Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Web 2.0 and Learning and Teaching

1,917 views

Published on

Tom Franklin discusses changes in L&T with Web 2.0

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

Web 2.0 and Learning and Teaching

  1. 1. Web 2.0 in learning and teaching Tom Franklin Franklin Consulting [email_address]
  2. 2. Technology trajectory Mature Well adapted Co-evolution of work and technology New Poorly understood Repeat old ways of working Young Enhance old ways of working Radical Transform work Time NOW
  3. 3. Inside out <ul><li>Are students members of the university? </li></ul><ul><li>Are staff? </li></ul><ul><li>What does membership mean? </li></ul><ul><li>When do they stop being members? </li></ul>
  4. 4. Will learning change? <ul><li>Old learning </li></ul><ul><li>Linear / slow </li></ul><ul><li>Proprietary knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Ideas as strategic advantage </li></ul><ul><li>Mentors </li></ul><ul><li>Learn by reverse engineering </li></ul><ul><li>Progress by &quot;shoulders of giants&quot; </li></ul><ul><li>Wisdom of experts </li></ul><ul><li>New learning </li></ul><ul><li>Exponential, networked, quick </li></ul><ul><li>Shared knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Ideas &quot;paid forward&quot; </li></ul><ul><li>Micromentors </li></ul><ul><li>Lessons-learned benefit all </li></ul><ul><li>Progress by the &quot;mash-pit&quot; </li></ul><ul><li>Wisdom of crowds </li></ul>Kathy Sierra from http://www.slideshare.net/Downes/understanding-learning-networks
  5. 5. Will teaching change <ul><li>Old teaching </li></ul><ul><li>Assessment led </li></ul><ul><li>Institutional control </li></ul><ul><li>Authoritative </li></ul><ul><li>Timetabled </li></ul><ul><li>Clear distinctions between formal and informal </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher centred </li></ul><ul><li>New teaching </li></ul><ul><li>? </li></ul><ul><li>Learner control? </li></ul><ul><li>Exploratory </li></ul><ul><li>timetabled </li></ul><ul><li>Blurring of boundaries </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher + learners + experts </li></ul>
  6. 6. What might we do differently <ul><li>Across time and courses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Share results from field trips between subjects and years </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Meaningful data </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Sharing resources between students through course based social bookmarking </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative creation of works of art </li></ul><ul><li>Co-design </li></ul><ul><li>Critiquing </li></ul>
  7. 7. Will Web 2.0 deliver? Keen presents a dystopian vision in which people endlessly Google themselves and expertise counts for nothing; online communities gather merely to confirm their own prejudices; internet television purports to showcase amateur talent but is dominated by corporate marketing; newspapers are driven to the wall by online advertising and news sites edited at the whimsical click of a mouse; and knowledge of history and literature becomes smothered by an avalanche of blogs from self-obsessed teenagers. From a review of The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy by Andrew Keen, June 2007 http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/story/0,,2068929,00.html

×