Case Study on a Global Learning Program

715 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
715
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Case Study on a Global Learning Program

  1. 1. Unified in Learning –Separated by Space Case Study on a Global Learning Program Martin Rehm OnlineEduca 2008 Thursday. 4th of December. 2008
  2. 2. Overview •(Methodological) Framework •Structure •(Selected) Results •Lessons Learned Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  3. 3. Framework •Large international organization (IO) •2006 & 2007 (6 months each): ~ 400 middle- & top-management ~ 100 offices world wide •Secure the impact of the IO •Enhancing the capacity and skills of its staff Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  4. 4. (Methodological) Framework Learning Program e-Learning Online Remedial Teaching Model Rienties, Tempelaar, Waterval, Rehm, & Gijselaers (2006) Face-to-Face Community of Practice Workshop Lave & Wenger (1991) Community of Learning Stacey, Smith & Barty (2004) Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  5. 5. e-Learning Entry 5 Modules: Questionnaires •Self-Study (Lectures & Readings) •Quizzes •Online Discussion Groups (asynchronous) •Final Assessment - 2006: formative - 2007: summative Face-to-Face Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  6. 6. 2006 2007 (n=157) (n=87) t-test Question Ø Ø (difference) Phase 1 of this Learning Programme was a valuable learning experience. 5,8 1,2 6,2 1,4 --- The allocated time was sufficient to study the subject matter. 2,4 1,3 3,6 1,9 0,000 I have been encouraged to cooperate more effectively with my colleagues worldwide. 4,4 1,4 4,9 1,4 0,040 I think I have learned more through collaboration with others than I would have learned, if I had to work alone 4,3 1,7 4,7 1,9 0,011 I have improved my evidence based analysis skills. 4,8 1,4 5,3 1,2 0,027 I will get better results in my career. 4,8 1,4 5,3 1,4 0,014 I expected the facilitators to take a more active role in the learning process 4,2 1,5 4,6 2,2 --- Overall grade for the quality of the e-Learning Phase (Scale 1-10) 6,6 1,6 7,1 1,6 0,053 Overall grade for the e-Learning Phase Team (Scale 1-10) 6,3 1,8 7,1 2 0,001 On average, how many hours per week did you work on the e-Learning Phase? 8 5,2 8,2 6,7 --- Likert Scale: 1 (strongly disagree) –7 (strongly agree) Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  7. 7. Performance Indicators for Phase 1 in 2006 & 2007 (Averages: 1 –10) 10 9 Paired-Sample t-test (PK –FG) 8 7 2006: no significant difference 6 5 2007: 2006 2007 significant increase 4 (at 0.01 level) 3 2 1 PK: Pre-Knowledge PG: Participation Grade QZ: Quizzes 0 FE: Final Exam PK PG QZ FE FG FG: Final Grade Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  8. 8. Lessons Learned •‘ Situated Learning’ (i.e.; Woods & Ebersole 2003) •‘ Collaborative Learning’ (i.e. Lave & Wenger, 1991; Stacey, Smith & Barty, 2004) •‘ Neo-Apprenticeship Style Learning’ (i.e. Gannon-Leary & Fontainha, 2007; Schlager, Fusco & Schank, 2002) •Time Management / Workload (i.e. Amin & Roberts, 2006; Trayner, Smith & Bettoni, 2006) •Online Facilitation (i.e. Anderson, Rourke, Garrison & Archer, 2001; Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  9. 9. Contact Details Martin Rehm Email martin.rehm@governance.unimaas.nl Internet http://martinrehm.wordpress.com/ www.governance.unimaas.nl Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)
  10. 10. Unified in Learning –Separated by Space Case Study on a Global Learning Program Martin Rehm OnlineEduca 2008 Thursday. 4th of December. 2008 Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG)

×