spaced, 12 pt, reasonable margins<br />Figures at end<br />Please put captions with figures!<br />
  41. 41. What about Supporting Information?<br />Supporting Information should support the manuscript:<br />NMR spectra, diffraction data, movies, calculations…<br />The manuscript should still be convincing if the SI is unavailable<br />If you need to refer to SI in the main text, it may not be SI!<br />SI should not be used to squeeze full papers into communications<br />
  42. 42. Writing the cover letter<br />Why is this topic important?<br />Why are the results significant?<br />What is the key result?<br />Why is it an advance on previous work?<br />Why are you submitting to this journal?<br />Why will this journal’s readers read it?<br />
  43. 43. Writing the cover letter<br />Disclose conflicts of interest<br />Provide reviewer suggestions<br />List related papers in press or under consideration<br />Other tips:<br />Get the editor’s name right!<br />Moved, dead, etc.<br />Get the journal’s name right!<br />Especially if not your first-choice journal…<br />
  44. 44. Conflicts of interest<br />Potential conflicts of interest:<br />Competitor that could “scoop” you<br />Current or former collaborators, grant co-applicants<br />Members of your institution<br />Current or former thesis or postdoc advisor<br />Anyone you believe could not give an impartial report<br />within reason…<br />
  45. 45. Submitting the package<br />
  46. 46. Accept, reject, or revise…<br />Acceptance<br />Without changes (rare)<br />With changes<br />Rejection<br />Without external referee reports (editor)<br />Based on reports<br />Revision<br />Reconsideration and resubmission possible after major revisions<br />
  47. 47. Rejection<br />Direct (“in-house”, “on topic”)<br />Outside scope<br />Wrong format<br />Novelty unclear<br />Impact/importance unclear<br />Interest unclear<br />…<br />On reports<br />Technical/scientific issues<br />Motivation unclear/unimportant<br />Less novel, less original<br />Conclusions do not support the data<br />Results less important<br />Results less interesting<br />Ethical questions<br />Unclear presentation<br />
  48. 48. Should I appeal?<br />Usually, no<br />Risk of long time to publication<br />Good papers are cited<br />Editors and referees know journal<br />Criticisms may be valid!<br />Occasionally, yes<br />Importance / impact / novelty missed by editor/referees<br />Need for a good cover letter!<br />Factual errors in referee reports that led to rejection<br />
  49. 49. Revision<br />Carefully consider reviewer comments<br />Not all changes have to be made…<br />…but need convincing arguments for changes not made<br />Prepare revision<br />Revise manuscript<br />Highlight changes in manuscript<br />Point-by-point response to all reviewer issues<br />Changes made<br />Why changes not made<br />Response may go back to reviewers!<br />Need to convince editor and reviewers<br />
  50. 50. Acceptance<br />Congratulations!<br />Revise manuscript<br />Highlight changes in manuscript<br />Point-by-point response to all referee criticisms<br />Changes made<br />Why changes not made<br />Production data checklist<br />Text format<br />Figure preparation<br />Print vs. reviewer quality<br />Proofs<br />Return quickly!<br />Electronic (PDF)<br />Fax (reduce by 20%)<br />Check copyediting changes/queries<br />Ask colleague to check<br />
  51. 51. Author responsibilities<br />Present data honestly and accurately, not fabricate or falsify data<br />Reference and cite properly, not plagiarize or ignore related work<br />Avoid fragmentation and redundant publication<br />Inform the editor of related manuscripts under consideration or in press<br />Submit to only one journal at a time<br />Disclose conflicts of interest<br />More information under “For Authors” at <br />
  52. 52. Reviewer responsibilities<br />Ensure confidentiality of manuscripts<br />Inform editor quickly if not qualified or unable to review<br />Judge manuscript objectively and in timely fashion<br />Return to editor without review if conflict of interest<br />Explain and support recommendations with arguments and references where appropriate<br />Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for one’s own research<br />Inform editor of similarities between submitted manuscript and published or unpublished manuscripts elsewhere<br />Inform editor if plagiarized or falsified data is suspected<br />More information under “For Reviewers” at<br />
  53. 53. Editor responsibilities<br />Ensure efficient, fair, and timely manuscript processing<br />Ensure confidentiality of submitted manuscripts<br />Make the final decision for accepting or rejecting<br />Base decision to accept or reject only on the merits of the manuscript<br />Not use work reported in a submitted manuscript for their own research<br />Ensure fair selection of referees, including those suggested or requested for exclusion by author<br />Respond to suggestions of scientific misconduct<br />Deal fairly with author appeals<br />
  54. 54. By Nick Kim (; used with permission<br />
  55. 55. Conclusions<br />Unpublished work is lost<br />Science output is growing fast and is the driver of reviewer loads, production costs, and journal pricing<br />Asia, particularly China, is growing in volume and quality, but Europe is still strong<br />Access is huge and has never been greater<br />Peer review isn‘t perfect but it is the best we have<br />Competition is hard, so make your work stand out<br />
  56. 56. Thank you — 谢谢!<br />More information at under “Guide for Authors”<br />Daily materials science news at<br />Follow me at<br />Questions?<br />